Evaluation of the red & blue LED effects on cutaneous refractory wound healing in male Sprague–Dawley rat using 3 different multi‐drug resistant bacteria

Objectives Photobiomodulation (PBM) is widely used in clinical therapy, and is an effective approach to resist the bacterial infection of the cutaneous wound and modulate the wound healing process. Due to the several detriments of lasers, Red & Blue LED light (RBLL) may be a more viable light so...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lasers in surgery and medicine 2022-07, Vol.54 (5), p.725-736
Hauptverfasser: Lv, Yang, Chen, ZengHong, Yang, ZhiGuo, Yang, WenYu, Chu, WenWen, Tu, YiQian, Xie, Juan, Cao, DongSheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 736
container_issue 5
container_start_page 725
container_title Lasers in surgery and medicine
container_volume 54
creator Lv, Yang
Chen, ZengHong
Yang, ZhiGuo
Yang, WenYu
Chu, WenWen
Tu, YiQian
Xie, Juan
Cao, DongSheng
description Objectives Photobiomodulation (PBM) is widely used in clinical therapy, and is an effective approach to resist the bacterial infection of the cutaneous wound and modulate the wound healing process. Due to the several detriments of lasers, Red & Blue LED light (RBLL) may be a more viable light source. This study is aimed to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effect of RBLL light on different multi‐drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in vitro and male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rat refractory MDR infection wound model in vivo. Materials and Methods Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Extended‐spectrum β‐lactamases ‐producing Escherichia coli (ESBLs‐Eco), and the MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR‐Pae) were employed to evaluate the antibacterial effects of the Blue LED light in vitro. Effects of RBLL on in vivo wound healing were evaluated by analyzing time to closure, wound score, semi‐quantitative test for bacterial culture, histopathological examination and Masson staining of skin tissue, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and western blot analysis (WB) of wound tissue. Results Blue LED light inhibited MRSA, ESBLs‐Eco, and MDR‐Pae in vitro study. In vivo, RBLL accelerated wound healing, reduced levels of pathogenic bacteria on the wound surface while increasing the blood supply to the wound surface and inhibiting the excessive inflammatory response. Conclusion RBLL showed a great potential gain for the treatment of MDR bacterial infected wounds, suggesting PBM therapy is an inexpensive, convenient, pain‐free, and safe therapeutic intervention for refractory MDR infection wounds.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lsm.23515
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2674654138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2674654138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3205-aa4798433a69d3a1ee8ca9eb62e07918bc8fef2a041a59d5ebe45c587b76cae33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kbtOHEEQRVvIFiyPgB9AJVlCIljonp5XhwjWYGktB0A8qumpWRrNY90PVpvxCUiO-Tm-hMaLyRxVBUenVPcydij4qeA8Oetcf5rITGRbbCK4yqdKcPGFTbiIe8lVssN2nXvgnMuEF9tsR6aqVKkoJuxl9ohdQG_GAcYW_D2BpQaOoe4CwXx2CdS2pL2DCOjgcaAxuMi0FrUf7RpWYxgauCfszLAAM0CPHcHN0uIi0OvTn0tcdbQGix6Ce0ckNCY6LQ0e-tB58_r03NiwiFJnXLzgoY5usgb32dcWO0cHH3OP3X2f3V5cT-e_rn5cnM-nOj6UTRHTQpWplJirRqIgKjUqqvOEeKFEWeuypTZBngrMVJNRTWmms7Koi1wjSbnHvm28Szv-DuR89TAGO8STVZIXaZ6lQpaROtlQ2o7OxQiqpTU92nUlePVeRBWLqP4WEdmjD2Ooe2o-yX_JR-BsA6xMjOf_pmp-83OjfAPMZJaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674654138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the red &amp; blue LED effects on cutaneous refractory wound healing in male Sprague–Dawley rat using 3 different multi‐drug resistant bacteria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lv, Yang ; Chen, ZengHong ; Yang, ZhiGuo ; Yang, WenYu ; Chu, WenWen ; Tu, YiQian ; Xie, Juan ; Cao, DongSheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Lv, Yang ; Chen, ZengHong ; Yang, ZhiGuo ; Yang, WenYu ; Chu, WenWen ; Tu, YiQian ; Xie, Juan ; Cao, DongSheng</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Photobiomodulation (PBM) is widely used in clinical therapy, and is an effective approach to resist the bacterial infection of the cutaneous wound and modulate the wound healing process. Due to the several detriments of lasers, Red &amp; Blue LED light (RBLL) may be a more viable light source. This study is aimed to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effect of RBLL light on different multi‐drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in vitro and male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rat refractory MDR infection wound model in vivo. Materials and Methods Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Extended‐spectrum β‐lactamases ‐producing Escherichia coli (ESBLs‐Eco), and the MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR‐Pae) were employed to evaluate the antibacterial effects of the Blue LED light in vitro. Effects of RBLL on in vivo wound healing were evaluated by analyzing time to closure, wound score, semi‐quantitative test for bacterial culture, histopathological examination and Masson staining of skin tissue, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and western blot analysis (WB) of wound tissue. Results Blue LED light inhibited MRSA, ESBLs‐Eco, and MDR‐Pae in vitro study. In vivo, RBLL accelerated wound healing, reduced levels of pathogenic bacteria on the wound surface while increasing the blood supply to the wound surface and inhibiting