Conflicts over Land as a Risk for Social-Ecological Resilience: A Transnational Comparative Analysis in the Southwestern Amazon
People in the department of Madre de Dios/Peru, the state of Acre/Brazil, and the department of Pando/Bolivia experience similar conflicts over land, land use, and access to resources. At the same time, each conflict reveals distinct characteristics and dynamics, arising from its history, legal regu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2022-06, Vol.14 (11), p.6520 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 6520 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Froese, Rebecca Pinzón, Claudia Aceitón, Loreto Argentim, Tarik Arteaga, Marliz Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian Pismel, Gleiciane Scherer, Sophia Florence Reutter, Jannis Schilling, Janpeter Schönenberg, Regine |
description | People in the department of Madre de Dios/Peru, the state of Acre/Brazil, and the department of Pando/Bolivia experience similar conflicts over land, land use, and access to resources. At the same time, each conflict reveals distinct characteristics and dynamics, arising from its history, legal regulation, institutional (in-)capacities, and culturally diverse local populations. The aim of this paper is to better understand the main drivers of social-ecological conflicts over land in and around three protected areas in this transboundary region, known as MAP, and to analyze how (environmental) institutions influence these drivers. The paper is based on a literature review and expert interviews; it focuses on conflicts around (1) gold mining in Madre de Dios, (2) extensive cattle ranching in Acre, and (3) access to communal land in Pando. Using theories of conflict research, expanded by a political ecology perspective and insights from stakeholder and expert interviews, we find that the major conflict drivers are (1) land tenure and access to land and natural resources, (2) identity and lifestyle driven transformations, (3) state and market driven agendas, and (4) networked illegal and criminal activities. Through a comparative conflict analysis, we develop four recommendations to strengthen the creation of reflexive institutions that may be able to foster social-ecological resilience in the region: (1) The clarification of responsibilities between governance institutions and their financing; (2) the awareness raising for existing power structures and opening spaces for enhanced local participation; (3) the breaking of corruptive cycles while developing economically, ecologically, and socially sustainable livelihood opportunities; and (4) taking the continuous reproduction of illegal activities into account while clarifying responsibilities, raising awareness, and breaking corruptive cycles. The results of our research therefore not only contribute to a better understanding of conflicts in the MAP region and the wider scientific literature on social-ecological conflicts and governance, but it is also the first paper that identifies entry points and prerequisites for the transformation from reactive to reflexive institutions in Amazonian societies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su14116520 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2674417316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A784034465</galeid><sourcerecordid>A784034465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2130-9c6f7b8442a20f323ff2247321022c3b8ab2cccb182c159d0711d03ba7f07d203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtLAzEQgBdRULQXf0HAk8JqXt2Ht6X4goLQ1vMym01qdJvUzK6vi3_dSAXtzGFe3wwzTJIcM3ouREkvcGCSsWzM6U5ywGnOUkbHdPefv5-MEJ9oFCFYybKD5Gvinems6pH4Vx3IFFxLAAmQmcVnYnwgc68sdOmV8p1fWgUdmWm0ndVO6UtSkUUAhw56612sTfxqDSFGr5pUMfGBFol1pH_UcdLQP75p7HVwpFrBp3dHyZ6BDvXo1x4mD9dXi8ltOr2_uZtU01RxJmhaqszkTSElB06N4MIYzmUuOKOcK9EU0HClVMMKrti4bOPBrKWigdzQvOVUHCYnm7nr4F-GuEL95IcQ98OaZ7mULBcsi9T5hlpCp2vrjO8DqKitXlnlnTY25qu8kFRImY1jw-lWQ2R6_d4vYUCs7-azbfZsw6rgEYM29TrYFYSPmtH654H13wPFN1Qui90</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674417316</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conflicts over Land as a Risk for Social-Ecological Resilience: A Transnational Comparative Analysis in the Southwestern Amazon</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Froese, Rebecca ; Pinzón, Claudia ; Aceitón, Loreto ; Argentim, Tarik ; Arteaga, Marliz ; Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian ; Pismel, Gleiciane ; Scherer, Sophia Florence ; Reutter, Jannis ; Schilling, Janpeter ; Schönenberg, Regine</creator><creatorcontrib>Froese, Rebecca ; Pinzón, Claudia ; Aceitón, Loreto ; Argentim, Tarik ; Arteaga, Marliz ; Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian ; Pismel, Gleiciane ; Scherer, Sophia Florence ; Reutter, Jannis ; Schilling, Janpeter ; Schönenberg, Regine</creatorcontrib><description>People in the department of Madre de Dios/Peru, the state of Acre/Brazil, and the department of Pando/Bolivia experience similar conflicts over land, land use, and access to resources. At the same time, each conflict reveals distinct characteristics and dynamics, arising from its history, legal regulation, institutional (in-)capacities, and culturally diverse local populations. The aim of this paper is to better understand the main drivers of social-ecological conflicts over land in and around three protected areas in this transboundary region, known as MAP, and to analyze how (environmental) institutions influence these drivers. The paper is based on a literature review and expert interviews; it focuses on conflicts around (1) gold mining in Madre de Dios, (2) extensive cattle ranching in Acre, and (3) access to communal land in Pando. Using theories of conflict research, expanded by a political ecology perspective and insights from stakeholder and expert interviews, we find that the major conflict drivers are (1) land tenure and access to land and natural resources, (2) identity and lifestyle driven transformations, (3) state and market driven agendas, and (4) networked illegal and criminal activities. Through a comparative conflict analysis, we develop four recommendations to strengthen the creation of reflexive institutions that may be able to foster social-ecological resilience