Conflicts over Land as a Risk for Social-Ecological Resilience: A Transnational Comparative Analysis in the Southwestern Amazon

People in the department of Madre de Dios/Peru, the state of Acre/Brazil, and the department of Pando/Bolivia experience similar conflicts over land, land use, and access to resources. At the same time, each conflict reveals distinct characteristics and dynamics, arising from its history, legal regu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-06, Vol.14 (11), p.6520
Hauptverfasser: Froese, Rebecca, Pinzón, Claudia, Aceitón, Loreto, Argentim, Tarik, Arteaga, Marliz, Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian, Pismel, Gleiciane, Scherer, Sophia Florence, Reutter, Jannis, Schilling, Janpeter, Schönenberg, Regine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page 6520
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Froese, Rebecca
Pinzón, Claudia
Aceitón, Loreto
Argentim, Tarik
Arteaga, Marliz
Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian
Pismel, Gleiciane
Scherer, Sophia Florence
Reutter, Jannis
Schilling, Janpeter
Schönenberg, Regine
description People in the department of Madre de Dios/Peru, the state of Acre/Brazil, and the department of Pando/Bolivia experience similar conflicts over land, land use, and access to resources. At the same time, each conflict reveals distinct characteristics and dynamics, arising from its history, legal regulation, institutional (in-)capacities, and culturally diverse local populations. The aim of this paper is to better understand the main drivers of social-ecological conflicts over land in and around three protected areas in this transboundary region, known as MAP, and to analyze how (environmental) institutions influence these drivers. The paper is based on a literature review and expert interviews; it focuses on conflicts around (1) gold mining in Madre de Dios, (2) extensive cattle ranching in Acre, and (3) access to communal land in Pando. Using theories of conflict research, expanded by a political ecology perspective and insights from stakeholder and expert interviews, we find that the major conflict drivers are (1) land tenure and access to land and natural resources, (2) identity and lifestyle driven transformations, (3) state and market driven agendas, and (4) networked illegal and criminal activities. Through a comparative conflict analysis, we develop four recommendations to strengthen the creation of reflexive institutions that may be able to foster social-ecological resilience in the region: (1) The clarification of responsibilities between governance institutions and their financing; (2) the awareness raising for existing power structures and opening spaces for enhanced local participation; (3) the breaking of corruptive cycles while developing economically, ecologically, and socially sustainable livelihood opportunities; and (4) taking the continuous reproduction of illegal activities into account while clarifying responsibilities, raising awareness, and breaking corruptive cycles. The results of our research therefore not only contribute to a better understanding of conflicts in the MAP region and the wider scientific literature on social-ecological conflicts and governance, but it is also the first paper that identifies entry points and prerequisites for the transformation from reactive to reflexive institutions in Amazonian societies.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su14116520
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2674417316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A784034465</galeid><sourcerecordid>A784034465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2130-9c6f7b8442a20f323ff2247321022c3b8ab2cccb182c159d0711d03ba7f07d203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtLAzEQgBdRULQXf0HAk8JqXt2Ht6X4goLQ1vMym01qdJvUzK6vi3_dSAXtzGFe3wwzTJIcM3ouREkvcGCSsWzM6U5ywGnOUkbHdPefv5-MEJ9oFCFYybKD5Gvinems6pH4Vx3IFFxLAAmQmcVnYnwgc68sdOmV8p1fWgUdmWm0ndVO6UtSkUUAhw56612sTfxqDSFGr5pUMfGBFol1pH_UcdLQP75p7HVwpFrBp3dHyZ6BDvXo1x4mD9dXi8ltOr2_uZtU01RxJmhaqszkTSElB06N4MIYzmUuOKOcK9EU0HClVMMKrti4bOPBrKWigdzQvOVUHCYnm7nr4F-GuEL95IcQ98OaZ7mULBcsi9T5hlpCp2vrjO8DqKitXlnlnTY25qu8kFRImY1jw-lWQ2R6_d4vYUCs7-azbfZsw6rgEYM29TrYFYSPmtH654H13wPFN1Qui90</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674417316</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conflicts over Land as a Risk for Social-Ecological Resilience: A Transnational Comparative Analysis in the Southwestern Amazon</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Froese, Rebecca ; Pinzón, Claudia ; Aceitón, Loreto ; Argentim, Tarik ; Arteaga, Marliz ; Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian ; Pismel, Gleiciane ; Scherer, Sophia Florence ; Reutter, Jannis ; Schilling, Janpeter ; Schönenberg, Regine</creator><creatorcontrib>Froese, Rebecca ; Pinzón, Claudia ; Aceitón, Loreto ; Argentim, Tarik ; Arteaga, Marliz ; Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian ; Pismel, Gleiciane ; Scherer, Sophia Florence ; Reutter, Jannis ; Schilling, Janpeter ; Schönenberg, Regine</creatorcontrib><description>People in the department of Madre de Dios/Peru, the state of Acre/Brazil, and the department of Pando/Bolivia experience similar conflicts over land, land use, and access to resources. At the same time, each conflict reveals distinct characteristics and dynamics, arising from its history, legal regulation, institutional (in-)capacities, and culturally diverse local populations. The aim of this paper is to better understand the main drivers of social-ecological conflicts over land in and around three protected areas in this transboundary region, known as MAP, and to analyze how (environmental) institutions influence these drivers. The paper is based on a literature review and expert interviews; it focuses on conflicts around (1) gold mining in Madre de Dios, (2) extensive cattle ranching in Acre, and (3) access to communal land in Pando. Using theories of conflict research, expanded by a political ecology perspective and insights from stakeholder and expert interviews, we find that the major conflict drivers are (1) land tenure and access to land and natural resources, (2) identity and lifestyle driven transformations, (3) state and market driven agendas, and (4) networked illegal and criminal activities. Through a