Security, Suspicion, and Surveillance? There’s an App for That
Despite the recent rise in popularity of mobile safety applications, social scientists have yet to examine these applications in any considerable depth. In this paper we undertake the case studies of bSafe, Citizen, and Nextdoor – analyzing promotional materials and blog posts – in order to further...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surveillance & society 2022-01, Vol.20 (2), p.127-141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 141 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | Surveillance & society |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Kennedy, Liam Coelho, Madelaine |
description | Despite the recent rise in popularity of mobile safety applications, social scientists have yet to examine these applications in any considerable depth. In this paper we undertake the case studies of bSafe, Citizen, and Nextdoor – analyzing promotional materials and blog posts – in order to further theorize digital security consumption and the potential concomitant social harms. We find these app companies frame crime and risk in ways that obscure the structural elements that precede crime and encourage social divisions. Drawing from over 30,000 user reviews, we speculate about the ways these apps might shape understandings, feelings, and experiences of risk, crime, and victimization. A closer examination of these apps is particularly urgent given these digital technologies have been mobilized in similar ways to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.24908/ss.v20i2.14536 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2678111064</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2678111064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-9b0538f64a826617b18ced264ce28dc6a9e8621f8f876167305d487c0f85a6603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkL9OwzAQxi0EEqUws0ZibVLbcc7OBFVV_kiVGFpmy3Vs4SokwU4qdeM1eD2eBCtlYLrv7j7dd_ohdEtwRlmJxTyE7ECxoxlhRQ5naEIY5ylngp__05foKoQ9xgWnlEzQw8bowbv-OEs2Q-icdm0zS1RTxdYfjKtr1Whzn2zfjTc_X98h7pJF1yW29XGo-mt0YVUdzM1fnaK3x9V2-ZyuX59elot1qimUfVrucJELC0wJCkD4jghtKgpMGyoqDao0AiixwgoOBHiOiyp-q7EVhQLA-RTdne52vv0cTOjlvh18EyMlBS4IIRhYdM1PLu3bELyxsvPuQ_mjJFiOmGQIcsQkR0z5L5g-WmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678111064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Security, Suspicion, and Surveillance? There’s an App for That</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Kennedy, Liam ; Coelho, Madelaine</creator><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Liam ; Coelho, Madelaine</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the recent rise in popularity of mobile safety applications, social scientists have yet to examine these applications in any considerable depth. In this paper we undertake the case studies of bSafe, Citizen, and Nextdoor – analyzing promotional materials and blog posts – in order to further theorize digital security consumption and the potential concomitant social harms. We find these app companies frame crime and risk in ways that obscure the structural elements that precede crime and encourage social divisions. Drawing from over 30,000 user reviews, we speculate about the ways these apps might shape understandings, feelings, and experiences of risk, crime, and victimization. A closer examination of these apps is particularly urgent given these digital technologies have been mobilized in similar ways to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-7487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-7487</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24908/ss.v20i2.14536</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kingston: Surveillance Studies Network</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Citizen participation ; Citizenship ; Consumption ; Crime ; Crime prevention ; Empowerment ; Neoliberalism ; Popularity ; Rhetoric ; Risk management ; Safety regulations ; Security ; Surveillance ; Victimization ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Surveillance & society, 2022-01, Vol.20 (2), p.127-141</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-9b0538f64a826617b18ced264ce28dc6a9e8621f8f876167305d487c0f85a6603</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3012-5544</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27323,27903,27904,33753</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Liam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Madelaine</creatorcontrib><title>Security, Suspicion, and Surveillance? There’s an App for That</title><title>Surveillance & society</title><description>Despite the recent rise in popularity of mobile safety applications, social scientists have yet to examine these applications in any considerable depth. In this paper we undertake the case studies of bSafe, Citizen, and Nextdoor – analyzing promotional materials and blog posts – in order to further theorize digital security consumption and the potential concomitant social harms. We find these app companies frame crime and risk in ways that obscure the structural elements that precede crime and encourage social divisions. Drawing from over 30,000 user reviews, we speculate about the ways these apps might shape understandings, feelings, and experiences of risk, crime, and victimization. A closer examination of these apps is particularly urgent given these digital technologies have been mobilized in similar ways to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Crime prevention</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Safety regulations</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Victimization</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>1477-7487</issn><issn>1477-7487</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkL9OwzAQxi0EEqUws0ZibVLbcc7OBFVV_kiVGFpmy3Vs4SokwU4qdeM1eD2eBCtlYLrv7j7dd_ohdEtwRlmJxTyE7ECxoxlhRQ5naEIY5ylngp__05foKoQ9xgWnlEzQw8bowbv-OEs2Q-icdm0zS1RTxdYfjKtr1Whzn2zfjTc_X98h7pJF1yW29XGo-mt0YVUdzM1fnaK3x9V2-ZyuX59elot1qimUfVrucJELC0wJCkD4jghtKgpMGyoqDao0AiixwgoOBHiOiyp-q7EVhQLA-RTdne52vv0cTOjlvh18EyMlBS4IIRhYdM1PLu3bELyxsvPuQ_mjJFiOmGQIcsQkR0z5L5g-WmQ</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Kennedy, Liam</creator><creator>Coelho, Madelaine</creator><general>Surveillance Studies Network</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3012-5544</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Security, Suspicion, and Surveillance? There’s an App for That</title><author>Kennedy, Liam ; Coelho, Madelaine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-9b0538f64a826617b18ced264ce28dc6a9e8621f8f876167305d487c0f85a6603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Crime prevention</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Safety regulations</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Victimization</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Liam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Madelaine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Surveillance & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kennedy, Liam</au><au>Coelho, Madelaine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Security, Suspicion, and Surveillance? There’s an App for That</atitle><jtitle>Surveillance & society</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>127-141</pages><issn>1477-7487</issn><eissn>1477-7487</eissn><abstract>Despite the recent rise in popularity of mobile safety applications, social scientists have yet to examine these applications in any considerable depth. In this paper we undertake the case studies of bSafe, Citizen, and Nextdoor – analyzing promotional materials and blog posts – in order to further theorize digital security consumption and the potential concomitant social harms. We find these app companies frame crime and risk in ways that obscure the structural elements that precede crime and encourage social divisions. Drawing from over 30,000 user reviews, we speculate about the ways these apps might shape understandings, feelings, and experiences of risk, crime, and victimization. A closer examination of these apps is particularly urgent given these digital technologies have been mobilized in similar ways to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.</abstract><cop>Kingston</cop><pub>Surveillance Studies Network</pub><doi>10.24908/ss.v20i2.14536</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3012-5544</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1477-7487 |
ispartof | Surveillance & society, 2022-01, Vol.20 (2), p.127-141 |
issn | 1477-7487 1477-7487 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2678111064 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Case studies Citizen participation Citizenship Consumption Crime Crime prevention Empowerment Neoliberalism Popularity Rhetoric Risk management Safety regulations Security Surveillance Victimization Violence |
title | Security, Suspicion, and Surveillance? There’s an App for That |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A49%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Security,%20Suspicion,%20and%20Surveillance?%20There%E2%80%99s%20an%20App%20for%20That&rft.jtitle=Surveillance%20&%20society&rft.au=Kennedy,%20Liam&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=127-141&rft.issn=1477-7487&rft.eissn=1477-7487&rft_id=info:doi/10.24908/ss.v20i2.14536&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2678111064%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678111064&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |