A Regional Seasonal Forecast Model of Arctic Minimum Sea Ice Extent: Reflected Solar Radiation versus Late Winter Coastal Divergence

Thinning sea ice cover in the Arctic is associated with larger interannual variability in the minimum sea ice extent (SIE). The current generation of forced or fully coupled models, however, has difficulty predicting SIE anomalies from the long-term trend, highlighting the need to better identify th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of climate 2021-08, Vol.34 (15), p.6097-6113
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Rachel, Tremblay, L. Bruno, Brunette, Charles, Newton, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6113
container_issue 15
container_start_page 6097
container_title Journal of climate
container_volume 34
creator Kim, Rachel
Tremblay, L. Bruno
Brunette, Charles
Newton, Robert
description Thinning sea ice cover in the Arctic is associated with larger interannual variability in the minimum sea ice extent (SIE). The current generation of forced or fully coupled models, however, has difficulty predicting SIE anomalies from the long-term trend, highlighting the need to better identify the mechanisms involved in the seasonal evolution of sea ice cover. One such mechanism is coastal divergence (CD), a proxy for ice thickness anomalies based on late winter ice motion, quantified using Lagrangian ice tracking. CD gains predictive skill through the positive feedback of surface albedo anomalies, mirrored in reflected solar radiation (RSR), during melt season. Exploring the dynamic and thermodynamic contributions to minimum SIE predictability, RSR, initial SIE (iSIE), and CD are compared as predictors using a regional seasonal sea ice forecast model for 1 July, 1 June, and 1 May forecast dates for all Arctic peripheral seas. The predictive skill of June RSR anomalies mainly originates from open water fraction at the surface; that is, June iSIE and June RSR have equal predictive skill for most seas. The finding is supported by the surprising positive correlation found between June melt pond fraction (MPF) and June RSR in all peripheral seas: MPF anomalies indicate the presence of ice or open water, which is key to creating minimum SIE anomalies. This contradicts models that show correlation between melt onset, MPF, and the minimum SIE. A hindcast model shows that for a 1 May forecast, CD anomalies have better predictive skill than RSR anomalies for most peripheral seas.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0846.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2675668067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27076936</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27076936</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-c3af78967ea86ddf3a053f1a304c29dd6007ce54acdf58243e3d002703700d8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB97N0LA9dSbd2ZZpq1WWgQf6xCSjExpm5qkoP_eGStu7gO-c-_hIHRDYEyIEvdPzXJRTSsKFWgux-QEjYgYNs7pKRqBrnmllRDn6CLnNQChEmCEmgl-CR9d3NkNfg02_w7zmIKzueBV9GGDY4snyZXO4VW367aH7UDihQt49lXCrlyhs9Zucrj-65fofT57ax6r5fPDopksK8eYKH21rdK1VMFq6X3LLAjWEsuAO1p73_tRLghunW-FppwF5gGoAqYAvA7sEt0d7-5T_DyEXMw6HlJvOBsqlZBSg1Q9BUfKpZhzCq3Zp25r07chYIaozBCVmRoKZojKkF5ye5Ssc4npn-9fK1kzyX4AoThj5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2675668067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Regional Seasonal Forecast Model of Arctic Minimum Sea Ice Extent: Reflected Solar Radiation versus Late Winter Coastal Divergence</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kim, Rachel ; Tremblay, L. Bruno ; Brunette, Charles ; Newton, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Rachel ; Tremblay, L. Bruno ; Brunette, Charles ; Newton, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Thinning sea ice cover in the Arctic is associated with larger interannual variability in the minimum sea ice extent (SIE). The current generation of forced or fully coupled models, however, has difficulty predicting SIE anomalies from the long-term trend, highlighting the need to better identify the mechanisms involved in the seasonal evolution of sea ice cover. One such mechanism is coastal divergence (CD), a proxy for ice thickness anomalies based on late winter ice motion, quantified using Lagrangian ice tracking. CD gains predictive skill through the positive feedback of surface albedo anomalies, mirrored in reflected solar radiation (RSR), during melt season. Exploring the dynamic and thermodynamic contributions to minimum SIE predictability, RSR, initial SIE (iSIE), and CD are compared as predictors using a regional seasonal sea ice forecast model for 1 July, 1 June, and 1 May forecast dates for all Arctic peripheral seas. The predictive skill of June RSR anomalies mainly originates from open water fraction at the surface; that is, June iSIE and June RSR have equal predictive skill for most seas. The finding is supported by the surprising positive correlation found between June melt pond fraction (MPF) and June RSR in all peripheral seas: MPF anomalies indicate the presence of ice or open water, which is key to creating minimum SIE anomalies. This contradicts models that show correlation between melt onset, MPF, and the minimum SIE. A hindcast model shows that for a 1 May forecast, CD anomalies have better predictive skill than RSR anomalies for most peripheral seas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0846.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Albedo ; Anomalies ; Arctic sea ice ; Correlation ; Divergence ; Ice cover ; Ice thickness ; Interannual variability ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Positive feedback ; Radiation ; Sea ice ; Sea ice forecasting ; Seasonal forecasting ; Seasons ; Solar radiation ; Thickness anomalies ; Tracking ; Winter ; Winter ice</subject><ispartof>Journal of climate, 2021-08, Vol.34 (15), p.6097-6113</ispartof><rights>2021 American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Aug 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-c3af78967ea86ddf3a053f1a304c29dd6007ce54acdf58243e3d002703700d8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-c3af78967ea86ddf3a053f1a304c29dd6007ce54acdf58243e3d002703700d8e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27076936$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27076936$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3679,27922,27923,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, L. Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunette, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>A Regional Seasonal Forecast Model of Arctic Minimum Sea Ice Extent: Reflected Solar Radiation versus Late Winter Coastal Divergence</title><title>Journal of climate</title><description>Thinning sea ice cover in the Arctic is associated with larger interannual variability in the minimum sea ice extent (SIE). The current generation of forced or fully coupled models, however, has difficulty predicting SIE anomalies from the long-term trend, highlighting the need to better identify the mechanisms involved in the seasonal evolution of sea ice cover. One such mechanism is coastal divergence (CD), a proxy for ice thickness anomalies based on late winter ice motion, quantified using Lagrangian ice tracking. CD gains predictive skill through the positive feedback of surface albedo anomalies, mirrored in reflected solar radiation (RSR), during melt season. Exploring the dynamic and thermodynamic contributions to minimum SIE predictability, RSR, initial SIE (iSIE), and CD are compared as predictors using a regional seasonal sea ice forecast model for 1 July, 1 June, and 1 May forecast dates for all Arctic peripheral seas. The predictive skill of June RSR anomalies mainly originates from open water fraction at the surface; that is, June iSIE and June RSR have equal predictive skill for most seas. The finding is supported by the surprising positive correlation found between June melt pond fraction (MPF) and June RSR in all peripheral seas: MPF anomalies indicate the presence of ice or open water, which is key to creating minimum SIE anomalies. This contradicts models that show correlation between melt onset, MPF, and the minimum SIE. A hindcast model shows that for a 1 May forecast, CD anomalies have better predictive skill than RSR anomalies for most peripheral seas.</description><subject>Albedo</subject><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Arctic sea ice</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Ice cover</subject><subject>Ice thickness</subject><subject>Interannual variability</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Positive feedback</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Sea ice</subject><subject>Sea ice forecasting</subject><subject>Seasonal forecasting</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><subject>Thickness anomalies</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><subject>Winter</subject><subject>Winter ice</subject><issn>0894-8755</issn><issn>1520-0442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB97N0LA9dSbd2ZZpq1WWgQf6xCSjExpm5qkoP_eGStu7gO-c-_hIHRDYEyIEvdPzXJRTSsKFWgux-QEjYgYNs7pKRqBrnmllRDn6CLnNQChEmCEmgl-CR9d3NkNfg02_w7zmIKzueBV9GGDY4snyZXO4VW367aH7UDihQt49lXCrlyhs9Zucrj-65fofT57ax6r5fPDopksK8eYKH21rdK1VMFq6X3LLAjWEsuAO1p73_tRLghunW-FppwF5gGoAqYAvA7sEt0d7-5T_DyEXMw6HlJvOBsqlZBSg1Q9BUfKpZhzCq3Zp25r07chYIaozBCVmRoKZojKkF5ye5Ssc4npn-9fK1kzyX4AoThj5A</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Kim, Rachel</creator><creator>Tremblay, L. Bruno</creator><creator>Brunette, Charles</creator><creator>Newton, Robert</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>A