in the region: (1) The clarification of responsibilities between governance institutions and their financing; (2) the awareness raising for existing power structures and opening spaces for enhanced local participation; (3) the breaking of corruptive cycles while developing economically, ecologically, and socially sustainable livelihood opportunities; and (4) taking the continuous reproduction of illegal activities into account while clarifying responsibilities, raising awareness, and breaking corruptive cycles. The results of our research therefore not only contribute to a better understanding of conflicts in the MAP region and the wider scientific literature on social-ecological conflicts and governance, but it is also the first paper that identifies entry points and prerequisites for the transformation from reactive to reflexive institutions in Amazonian societies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14116520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Bolivia ; Brazil ; Comparative analysis ; Crime ; Ecological risk assessment ; Ecology ; Germany ; Gold mines & mining ; Institutions ; Israel ; Land tenure ; Land use ; Literature reviews ; Natural resources ; Organized crime ; Protected areas ; Protection and preservation ; Ranching ; Reflexivity ; Resilience ; Sustainability ; Timber</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-06, Vol.14 (11), p.6520</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2130-9c6f7b8442a20f323ff2247321022c3b8ab2cccb182c159d0711d03ba7f07d203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2130-9c6f7b8442a20f323ff2247321022c3b8ab2cccb182c159d0711d03ba7f07d203</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6410-5432 ; 0000-0002-9682-8093</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Froese, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinzón, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aceitón, Loreto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argentim, Tarik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arteaga, Marliz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pismel, Gleiciane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherer, Sophia Florence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reutter, Jannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schilling, Janpeter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönenberg, Regine</creatorcontrib><title>Conflicts over Land as a Risk for Social-Ecological Resilience: A Transnational Comparative Analysis in the Southwestern Amazon</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>People in the department of Madre de Dios/Peru, the state of Acre/Brazil, and the department of Pando/Bolivia experience similar conflicts over land, land use, and access to resources. At the same time, each conflict reveals distinct characteristics and dynamics, arising from its history, legal regulation, institutional (in-)capacities, and culturally diverse local populations. The aim of this paper is to better understand the main drivers of social-ecological conflicts over land in and around three protected areas in this transboundary region, known as MAP, and to analyze how (environmental) institutions influence these drivers. The paper is based on a literature review and expert interviews; it focuses on conflicts around (1) gold mining in Madre de Dios, (2) extensive cattle ranching in Acre, and (3) access to communal land in Pando. Using theories of conflict research, expanded by a political ecology perspective and insights from stakeholder and expert interviews, we find that the major conflict drivers are (1) land tenure and access to land and natural resources, (2) identity and lifestyle driven transformations, (3) state and market driven agendas, and (4) networked illegal and criminal activities. Through a comparative conflict analysis, we develop four recommendations to strengthen the creation of reflexive institutions that may be able to foster social-ecological resilience in the region: (1) The clarification of responsibilities between governance institutions and their financing; (2) the awareness raising for existing power structures and opening spaces for enhanced local participation; (3) the breaking of corruptive cycles while developing economically, ecologically, and socially sustainable livelihood opportunities; and (4) taking the continuous reproduction of illegal activities into account while clarifying responsibilities, raising awareness, and breaking corruptive cycles. The results of our research therefore not only contribute to a better understanding of conflicts in the MAP region and the wider scientific literature on social-ecological conflicts and governance, but it is also the first paper that identifies entry points and prerequisites for the transformation from reactive to reflexive institutions in Amazonian societies.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bolivia</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Gold mines & mining</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Israel</subject><subject>Land tenure</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Organized crime</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Ranching</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Timber</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtLAzEQgBdRULQXf0HAk8JqXt2Ht6X4goLQ1vMym01qdJvUzK6vi3_dSAXtzGFe3wwzTJIcM3ouREkvcGCSsWzM6U5ywGnOUkbHdPefv5-MEJ9oFCFYybKD5Gvinems6pH4Vx3IFFxLAAmQmcVnYnwgc68sdOmV8p1fWgUdmWm0ndVO6UtSkUUAhw56612sTfxqDSFGr5pUMfGBFol1pH_UcdLQP75p7HVwpFrBp3dHyZ6BDvXo1x4mD9dXi8ltOr2_uZtU01RxJmhaqszkTSElB06N4MIYzmUuOKOcK9EU0HClVMMKrti4bOPBrKWigdzQvOVUHCYnm7nr4F-GuEL95IcQ98OaZ7mULBcsi9T5hlpCp2vrjO8DqKitXlnlnTY25qu8kFRImY1jw-lWQ2R6_d4vYUCs7-azbfZsw6rgEYM29TrYFYSPmtH654H13wPFN1Qui90</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Froese, Rebecca</creator><creator>Pinzón, Claudia</creator><creator>Aceitón, Loreto</creator><creator>Argentim, Tarik</creator><creator>Arteaga, Marliz</creator><creator>Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian</creator><creator>Pismel, Gleiciane</creator><creator>Scherer, Sophia