Evaluation of the red & blue LED effects on cutaneous refractory wound healing in male Sprague–Dawley rat using 3 different multi‐drug resistant bacteria
Objectives Photobiomodulation (PBM) is widely used in clinical therapy, and is an effective approach to resist the bacterial infection of the cutaneous wound and modulate the wound healing process. Due to the several detriments of lasers, Red & Blue LED light (RBLL) may be a more viable light so...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Lasers in surgery and medicine 2022-07, Vol.54 (5), p.725-736 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 736 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 725 |
container_title | Lasers in surgery and medicine |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Lv, Yang Chen, ZengHong Yang, ZhiGuo Yang, WenYu Chu, WenWen Tu, YiQian Xie, Juan Cao, DongSheng |
description | Objectives
Photobiomodulation (PBM) is widely used in clinical therapy, and is an effective approach to resist the bacterial infection of the cutaneous wound and modulate the wound healing process. Due to the several detriments of lasers, Red & Blue LED light (RBLL) may be a more viable light source. This study is aimed to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effect of RBLL light on different multi‐drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in vitro and male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rat refractory MDR infection wound model in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Extended‐spectrum β‐lactamases ‐producing Escherichia coli (ESBLs‐Eco), and the MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR‐Pae) were employed to evaluate the antibacterial effects of the Blue LED light in vitro. Effects of RBLL on in vivo wound healing were evaluated by analyzing time to closure, wound score, semi‐quantitative test for bacterial culture, histopathological examination and Masson staining of skin tissue, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and western blot analysis (WB) of wound tissue.
Results
Blue LED light inhibited MRSA, ESBLs‐Eco, and MDR‐Pae in vitro study. In vivo, RBLL accelerated wound healing, reduced levels of pathogenic bacteria on the wound surface while increasing the blood supply to the wound surface and inhibiting the excessive inflammatory response.
Conclusion
RBLL showed a great potential gain for the treatment of MDR bacterial infected wounds, suggesting PBM therapy is an inexpensive, convenient, pain‐free, and safe therapeutic intervention for refractory MDR infection wounds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lsm.23515 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2674654138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2674654138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3205-aa4798433a69d3a1ee8ca9eb62e07918bc8fef2a041a59d5ebe45c587b76cae33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kbtOHEEQRVvIFiyPgB9AJVlCIljonp5XhwjWYGktB0A8qumpWRrNY90PVpvxCUiO-Tm-hMaLyRxVBUenVPcydij4qeA8Oetcf5rITGRbbCK4yqdKcPGFTbiIe8lVssN2nXvgnMuEF9tsR6aqVKkoJuxl9ohdQG_GAcYW_D2BpQaOoe4CwXx2CdS2pL2DCOjgcaAxuMi0FrUf7RpWYxgauCfszLAAM0CPHcHN0uIi0OvTn0tcdbQGix6Ce0ckNCY6LQ0e-tB58_r03NiwiFJnXLzgoY5usgb32dcWO0cHH3OP3X2f3V5cT-e_rn5cnM-nOj6UTRHTQpWplJirRqIgKjUqqvOEeKFEWeuypTZBngrMVJNRTWmms7Koi1wjSbnHvm28Szv-DuR89TAGO8STVZIXaZ6lQpaROtlQ2o7OxQiqpTU92nUlePVeRBWLqP4WEdmjD2Ooe2o-yX_JR-BsA6xMjOf_pmp-83OjfAPMZJaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674654138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the red & blue LED effects on cutaneous refractory wound healing in male Sprague–Dawley rat using 3 different multi‐drug resistant bacteria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lv, Yang ; Chen, ZengHong ; Yang, ZhiGuo ; Yang, WenYu ; Chu, WenWen ; Tu, YiQian ; Xie, Juan ; Cao, DongSheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Lv, Yang ; Chen, ZengHong ; Yang, ZhiGuo ; Yang, WenYu ; Chu, WenWen ; Tu, YiQian ; Xie, Juan ; Cao, DongSheng</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
Photobiomodulation (PBM) is widely used in clinical therapy, and is an effective approach to resist the bacterial infection of the cutaneous wound and modulate the wound healing process. Due to the several detriments of lasers, Red & Blue LED light (RBLL) may be a more viable light source. This study is aimed to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effect of RBLL light on different multi‐drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in vitro and male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rat refractory MDR infection wound model in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Extended‐spectrum β‐lactamases ‐producing Escherichia coli (ESBLs‐Eco), and the MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR‐Pae) were employed to evaluate the antibacterial effects of the Blue LED light in vitro. Effects of RBLL on in vivo wound healing were evaluated by analyzing time to closure, wound score, semi‐quantitative test for bacterial culture, histopathological examination and Masson staining of skin tissue, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and western blot analysis (WB) of wound tissue.
Results
Blue LED light inhibited MRSA, ESBLs‐Eco, and MDR‐Pae in vitro study. In vivo, RBLL accelerated wound healing, reduced levels of pathogenic bacteria on the wound surface while increasing the blood supply to the wound surface and inhibiting the excessive inflammatory response.
Conclusion
RBLL showed a great potential gain for the treatment of MDR bacterial infected wounds, suggesting PBM therapy is an inexpensive, convenient, pain‐free, and safe therapeutic intervention for refractory MDR infection wounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23515</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34989417</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibacterial activity ; Antiinfectives and antibacterials ; Bacteria ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial infections ; Drug resistance ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial ; E coli ; Evaluation ; In vivo methods and tests ; Infections ; Inflammation ; Inflammatory response ; Light sources ; Male ; Males ; Methicillin ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; Pain ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Staining ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus infections ; Wound Healing ; Wound Infection - drug therapy ; β Lactamase</subject><ispartof>Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2022-07, Vol.54 (5), p.725-736</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3205-aa4798433a69d3a1ee8ca9eb62e07918bc8fef2a041a59d5ebe45c587b76cae33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3205-aa4798433a69d3a1ee8ca9eb62e07918bc8fef2a041a59d5ebe45c587b76cae33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6490-9438</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flsm.23515$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flsm.23515$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34989417$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lv, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, ZengHong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, ZhiGuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, WenYu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, WenWen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, YiQian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, DongSheng</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the red & blue LED effects on cutaneous refractory wound healing in male Sprague–Dawley rat using 3 different multi‐drug resistant bacteria</title><title>Lasers in surgery and medicine</title><addtitle>Lasers Surg Med</addtitle><description>Objectives
Photobiomodulation (PBM) is widely used in clinical therapy, and is an effective approach to resist the bacterial infection of the cutaneous wound and modulate the wound healing process. Due to the several detriments of lasers, Red & Blue LED light (RBLL) may be a more viable light source. This study is aimed to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effect of RBLL light on different multi‐drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in vitro and male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rat refractory MDR infection wound model in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Extended‐spectrum β‐lactamases ‐producing Escherichia coli (ESBLs‐Eco), and the MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR‐Pae) were employed to evaluate the antibacterial effects of the Blue LED light in vitro. Effects of RBLL on in vivo wound healing were evaluated by analyzing time to closure, wound score, semi‐quantitative test for bacterial culture, histopathological examination and Masson staining of skin tissue, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and western blot analysis (WB) of wound tissue.
Results
Blue LED light inhibited MRSA, ESBLs‐Eco, and MDR‐Pae in vitro study. In vivo, RBLL accelerated wound healing, reduced levels of pathogenic bacteria on the wound surface while increasing the blood supply to the wound surface and inhibiting the excessive inflammatory response.
Conclusion
RBLL showed a great potential gain for the treatment of MDR bacterial infected wounds, suggesting PBM therapy is an inexpensive, convenient, pain‐free, and safe therapeutic intervention for refractory MDR infection wounds.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibacterial activity</subject><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>In vivo methods and tests</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Inflammatory response</subject><subject>Light sources</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Methicillin</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Staining</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><subject>Wound Infection - drug therapy</subject><subject>β Lactamase</subject><issn>0196-8092</issn><issn>1096-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kbtOHEEQRVvIFiyPgB9AJVlCIljonp5XhwjWYGktB0A8qumpWRrNY90PVpvxCUiO-Tm-hMaLyRxVBUenVPcydij4qeA8Oetcf5rITGRbbCK4yqdKcPGFTbiIe8lVssN2nXvgnMuEF9tsR6aqVKkoJuxl9ohdQG_GAcYW_D2BpQaOoe4CwXx2CdS2pL2DCOjgcaAxuMi0FrUf7RpWYxgauCfszLAAM0CPHcHN0uIi0OvTn0tcdbQGix6Ce0ckNCY6LQ0e-tB58_r03NiwiFJnXLzgoY5usgb32dcWO0cHH3OP3X2f3V5cT-e_rn5cnM-nOj6UTRHTQpWplJirRqIgKjUqqvOEeKFEWeuypTZBngrMVJNRTWmms7Koi1wjSbnHvm28Szv-DuR89TAGO8STVZIXaZ6lQpaROtlQ2o7OxQiqpTU92nUlePVeRBWLqP4WEdmjD2Ooe2o-yX_JR-BsA6xMjOf_pmp-83OjfAPMZJaw</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Lv, Yang</creator><creator>Chen, ZengHong</creator><creator>Yang, ZhiGuo</creator><creator>Yang, WenYu</creator><creator>Chu, WenWen</creator><creator>Tu, YiQian</creator><creator>Xie, Juan</creator><creator>Cao, DongSheng</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6490-9438</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the