Regional Seasonal Forecast Model of Arctic Minimum Sea Ice Extent</title><author>Kim, Rachel ; Tremblay, L. Bruno ; Brunette, Charles ; Newton, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-c3af78967ea86ddf3a053f1a304c29dd6007ce54acdf58243e3d002703700d8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Albedo</topic><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Arctic sea ice</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Ice cover</topic><topic>Ice thickness</topic><topic>Interannual variability</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Positive feedback</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Sea ice</topic><topic>Sea ice forecasting</topic><topic>Seasonal forecasting</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><topic>Thickness anomalies</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><topic>Winter</topic><topic>Winter ice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, L. Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunette, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Rachel</au><au>Tremblay, L. Bruno</au><au>Brunette, Charles</au><au>Newton, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Regional Seasonal Forecast Model of Arctic Minimum Sea Ice Extent: Reflected Solar Radiation versus Late Winter Coastal Divergence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>6097</spage><epage>6113</epage><pages>6097-6113</pages><issn>0894-8755</issn><eissn>1520-0442</eissn><abstract>Thinning sea ice cover in the Arctic is associated with larger interannual variability in the minimum sea ice extent (SIE). The current generation of forced or fully coupled models, however, has difficulty predicting SIE anomalies from the long-term trend, highlighting the need to better identify the mechanisms involved in the seasonal evolution of sea ice cover. One such mechanism is coastal divergence (CD), a proxy for ice thickness anomalies based on late winter ice motion, quantified using Lagrangian ice tracking. CD gains predictive skill through the positive feedback of surface albedo anomalies, mirrored in reflected solar radiation (RSR), during melt season. Exploring the dynamic and thermodynamic contributions to minimum SIE predictability, RSR, initial SIE (iSIE), and CD are compared as predictors using a regional seasonal sea ice forecast model for 1 July, 1 June, and 1 May forecast dates for all Arctic peripheral seas. The predictive skill of June RSR anomalies mainly originates from open water fraction at the surface; that is, June iSIE and June RSR have equal predictive skill for most seas. The finding is supported by the surprising positive correlation found between June melt pond fraction (MPF) and June RSR in all peripheral seas: MPF anomalies indicate the presence of ice or open water, which is key to creating minimum SIE anomalies. This contradicts models that show correlation between melt onset, MPF, and the minimum SIE. A hindcast model shows that for a 1 May forecast, CD anomalies have better predictive skill than RSR anomalies for most peripheral seas.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0846.1</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-8755
ispartof Journal of climate, 2021-08, Vol.34 (15), p.6097-6113
issn 0894-8755
1520-0442
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2675668067
source American Meteorological Society; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Albedo
Anomalies
Arctic sea ice
Correlation
Divergence
Ice cover
Ice thickness
Interannual variability
Mathematical models
Modelling
Positive feedback
Radiation
Sea ice
Sea ice forecasting
Seasonal forecasting
Seasons
Solar radiation
Thickness anomalies
Tracking
Winter
Winter ice
title A Regional Seasonal Forecast Model of Arctic Minimum Sea Ice Extent: Reflected Solar Radiation versus Late Winter Coastal Divergence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A53%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Regional%20Seasonal%20Forecast%20Model%20of%20Arctic%20Minimum%20Sea%20Ice%20Extent:%20Reflected%20Solar%20Radiation%20versus%20Late%20Winter%20Coastal%20Divergence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20climate&rft.au=Kim,%20Rachel&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=6097&rft.epage=6113&rft.pages=6097-6113&rft.issn=0894-8755&rft.eissn=1520-0442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0846.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27076936%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2675668067&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27076936&rfr_iscdi=true