A note on the zero-sum gains data envelopment analysis model
In the case of the proportional output reduction strategy with a single output, the Variable-Returns-to-Scale (VRS) Zero-Sum Gains Data Envelopment Analysis (ZSG-DEA) efficiency scores can be obtained from the VRS conventional DEA efficiency scores by means of the Target’s Assessment Theorem (TAT)....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Operational research 2022-07, Vol.22 (3), p.1737-1758 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1758 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 1737 |
| container_title | Operational research |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Bouzidis, Thanasis Karagiannis, Giannis |
| description | In the case of the proportional output reduction strategy with a single output, the Variable-Returns-to-Scale (VRS) Zero-Sum Gains Data Envelopment Analysis (ZSG-DEA) efficiency scores can be obtained from the VRS conventional DEA efficiency scores by means of the Target’s Assessment Theorem (TAT). Using TAT as a departure point, two relations for computing the ZSG-DEA efficiency scores appear in the literature. Our objective in this note is to compare, contrast and challenge them on both theoretical and empirical grounds. For the latter, three different data sets are used. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12351-021-00631-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2678131934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2678131934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-13b8cf4eb355ec3c7c2333845909385e0e336aed751d7d425e0c0fc79065ea413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgqf0DngKeo0lms5sFL6X4BQUveg5pdrZu2SY12Qr115u6Qm8ODDPMvPdmeIRcC34rOK_ukpCgBOMyJy9BMH1GJkKXJROKq_PcC14zqZW-JLOUNjwHyEoXekLu59SHAWnwdPhA-o0xsLTf0rXtfKKNHSxF_4V92G3RD9R62x9Sl-g2NNhfkYvW9glnf3VK3h8f3hbPbPn69LKYL5krJB-YgJV2bYErUAoduMpJANCFqnkNWiFHgNJiUynRVE0h88Tx1lU1LxXaQsCU3Iy6uxg-95gGswn7mF9JRpaVFiBqKDJKjigXQ0oRW7OL3dbGgxHcHI0yo1EmG2V-jTI6k-hIQhd8l04ULWWplZJHXRghKS_9GuPp-j_CPwOGc3s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678131934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A note on the zero-sum gains data envelopment analysis model</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Bouzidis, Thanasis ; Karagiannis, Giannis</creator><creatorcontrib>Bouzidis, Thanasis ; Karagiannis, Giannis</creatorcontrib><description>In the case of the proportional output reduction strategy with a single output, the Variable-Returns-to-Scale (VRS) Zero-Sum Gains Data Envelopment Analysis (ZSG-DEA) efficiency scores can be obtained from the VRS conventional DEA efficiency scores by means of the Target’s Assessment Theorem (TAT). Using TAT as a departure point, two relations for computing the ZSG-DEA efficiency scores appear in the literature. Our objective in this note is to compare, contrast and challenge them on both theoretical and empirical grounds. For the latter, three different data sets are used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1109-2858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-1505</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12351-021-00631-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Computational Intelligence ; Data analysis ; Data envelopment analysis ; Efficiency ; Empirical analysis ; Management Science ; Operations Research ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Original Paper</subject><ispartof>Operational research, 2022-07, Vol.22 (3), p.1737-1758</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-13b8cf4eb355ec3c7c2333845909385e0e336aed751d7d425e0c0fc79065ea413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-13b8cf4eb355ec3c7c2333845909385e0e336aed751d7d425e0c0fc79065ea413</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8255-997X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12351-021-00631-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-021-00631-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bouzidis, Thanasis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karagiannis, Giannis</creatorcontrib><title>A note on the zero-sum gains data envelopment analysis model</title><title>Operational research</title><addtitle>Oper Res Int J</addtitle><description>In the case of the proportional output reduction strategy with a single output, the Variable-Returns-to-Scale (VRS) Zero-Sum Gains Data Envelopment Analysis (ZSG-DEA) efficiency scores can be obtained from the VRS conventional DEA efficiency scores by means of the Target’s Assessment Theorem (TAT). Using TAT as a departure point, two relations for computing the ZSG-DEA efficiency scores appear in the literature. Our objective in this note is to compare, contrast and challenge them on both theoretical and empirical grounds. For the latter, three different data sets are used.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Computational Intelligence</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Management Science</subject><subject>Operations Research</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><issn>1109-2858</issn><issn>1866-1505</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgqf0DngKeo0lms5sFL6X4BQUveg5pdrZu2SY12Qr115u6Qm8ODDPMvPdmeIRcC34rOK_ukpCgBOMyJy9BMH1GJkKXJROKq_PcC14zqZW-JLOUNjwHyEoXekLu59SHAWnwdPhA-o0xsLTf0rXtfKKNHSxF_4V92G3RD9R62x9Sl-g2NNhfkYvW9glnf3VK3h8f3hbPbPn69LKYL5krJB-YgJV2bYErUAoduMpJANCFqnkNWiFHgNJiUynRVE0h88Tx1lU1LxXaQsCU3Iy6uxg-95gGswn7mF9JRpaVFiBqKDJKjigXQ0oRW7OL3dbGgxHcHI0yo1EmG2V-jTI6k-hIQhd8l04ULWWplZJHXRghKS_9GuPp-j_CPwOGc3s</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Bouzidis, Thanasis</creator><creator>Karagiannis, Giannis</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8255-997X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>A note on the zero-sum gains data envelopment analysis model</title><author>Bouzidis, Thanasis ; Karagiannis, Giannis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-13b8cf4eb355ec3c7c2333845909385e0e336aed751d7d425e0c0fc79065ea413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Computational Intelligence</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Management Science</topic><topic>Operations Research</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bouzidis, Thanasis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karagiannis, Giannis</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Operational research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bouzidis, Thanasis</au><au>Karagiannis, Giannis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A note on the zero-sum gains data envelopment analysis model</atitle><jtitle>Operational research</jtitle><stitle>Oper Res Int J</stitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1737</spage><epage>1758</epage><pages>1737-1758</pages><issn>1109-2858</issn><eissn>1866-1505</eissn><abstract>In the case of the proportional output reduction strategy with a single output, the Variable-Returns-to-Scale (VRS) Zero-Sum Gains Data Envelopment Analysis (ZSG-DEA) efficiency scores can be obtained from the VRS conventional DEA efficiency scores by means of the Target’s Assessment Theorem (TAT). Using TAT as a departure point, two relations for computing the ZSG-DEA efficiency scores appear in the literature. Our objective in this note is to compare, contrast and challenge them on both theoretical and empirical grounds. For the latter, three different data sets are used.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12351-021-00631-8</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8255-997X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1109-2858 |
| ispartof | Operational research, 2022-07, Vol.22 (3), p.1737-1758 |
| issn | 1109-2858 1866-1505 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2678131934 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Business and Management Computational Intelligence Data analysis Data envelopment analysis Efficiency Empirical analysis Management Science Operations Research Operations Research/Decision Theory Original Paper |
| title | A note on the zero-sum gains data envelopment analysis model |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A50%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20note%20on%20the%20zero-sum%20gains%20data%20envelopment%20analysis%20model&rft.jtitle=Operational%20research&rft.au=Bouzidis,%20Thanasis&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1737&rft.epage=1758&rft.pages=1737-1758&rft.issn=1109-2858&rft.eissn=1866-1505&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12351-021-00631-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2678131934%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678131934&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |