Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale
In this work, I argue that hegemonic AI is becoming a more powerful force capable of perpetrating global violence through three epistemic processes: datafication (extraction and dispossession), algorithmisation (mediation and governmentality) and automation (violence, inequality and displacement of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Media, culture & society culture & society, 2022-05, Vol.44 (4), p.726-745 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 745 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 726 |
container_title | Media, culture & society |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Ricaurte, Paola |
description | In this work, I argue that hegemonic AI is becoming a more powerful force capable of perpetrating global violence through three epistemic processes: datafication (extraction and dispossession), algorithmisation (mediation and governmentality) and automation (violence, inequality and displacement of responsibility). These articulated epistemic mechanisms lead to global classification orders and epistemic, economic, social, cultural and environmental inequality. Hegemonic AI can be thought of as a bio-necro-technopolitical machine that serves to maintain the capitalist, colonialist and patriarchal order of the world. To make this point, the proposed approach bridges the macro and micropolitical, building on Suely Rolnik’s call for understanding the effects of the macropolitical in the micropolitical, as well as what feminist black scholar Patricia Hill Collins made visible about oppressive systems operating at the structural, institutional and individual levels. A critical AI ethics is one that is concerned with the preservation of life and the coresponsibility of AI harms to the majority of the planet. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/01634437221099612 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2674272328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_01634437221099612</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2674272328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-bfecb8182b16feff37113c1538edfd8766f5a8db1438183e754b392899cbb6ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EEqXwA9gsMaf42Y7tsFVVaStVYoE5sh2bpkrjYqeg_nvSBokBMb3hvrt7OoTugUwApHwkIBjnTFIKpCgE0As0Ai5IxoTML9HopGcn4BrdpLQlhFBO2Qgt5t2mtgn7EHG3cXintyHW3RF_hdhUT3i6wrqtztLHwaWuDi0OHn_WoXGtdVh3OFnduFt05XWT3N3PHaO35_nrbJmtXxar2XSdWaryLjPeWaNAUQPCO--ZBGAWcqZc5SslhfC5VpUBznqKOZlzwwqqisIaI5xnY_Qw5O5jOD9UbsMhtn1lSYXkVFJGVU_BQNkYUorOl_tY73Q8lkDK017ln716z2TwJP3uflP_N3wDV85pHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674272328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Ricaurte, Paola</creator><creatorcontrib>Ricaurte, Paola</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, I argue that hegemonic AI is becoming a more powerful force capable of perpetrating global violence through three epistemic processes: datafication (extraction and dispossession), algorithmisation (mediation and governmentality) and automation (violence, inequality and displacement of responsibility). These articulated epistemic mechanisms lead to global classification orders and epistemic, economic, social, cultural and environmental inequality. Hegemonic AI can be thought of as a bio-necro-technopolitical machine that serves to maintain the capitalist, colonialist and patriarchal order of the world. To make this point, the proposed approach bridges the macro and micropolitical, building on Suely Rolnik’s call for understanding the effects of the macropolitical in the micropolitical, as well as what feminist black scholar Patricia Hill Collins made visible about oppressive systems operating at the structural, institutional and individual levels. A critical AI ethics is one that is concerned with the preservation of life and the coresponsibility of AI harms to the majority of the planet.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-4437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3675</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/01634437221099612</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Automation ; Capitalism ; Classification ; Collins, Patricia Hill ; Epistemology ; Ethics ; Extraction ; Feminism ; Governmentality ; Hegemony ; Inequality ; Preservation ; Social inequality ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Media, culture & society, 2022-05, Vol.44 (4), p.726-745</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-bfecb8182b16feff37113c1538edfd8766f5a8db1438183e754b392899cbb6ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-bfecb8182b16feff37113c1538edfd8766f5a8db1438183e754b392899cbb6ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9952-6659</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01634437221099612$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01634437221099612$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21810,27915,27916,33765,43612,43613</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ricaurte, Paola</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale</title><title>Media, culture & society</title><description>In this work, I argue that hegemonic AI is becoming a more powerful force capable of perpetrating global violence through three epistemic processes: datafication (extraction and dispossession), algorithmisation (mediation and governmentality) and automation (violence, inequality and displacement of responsibility). These articulated epistemic mechanisms lead to global classification orders and epistemic, economic, social, cultural and environmental inequality. Hegemonic AI can be thought of as a bio-necro-technopolitical machine that serves to maintain the capitalist, colonialist and patriarchal order of the world. To make this point, the proposed approach bridges the macro and micropolitical, building on Suely Rolnik’s call for understanding the effects of the macropolitical in the micropolitical, as well as what feminist black scholar Patricia Hill Collins made visible about oppressive systems operating at the structural, institutional and individual levels. A critical AI ethics is one that is concerned with the preservation of life and the coresponsibility of AI harms to the majority of the planet.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Collins, Patricia Hill</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Governmentality</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Social inequality</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0163-4437</issn><issn>1460-3675</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EEqXwA9gsMaf42Y7tsFVVaStVYoE5sh2bpkrjYqeg_nvSBokBMb3hvrt7OoTugUwApHwkIBjnTFIKpCgE0As0Ai5IxoTML9HopGcn4BrdpLQlhFBO2Qgt5t2mtgn7EHG3cXintyHW3RF_hdhUT3i6wrqtztLHwaWuDi0OHn_WoXGtdVh3OFnduFt05XWT3N3PHaO35_nrbJmtXxar2XSdWaryLjPeWaNAUQPCO--ZBGAWcqZc5SslhfC5VpUBznqKOZlzwwqqisIaI5xnY_Qw5O5jOD9UbsMhtn1lSYXkVFJGVU_BQNkYUorOl_tY73Q8lkDK017ln716z2TwJP3uflP_N3wDV85pHA</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Ricaurte, Paola</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-6659</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale</title><author>Ricaurte, Paola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-bfecb8182b16feff37113c1538edfd8766f5a8db1438183e754b392899cbb6ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Collins, Patricia Hill</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Governmentality</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Social inequality</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ricaurte, Paola</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Media, culture & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ricaurte, Paola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale</atitle><jtitle>Media, culture & society</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>726</spage><epage>745</epage><pages>726-745</pages><issn>0163-4437</issn><eissn>1460-3675</eissn><abstract>In this work, I argue that hegemonic AI is becoming a more powerful force capable of perpetrating global violence through three epistemic processes: datafication (extraction and dispossession), algorithmisation (mediation and governmentality) and automation (violence, inequality and displacement of responsibility). These articulated epistemic mechanisms lead to global classification orders and epistemic, economic, social, cultural and environmental inequality. Hegemonic AI can be thought of as a bio-necro-technopolitical machine that serves to maintain the capitalist, colonialist and patriarchal order of the world. To make this point, the proposed approach bridges the macro and micropolitical, building on Suely Rolnik’s call for understanding the effects of the macropolitical in the micropolitical, as well as what feminist black scholar Patricia Hill Collins made visible about oppressive systems operating at the structural, institutional and individual levels. A critical AI ethics is one that is concerned with the preservation of life and the coresponsibility of AI harms to the majority of the planet.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/01634437221099612</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-6659</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0163-4437 |
ispartof | Media, culture & society, 2022-05, Vol.44 (4), p.726-745 |
issn | 0163-4437 1460-3675 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2674272328 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Artificial intelligence Automation Capitalism Classification Collins, Patricia Hill Epistemology Ethics Extraction Feminism Governmentality Hegemony Inequality Preservation Social inequality Violence |
title | Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A35%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics%20for%20the%20majority%20world:%20AI%20and%20the%20question%20of%20violence%20at%20scale&rft.jtitle=Media,%20culture%20&%20society&rft.au=Ricaurte,%20Paola&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=726&rft.epage=745&rft.pages=726-745&rft.issn=0163-4437&rft.eissn=1460-3675&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/01634437221099612&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2674272328%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674272328&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_01634437221099612&rfr_iscdi=true |