Melody, not Beat Perception, Predicts Rhythmic Error Detection

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among beat perception, error detection, and musical experience. We presented monophonic rhythms using a piano timbre along with two measures of beat perception (Harvard Beat Finding and Interval Test [BFIT] and Goldsmiths Beat Alignment Test...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of research in music education 2022-07, Vol.70 (2), p.190-205
Hauptverfasser: Nichols, Bryan E., Stambaugh, Laura A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 205
container_issue 2
container_start_page 190
container_title Journal of research in music education
container_volume 70
creator Nichols, Bryan E.
Stambaugh, Laura A.
description The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among beat perception, error detection, and musical experience. We presented monophonic rhythms using a piano timbre along with two measures of beat perception (Harvard Beat Finding and Interval Test [BFIT] and Goldsmiths Beat Alignment Test) and a measure of melodic error detection. College musicians’ (N = 43) ability to detect rhythm errors was not significantly correlated to their ability to perceive beat alignment (Goldsmiths test) or tempo change (BFIT). Age was related to performance on only one of the measures, the BFIT test. A regression model yielded pitch error detection as the only significant predictor of rhythmic error detection. We suggest that college musicians already possess a requisite ability for beat processing that allows them to perform error detection. The lack of relationship between beat perception and rhythmic error detection is explained by this requisite ability in the population, and we promote future research for pitch and rhythm processing as it relates to rhythm perception or performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00224294211032160
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2677387050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1343046</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_00224294211032160</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2677387050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-ed8f8ec98e743e6b5c7e11dc182b1318f18dcf9114eb10bc8119669b8fc1e8963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwIMQ8NqteUk2m1wEbes_KhbR87KbfWu3tE1N0kO_vV1W9CC-yzvMb2ZgCDkHNgTIsivGOJfcSA7ABAfFDkgPjEwTxkx6SHqtnrTAMTkJYcHaU7xHrp9x6ardgK5dpLdYRDpDb3ETG7ce0JnHqrEx0Nf5Ls5XjaUT752nY4xoW-SUHNXFMuDZ9--T97vJ2-ghmb7cP45upokVQsYEK11rtEZjJgWqMrUZAlQWNC9BgK5BV7Y2ABJLYKXVAEYpU-raAmqjRJ9cdrkb7z63GGK-cFu_3lfmXGWZ0BlL2Z6CjrLeheCxzje-WRV-lwPL25nyPzPtPRedB31jf_jJEwgpmGybh50eig_8bf0_8AtOL27i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2677387050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Melody, not Beat Perception, Predicts Rhythmic Error Detection</title><source>Education Source</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Nichols, Bryan E. ; Stambaugh, Laura A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Bryan E. ; Stambaugh, Laura A.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among beat perception, error detection, and musical experience. We presented monophonic rhythms using a piano timbre along with two measures of beat perception (Harvard Beat Finding and Interval Test [BFIT] and Goldsmiths Beat Alignment Test) and a measure of melodic error detection. College musicians’ (N = 43) ability to detect rhythm errors was not significantly correlated to their ability to perceive beat alignment (Goldsmiths test) or tempo change (BFIT). Age was related to performance on only one of the measures, the BFIT test. A regression model yielded pitch error detection as the only significant predictor of rhythmic error detection. We suggest that college musicians already possess a requisite ability for beat processing that allows them to perform error detection. The lack of relationship between beat perception and rhythmic error detection is explained by this requisite ability in the population, and we promote future research for pitch and rhythm processing as it relates to rhythm perception or performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-0095</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00224294211032160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Age Differences ; Alignment ; Correlation ; Error correction &amp; detection ; Error Patterns ; Experience ; Music ; Music Techniques ; Musical Instruments ; Musicians ; Perceptions ; Predictor Variables ; Rhythm ; Skills ; Student Characteristics ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Journal of research in music education, 2022-07, Vol.70 (2), p.190-205</ispartof><rights>National Association for Music Education 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-ed8f8ec98e743e6b5c7e11dc182b1318f18dcf9114eb10bc8119669b8fc1e8963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-ed8f8ec98e743e6b5c7e11dc182b1318f18dcf9114eb10bc8119669b8fc1e8963</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8970-3284 ; 0000-0002-7459-5890</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00224294211032160$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00224294211032160$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1343046$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Bryan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stambaugh, Laura A.