Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale

In this work, I argue that hegemonic AI is becoming a more powerful force capable of perpetrating global violence through three epistemic processes: datafication (extraction and dispossession), algorithmisation (mediation and governmentality) and automation (violence, inequality and displacement of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Media, culture & society culture & society, 2022-05, Vol.44 (4), p.726-745
1. Verfasser: Ricaurte, Paola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 745
container_issue 4
container_start_page 726
container_title Media, culture & society
container_volume 44
creator Ricaurte, Paola
description In this work, I argue that hegemonic AI is becoming a more powerful force capable of perpetrating global violence through three epistemic processes: datafication (extraction and dispossession), algorithmisation (mediation and governmentality) and automation (violence, inequality and displacement of responsibility). These articulated epistemic mechanisms lead to global classification orders and epistemic, economic, social, cultural and environmental inequality. Hegemonic AI can be thought of as a bio-necro-technopolitical machine that serves to maintain the capitalist, colonialist and patriarchal order of the world. To make this point, the proposed approach bridges the macro and micropolitical, building on Suely Rolnik’s call for understanding the effects of the macropolitical in the micropolitical, as well as what feminist black scholar Patricia Hill Collins made visible about oppressive systems operating at the structural, institutional and individual levels. A critical AI ethics is one that is concerned with the preservation of life and the coresponsibility of AI harms to the majority of the planet.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/01634437221099612
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2674272328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_01634437221099612</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2674272328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-bfecb8182b16feff37113c1538edfd8766f5a8db1438183e754b392899cbb6ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EEqXwA9gsMaf42Y7tsFVVaStVYoE5sh2bpkrjYqeg_nvSBokBMb3hvrt7OoTugUwApHwkIBjnTFIKpCgE0As0Ai5IxoTML9HopGcn4BrdpLQlhFBO2Qgt5t2mtgn7EHG3cXintyHW3RF_hdhUT3i6wrqtztLHwaWuDi0OHn_WoXGtdVh3OFnduFt05XWT3N3PHaO35_nrbJmtXxar2XSdWaryLjPeWaNAUQPCO--ZBGAWcqZc5SslhfC5VpUBznqKOZlzwwqqisIaI5xnY_Qw5O5jOD9UbsMhtn1lSYXkVFJGVU_BQNkYUorOl_tY73Q8lkDK017ln716z2TwJP3uflP_N3wDV85pHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674272328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Ricaurte, Paola</creator><creatorcontrib>Ricaurte, Paola</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, I argue that hegemonic AI is becoming a more powerful force capable of perpetrating global violence through three epistemic processes: datafication (extraction and dispossession), algorithmisation (mediation and governmentality) and automation (violence, inequality and displacement of responsibility). These articulated epistemic mechanisms lead to global classification orders and epistemic, economic, social, cultural and environmental inequality. Hegemonic AI can be thought of as a bio-necro-technopolitical machine that serves to maintain the capitalist, colonialist and patriarchal order of the world. To make this point, the proposed approach bridges the macro and micropolitical, building on Suely Rolnik’s call for understanding the effects of the macropolitical in the micropolitical, as well as what feminist black scholar Patricia Hill Collins made visible about oppressive systems operating at the structural, institutional and individual levels. A critical AI ethics is one that is concerned with the preservation of life and the coresponsibility of AI harms to the majority of the planet.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-4437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3675</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/01634437221099612</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Automation ; Capitalism ; Classification ; Collins, Patricia Hill ; Epistemology ; Ethics ; Extraction ; Feminism ; Governmentality ; Hegemony ; Inequality ; Preservation ; Social inequality ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Media, culture &amp; society, 2022-05, Vol.44 (4), p.726-745</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-bfecb8182b16feff37113c1538edfd8766f5a8db1438183e754b392899cbb6ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-bfecb8182b16feff37113c1538edfd8766f5a8db1438183e754b392899cbb6ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9952-6659</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01634437221099612$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01634437221099612$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21810,27915,27916,33765,43612,43613</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ricaurte, Paola</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale</title><title>Media, culture &amp; society</title><description>In this work, I argue that hegemonic AI is becoming a more powerful force capable of perpetrating global violence through three epistemic processes: datafication (extraction and dispossession), algorithmisation (mediation and governmentality) and automation (violence, inequality and displacement of responsibility). These articulated epistemic mechanisms lead to global classification orders and epistemic, economic, social, cultural and environmental inequality. Hegemonic AI can be thought of as a bio-necro-technopolitical machine that serves to maintain the capitalist, colonialist and patriarchal order of the world. To make this point, the proposed approach bridges the macro and micropolitical, building on Suely Rolnik’s call for understanding the effects of the macropolitical in the micropolitical, as well as what feminist black scholar Patricia Hill Collins made visible about oppressive systems operating at the structural, institutional and individual levels. A critical AI ethics is one that is concerned with the preservation of life and the coresponsibility of AI harms to the majority of the planet.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Collins, Patricia Hill</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Governmentality</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Social inequality</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0163-4437</issn><issn>1460-3675</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EEqXwA9gsMaf42Y7tsFVVaStVYoE5sh2bpkrjYqeg_nvSBokBMb3hvrt7OoTugUwApHwkIBjnTFIKpCgE0As0Ai5IxoTML9HopGcn4BrdpLQlhFBO2Qgt5t2mtgn7EHG3cXintyHW3RF_hdhUT3i6wrqtztLHwaWuDi0OHn_WoXGtdVh3OFnduFt05XWT3N3PHaO35_nrbJmtXxar2XSdWaryLjPeWaNAUQPCO--ZBGAWcqZc5SslhfC5VpUBznqKOZlzwwqqisIaI5xnY_Qw5O5jOD9UbsMhtn1lSYXkVFJGVU_BQNkYUorOl_tY73Q8lkDK017ln716z2TwJP3uflP_N3wDV85pHA</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Ricaurte, Paola</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-6659</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale</title><author>Ricaurte, Paola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-bfecb8182b16feff37113c1538edfd8766f5a8db1438183e754b392899cbb6ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Collins, Patricia Hill</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Governmentality</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Social inequality</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ricaurte, Paola</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Media, culture &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ricaurte, Paola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale</atitle><jtitle>Media, culture &amp; society</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>726</spage><epage>745</epage><pages>726-745</pages><issn>0163-4437</issn><eissn>1460-3675</eissn><abstract>In this work, I argue that hegemonic AI is becoming a more powerful force capable of perpetrating global violence through three epistemic processes: datafication (extraction and dispossession), algorithmisation (mediation and governmentality) and automation (violence, inequality and displacement of responsibility). These articulated epistemic mechanisms lead to global classification orders and epistemic, economic, social, cultural and environmental inequality. Hegemonic AI can be thought of as a bio-necro-technopolitical machine that serves to maintain the capitalist, colonialist and patriarchal order of the world. To make this point, the proposed approach bridges the macro and micropolitical, building on Suely Rolnik’s call for understanding the effects of the macropolitical in the micropolitical, as well as what feminist black scholar Patricia Hill Collins made visible about oppressive systems operating at the structural, institutional and individual levels. A critical AI ethics is one that is concerned with the preservation of life and the coresponsibility of AI harms to the majority of the planet.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/01634437221099612</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-6659</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-4437
ispartof Media, culture & society, 2022-05, Vol.44 (4), p.726-745
issn 0163-4437
1460-3675
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2674272328
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Artificial intelligence
Automation
Capitalism
Classification
Collins, Patricia Hill
Epistemology
Ethics
Extraction
Feminism
Governmentality
Hegemony
Inequality
Preservation
Social inequality
Violence
title Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A35%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics%20for%20the%20majority%20world:%20AI%20and%20the%20question%20of%20violence%20at%20scale&rft.jtitle=Media,%20culture%20&%20society&rft.au=Ricaurte,%20Paola&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=726&rft.epage=745&rft.pages=726-745&rft.issn=0163-4437&rft.eissn=1460-3675&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/01634437221099612&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2674272328%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674272328&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_01634437221099612&rfr_iscdi=true