the excessive inflammatory response. Conclusion RBLL showed a great potential gain for the treatment of MDR bacterial infected wounds, suggesting PBM therapy is an inexpensive, convenient, pain‐free, and safe therapeutic intervention for refractory MDR infection wounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23515</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34989417</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibacterial activity ; Antiinfectives and antibacterials ; Bacteria ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial infections ; Drug resistance ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial ; E coli ; Evaluation ; In vivo methods and tests ; Infections ; Inflammation ; Inflammatory response ; Light sources ; Male ; Males ; Methicillin ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; Pain ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Staining ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus infections ; Wound Healing ; Wound Infection - drug therapy ; β Lactamase</subject><ispartof>Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2022-07, Vol.54 (5), p.725-736</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3205-aa4798433a69d3a1ee8ca9eb62e07918bc8fef2a041a59d5ebe45c587b76cae33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3205-aa4798433a69d3a1ee8ca9eb62e07918bc8fef2a041a59d5ebe45c587b76cae33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6490-9438</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flsm.23515$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flsm.23515$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34989417$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lv, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, ZengHong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, ZhiGuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, WenYu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, WenWen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, YiQian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, DongSheng</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the red &amp; blue LED effects on cutaneous refractory wound healing in male Sprague–Dawley rat using 3 different multi‐drug resistant bacteria</title><title>Lasers in surgery and medicine</title><addtitle>Lasers Surg Med</addtitle><description>Objectives Photobiomodulation (PBM) is widely used in clinical therapy, and is an effective approach to resist the bacterial infection of the cutaneous wound and modulate the wound healing process. Due to the several detriments of lasers, Red &amp; Blue LED light (RBLL) may be a more viable light source. This study is aimed to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effect of RBLL light on different multi‐drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in vitro and male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rat refractory MDR infection wound model in vivo. Materials and Methods Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Extended‐spectrum β‐lactamases ‐producing Escherichia coli (ESBLs‐Eco), and the MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR‐Pae) were employed to evaluate the antibacterial effects of the Blue LED light in vitro. Effects of RBLL on in vivo wound healing were evaluated by analyzing time to closure, wound score, semi‐quantitative test for bacterial culture, histopathological examination and Masson staining of skin tissue, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and western blot analysis (WB) of wound tissue. Results Blue LED light inhibited MRSA, ESBLs‐Eco, and MDR‐Pae in vitro study. In vivo, RBLL accelerated wound healing, reduced levels of pathogenic bacteria on the wound surface while increasing the blood supply to the wound surface and inhibiting the excessive inflammatory response. Conclusion RBLL showed a great potential gain for the treatment of MDR bacterial infected wounds, suggesting PBM therapy is an inexpensive, convenient, pain‐free, and safe therapeutic intervention for refractory MDR infection wounds.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibacterial activity</subject><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>In vivo methods and tests</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Inflammatory response</subject><subject>Light sources</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Methicillin</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Staining</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><subject>Wound Infection - drug therapy</subject><subject>β Lactamase</subject><issn>0196-8092</issn><issn>1096-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kbtOHEEQRVvIFiyPgB9AJVlCIljonp5XhwjWYGktB0A8qumpWRrNY90PVpvxCUiO-Tm-hMaLyRxVBUenVPcydij4qeA8Oetcf5rITGRbbCK4yqdKcPGFTbiIe8lVssN2nXvgnMuEF9tsR6aqVKkoJuxl9ohdQG_GAcYW_D2BpQaOoe4CwXx2CdS2pL2DCOjgcaAxuMi0FrUf7RpWYxgauCfszLAAM0CPHcHN0uIi0OvTn0tcdbQGix6Ce0ckNCY6LQ0e-tB58_r03NiwiFJnXLzgoY5usgb32dcWO0cHH3OP3X2f3V5cT-e_rn5cnM-nOj6UTRHTQpWplJirRqIgKjUqqvOEeKFEWeuypTZBngrMVJNRTWmms7Koi1wjSbnHvm28Szv-DuR89TAGO8STVZIXaZ6lQpaROtlQ2o7OxQiqpTU92nUlePVeRBWLqP4WEdmjD2Ooe2o-yX_JR-BsA6xMjOf_pmp-83OjfAPMZJaw</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Lv, Yang</creator><creator>Chen, ZengHong</creator><creator>Yang, ZhiGuo</creator><creator>Yang, WenYu</creator><creator>Chu, WenWen</creator><creator>Tu, YiQian</creator><creator>Xie, Juan</creator><creator>Cao, DongSheng</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6490-9438</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the red &amp; blue LED effects on cutaneous refractory wound healing in male Sprague–Dawley rat using 3 different multi‐drug resistant bacteria</title><author>Lv, Yang ; Chen, ZengHong ; Yang, ZhiGuo ; Yang, WenYu ; Chu, WenWen ; Tu, YiQian ; Xie, Juan ; Cao, DongSheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3205-aa4798433a69d3a1ee8ca9eb62e07918bc8fef2a041a59d5ebe45c587b76cae33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibacterial activity</topic><topic>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>In vivo methods and tests</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Inflammatory response</topic><topic>Light sources</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Methicillin</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Staining</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><topic>Wound Infection - drug therapy</topic><topic>β Lactamase</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lv, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, ZengHong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, ZhiGuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, WenYu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, WenWen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, YiQian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, DongSheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lv, Yang</au><au>Chen, ZengHong</au><au>Yang, ZhiGuo</au><au>Yang, WenYu</au><au>Chu, WenWen</au><au>Tu, YiQian</au><au>Xie, Juan</au><au>Cao, DongSheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the red &amp; blue LED effects on cutaneous refractory wound healing in male Sprague–Dawley rat using 3 different multi‐drug resistant bacteria</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Lasers Surg Med</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>725</spage><epage>736</epage><pages>725-736</pages><issn>0196-8092</issn><eissn>1096-9101</eissn><abstract>Objectives Photobiomodulation (PBM) is widely used in clinical therapy, and is an effective approach to resist the bacterial infection of the cutaneous wound and modulate the wound healing process. Due to the several detriments of lasers, Red &amp; Blue LED light (RBLL) may be a more viable light source. This study is aimed to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effect of RBLL light on different multi‐drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in vitro and male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rat refractory MDR infection wound model in vivo. Materials and Methods Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Extended‐spectrum β‐lactamases ‐producing Escherichia coli (ESBLs‐Eco), and the MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR‐Pae) were employed to evaluate the antibacterial effects of the Blue LED light in vitro. Effects of RBLL on in vivo wound healing were evaluated by analyzing time to closure, wound score, semi‐quantitative test for bacterial culture, histopathological examination and Masson staining of skin tissue, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and western blot analysis (WB) of wound tissue. Results Blue LED light inhibited MRSA, ESBLs‐Eco, and MDR‐Pae in vitro study. In vivo, RBLL accelerated wound healing, reduced levels of pathogenic bacteria on the wound surface while increasing the blood supply to the wound surface and inhibiting the excessive inflammatory response. Conclusion RBLL showed a great potential gain for the treatment of MDR bacterial infected wounds, suggesting PBM therapy is an inexpensive, convenient, pain‐free, and safe therapeutic intervention for refractory MDR infection wounds.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34989417</pmid><doi>10.1002/lsm.23515</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6490-9438</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-8092
ispartof Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2022-07, Vol.54 (5), p.725-736
issn 0196-8092
1096-9101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2674654138
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Antibacterial activity
Antiinfectives and antibacterials
Bacteria
Bacterial diseases
Bacterial infections
Drug resistance
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
E coli
Evaluation
In vivo methods and tests
Infections
Inflammation
Inflammatory response
Light sources
Male
Males
Methicillin
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Pain
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Staining
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus infections
Wound Healing
Wound Infection - drug therapy
β Lactamase
title Evaluation of the red & blue LED effects on cutaneous refractory wound healing in male Sprague–Dawley rat using 3 different multi‐drug resistant bacteria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T15%3A11%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20red%20&%20blue%20LED%20effects%20on%20cutaneous%20refractory%20wound%20healing%20in%20male%20Sprague%E2%80%93Dawley%20rat%20using%203%20different%20multi%E2%80%90drug%20resistant%20bacteria&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20surgery%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Lv,%20Yang&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=725&rft.epage=736&rft.pages=725-736&rft.issn=0196-8092&rft.eissn=1096-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lsm.23515&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2674654138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674654138&rft_id=info:pmid/34989417&rfr_iscdi=true