Dynamic Facility Location with Generalized Modular Capacities
Location decisions are frequently subject to dynamic aspects such as changes in customer demand. Often, flexibility regarding the geographic location of facilities, as well as their capacities, is the only solution to such issues. Even when demand can be forecast, finding the optimal schedule for th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transportation science 2015-08, Vol.49 (3), p.484-499 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 499 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 484 |
container_title | Transportation science |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Jena, Sanjay Dominik Cordeau, Jean-François Gendron, Bernard |
description | Location decisions are frequently subject to dynamic aspects such as changes in customer demand. Often, flexibility regarding the geographic location of facilities, as well as their capacities, is the only solution to such issues. Even when demand can be forecast, finding the optimal schedule for the deployment and dynamic adjustment of capacities remains a challenge, especially when the cost structure for these adjustments is complex. In this paper, we introduce a unifying model that generalizes existing formulations for several dynamic facility location problems and provides stronger linear programming relaxations than the specialized formulations. In addition, the model can address facility location problems where the costs for capacity changes are defined for all pairs of capacity levels. To the best of our knowledge, this problem has not been addressed in the literature. We apply our model to special cases of the problem with capacity expansion and reduction or temporary facility closing and reopening. We prove dominance relationships between our formulation and existing models for the special cases. Computational experiments on a large set of randomly generated instances with up to 100 facility locations and 1,000 customers show that our model can obtain optimal solutions in shorter computing times than the existing specialized formulations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1287/trsc.2014.0575 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2677662620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A427000032</galeid><jstor_id>43666753</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A427000032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-48c2a7bb5574bd41a71c2349ed2b73db0ff80936ed4066484c5c7a99df549e933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1r2zAYxsXoYGnWa28DQ691Jsn6sA89hHRJCxm7bGchy3Ki4FipXpmS_fWTyVhaCEwCvSD9nkd69SB0S_CM0FJ-jQHMjGLCZphL_gFNCKci54zJKzTBmJGcCM4_oWuAHcaES8In6OHx2Ou9M9lSG9e5eMzW3ujofJ-9urjNVra3QXfut22y774ZOh2yhT4kODoLn9HHVndgb_7WKfq1_PZz8ZSvf6yeF_N1bjgtY85KQ7Wsa84lqxtGtCSGFqyyDa1l0dS4bUtcFcI2DAvBSma4kbqqmpYnqCqKKbo7-R6CfxksRLXzQ-jTlYoKKYWgguIztdGdVa5vfQza7B0YNWdU4jQKmqj8ArU59el727q0_Y6fXeDTbGz6t4uC-zeCegDXW0gLuM02wkYPABf9TfAAwbbqENxeh6MiWI3BqjFYNQarxmCT4MtJsIPowz-aFUKIdHxucHxr2MP__P4AARSrkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2677662620</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic Facility Location with Generalized Modular Capacities</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Informs</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Jena, Sanjay Dominik ; Cordeau, Jean-François ; Gendron, Bernard</creator><creatorcontrib>Jena, Sanjay Dominik ; Cordeau, Jean-François ; Gendron, Bernard</creatorcontrib><description>Location decisions are frequently subject to dynamic aspects such as changes in customer demand. Often, flexibility regarding the geographic location of facilities, as well as their capacities, is the only solution to such issues. Even when demand can be forecast, finding the optimal schedule for the deployment and dynamic adjustment of capacities remains a challenge, especially when the cost structure for these adjustments is complex. In this paper, we introduce a unifying model that generalizes existing formulations for several dynamic facility location problems and provides stronger linear programming relaxations than the specialized formulations. In addition, the model can address facility location problems where the costs for capacity changes are defined for all pairs of capacity levels. To the best of our knowledge, this problem has not been addressed in the literature. We apply our model to special cases of the problem with capacity expansion and reduction or temporary facility closing and reopening. We prove dominance relationships between our formulation and existing models for the special cases. Computational experiments on a large set of randomly generated instances with up to 100 facility locations and 1,000 customers show that our model can obtain optimal solutions in shorter computing times than the existing specialized formulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2014.0575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Adjustment ; Customers ; Deployment ; Dominance ; Economic forecasting ; Facilities ; facility location ; Flexibility ; Geographical locations ; Industrial locations ; Integer programming ; Linear programming ; Location analysis ; Mathematical models ; mixed-integer programming ; modular capacities ; Transportation industry</subject><ispartof>Transportation science, 2015-08, Vol.49 (3), p.484-499</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Aug 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-48c2a7bb5574bd41a71c2349ed2b73db0ff80936ed4066484c5c7a99df549e933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-48c2a7bb5574bd41a71c2349ed2b73db0ff80936ed4066484c5c7a99df549e933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43666753$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/trsc.2014.0575$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3679,27901,27902,57992,58225,62589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jena, Sanjay Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordeau, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gendron, Bernard</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic Facility Location with Generalized Modular Capacities</title><title>Transportation science</title><description>Location decisions are frequently subject to dynamic aspects such as changes in customer demand. Often, flexibility regarding the geographic location of facilities, as well as their capacities, is the only solution to such issues. Even when demand can be forecast, finding the optimal schedule for the deployment and dynamic adjustment of capacities remains a challenge, especially when the cost structure for these adjustments is complex. In this paper, we introduce a unifying model that generalizes existing formulations for several dynamic facility location problems and provides stronger linear programming relaxations than the specialized formulations. In addition, the model can address facility location problems where the costs for capacity changes are defined for all pairs of capacity levels. To the best of our knowledge, this problem has not been addressed in the literature. We apply our model to special cases of the problem with capacity expansion and reduction or temporary facility closing and reopening. We prove dominance relationships between our formulation and existing models for the special cases. Computational experiments on a large set of randomly generated instances with up to 100 facility locations and 1,000 customers show that our model can obtain optimal solutions in shorter computing times than the existing specialized formulations.