Optimizing Product Launches in the Presence of Strategic Consumers
A technology firm launches newer generations of a given product over time. At any moment, the firm decides whether to release a new version of the product that captures the current technology level at the expense of a fixed launch cost. Consumers are forward-looking and purchase newer models only wh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Management science 2016-06, Vol.62 (6), p.1778-1799 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1799 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1778 |
container_title | Management science |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Lobel, Ilan Patel, Jigar Vulcano, Gustavo Zhang, Jiawei |
description | A technology firm launches newer generations of a given product over time. At any moment, the firm decides whether to release a new version of the product that captures the current technology level at the expense of a fixed launch cost. Consumers are forward-looking and purchase newer models only when it maximizes their own future discounted surpluses. We start by assuming that consumers have a common valuation for the product and consider two product launch settings. In the first setting, the firm does not announce future release technologies and the equilibrium of the game is to release new versions cyclically with a constant level of technology improvement that is optimal for the firm. In the second setting, the firm is able to precommit to a schedule of technology releases and the optimal policy generally consists of alternating minor and major technology launch cycles. We verify that the difference in profits between the commitment and no-commitment scenarios can be significant, varying from 4% to 12%. Finally, we generalize our model to allow for multiple customer classes with different valuations for the product, demonstrating how to compute equilibria in this case and numerically deriving insights for different market compositions.
This paper was accepted by Yossi Aviv, operations management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2189 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2678106555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24740370</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24740370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-f193bf3da02ab5df958f4c7f9b5a0cadedceba65a155f96c05bd5f87da2cc5623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK5evQkFz62TtNO0R138goUV1HNI02S3i03WJD3or7el4tXTwPs18BBySSGjrOI3vQ0qY0AxY7Sqj8iCIitTRKDHZAHAMKU11KfkLIQ9APCKlwtytznEru--O7tNXrxrBxWTtRys2umQdDaJOz3qOmirdOJM8hq9jHrbqWTlbBh67cM5OTHyI-iL37sk7w_3b6undL15fF7drlNVYBFTQ-u8MXkrgckGW1NjZQrFTd2gBCVb3SrdyBIlRTR1qQCbFk3FW8mUwpLlS3I97x68-xx0iGLvBm_Hl4KVvKJQIuKYyuaU8i4Er404-K6X_ktQEBMnMXESEycxcRoLV3NhH6Lzf2lW8AJyDqOfzn5njfN9-G_vB8D8dUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678106555</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing Product Launches in the Presence of Strategic Consumers</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lobel, Ilan ; Patel, Jigar ; Vulcano, Gustavo ; Zhang, Jiawei</creator><creatorcontrib>Lobel, Ilan ; Patel, Jigar ; Vulcano, Gustavo ; Zhang, Jiawei</creatorcontrib><description>A technology firm launches newer generations of a given product over time. At any moment, the firm decides whether to release a new version of the product that captures the current technology level at the expense of a fixed launch cost. Consumers are forward-looking and purchase newer models only when it maximizes their own future discounted surpluses. We start by assuming that consumers have a common valuation for the product and consider two product launch settings. In the first setting, the firm does not announce future release technologies and the equilibrium of the game is to release new versions cyclically with a constant level of technology improvement that is optimal for the firm. In the second setting, the firm is able to precommit to a schedule of technology releases and the optimal policy generally consists of alternating minor and major technology launch cycles. We verify that the difference in profits between the commitment and no-commitment scenarios can be significant, varying from 4% to 12%. Finally, we generalize our model to allow for multiple customer classes with different valuations for the product, demonstrating how to compute equilibria in this case and numerically deriving insights for different market compositions.
This paper was accepted by Yossi Aviv, operations management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-1909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2189</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Consumer behavior ; Consumers ; Market equilibrium ; new product development ; new product introduction ; noncooperative game theory ; Product introduction ; Product quality ; Profits ; strategic consumer behavior ; Surpluses ; Target markets ; Technology ; Technology adoption ; technology products ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>Management science, 2016-06, Vol.62 (6), p.1778-1799</ispartof><rights>2016 INFORMS</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Jun 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-f193bf3da02ab5df958f4c7f9b5a0cadedceba65a155f96c05bd5f87da2cc5623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-f193bf3da02ab5df958f4c7f9b5a0cadedceba65a155f96c05bd5f87da2cc5623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24740370$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2189$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3679,27901,27902,57992,58225,62589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lobel, Ilan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Jigar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vulcano, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiawei</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing Product Launches in the Presence of Strategic Consumers</title><title>Management science</title><description>A technology firm launches newer generations of a given product over time. At any moment, the firm decides whether to release a new version of the product that captures the current technology level at the expense of a fixed launch cost. Consumers are forward-looking and purchase newer models only when it maximizes their own future discounted surpluses. We start by assuming that consumers have a common valuation for the product and consider two product launch settings. In the first setting, the firm does not announce future release technologies and the equilibrium of the game is to release new versions cyclically with a constant level of technology improvement that is optimal for the firm. In the second setting, the firm is able to precommit to a schedule of technology releases and the optimal policy generally consists of alternating minor and major technology launch cycles. We verify that the difference in profits between the commitment and no-commitment scenarios can be significant, varying from 4% to 12%. Finally, we generalize our model to allow for multiple customer classes with different valuations for the product, demonstrating how to compute equilibria in this case and numerically deriving insights for different market compositions.
