1012 ASSESSING THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF EMERGENCY HEALTH CARE PLANS (EHCPS); A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW

Abstract Introduction Almost 30% of hospital patients are in their last year of life; mortality is five times higher one year post-hospital admission for patients aged 85+ (Clark D, Armstrong M. Palliative Medicine, 2014, 28, 474–479). Studies have shown 40–50% of those who die in hospital could hav...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Age and ageing 2022-06, Vol.51 (Supplement_2)
Hauptverfasser: Thatcher, C, Zin, E T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page
container_title Age and ageing
container_volume 51
creator Thatcher, C
Zin, E T
description Abstract Introduction Almost 30% of hospital patients are in their last year of life; mortality is five times higher one year post-hospital admission for patients aged 85+ (Clark D, Armstrong M. Palliative Medicine, 2014, 28, 474–479). Studies have shown 40–50% of those who die in hospital could have died in the community (End of Life Care, National Audit Office, 2008). As a geriatric department, we wanted to adopt existing good practice to ensure we were recognising individuals in their last 12 months of life and enabling them to die where they chose. Method Using the Gold Standards Framework (Clifford C, Thomas K, Armstrong-Wilson J. End of Life, 2016, 6) in 2019 DrZin introduced a standardised document for EHCPs. We reviewed 123 EHCPs implemented March 2019—August 2021, focusing on the number of attendances to A&E in the year prior to implementation, the number of avoidable admissions to hospital following completion of an EHCP, and place of death. Results Of 123 patients, the mean number of A&E attendances in the year before EHCP implementation was 2.52 per patient; post implementation it was 0.18. There were 22 A&E attendances after implementation (17.8%); all resulted in an admission. Of those, 12 (54.5%) were deemed avoidable. There were 100 deaths (81.3%) within 12 months of implementation; 5% died in hospital. Conclusion 95% of patients with an EHCP died in their preferred setting. Having an EHCP reduced patients’ attendance to A&E. However, work is required to reduce avoidable attendances, through education for GPs and community carers. Although every EHCP was sent to the patient’s GP and residence, several attendances contained no reference to the patient having an EHCP. Therefore, the next step of our project will be creating an alert for patients with an EHCP on their electronic record and re-reviewing hospital admissions rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ageing/afac126.052
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2678242778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ageing/afac126.052</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2678242778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1532-ec4e02821ff4a44e9c91ae9b4804ef67479e0b3c10d3059ea0d7c26f55767eb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1Og0AUhSdGE2v1BVxN4kYXtHcuAwNxRchQSJA2gDWuJlM61DZaKtiFby8NfQBXNyf3_CQfIfcMJgx8e6o3ZrvfTHWtK4buBBy8ICPGXc9Cz-aXZAQAaIFA_5rcdN2ul8xhOCIfDBjSoChkUSTZjJaxpGGaZEkYpFRGkQzLZCmz_kvnEZUvMp_JLHynsQzSMqZhkEu6SIOsoI8yDhfF0zMNaC7LfF4shmyvlol8uyVXtf7szN35jslrJMswttL57DRmVcyx0TIVN4AesrrmmnPjVz7Txl9xD7ipXcGFb2BlVwzWNji-0bAWFbq14whXmJVjj8nD0Htom--j6X7Urjm2-35SoSs85CiE17twcFVt03WtqdWh3X7p9lcxUCeiaiCqzkRVT7QPWUOoOR7-4_8DBa9wmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678242778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>1012 ASSESSING THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF EMERGENCY HEALTH CARE PLANS (EHCPS); A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Thatcher, C ; Zin, E T</creator><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, C ; Zin, E T</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Almost 30% of hospital patients are in their last year of life; mortality is five times higher one year post-hospital admission for patients aged 85+ (Clark D, Armstrong M. Palliative Medicine, 2014, 28, 474–479). Studies have shown 40–50% of those who die in hospital could have died in the community (End of Life Care, National Audit Office, 2008). As a geriatric department, we wanted to adopt existing good practice to ensure we were recognising individuals in their last 12 months of life and enabling them to die where they chose. Method Using the Gold Standards Framework (Clifford C, Thomas K, Armstrong-Wilson J. End of Life, 2016, 6) in 2019 DrZin introduced a standardised document for EHCPs. We reviewed 123 EHCPs implemented March 2019—August 2021, focusing on the number of attendances to A&amp;E in the year prior to implementation, the number of avoidable admissions to hospital following completion of an EHCP, and place of death. Results Of 123 patients, the mean number of A&amp;E attendances in the year before EHCP implementation was 2.52 per patient; post implementation it was 0.18. There were 22 A&amp;E attendances after implementation (17.8%); all resulted in an admission. Of those, 12 (54.5%) were deemed avoidable. There were 100 deaths (81.3%) within 12 months of implementation; 5% died in hospital. Conclusion 95% of patients with an EHCP died in their preferred setting. Having an EHCP reduced patients’ attendance to A&amp;E. However, work is required to reduce avoidable attendances, through education for GPs and community carers. Although every EHCP was sent to the patient’s GP and residence, several attendances contained no reference to the patient having an EHCP. Therefore, the next step of our project will be creating an alert for patients with an EHCP on their electronic record and re-reviewing hospital admissions rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac126.052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Avoidable ; Care plans ; Clinical effectiveness ; Clinical standards ; End of life decisions ; Family physicians ; Health care ; Hospice care ; Hospitalization ; Implementation ; Palliative care ; Patients ; Place of death</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2022-06, Vol.51 (Supplement_2)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1583,27922,27923,30997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zin, E T</creatorcontrib><title>1012 ASSESSING THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF EMERGENCY HEALTH CARE PLANS (EHCPS); A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW</title><title>Age and ageing</title><description>Abstract Introduction Almost 30% of hospital patients are in their last year of life; mortality is five times higher one year post-hospital admission for patients aged 85+ (Clark D, Armstrong M. Palliative Medicine, 2014, 28, 474–479). Studies have shown 40–50% of those who die in hospital could have died in the community (End of Life Care, National Audit Office, 2008). As a geriatric department, we wanted to adopt existing good practice to ensure we were recognising individuals in their last 12 months of life and enabling them to die where they chose. Method Using the Gold Standards Framework (Clifford C, Thomas K, Armstrong-Wilson J. End of Life, 2016, 6) in 2019 DrZin introduced a standardised document for EHCPs. We reviewed 123 EHCPs implemented March 2019—August 2021, focusing on the number of attendances to A&amp;E in the year prior to implementation, the number of avoidable admissions to hospital following completion of an EHCP, and place of death. Results Of 123 patients, the mean number of A&amp;E attendances in the year before EHCP implementation was 2.52 per patient; post implementation it was 0.18. There were 22 A&amp;E attendances after implementation (17.8%); all resulted in an admission. Of those, 12 (54.5%) were deemed avoidable. There were 100 deaths (81.3%) within 12 months of implementation; 5% died in hospital. Conclusion 95% of patients with an EHCP died in their preferred setting. Having an EHCP reduced patients’ attendance to A&amp;E. However, work is required to reduce avoidable attendances, through education for GPs and community carers. Although every EHCP was sent to the patient’s GP and residence, several attendances contained no reference to the patient having an EHCP. Therefore, the next step of our project will be creating an alert for patients with an EHCP on their electronic record and re-reviewing hospital admissions rates.