Politics, Markets, and Pandemics: Public Education’s Response to COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to examine how local governments respond to a public health crisis amid high levels of partisan polarization. As an arena that has historically been relatively insulated from national partisan cleavages, public schools provide a useful window into...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Perspectives on politics 2022-06, Vol.20 (2), p.457-473 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 473 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 457 |
container_title | Perspectives on politics |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Hartney, Michael T. Finger, Leslie K. |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to examine how local governments respond to a public health crisis amid high levels of partisan polarization. As an arena that has historically been relatively insulated from national partisan cleavages, public schools provide a useful window into understanding the growing nationalization of local politics. Leveraging the fact that all school districts had to adopt a reopening plan in fall 2020, we assess the factors that influenced school district reopening decisions. We find that mass partisanship and vested interests best explain the degree to which schools reopened. Republican (Democratic) districts were far more (less) likely to reopen in person, while districts with stronger unions relied more on remote learning. Notably, we find little connection between reopening decisions and indicators measuring the severity of the virus. Finally, public schools were sensitive to the threat of student exit. Districts located in counties with more Catholic schools were somewhat more likely to reopen in person. We assess the implications of these findings for U.S. education policy and the study of local government more generally. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1537592721000955 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2674217530</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1537592721000955</cupid><sourcerecordid>2674217530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2755-35f32bb5dcef0645cff4d59cf129f201bcfa5a8725dd7214e8123bd2b3065b733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPElYAf2TjhhkqBiqJWvK6RnygljYudHLjxG_weX0KqVuKAuOyOdmdmtYPQMSVnlFBx_kiBCyiYYJQQUgDsoAGFlCakyLPdNeYiWe_30UGMC0IY4yQfoLu5r6u20vEU38vwZtseyMbgeV_ssp9f4Hmn6krjsem0bCvffH9-Rfxg48o30eLW49HsZXKV0OIQ7TlZR3u07UP0fD1-Gt0m09nNZHQ5TTQTAAkHx5lSYLR1JEtBO5caKLSjrHCMUKWdBJkLBsb076Q2p4wrwxQnGSjB-RCdbHxXwb93Nrblwneh6U-WLBMpowI46Vl0w9LBxxisK1ehWsrwUVJSrjMr_2TWa_hWI5cqVObV_lr_r_oBiThsfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674217530</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Politics, Markets, and Pandemics: Public Education’s Response to COVID-19</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Hartney, Michael T. ; Finger, Leslie K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hartney, Michael T. ; Finger, Leslie K.</creatorcontrib><description>The COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to examine how local governments respond to a public health crisis amid high levels of partisan polarization. As an arena that has historically been relatively insulated from national partisan cleavages, public schools provide a useful window into understanding the growing nationalization of local politics. Leveraging the fact that all school districts had to adopt a reopening plan in fall 2020, we assess the factors that influenced school district reopening decisions. We find that mass partisanship and vested interests best explain the degree to which schools reopened. Republican (Democratic) districts were far more (less) likely to reopen in person, while districts with stronger unions relied more on remote learning. Notably, we find little connection between reopening decisions and indicators measuring the severity of the virus. Finally, public schools were sensitive to the threat of student exit. Districts located in counties with more Catholic schools were somewhat more likely to reopen in person. We assess the implications of these findings for U.S. education policy and the study of local government more generally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1537-5927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1537592721000955</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Catholic schools ; Catholics ; Coronaviruses ; Counties ; COVID-19 ; Education policy ; Local government ; Local politics ; Nationalization ; Pandemics ; Partisanship ; Polarization ; Public health ; Public schools ; Religious schools ; School districts ; Special Issue Articles: Pandemic Politics ; Trump, Donald J</subject><ispartof>Perspectives on politics, 2022-06, Vol.20 (2), p.457-473</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2755-35f32bb5dcef0645cff4d59cf129f201bcfa5a8725dd7214e8123bd2b3065b733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2755-35f32bb5dcef0645cff4d59cf129f201bcfa5a8725dd7214e8123bd2b3065b733</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7843-5256 ; 0000-0003-1112-2559</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1537592721000955/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,315,781,785,12850,27871,27929,27930,55633</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hartney, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finger, Leslie K.