This paper was accepted by Yossi Aviv, operations management.</description><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Market equilibrium</subject><subject>new product development</subject><subject>new product introduction</subject><subject>noncooperative game theory</subject><subject>Product introduction</subject><subject>Product quality</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>strategic consumer behavior</subject><subject>Surpluses</subject><subject>Target markets</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><subject>technology products</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>0025-1909</issn><issn>1526-5501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK5evQkFz62TtNO0R138goUV1HNI02S3i03WJD3or7el4tXTwPs18BBySSGjrOI3vQ0qY0AxY7Sqj8iCIitTRKDHZAHAMKU11KfkLIQ9APCKlwtytznEru--O7tNXrxrBxWTtRys2umQdDaJOz3qOmirdOJM8hq9jHrbqWTlbBh67cM5OTHyI-iL37sk7w_3b6undL15fF7drlNVYBFTQ-u8MXkrgckGW1NjZQrFTd2gBCVb3SrdyBIlRTR1qQCbFk3FW8mUwpLlS3I97x68-xx0iGLvBm_Hl4KVvKJQIuKYyuaU8i4Er404-K6X_ktQEBMnMXESEycxcRoLV3NhH6Lzf2lW8AJyDqOfzn5njfN9-G_vB8D8dUw</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Lobel, Ilan</creator><creator>Patel, Jigar</creator><creator>Vulcano, Gustavo</creator><creator>Zhang, Jiawei</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Optimizing Product Launches in the Presence of Strategic Consumers</title><author>Lobel, Ilan ; Patel, Jigar ; Vulcano, Gustavo ; Zhang, Jiawei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-f193bf3da02ab5df958f4c7f9b5a0cadedceba65a155f96c05bd5f87da2cc5623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Market equilibrium</topic><topic>new product development</topic><topic>new product introduction</topic><topic>noncooperative game theory</topic><topic>Product introduction</topic><topic>Product quality</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>strategic consumer behavior</topic><topic>Surpluses</topic><topic>Target markets</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><topic>technology products</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lobel, Ilan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Jigar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vulcano, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiawei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lobel, Ilan</au><au>Patel, Jigar</au><au>Vulcano, Gustavo</au><au>Zhang, Jiawei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing Product Launches in the Presence of Strategic Consumers</atitle><jtitle>Management science</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1778</spage><epage>1799</epage><pages>1778-1799</pages><issn>0025-1909</issn><eissn>1526-5501</eissn><abstract>A technology firm launches newer generations of a given product over time. At any moment, the firm decides whether to release a new version of the product that captures the current technology level at the expense of a fixed launch cost. Consumers are forward-looking and purchase newer models only when it maximizes their own future discounted surpluses. We start by assuming that consumers have a common valuation for the product and consider two product launch settings. In the first setting, the firm does not announce future release technologies and the equilibrium of the game is to release new versions cyclically with a constant level of technology improvement that is optimal for the firm. In the second setting, the firm is able to precommit to a schedule of technology releases and the optimal policy generally consists of alternating minor and major technology launch cycles. We verify that the difference in profits between the commitment and no-commitment scenarios can be significant, varying from 4% to 12%. Finally, we generalize our model to allow for multiple customer classes with different valuations for the product, demonstrating how to compute equilibria in this case and numerically deriving insights for different market compositions.
This paper was accepted by Yossi Aviv, operations management.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/mnsc.2015.2189</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-1909 |
ispartof | Management science, 2016-06, Vol.62 (6), p.1778-1799 |
issn | 0025-1909 1526-5501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2678106555 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; INFORMS PubsOnLine; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Consumer behavior Consumers Market equilibrium new product development new product introduction noncooperative game theory Product introduction Product quality Profits strategic consumer behavior Surpluses Target markets Technology Technology adoption technology products Valuation |
title | Optimizing Product Launches in the Presence of Strategic Consumers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A53%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20Product%20Launches%20in%20the%20Presence%20of%20Strategic%20Consumers&rft.jtitle=Management%20science&rft.au=Lobel,%20Ilan&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1778&rft.epage=1799&rft.pages=1778-1799&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.eissn=1526-5501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2189&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24740370%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678106555&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24740370&rfr_iscdi=true |