</description><subject>Avoidable</subject><subject>Care plans</subject><subject>Clinical effectiveness</subject><subject>Clinical standards</subject><subject>End of life decisions</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospice care</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Place of death</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1Og0AUhSdGE2v1BVxN4kYXtHcuAwNxRchQSJA2gDWuJlM61DZaKtiFby8NfQBXNyf3_CQfIfcMJgx8e6o3ZrvfTHWtK4buBBy8ICPGXc9Cz-aXZAQAaIFA_5rcdN2ul8xhOCIfDBjSoChkUSTZjJaxpGGaZEkYpFRGkQzLZCmz_kvnEZUvMp_JLHynsQzSMqZhkEu6SIOsoI8yDhfF0zMNaC7LfF4shmyvlol8uyVXtf7szN35jslrJMswttL57DRmVcyx0TIVN4AesrrmmnPjVz7Txl9xD7ipXcGFb2BlVwzWNji-0bAWFbq14whXmJVjj8nD0Htom--j6X7Urjm2-35SoSs85CiE17twcFVt03WtqdWh3X7p9lcxUCeiaiCqzkRVT7QPWUOoOR7-4_8DBa9wmQ</recordid><startdate>20220614</startdate><enddate>20220614</enddate><creator>Thatcher, C</creator><creator>Zin, E T</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220614</creationdate><title>1012 ASSESSING THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF EMERGENCY HEALTH CARE PLANS (EHCPS); A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW</title><author>Thatcher, C ; Zin, E T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1532-ec4e02821ff4a44e9c91ae9b4804ef67479e0b3c10d3059ea0d7c26f55767eb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Avoidable</topic><topic>Care plans</topic><topic>Clinical effectiveness</topic><topic>Clinical standards</topic><topic>End of life decisions</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospice care</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Place of death</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thatcher, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zin, E T</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thatcher, C</au><au>Zin, E T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>1012 ASSESSING THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF EMERGENCY HEALTH CARE PLANS (EHCPS); A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><date>2022-06-14</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Almost 30% of hospital patients are in their last year of life; mortality is five times higher one year post-hospital admission for patients aged 85+ (Clark D, Armstrong M. Palliative Medicine, 2014, 28, 474–479). Studies have shown 40–50% of those who die in hospital could have died in the community (End of Life Care, National Audit Office, 2008). As a geriatric department, we wanted to adopt existing good practice to ensure we were recognising individuals in their last 12 months of life and enabling them to die where they chose. Method Using the Gold Standards Framework (Clifford C, Thomas K, Armstrong-Wilson J. End of Life, 2016, 6) in 2019 DrZin introduced a standardised document for EHCPs. We reviewed 123 EHCPs implemented March 2019—August 2021, focusing on the number of attendances to A&amp;E in the year prior to implementation, the number of avoidable admissions to hospital following completion of an EHCP, and place of death. Results Of 123 patients, the mean number of A&amp;E attendances in the year before EHCP implementation was 2.52 per patient; post implementation it was 0.18. There were 22 A&amp;E attendances after implementation (17.8%); all resulted in an admission. Of those, 12 (54.5%) were deemed avoidable. There were 100 deaths (81.3%) within 12 months of implementation; 5% died in hospital. Conclusion 95% of patients with an EHCP died in their preferred setting. Having an EHCP reduced patients’ attendance to A&amp;E. However, work is required to reduce avoidable attendances, through education for GPs and community carers. Although every EHCP was sent to the patient’s GP and residence, several attendances contained no reference to the patient having an EHCP. Therefore, the next step of our project will be creating an alert for patients with an EHCP on their electronic record and re-reviewing hospital admissions rates.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ageing/afac126.052</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-0729
ispartof Age and ageing, 2022-06, Vol.51 (Supplement_2)
issn 0002-0729
1468-2834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2678242778
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Avoidable
Care plans
Clinical effectiveness
Clinical standards
End of life decisions
Family physicians
Health care
Hospice care
Hospitalization
Implementation
Palliative care
Patients
Place of death
title 1012 ASSESSING THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF EMERGENCY HEALTH CARE PLANS (EHCPS); A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T03%3A04%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=1012%20ASSESSING%20THE%20CLINICAL%20EFFECTIVENESS%20OF%20EMERGENCY%20HEALTH%20CARE%20PLANS%20(EHCPS);%20A%20RETROSPECTIVE%20REVIEW&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Thatcher,%20C&rft.date=2022-06-14&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afac126.052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2678242778%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678242778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ageing/afac126.052&rfr_iscdi=true