Better Kept in the Dark? Portfolio Disclosure and Agency Problems in Mutual Funds
We study the agency implications of increased disclosure using a regulatory change in the mutual fund industry as an experimental setting. This quasi-natural experiment mandated more frequent portfolio disclosure, which we show imposes managerial skill-reassessment risks from investors on funds with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of financial and quantitative analysis 2022-06, Vol.57 (4), p.1529-1563 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1563 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1529 |
container_title | Journal of financial and quantitative analysis |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Dyakov, Teodor Harford, Jarrad Qiu, Buhui |
description | We study the agency implications of increased disclosure using a regulatory change in the mutual fund industry as an experimental setting. This quasi-natural experiment mandated more frequent portfolio disclosure, which we show imposes managerial skill-reassessment risks from investors on funds with high relative performance volatility. In turn, this risk translates into greater agency costs to investors. We show that high-volatility funds, relative to low-volatility funds, responded to the increased skill-reassessment risk after regulation with an increase in management fees and a decrease in risk taking. These actions get transmitted to fund investors in the form of inferior net performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022109021000041 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2676605595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022109021000041</cupid><sourcerecordid>2676605595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-10d329a5d1444d40e2be58ae6962bffd03eeba2595bff5cbd1f8545a688796193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFOwzAMhiMEEmPwANwicS4kaZM2JzQ2BoghhoBzlTbu6OiakqSHvT2pNmkHhA-2LP_fb8sIXVJyTQlNb94JYYwSSUIKkdAjNKIpF5GQVByj0TCOhvkpOnNuPWgYIyP0dgfeg8XP0Hlct9h_AZ4p-32Ll8b6yjS1wbPalY1xvQWsWo0nK2jLLV5aUzSwcQP10vteNXjet9qdo5NKNQ4u9nWMPuf3H9PHaPH68DSdLKIyTrkPt-iYScU1TZJEJwRYATxTIKRgRVVpEgMUinHJQ8fLQtMq4wlXIstSKaiMx-hq59tZ89OD8_na9LYNK3MmUiEID2xQ0Z2qtMY5C1Xe2Xqj7DanJB8-l__5XGDwjoHStLU7EBmRMUl4Okjiva3aFLbWKzhs_9_4FxwgeJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2676605595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Better Kept in the Dark? Portfolio Disclosure and Agency Problems in Mutual Funds</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Dyakov, Teodor ; Harford, Jarrad ; Qiu, Buhui</creator><creatorcontrib>Dyakov, Teodor ; Harford, Jarrad ; Qiu, Buhui</creatorcontrib><description>We study the agency implications of increased disclosure using a regulatory change in the mutual fund industry as an experimental setting. This quasi-natural experiment mandated more frequent portfolio disclosure, which we show imposes managerial skill-reassessment risks from investors on funds with high relative performance volatility. In turn, this risk translates into greater agency costs to investors. We show that high-volatility funds, relative to low-volatility funds, responded to the increased skill-reassessment risk after regulation with an increase in management fees and a decrease in risk taking. These actions get transmitted to fund investors in the form of inferior net performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1090</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-6916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022109021000041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Disclosure ; Fees & charges ; Investors ; Mutual funds ; Portfolio management ; Risk factors ; Risk taking ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 2022-06, Vol.57 (4), p.1529-1563</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington</rights><rights>Copyright University of Washington, School of Business Administration Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-10d329a5d1444d40e2be58ae6962bffd03eeba2595bff5cbd1f8545a688796193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-10d329a5d1444d40e2be58ae6962bffd03eeba2595bff5cbd1f8545a688796193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109021000041/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dyakov, Teodor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harford, Jarrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Buhui</creatorcontrib><title>Better Kept in the Dark? Portfolio Disclosure and Agency Problems in Mutual Funds</title><title>Journal of financial and quantitative analysis</title><addtitle>J. Financ. Quant. Anal</addtitle><description>We study the agency implications of increased disclosure using a regulatory change in the mutual fund industry as an experimental setting. This quasi-natural experiment mandated more frequent portfolio disclosure, which we show imposes managerial skill-reassessment risks from investors on funds with high relative performance volatility. In turn, this risk translates into greater agency costs to investors. We show that high-volatility funds, relative to low-volatility funds, responded to the increased skill-reassessment risk after regulation with an increase in management fees and a decrease in risk taking. These actions get transmitted to fund investors in the form of inferior net performance.