comparative conflict analysis, we develop four recommendations to strengthen the creation of reflexive institutions that may be able to foster social-ecological resilience in the region: (1) The clarification of responsibilities between governance institutions and their financing; (2) the awareness raising for existing power structures and opening spaces for enhanced local participation; (3) the breaking of corruptive cycles while developing economically, ecologically, and socially sustainable livelihood opportunities; and (4) taking the continuous reproduction of illegal activities into account while clarifying responsibilities, raising awareness, and breaking corruptive cycles. The results of our research therefore not only contribute to a better understanding of conflicts in the MAP region and the wider scientific literature on social-ecological conflicts and governance, but it is also the first paper that identifies entry points and prerequisites for the transformation from reactive to reflexive institutions in Amazonian societies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14116520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Bolivia ; Brazil ; Comparative analysis ; Crime ; Ecological risk assessment ; Ecology ; Germany ; Gold mines &amp; mining ; Institutions ; Israel ; Land tenure ; Land use ; Literature reviews ; Natural resources ; Organized crime ; Protected areas ; Protection and preservation ; Ranching ; Reflexivity ; Resilience ; Sustainability ; Timber</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-06, Vol.14 (11), p.6520</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2130-9c6f7b8442a20f323ff2247321022c3b8ab2cccb182c159d0711d03ba7f07d203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2130-9c6f7b8442a20f323ff2247321022c3b8ab2cccb182c159d0711d03ba7f07d203</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6410-5432 ; 0000-0002-9682-8093</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Froese, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinzón, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aceitón, Loreto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argentim, Tarik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arteaga, Marliz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pismel, Gleiciane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherer, Sophia Florence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reutter, Jannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schilling, Janpeter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönenberg, Regine</creatorcontrib><title>Conflicts over Land as a Risk for Social-Ecological Resilience: A Transnational Comparative Analysis in the Southwestern Amazon</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>People in the department of Madre de Dios/Peru, the state of Acre/Brazil, and the department of Pando/Bolivia experience similar conflicts over land, land use, and access to resources. At the same time, each conflict reveals distinct characteristics and dynamics, arising from its history, legal regulation, institutional (in-)capacities, and culturally diverse local populations. The aim of this paper is to better understand the main drivers of social-ecological conflicts over land in and around three protected areas in this transboundary region, known as MAP, and to analyze how (environmental) institutions influence these drivers. The paper is based on a literature review and expert interviews; it focuses on conflicts around (1) gold mining in Madre de Dios, (2) extensive cattle ranching in Acre, and (3) access to communal land in Pando. Using theories of conflict research, expanded by a political ecology perspective and insights from stakeholder and expert interviews, we find that the major conflict drivers are (1) land tenure and access to land and natural resources, (2) identity and lifestyle driven transformations, (3) state and market driven agendas, and (4) networked illegal and criminal activities. Through a comparative conflict analysis, we develop four recommendations to strengthen the creation of reflexive institutions that may be able to foster social-ecological resilience in the region: (1) The clarification of responsibilities between governance institutions and their financing; (2) the awareness raising for existing power structures and opening spaces for enhanced local participation; (3) the breaking of corruptive cycles while developing economically, ecologically, and socially sustainable livelihood opportunities; and (4) taking the continuous reproduction of illegal activities into account while clarifying responsibilities, raising awareness, and breaking corruptive cycles. The results of our research therefore not only contribute to a better understanding of conflicts in the MAP region and the wider scientific literature on social-ecological conflicts and governance, but it is also the first paper that identifies entry points and prerequisites for the transformation from reactive to reflexive institutions in Amazonian societies.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bolivia</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Gold mines &amp; mining</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Israel</subject><subject>Land tenure</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Organized crime</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Ranching</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Timber</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtLAzEQgBdRULQXf0HAk8JqXt2Ht6X4goLQ1vMym01qdJvUzK6vi3_dSAXtzGFe3wwzTJIcM3ouREkvcGCSsWzM6U5ywGnOUkbHdPefv5-MEJ9oFCFYybKD5Gvinems6pH4Vx3IFFxLAAmQmcVnYnwgc68sdOmV8p1fWgUdmWm0ndVO6UtSkUUAhw56612sTfxqDSFGr5pUMfGBFol1pH_UcdLQP75p7HVwpFrBp3dHyZ6BDvXo1x4mD9dXi8ltOr2_uZtU01RxJmhaqszkTSElB06N4MIYzmUuOKOcK9EU0HClVMMKrti4bOPBrKWigdzQvOVUHCYnm7nr4F-GuEL95IcQ98OaZ7mULBcsi9T5hlpCp2vrjO8DqKitXlnlnTY25qu8kFRImY1jw-lWQ2R6_d4vYUCs7-azbfZsw6rgEYM29TrYFYSPmtH654H13wPFN1Qui90</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Froese, Rebecca</creator><creator>Pinzón, Claudia</creator><creator>Aceitón, Loreto</creator><creator>Argentim, Tarik</creator><creator>Arteaga, Marliz</creator><creator>Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian</creator><creator>Pismel, Gleiciane</creator><creator>Scherer, Sophia