</description><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Deployment</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Economic forecasting</subject><subject>Facilities</subject><subject>facility location</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Geographical locations</subject><subject>Industrial locations</subject><subject>Integer programming</subject><subject>Linear programming</subject><subject>Location analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>mixed-integer programming</subject><subject>modular capacities</subject><subject>Transportation industry</subject><issn>0041-1655</issn><issn>1526-5447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1r2zAYxsXoYGnWa28DQ691Jsn6sA89hHRJCxm7bGchy3Ki4FipXpmS_fWTyVhaCEwCvSD9nkd69SB0S_CM0FJ-jQHMjGLCZphL_gFNCKci54zJKzTBmJGcCM4_oWuAHcaES8In6OHx2Ou9M9lSG9e5eMzW3ujofJ-9urjNVra3QXfut22y774ZOh2yhT4kODoLn9HHVndgb_7WKfq1_PZz8ZSvf6yeF_N1bjgtY85KQ7Wsa84lqxtGtCSGFqyyDa1l0dS4bUtcFcI2DAvBSma4kbqqmpYnqCqKKbo7-R6CfxksRLXzQ-jTlYoKKYWgguIztdGdVa5vfQza7B0YNWdU4jQKmqj8ArU59el727q0_Y6fXeDTbGz6t4uC-zeCegDXW0gLuM02wkYPABf9TfAAwbbqENxeh6MiWI3BqjFYNQarxmCT4MtJsIPowz-aFUKIdHxucHxr2MP__P4AARSrkA</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Jena, Sanjay Dominik</creator><creator>Cordeau, Jean-François</creator><creator>Gendron, Bernard</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Transportation Science & Logistic Society of the Institute for Operations Research and Management Sciences</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Dynamic Facility Location with Generalized Modular Capacities</title><author>Jena, Sanjay Dominik ; Cordeau, Jean-François ; Gendron, Bernard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-48c2a7bb5574bd41a71c2349ed2b73db0ff80936ed4066484c5c7a99df549e933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Deployment</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Economic forecasting</topic><topic>Facilities</topic><topic>facility location</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Geographical locations</topic><topic>Industrial locations</topic><topic>Integer programming</topic><topic>Linear programming</topic><topic>Location analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>mixed-integer programming</topic><topic>modular capacities</topic><topic>Transportation industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jena, Sanjay Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordeau, Jean-François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gendron, Bernard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Transportation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jena, Sanjay Dominik</au><au>Cordeau, Jean-François</au><au>Gendron, Bernard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic Facility Location with Generalized Modular Capacities</atitle><jtitle>Transportation science</jtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>484</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>484-499</pages><issn>0041-1655</issn><eissn>1526-5447</eissn><abstract>Location decisions are frequently subject to dynamic aspects such as changes in customer demand. Often, flexibility regarding the geographic location of facilities, as well as their capacities, is the only solution to such issues. Even when demand can be forecast, finding the optimal schedule for the deployment and dynamic adjustment of capacities remains a challenge, especially when the cost structure for these adjustments is complex. In this paper, we introduce a unifying model that generalizes existing formulations for several dynamic facility location problems and provides stronger linear programming relaxations than the specialized formulations. In addition, the model can address facility location problems where the costs for capacity changes are defined for all pairs of capacity levels. To the best of our knowledge, this problem has not been addressed in the literature. We apply our model to special cases of the problem with capacity expansion and reduction or temporary facility closing and reopening. We prove dominance relationships between our formulation and existing models for the special cases. Computational experiments on a large set of randomly generated instances with up to 100 facility locations and 1,000 customers show that our model can obtain optimal solutions in shorter computing times than the existing specialized formulations.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/trsc.2014.0575</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-1655 |
ispartof | Transportation science, 2015-08, Vol.49 (3), p.484-499 |
issn | 0041-1655 1526-5447 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2677662620 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Informs; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Adjustment Customers Deployment Dominance Economic forecasting Facilities facility location Flexibility Geographical locations Industrial locations Integer programming Linear programming Location analysis Mathematical models mixed-integer programming modular capacities Transportation industry |
title | Dynamic Facility Location with Generalized Modular Capacities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A42%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20Facility%20Location%20with%20Generalized%20Modular%20Capacities&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20science&rft.au=Jena,%20Sanjay%20Dominik&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=484&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=484-499&rft.issn=0041-1655&rft.eissn=1526-5447&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/trsc.2014.0575&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA427000032%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2677662620&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A427000032&rft_jstor_id=43666753&rfr_iscdi=true |