</description><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Fees & charges</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Mutual funds</subject><subject>Portfolio management</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0022-1090</issn><issn>1756-6916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFOwzAMhiMEEmPwANwicS4kaZM2JzQ2BoghhoBzlTbu6OiakqSHvT2pNmkHhA-2LP_fb8sIXVJyTQlNb94JYYwSSUIKkdAjNKIpF5GQVByj0TCOhvkpOnNuPWgYIyP0dgfeg8XP0Hlct9h_AZ4p-32Ll8b6yjS1wbPalY1xvQWsWo0nK2jLLV5aUzSwcQP10vteNXjet9qdo5NKNQ4u9nWMPuf3H9PHaPH68DSdLKIyTrkPt-iYScU1TZJEJwRYATxTIKRgRVVpEgMUinHJQ8fLQtMq4wlXIstSKaiMx-hq59tZ89OD8_na9LYNK3MmUiEID2xQ0Z2qtMY5C1Xe2Xqj7DanJB8-l__5XGDwjoHStLU7EBmRMUl4Okjiva3aFLbWKzhs_9_4FxwgeJg</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Dyakov, Teodor</creator><creator>Harford, Jarrad</creator><creator>Qiu, Buhui</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Better Kept in the Dark? Portfolio Disclosure and Agency Problems in Mutual Funds</title><author>Dyakov, Teodor ; Harford, Jarrad ; Qiu, Buhui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-10d329a5d1444d40e2be58ae6962bffd03eeba2595bff5cbd1f8545a688796193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Fees & charges</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Mutual funds</topic><topic>Portfolio management</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dyakov, Teodor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harford, Jarrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Buhui</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of financial and quantitative analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dyakov, Teodor</au><au>Harford, Jarrad</au><au>Qiu, Buhui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Better Kept in the Dark? Portfolio Disclosure and Agency Problems in Mutual Funds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of financial and quantitative analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J. Financ. Quant. Anal</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1529</spage><epage>1563</epage><pages>1529-1563</pages><issn>0022-1090</issn><eissn>1756-6916</eissn><abstract>We study the agency implications of increased disclosure using a regulatory change in the mutual fund industry as an experimental setting. This quasi-natural experiment mandated more frequent portfolio disclosure, which we show imposes managerial skill-reassessment risks from investors on funds with high relative performance volatility. In turn, this risk translates into greater agency costs to investors. We show that high-volatility funds, relative to low-volatility funds, responded to the increased skill-reassessment risk after regulation with an increase in management fees and a decrease in risk taking. These actions get transmitted to fund investors in the form of inferior net performance.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022109021000041</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1090 |
ispartof | Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 2022-06, Vol.57 (4), p.1529-1563 |
issn | 0022-1090 1756-6916 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2676605595 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Disclosure Fees & charges Investors Mutual funds Portfolio management Risk factors Risk taking Volatility |
title | Better Kept in the Dark? Portfolio Disclosure and Agency Problems in Mutual Funds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A36%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Better%20Kept%20in%20the%20Dark?%20Portfolio%20Disclosure%20and%20Agency%20Problems%20in%20Mutual%20Funds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20financial%20and%20quantitative%20analysis&rft.au=Dyakov,%20Teodor&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1529&rft.epage=1563&rft.pages=1529-1563&rft.issn=0022-1090&rft.eissn=1756-6916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022109021000041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2676605595%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2676605595&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022109021000041&rfr_iscdi=true |