red & blue LED effects on cutaneous refractory wound healing in male Sprague–Dawley rat using 3 different multi‐drug resistant bacteria</title><author>Lv, Yang ; Chen, ZengHong ; Yang, ZhiGuo ; Yang, WenYu ; Chu, WenWen ; Tu, YiQian ; Xie, Juan ; Cao, DongSheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3205-aa4798433a69d3a1ee8ca9eb62e07918bc8fef2a041a59d5ebe45c587b76cae33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibacterial activity</topic><topic>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>In vivo methods and tests</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Inflammatory response</topic><topic>Light sources</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Methicillin</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Staining</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><topic>Wound Infection - drug therapy</topic><topic>β Lactamase</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lv, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, ZengHong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, ZhiGuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, WenYu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, WenWen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, YiQian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, DongSheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lv, Yang</au><au>Chen, ZengHong</au><au>Yang, ZhiGuo</au><au>Yang, WenYu</au><au>Chu, WenWen</au><au>Tu, YiQian</au><au>Xie, Juan</au><au>Cao, DongSheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the red & blue LED effects on cutaneous refractory wound healing in male Sprague–Dawley rat using 3 different multi‐drug resistant bacteria</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Lasers Surg Med</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>725</spage><epage>736</epage><pages>725-736</pages><issn>0196-8092</issn><eissn>1096-9101</eissn><abstract>Objectives
Photobiomodulation (PBM) is widely used in clinical therapy, and is an effective approach to resist the bacterial infection of the cutaneous wound and modulate the wound healing process. Due to the several detriments of lasers, Red & Blue LED light (RBLL) may be a more viable light source. This study is aimed to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effect of RBLL light on different multi‐drug resistant (MDR) bacteria in vitro and male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rat refractory MDR infection wound model in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Extended‐spectrum β‐lactamases ‐producing Escherichia coli (ESBLs‐Eco), and the MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR‐Pae) were employed to evaluate the antibacterial effects of the Blue LED light in vitro. Effects of RBLL on in vivo wound healing were evaluated by analyzing time to closure, wound score, semi‐quantitative test for bacterial culture, histopathological examination and Masson staining of skin tissue, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and western blot analysis (WB) of wound tissue.
Results
Blue LED light inhibited MRSA, ESBLs‐Eco, and MDR‐Pae in vitro study. In vivo, RBLL accelerated wound healing, reduced levels of pathogenic bacteria on the wound surface while increasing the blood supply to the wound surface and inhibiting the excessive inflammatory response.
Conclusion
RBLL showed a great potential gain for the treatment of MDR bacterial infected wounds, suggesting PBM therapy is an inexpensive, convenient, pain‐free, and safe therapeutic intervention for refractory MDR infection wounds.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34989417</pmid><doi>10.1002/lsm.23515</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6490-9438</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-8092 |
ispartof | Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2022-07, Vol.54 (5), p.725-736 |
issn | 0196-8092 1096-9101 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2674654138 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antibacterial activity Antiinfectives and antibacterials Bacteria Bacterial diseases Bacterial infections Drug resistance Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial E coli Evaluation In vivo methods and tests Infections Inflammation Inflammatory response Light sources Male Males Methicillin Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Pain Pseudomonas aeruginosa Rats Rats, Sprague-Dawley Staining Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus infections Wound Healing Wound Infection - drug therapy β Lactamase |
title | Evaluation of the red & blue LED effects on cutaneous refractory wound healing in male Sprague–Dawley rat using 3 different multi‐drug resistant bacteria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T15%3A11%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20red%20&%20blue%20LED%20effects%20on%20cutaneous%20refractory%20wound%20healing%20in%20male%20Sprague%E2%80%93Dawley%20rat%20using%203%20different%20multi%E2%80%90drug%20resistant%20bacteria&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20surgery%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Lv,%20Yang&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=725&rft.epage=736&rft.pages=725-736&rft.issn=0196-8092&rft.eissn=1096-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lsm.23515&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2674654138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674654138&rft_id=info:pmid/34989417&rfr_iscdi=true |