Florence</creator><creator>Reutter, Jannis</creator><creator>Schilling, Janpeter</creator><creator>Schönenberg, Regine</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-5432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9682-8093</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Conflicts over Land as a Risk for Social-Ecological Resilience: A Transnational Comparative Analysis in the Southwestern Amazon</title><author>Froese, Rebecca ; Pinzón, Claudia ; Aceitón, Loreto ; Argentim, Tarik ; Arteaga, Marliz ; Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian ; Pismel, Gleiciane ; Scherer, Sophia Florence ; Reutter, Jannis ; Schilling, Janpeter ; Schönenberg, Regine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2130-9c6f7b8442a20f323ff2247321022c3b8ab2cccb182c159d0711d03ba7f07d203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bolivia</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Gold mines & mining</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Israel</topic><topic>Land tenure</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Organized crime</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Ranching</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Timber</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Froese, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinzón, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aceitón, Loreto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argentim, Tarik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arteaga, Marliz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pismel, Gleiciane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherer, Sophia Florence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reutter, Jannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schilling, Janpeter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönenberg, Regine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Froese, Rebecca</au><au>Pinzón, Claudia</au><au>Aceitón, Loreto</au><au>Argentim, Tarik</au><au>Arteaga, Marliz</au><au>Navas-Guzmán, Juan Sebastian</au><au>Pismel, Gleiciane</au><au>Scherer, Sophia Florence</au><au>Reutter, Jannis</au><au>Schilling, Janpeter</au><au>Schönenberg, Regine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conflicts over Land as a Risk for Social-Ecological Resilience: A Transnational Comparative Analysis in the Southwestern Amazon</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>6520</spage><pages>6520-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>People in the department of Madre de Dios/Peru, the state of Acre/Brazil, and the department of Pando/Bolivia experience similar conflicts over land, land use, and access to resources. At the same time, each conflict reveals distinct characteristics and dynamics, arising from its history, legal regulation, institutional (in-)capacities, and culturally diverse local populations. The aim of this paper is to better understand the main drivers of social-ecological conflicts over land in and around three protected areas in this transboundary region, known as MAP, and to analyze how (environmental) institutions influence these drivers. The paper is based on a literature review and expert interviews; it focuses on conflicts around (1) gold mining in Madre de Dios, (2) extensive cattle ranching in Acre, and (3) access to communal land in Pando. Using theories of conflict research, expanded by a political ecology perspective and insights from stakeholder and expert interviews, we find that the major conflict drivers are (1) land tenure and access to land and natural resources, (2) identity and lifestyle driven transformations, (3) state and market driven agendas, and (4) networked illegal and criminal activities. Through a comparative conflict analysis, we develop four recommendations to strengthen the creation of reflexive institutions that may be able to foster social-ecological resilience in the region: (1) The clarification of responsibilities between governance institutions and their financing; (2) the awareness raising for existing power structures and opening spaces for enhanced local participation; (3) the breaking of corruptive cycles while developing economically, ecologically, and socially sustainable livelihood opportunities; and (4) taking the continuous reproduction of illegal activities into account while clarifying responsibilities, raising awareness, and breaking corruptive cycles. The results of our research therefore not only contribute to a better understanding of conflicts in the MAP region and the wider scientific literature on social-ecological conflicts and governance, but it is also the first paper that identifies entry points and prerequisites for the transformation from reactive to reflexive institutions in Amazonian societies.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14116520</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-5432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9682-8093</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2022-06, Vol.14 (11), p.6520 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2674417316 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Biodiversity Bolivia Brazil Comparative analysis Crime Ecological risk assessment Ecology Germany Gold mines & mining Institutions Israel Land tenure Land use Literature reviews Natural resources Organized crime Protected areas Protection and preservation Ranching Reflexivity Resilience Sustainability Timber |
title | Conflicts over Land as a Risk for Social-Ecological Resilience: A Transnational Comparative Analysis in the Southwestern Amazon |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A23%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conflicts%20over%20Land%20as%20a%20Risk%20for%20Social-Ecological%20Resilience:%20A%20Transnational%20Comparative%20Analysis%20in%20the%20Southwestern%20Amazon&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Froese,%20Rebecca&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=6520&rft.pages=6520-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14116520&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA784034465%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674417316&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A784034465&rfr_iscdi=true |