</creatorcontrib><title>Melody, not Beat Perception, Predicts Rhythmic Error Detection</title><title>Journal of research in music education</title><description>The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among beat perception, error detection, and musical experience. We presented monophonic rhythms using a piano timbre along with two measures of beat perception (Harvard Beat Finding and Interval Test [BFIT] and Goldsmiths Beat Alignment Test) and a measure of melodic error detection. College musicians’ (N = 43) ability to detect rhythm errors was not significantly correlated to their ability to perceive beat alignment (Goldsmiths test) or tempo change (BFIT). Age was related to performance on only one of the measures, the BFIT test. A regression model yielded pitch error detection as the only significant predictor of rhythmic error detection. We suggest that college musicians already possess a requisite ability for beat processing that allows them to perform error detection. The lack of relationship between beat perception and rhythmic error detection is explained by this requisite ability in the population, and we promote future research for pitch and rhythm processing as it relates to rhythm perception or performance.</description><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Error correction &amp; detection</subject><subject>Error Patterns</subject><subject>Experience</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Music Techniques</subject><subject>Musical Instruments</subject><subject>Musicians</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Rhythm</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>0022-4294</issn><issn>1945-0095</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfwIMQ8NqteUk2m1wEbes_KhbR87KbfWu3tE1N0kO_vV1W9CC-yzvMb2ZgCDkHNgTIsivGOJfcSA7ABAfFDkgPjEwTxkx6SHqtnrTAMTkJYcHaU7xHrp9x6ardgK5dpLdYRDpDb3ETG7ce0JnHqrEx0Nf5Ls5XjaUT752nY4xoW-SUHNXFMuDZ9--T97vJ2-ghmb7cP45upokVQsYEK11rtEZjJgWqMrUZAlQWNC9BgK5BV7Y2ABJLYKXVAEYpU-raAmqjRJ9cdrkb7z63GGK-cFu_3lfmXGWZ0BlL2Z6CjrLeheCxzje-WRV-lwPL25nyPzPtPRedB31jf_jJEwgpmGybh50eig_8bf0_8AtOL27i</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Nichols, Bryan E.</creator><creator>Stambaugh, Laura A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>National Association for Music Education</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8970-3284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7459-5890</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Melody, not Beat Perception, Predicts Rhythmic Error Detection</title><author>Nichols, Bryan E. ; Stambaugh, Laura A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-ed8f8ec98e743e6b5c7e11dc182b1318f18dcf9114eb10bc8119669b8fc1e8963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Error correction &amp; detection</topic><topic>Error Patterns</topic><topic>Experience</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Music Techniques</topic><topic>Musical Instruments</topic><topic>Musicians</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Rhythm</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Bryan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stambaugh, Laura A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of research in music education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nichols, Bryan E.</au><au>Stambaugh, Laura A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1343046</ericid><atitle>Melody, not Beat Perception, Predicts Rhythmic Error Detection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of research in music education</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>190</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>190-205</pages><issn>0022-4294</issn><eissn>1945-0095</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among beat perception, error detection, and musical experience. We presented monophonic rhythms using a piano timbre along with two measures of beat perception (Harvard Beat Finding and Interval Test [BFIT] and Goldsmiths Beat Alignment Test) and a measure of melodic error detection. College musicians’ (N = 43) ability to detect rhythm errors was not significantly correlated to their ability to perceive beat alignment (Goldsmiths test) or tempo change (BFIT). Age was related to performance on only one of the measures, the BFIT test. A regression model yielded pitch error detection as the only significant predictor of rhythmic error detection. We suggest that college musicians already possess a requisite ability for beat processing that allows them to perform error detection. The lack of relationship between beat perception and rhythmic error detection is explained by this requisite ability in the population, and we promote future research for pitch and rhythm processing as it relates to rhythm perception or performance.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00224294211032160</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8970-3284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7459-5890</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4294
ispartof Journal of research in music education, 2022-07, Vol.70 (2), p.190-205
issn 0022-4294
1945-0095
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2677387050
source Education Source; SAGE Complete
subjects Age Differences
Alignment
Correlation
Error correction & detection
Error Patterns
Experience
Music
Music Techniques
Musical Instruments
Musicians
Perceptions
Predictor Variables
Rhythm
Skills
Student Characteristics
Undergraduate Students
title Melody, not Beat Perception, Predicts Rhythmic Error Detection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T14%3A22%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Melody,%20not%20Beat%20Perception,%20Predicts%20Rhythmic%20Error%20Detection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20research%20in%20music%20education&rft.au=Nichols,%20Bryan%20E.&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=190&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=190-205&rft.issn=0022-4294&rft.eissn=1945-0095&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00224294211032160&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2677387050%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2677387050&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1343046&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00224294211032160&rfr_iscdi=true