Florence</creator><creator>Reutter, Jannis</creator><creator>Schilling, Janpeter</creator><creator>Schönenberg, Regine</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-5432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9682-8093</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Conflicts over Land as a Risk for Social-Ecological Resilience: A Transnational Comparative Analysis in the Southwestern Amazon</title><author>Froese, Rebecca ; Pinzón, Claudia ; Aceitón, Loreto ; Argentim, Tarik ; Arteaga, Marliz ; Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian ; Pismel, Gleiciane ; Scherer, Sophia Florence ; Reutter, Jannis ; Schilling, Janpeter ; Schönenberg, Regine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2130-9c6f7b8442a20f323ff2247321022c3b8ab2cccb182c159d0711d03ba7f07d203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bolivia</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Gold mines &amp; mining</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Israel</topic><topic>Land tenure</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Organized crime</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Ranching</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Timber</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Froese, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinzón, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aceitón, Loreto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argentim, Tarik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arteaga, Marliz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pismel, Gleiciane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherer, Sophia Florence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reutter, Jannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schilling, Janpeter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönenberg, Regine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Froese, Rebecca</au><au>Pinzón, Claudia</au><au>Aceitón, Loreto</au><au>Argentim, Tarik</au><au>Arteaga, Marliz</au><au>Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian</au><au>Pismel, Gleiciane</au><au>Scherer, Sophia Florence</au><au>Reutter, Jannis</au><au>Schilling, Janpeter</au><au>Schönenberg, Regine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conflicts over Land as a Risk for Social-Ecological Resilience: A Transnational Comparative Analysis in the Southwestern Amazon</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>6520</spage><pages>6520-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>People in the department of Madre de Dios/Peru, the state of Acre/Brazil, and the department of Pando/Bolivia experience similar conflicts over land, land use, and access to resources. At the same time, each conflict reveals distinct characteristics and dynamics, arising from its history, legal regulation, institutional (in-)capacities, and culturally diverse local populations. The aim of this paper is to better understand the main drivers of social-ecological conflicts over land in and around three protected areas in this transboundary region, known as MAP, and to analyze how (environmental) institutions influence these drivers. The paper is based on a literature review and expert interviews; it focuses on conflicts around (1) gold mining in Madre de Dios, (2) extensive cattle ranching in Acre, and (3) access to communal land in Pando. Using theories of conflict research, expanded by a political ecology perspective and insights from stakeholder and expert interviews, we find that the major conflict drivers are (1) land tenure and access to land and natural resources, (2) identity and lifestyle driven transformations, (3) state and market driven agendas, and (4) networked illegal and criminal activities. Through a comparative conflict analysis, we develop four recommendations to strengthen the creation of reflexive institutions that may be able to foster social-ecological resilience in the region: (1) The clarification of responsibilities between governance institutions and their financing; (2) the awareness raising for existing power structures and opening spaces for enhanced local participation; (3) the breaking of corruptive cycles while developing economically, ecologically, and socially sustainable livelihood opportunities; and (4) taking the continuous reproduction of illegal activities into account while clarifying responsibilities, raising awareness, and breaking corruptive cycles. The results of our research therefore not only contribute to a better understanding of conflicts in the MAP region and the wider scientific literature on social-ecological conflicts and governance, but it is also the first paper that identifies entry points and prerequisites for the transformation from reactive to reflexive institutions in Amazonian societies.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14116520</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-5432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9682-8093</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-06, Vol.14 (11), p.6520
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2674417316
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Biodiversity
Bolivia
Brazil
Comparative analysis
Crime
Ecological risk assessment
Ecology
Germany
Gold mines & mining
Institutions
Israel
Land tenure
Land use
Literature reviews
Natural resources
Organized crime
Protected areas
Protection and preservation
Ranching
Reflexivity
Resilience
Sustainability
Timber
title Conflicts over Land as a Risk for Social-Ecological Resilience: A Transnational Comparative Analysis in the Southwestern Amazon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A23%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conflicts%20over%20Land%20as%20a%20Risk%20for%20Social-Ecological%20Resilience:%20A%20Transnational%20Comparative%20Analysis%20in%20the%20Southwestern%20Amazon&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Froese,%20Rebecca&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=6520&rft.pages=6520-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14116520&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA784034465%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674417316&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A784034465&rfr_iscdi=true