CO2 diffusion in graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide foils and its comparison with N2 and Ar

Measurements of the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) diffusion in graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) vs. temperature have been performed using uniform GO thin foils with15 μm thickness. Regarding rGO, its foils have been obtained by submitting GO at a temperature of 130 °C in vacuum for 30 m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied physics. A, Materials science & processing Materials science & processing, 2022-07, Vol.128 (7), Article 589
Hauptverfasser: Torrisi, L., Silipigni, L., Cutroneo, M., Torrisi, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page
container_title Applied physics. A, Materials science & processing
container_volume 128
creator Torrisi, L.
Silipigni, L.
Cutroneo, M.
Torrisi, A.
description Measurements of the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) diffusion in graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) vs. temperature have been performed using uniform GO thin foils with15 μm thickness. Regarding rGO, its foils have been obtained by submitting GO at a temperature of 130 °C in vacuum for 30 min. The CO 2 diffusion has been controlled by the gas pressure gradient applied to two faces of the thin foils versus the time and the temperature. The calculated CO 2 coefficient diffusions have been compared with those relative to the nitrogen (N 2 ) and argon (Ar) gases obtained in previous measurements. The deduced diffusion coefficients are different for the three investigated gases, but remain of the order of 10 –3 cm 2 /s. At room temperature in GO the minimum value is obtained for nitrogen, while the highest one for Ar. Indeed, at 100 °C in rGO the minimum value is deduced for nitrogen and the maximum one for the carbon dioxide. The different diffusion coefficients can be attributed not only to the different size, shape and atomic mass of the investigated gases, but also to the inner lattice structure of the GO and rGO foils. GO contains water and oxygen functional groups which obstacle the diffusion process. rGO is poorer of oxygen functional groups and of water, partially enhancing the diffusion, but it has a high compactness and density which may reduce the total diffusivity. The obtained results, their correlation with the inner structure of the graphene sheets and the comparison between measurements and the literature data are presented and discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00339-022-05735-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2678206912</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2678206912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-b937e1cdcc14c33f7de1ad83f9a3327853fd645a3db2f69a1775a0e2ce7617213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQx4MoWKtfwFPA82oys7vZHEvxBcVe9BzSPNqUdndNdlG_vduuIHhwLsPwfwz8CLnm7JYzJu4SY4gyYwAZKwQWGZyQCc9xOEtkp2TCZC6yCmV5Ti5S2rJhcoAJWc2XQG3wvk-hqWmo6TrqduNqR5vPYB3VtaXR2d44-1fyTdiloyF0iZpm3-oY0tDyEboNfYGjNIuX5MzrXXJXP3tK3h7uX-dP2WL5-DyfLTIDueyylUThuLHG8NwgemEd17ZCLzUiiKpAb8u80GhX4EupuRCFZg6MEyUXwHFKbsbeNjbvvUud2jZ9rIeXCkpRASslh8EFo8vEJqXovGpj2Ov4pThTB5ZqZKkGlurIUh1COIbSYK7XLv5W_5P6BlTxdlE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678206912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CO2 diffusion in graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide foils and its comparison with N2 and Ar</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Torrisi, L. ; Silipigni, L. ; Cutroneo, M. ; Torrisi, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Torrisi, L. ; Silipigni, L. ; Cutroneo, M. ; Torrisi, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Measurements of the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) diffusion in graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) vs. temperature have been performed using uniform GO thin foils with15 μm thickness. Regarding rGO, its foils have been obtained by submitting GO at a temperature of 130 °C in vacuum for 30 min. The CO 2 diffusion has been controlled by the gas pressure gradient applied to two faces of the thin foils versus the time and the temperature. The calculated CO 2 coefficient diffusions have been compared with those relative to the nitrogen (N 2 ) and argon (Ar) gases obtained in previous measurements. The deduced diffusion coefficients are different for the three investigated gases, but remain of the order of 10 –3 cm 2 /s. At room temperature in GO the minimum value is obtained for nitrogen, while the highest one for Ar. Indeed, at 100 °C in rGO the minimum value is deduced for nitrogen and the maximum one for the carbon dioxide. The different diffusion coefficients can be attributed not only to the different size, shape and atomic mass of the investigated gases, but also to the inner lattice structure of the GO and rGO foils. GO contains water and oxygen functional groups which obstacle the diffusion process. rGO is poorer of oxygen functional groups and of water, partially