Sustainable and Responsible Design Education: Tensions in Transitions

Sustainable and Responsible Design (SRD) harnesses design’s potential to address eco-social problems and in doing so challenge the status quo of design education by reframing the social and ecological consequences, boundaries and agencies of design. This critical and transdisciplinary approach frays...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-06, Vol.14 (11), p.6397
Hauptverfasser: Boehnert, Joanna, Sinclair, Matt, Dewberry, Emma
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page 6397
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Boehnert, Joanna
Sinclair, Matt
Dewberry, Emma
description Sustainable and Responsible Design (SRD) harnesses design’s potential to address eco-social problems and in doing so challenge the status quo of design education by reframing the social and ecological consequences, boundaries and agencies of design. This critical and transdisciplinary approach frays the edges of traditional design disciplines with embedded and reflexive modes of learning. We describe characteristics of SRD education and present theories of learning to empower students in this complex terrain. The learning associated with SRD education is ecologically engaged, participative, critical, expansive and designerly. We recount case studies of our own experiences advancing sustainable and responsible undergraduate design education in the UK. We identify path constraints such as disciplinary fragility, appropriation, and power dynamics in the design school. The push for a revision of priorities generates tensions where there is often greenwashing rhetoric of sustainability and inclusivity. We describe strategies and tactics to address these tensions. We highlight the agency we have as educators and designers and argue that design education can only meaningfully participate in response to the challenges presented by climate change, other types of ecocide, and social problems when educators make substantive commitments to supporting sustainability literacies and design approaches that serve the interests of diverse stakeholders.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su14116397
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2674416808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A784034300</galeid><sourcerecordid>A784034300</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-857e81ac1fc4ae5c03302c1c9e0f148762e5a7a0036863bd25a44af52e5d69363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkVFLwzAQx4MoOOZe_AQFnxQ6kyZNWt_GrDoYCNt8Drf0OjK2dCYt6Lc3Y4Lu8nC5__2S-8MRcsvomPOSPoaeCcYkL9UFGWRUsZTRnF7-u1-TUQhbGoNzVjI5INWyDx1YB-sdJuDqZIHh0Lpgj_UzBrtxSVX3BjrbuqdkhbEV24l1ycpDLI56uCFXDewCjn7zkHy8VKvpWzp_f51NJ_PU8Ex1aZErLBgY1hgBmJvogmaGmRJpw0ShZIY5KIjuZCH5us5yEAKaPMq1LLnkQ3J3-vfg288eQ6e3be9dHKkzqYRgsqBFpMYnagM71NY1befBxFPj3prWYWOjPlGFoFzwOG1I7s8eRKbDr24DfQh6tlycsw8n1vg2BI-NPni7B_-tGdXHNei_NfAfbkd3fA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674416808</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainable and Responsible Design Education: Tensions in Transitions</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Boehnert, Joanna ; Sinclair, Matt ; Dewberry, Emma</creator><creatorcontrib>Boehnert, Joanna ; Sinclair, Matt ; Dewberry, Emma</creatorcontrib><description>Sustainable and Responsible Design (SRD) harnesses design’s potential to address eco-social problems and in doing so challenge the status quo of design education by reframing the social and ecological consequences, boundaries and agencies of design. This critical and transdisciplinary approach frays the edges of traditional design disciplines with embedded and reflexive modes of learning. We describe characteristics of SRD education and present theories of learning to empower students in this complex terrain. The learning associated with SRD education is ecologically engaged, participative, critical, expansive and designerly. We recount case studies of our own experiences advancing sustainable and responsible undergraduate design education in the UK. We identify path constraints such as disciplinary fragility, appropriation, and power dynamics in the design school. The push for a revision of priorities generates tensions where there is often greenwashing rhetoric of sustainability and inclusivity. We describe strategies and tactics to address these tensions. We highlight the agency we have as educators and designers and argue that design education can only meaningfully participate in response to the challenges presented by climate change, other types of ecocide, and social problems when educators make substantive commitments to supporting sustainability literacies and design approaches that serve the interests of diverse stakeholders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14116397</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Climate change ; Climatic changes ; Councils ; Design ; Designers ; Education ; Education of women ; Explicit knowledge ; Fragility ; Greenwashing ; Harnesses ; Learning ; Literacy ; Skills ; Social conditions ; Students ; Sustainability ; Sustainable design ; Sustainable development ; Tactics ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-06, Vol.14 (11), p.6397</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-857e81ac1fc4ae5c03302c1c9e0f148762e5a7a0036863bd25a44af52e5d69363</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6427-134X ; 0000-0002-8990-0325 ; 0000-0003-2647-7299</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boehnert, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewberry, Emma</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainable and Responsible Design Education: Tensions in Transitions</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Sustainable and Responsible Design (SRD) harnesses design’s potential to address eco-social problems and in doing so challenge the status quo of design education by reframing the social and ecological consequences, boundaries and agencies of design. This critical and transdisciplinary approach frays the edges of traditional design disciplines with embedded and reflexive modes of learning. We describe characteristics of SRD education and present theories of learning to empower students in this complex terrain. The learning associated with SRD education is ecologically engaged, participative, critical, expansive and designerly. We recount case studies of our own experiences advancing sustainable and responsible undergraduate design education in the UK. We identify path constraints such as disciplinary fragility, appropriation, and power dynamics in the design school. The push for a revision of priorities generates tensions where there is often greenwashing rhetoric of sustainability and inclusivity. We describe strategies and tactics to address these tensions. We highlight the agency we have as educators and designers and argue that design education can only meaningfully participate in response to the challenges presented by climate change, other types of ecocide, and social problems when educators make substantive commitments to supporting sustainability literacies and design approaches that serve the interests of diverse stakeholders.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Designers</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education of women</subject><subject>Explicit knowledge</subject><subject>Fragility</subject><subject>Greenwashing</subject><subject>Harnesses</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Social conditions</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable design</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Tactics</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkVFLwzAQx4MoOOZe_AQFnxQ6kyZNWt_GrDoYCNt8Drf0OjK2dCYt6Lc3Y4Lu8nC5__2S-8MRcsvomPOSPoaeCcYkL9UFGWRUsZTRnF7-u1-TUQhbGoNzVjI5INWyDx1YB-sdJuDqZIHh0Lpgj_UzBrtxSVX3BjrbuqdkhbEV24l1ycpDLI56uCFXDewCjn7zkHy8VKvpWzp_f51NJ_PU8Ex1aZErLBgY1hgBmJvogmaGmRJpw0ShZIY5KIjuZCH5us5yEAKaPMq1LLnkQ3J3-vfg288eQ6e3be9dHKkzqYRgsqBFpMYnagM71NY1befBxFPj3prWYWOjPlGFoFzwOG1I7s8eRKbDr24DfQh6tlycsw8n1vg2BI-NPni7B_-tGdXHNei_NfAfbkd3fA</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Boehnert, Joanna</creator><creator>Sinclair, Matt</creator><creator>Dewberry, Emma</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6427-134X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8990-0325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2647-7299</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Sustainable and Responsible Design Education: Tensions in Transitions</title><author>Boehnert, Joanna ; Sinclair, Matt ; Dewberry, Emma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-857e81ac1fc4ae5c03302c1c9e0f148762e5a7a0036863bd25a44af52e5d69363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Designers</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education of women</topic><topic>Explicit knowledge</topic><topic>Fragility</topic><topic>Greenwashing</topic><topic>Harnesses</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Social conditions</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable design</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Tactics</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boehnert, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewberry, Emma</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boehnert, Joanna</au><au>Sinclair, Matt</au><au>Dewberry, Emma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainable and Responsible Design Education: Tensions in Transitions</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>6397</spage><pages>6397-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Sustainable and Responsible Design (SRD) harnesses design’s potential to address eco-social problems and in doing so challenge the status quo of design education by reframing the social and ecological consequences, boundaries and agencies of design. This critical and transdisciplinary approach frays the edges of traditional design disciplines with embedded and reflexive modes of learning. We describe characteristics of SRD education and present theories of learning to empower students in this complex terrain. The learning associated with SRD education is ecologically engaged, participative, critical, expansive and designerly. We recount case studies of our own experiences advancing sustainable and responsible undergraduate design education in the UK. We identify path constraints such as disciplinary fragility, appropriation, and power dynamics in the design school. The push for a revision of priorities generates tensions where there is often greenwashing rhetoric of sustainability and inclusivity. We describe strategies and tactics to address these tensions. We highlight the agency we have as educators and designers and argue that design education can only meaningfully participate in response to the challenges presented by climate change, other types of ecocide, and social problems when educators make substantive commitments to supporting sustainability literacies and design approaches that serve the interests of diverse stakeholders.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14116397</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6427-134X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8990-0325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2647-7299</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-06, Vol.14 (11), p.6397
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2674416808
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Case studies
Climate change
Climatic changes
Councils
Design
Designers
Education
Education of women
Explicit knowledge
Fragility
Greenwashing
Harnesses
Learning
Literacy
Skills
Social conditions
Students
Sustainability
Sustainable design
Sustainable development
Tactics
Teachers
title Sustainable and Responsible Design Education: Tensions in Transitions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A13%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainable%20and%20Responsible%20Design%20Education:%20Tensions%20in%20Transitions&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Boehnert,%20Joanna&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=6397&rft.pages=6397-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14116397&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA784034300%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674416808&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A784034300&rfr_iscdi=true