</creatorcontrib><title>Politics, Markets, and Pandemics: Public Education’s Response to COVID-19</title><title>Perspectives on politics</title><addtitle>Perspect. polit</addtitle><description>The COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to examine how local governments respond to a public health crisis amid high levels of partisan polarization. As an arena that has historically been relatively insulated from national partisan cleavages, public schools provide a useful window into understanding the growing nationalization of local politics. Leveraging the fact that all school districts had to adopt a reopening plan in fall 2020, we assess the factors that influenced school district reopening decisions. We find that mass partisanship and vested interests best explain the degree to which schools reopened. Republican (Democratic) districts were far more (less) likely to reopen in person, while districts with stronger unions relied more on remote learning. Notably, we find little connection between reopening decisions and indicators measuring the severity of the virus. Finally, public schools were sensitive to the threat of student exit. Districts located in counties with more Catholic schools were somewhat more likely to reopen in person. We assess the implications of these findings for U.S. education policy and the study of local government more generally.</description><subject>Catholic schools</subject><subject>Catholics</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>Counties</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Local politics</subject><subject>Nationalization</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public schools</subject><subject>Religious schools</subject><subject>School districts</subject><subject>Special Issue Articles: Pandemic Politics</subject><subject>Trump, Donald J</subject><issn>1537-5927</issn><issn>1541-0986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPElYAf2TjhhkqBiqJWvK6RnygljYudHLjxG_weX0KqVuKAuOyOdmdmtYPQMSVnlFBx_kiBCyiYYJQQUgDsoAGFlCakyLPdNeYiWe_30UGMC0IY4yQfoLu5r6u20vEU38vwZtseyMbgeV_ssp9f4Hmn6krjsem0bCvffH9-Rfxg48o30eLW49HsZXKV0OIQ7TlZR3u07UP0fD1-Gt0m09nNZHQ5TTQTAAkHx5lSYLR1JEtBO5caKLSjrHCMUKWdBJkLBsb076Q2p4wrwxQnGSjB-RCdbHxXwb93Nrblwneh6U-WLBMpowI46Vl0w9LBxxisK1ehWsrwUVJSrjMr_2TWa_hWI5cqVObV_lr_r_oBiThsfw</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Hartney, Michael T.</creator><creator>Finger, Leslie K.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7843-5256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-2559</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Politics, Markets, and Pandemics: Public Education’s Response to COVID-19</title><author>Hartney, Michael T. ; Finger, Leslie K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2755-35f32bb5dcef0645cff4d59cf129f201bcfa5a8725dd7214e8123bd2b3065b733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Catholic schools</topic><topic>Catholics</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>Counties</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Local politics</topic><topic>Nationalization</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public schools</topic><topic>Religious schools</topic><topic>School districts</topic><topic>Special Issue Articles: Pandemic Politics</topic><topic>Trump, Donald J</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hartney, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finger, Leslie K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hartney, Michael T.</au><au>Finger, Leslie K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Politics, Markets, and Pandemics: Public Education’s Response to COVID-19</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on politics</jtitle><addtitle>Perspect. polit</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>457</spage><epage>473</epage><pages>457-473</pages><issn>1537-5927</issn><eissn>1541-0986</eissn><abstract>The COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to examine how local governments respond to a public health crisis amid high levels of partisan polarization. As an arena that has historically been relatively insulated from national partisan cleavages, public schools provide a useful window into understanding the growing nationalization of local politics. Leveraging the fact that all school districts had to adopt a reopening plan in fall 2020, we assess the factors that influenced school district reopening decisions. We find that mass partisanship and vested interests best explain the degree to which schools reopened. Republican (Democratic) districts were far more (less) likely to reopen in person, while districts with stronger unions relied more on remote learning. Notably, we find little connection between reopening decisions and indicators measuring the severity of the virus. Finally, public schools were sensitive to the threat of student exit. Districts located in counties with more Catholic schools were somewhat more likely to reopen in person. We assess the implications of these findings for U.S. education policy and the study of local government more generally.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1537592721000955</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7843-5256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-2559</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1537-5927 |
ispartof | Perspectives on politics, 2022-06, Vol.20 (2), p.457-473 |
issn | 1537-5927 1541-0986 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2674217530 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Catholic schools Catholics Coronaviruses Counties COVID-19 Education policy Local government Local politics Nationalization Pandemics Partisanship Polarization Public health Public schools Religious schools School districts Special Issue Articles: Pandemic Politics Trump, Donald J |
title | Politics, Markets, and Pandemics: Public Education’s Response to COVID-19 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T20%3A25%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Politics,%20Markets,%20and%20Pandemics:%20Public%20Education%E2%80%99s%20Response%20to%20COVID-19&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20politics&rft.au=Hartney,%20Michael%20T.&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=457&rft.epage=473&rft.pages=457-473&rft.issn=1537-5927&rft.eissn=1541-0986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1537592721000955&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2674217530%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674217530&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1537592721000955&rfr_iscdi=true |