enhancing the diffusion, but it has a high compactness and density which may reduce the total diffusivity. The obtained results, their correlation with the inner structure of the graphene sheets and the comparison between measurements and the literature data are presented and discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0947-8396</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00339-022-05735-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Applied physics ; Argon ; Atomic properties ; Carbon dioxide ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Coefficients ; Condensed Matter Physics ; Diffusion ; Foils ; Functional groups ; Gas pressure ; Graphene ; Machines ; Manufacturing ; Materials science ; Nanotechnology ; Nitrogen ; Optical and Electronic Materials ; Oxygen ; Physics ; Physics and Astronomy ; Processes ; Room temperature ; Surfaces and Interfaces ; Thin Films</subject><ispartof>Applied physics. A, Materials science &amp; processing, 2022-07, Vol.128 (7), Article 589</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-b937e1cdcc14c33f7de1ad83f9a3327853fd645a3db2f69a1775a0e2ce7617213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-b937e1cdcc14c33f7de1ad83f9a3327853fd645a3db2f69a1775a0e2ce7617213</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4031-1781</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00339-022-05735-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00339-022-05735-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934,41497,42566,51328</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torrisi, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silipigni, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutroneo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrisi, A.</creatorcontrib><title>CO2 diffusion in graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide foils and its comparison with N2 and Ar</title><title>Applied physics. A, Materials science &amp; processing</title><addtitle>Appl. Phys. A</addtitle><description>Measurements of the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) diffusion in graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) vs. temperature have been performed using uniform GO thin foils with15 μm thickness. Regarding rGO, its foils have been obtained by submitting GO at a temperature of 130 °C in vacuum for 30 min. The CO 2 diffusion has been controlled by the gas pressure gradient applied to two faces of the thin foils versus the time and the temperature. The calculated CO 2 coefficient diffusions have been compared with those relative to the nitrogen (N 2 ) and argon (Ar) gases obtained in previous measurements. The deduced diffusion coefficients are different for the three investigated gases, but remain of the order of 10 –3 cm 2 /s. At room temperature in GO the minimum value is obtained for nitrogen, while the highest one for Ar. Indeed, at 100 °C in rGO the minimum value is deduced for nitrogen and the maximum one for the carbon dioxide. The different diffusion coefficients can be attributed not only to the different size, shape and atomic mass of the investigated gases, but also to the inner lattice structure of the GO and rGO foils. GO contains water and oxygen functional groups which obstacle the diffusion process. rGO is poorer of oxygen functional groups and of water, partially enhancing the diffusion, but it has a high compactness and density which may reduce the total diffusivity. The obtained results, their correlation with the inner structure of the graphene sheets and the comparison between measurements and the literature data are presented and discussed.</description><subject>Applied physics</subject><subject>Argon</subject><subject>Atomic properties</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Condensed Matter Physics</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Foils</subject><subject>Functional groups</subject><subject>Gas pressure</subject><subject>Graphene</subject><subject>Machines</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Optical and Electronic Materials</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics and Astronomy</subject><subject>Processes</subject><subject>Room temperature</subject><subject>Surfaces and Interfaces</subject><subject>Thin Films</subject><issn>0947-8396</issn><issn>1432-0630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQx4MoWKtfwFPA82oys7vZHEvxBcVe9BzSPNqUdndNdlG_vduuIHhwLsPwfwz8CLnm7JYzJu4SY4gyYwAZKwQWGZyQCc9xOEtkp2TCZC6yCmV5Ti5S2rJhcoAJWc2XQG3wvk-hqWmo6TrqduNqR5vPYB3VtaXR2d44-1fyTdiloyF0iZpm3-oY0tDyEboNfYGjNIuX5MzrXXJXP3tK3h7uX-dP2WL5-DyfLTIDueyylUThuLHG8NwgemEd17ZCLzUiiKpAb8u80GhX4EupuRCFZg6MEyUXwHFKbsbeNjbvvUud2jZ9rIeXCkpRASslh8EFo8vEJqXovGpj2Ov4pThTB5ZqZKkGlurIUh1COIbSYK7XLv5W_5P6BlTxdlE</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Torrisi, L.</creator><creator>Silipigni, L.</creator><creator>Cutroneo, M.</creator><creator>Torrisi, A.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-1781</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>CO2 diffusion in graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide foils and its comparison with N2 and Ar</title><author>Torrisi, L. ; Silipigni, L. ; Cutroneo, M. ; Torrisi, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-b937e1cdcc14c33f7de1ad83f9a3327853fd645a3db2f69a1775a0e2ce7617213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Applied physics</topic><topic>Argon</topic><topic>Atomic properties</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Condensed Matter Physics</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Foils</topic><topic>Functional groups</topic><topic>Gas pressure</topic><topic>Graphene</topic><topic>Machines</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Optical and Electronic Materials</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics and Astronomy</topic><topic>Processes</topic><topic>Room temperature</topic><topic>Surfaces and Interfaces</topic><topic>Thin Films</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torrisi, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silipigni, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutroneo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrisi, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Applied physics. A, Materials science &amp; processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torrisi, L.</au><au>Silipigni, L.</au><au>Cutroneo, M.</au><au>Torrisi, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CO2 diffusion in graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide foils and its comparison with N2 and Ar</atitle><jtitle>Applied physics. A, Materials science &amp; processing</jtitle><stitle>Appl. Phys. A</stitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>7</issue><artnum>589</artnum><issn>0947-8396</issn><eissn>1432-0630</eissn><abstract>Measurements of the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) diffusion in graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) vs. temperature have been performed using uniform GO thin foils with15 μm thickness. Regarding rGO, its foils have been obtained by submitting GO at a temperature of 130 °C in vacuum for 30 min. The CO 2 diffusion has been controlled by the gas pressure gradient applied to two faces of the thin foils versus the time and the temperature. The calculated CO 2 coefficient diffusions have been compared with those relative to the nitrogen (N 2 ) and argon (Ar) gases obtained in previous measurements. The deduced diffusion coefficients are different for the three investigated gases, but remain of the order of 10 –3 cm 2 /s. At room temperature in GO the minimum value is obtained for nitrogen, while the highest one for Ar. Indeed, at 100 °C in rGO the minimum value is deduced for nitrogen and the maximum one for the carbon dioxide. The different diffusion coefficients can be attributed not only to the different size, shape and atomic mass of the investigated gases, but also to the inner lattice structure of the GO and rGO foils. GO contains water and oxygen functional groups which obstacle the diffusion process. rGO is poorer of oxygen functional groups and of water, partially enhancing the diffusion, but it has a high compactness and density which may reduce the total diffusivity. The obtained results, their correlation with the inner structure of the graphene sheets and the comparison between measurements and the literature data are presented and discussed.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00339-022-05735-2</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-1781</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0947-8396
ispartof Applied physics. A, Materials science & processing, 2022-07, Vol.128 (7), Article 589
issn 0947-8396
1432-0630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2678206912
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Applied physics
Argon
Atomic properties
Carbon dioxide
Characterization and Evaluation of Materials
Coefficients
Condensed Matter Physics
Diffusion
Foils
Functional groups
Gas pressure
Graphene
Machines
Manufacturing
Materials science
Nanotechnology
Nitrogen
Optical and Electronic Materials
Oxygen
Physics
Physics and Astronomy
Processes
Room temperature
Surfaces and Interfaces
Thin Films
title CO2 diffusion in graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide foils and its comparison with N2 and Ar
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-29T22%3A37%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CO2%20diffusion%20in%20graphene%20oxide%20and%20reduced%20graphene%20oxide%20foils%20and%20its%20comparison%20with%20N2%20and%20Ar&rft.jtitle=Applied%20physics.%20A,%20Materials%20science%20&%20processing&rft.au=Torrisi,%20L.&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=7&rft.artnum=589&rft.issn=0947-8396&rft.eissn=1432-0630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00339-022-05735-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2678206912%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678206912&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true