MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ABILITY OF MIXED-OWNERSHIP REFORM ENTERPRISES: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA

With the deepening of mixed ownership economy, good corporate governance ability has become an important guarantee for the growth and development of an enterprise, and therefore the governance ability of the mixed-ownership reform enterprises needs to be accurately identified. To evaluate the govern...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS 2022-01, Vol.21 (2), p.233
Hauptverfasser: Du, Yunchao, Wang, Renxiang, Li, Mingwei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 233
container_title TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS
container_volume 21
creator Du, Yunchao
Wang, Renxiang
Li, Mingwei
description With the deepening of mixed ownership economy, good corporate governance ability has become an important guarantee for the growth and development of an enterprise, and therefore the governance ability of the mixed-ownership reform enterprises needs to be accurately identified. To evaluate the governance capacity of the mixed-ownership reform enterprises, a measurement system including 16 second-level indicators and 53 third-level indicators was constructed from four aspects of resource integration ability, organizational remodelling ability, relationship coordination ability, and internal and external supervision ability. Using the data of listed companies in Zhejiang, China in 2020 and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, the corporate governance capability of the mixed-ownership reform enterprise was measured from three dimensions of the listed sector, regional distribution, and industry category. Results show that the corporate governance ability of mixed-ownership reform enterprises on the small and medium-sized board is superior to that of the mainboard. Comparing the difference in levels within cities, it can be concluded that internal differences from big to small, respectively are Hangzhou > Quzhou> Ningbo > Shaoxing > Taizhou > Jinhua > Jiaxing > Wenzhou = Huzhou. Most industries in Zhejiang of China have good corporate governance systems, and only a few industries have deficiencies. From the perspective of variance, except for the computer, medicine biological, real estate, and construction industries, other industries have a small gap and relatively balanced development. Overall, there are problems such as insufficient resource recognition ability and resource allocation ability, obvious regional differences, and inadequate control of organisational remodeling ability. Conclusions obtained from this study have theoretical implications for improving the corporate governance ability of mixed-ownership reform enterprises .
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2674046799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2674046799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p146t-ba4c75eff8699779eb2448d571757f2f3fe98a221571acd79ed89ef6c7df8ee03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjV1rwjAYhcvYYOL8D4FdF9IkzcfusvpWA20iaXXuSqpNLmRMZ_X_r7JdHTgfz3lIJiSnMpWCbB-TScaZTBnj-DmZDcMRY0xpxjCVk-RWg27WHmqwLdJ2jmCjq7VujbPIlahwfuW8bgEt3Aa81bYApN9NZdrPe16bLcxT92HBN0uzQh5K52s0wsCvvGmgeRuJZg73XeldjYqlsfoleYrd1xBm_zpN1iW0xTKt3MIUukrPGePXdN-xg8hDjJIrJYQKe8KY7HORiVxEEmkMSnaEZKPTHfqx0EsVIj-IPsoQMJ0mr3_c8-X0cwvDdXc83S7f4-WOcMEw40Ip-gtidE_m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674046799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ABILITY OF MIXED-OWNERSHIP REFORM ENTERPRISES: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Du, Yunchao ; Wang, Renxiang ; Li, Mingwei</creator><creatorcontrib>Du, Yunchao ; Wang, Renxiang ; Li, Mingwei</creatorcontrib><description>With the deepening of mixed ownership economy, good corporate governance ability has become an important guarantee for the growth and development of an enterprise, and therefore the governance ability of the mixed-ownership reform enterprises needs to be accurately identified. To evaluate the governance capacity of the mixed-ownership reform enterprises, a measurement system including 16 second-level indicators and 53 third-level indicators was constructed from four aspects of resource integration ability, organizational remodelling ability, relationship coordination ability, and internal and external supervision ability. Using the data of listed companies in Zhejiang, China in 2020 and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, the corporate governance capability of the mixed-ownership reform enterprise was measured from three dimensions of the listed sector, regional distribution, and industry category. Results show that the corporate governance ability of mixed-ownership reform enterprises on the small and medium-sized board is superior to that of the mainboard. Comparing the difference in levels within cities, it can be concluded that internal differences from big to small, respectively are Hangzhou &gt; Quzhou&gt; Ningbo &gt; Shaoxing &gt; Taizhou &gt; Jinhua &gt; Jiaxing &gt; Wenzhou = Huzhou. Most industries in Zhejiang of China have good corporate governance systems, and only a few industries have deficiencies. From the perspective of variance, except for the computer, medicine biological, real estate, and construction industries, other industries have a small gap and relatively balanced development. Overall, there are problems such as insufficient resource recognition ability and resource allocation ability, obvious regional differences, and inadequate control of organisational remodeling ability. Conclusions obtained from this study have theoretical implications for improving the corporate governance ability of mixed-ownership reform enterprises .</description><identifier>ISSN: 1648-4460</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2538-872X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kaunas: Vilnius University, Kaunas Faculty of Humanities</publisher><subject>Ability ; Construction industry ; Coordination ; Corporate governance ; Economic development ; Measurement ; Mixed ownership ; Real estate ; Reforms ; Regional variations ; Resource allocation ; Small &amp; medium sized enterprises-SME</subject><ispartof>TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS &amp; ECONOMICS, 2022-01, Vol.21 (2), p.233</ispartof><rights>Copyright Vilnius University, Kaunas Faculty of Humanities 2022</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Du, Yunchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Renxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Mingwei</creatorcontrib><title>MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ABILITY OF MIXED-OWNERSHIP REFORM ENTERPRISES: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA</title><title>TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS &amp; ECONOMICS</title><description>With the deepening of mixed ownership economy, good corporate governance ability has become an important guarantee for the growth and development of an enterprise, and therefore the governance ability of the mixed-ownership reform enterprises needs to be accurately identified. To evaluate the governance capacity of the mixed-ownership reform enterprises, a measurement system including 16 second-level indicators and 53 third-level indicators was constructed from four aspects of resource integration ability, organizational remodelling ability, relationship coordination ability, and internal and external supervision ability. Using the data of listed companies in Zhejiang, China in 2020 and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, the corporate governance capability of the mixed-ownership reform enterprise was measured from three dimensions of the listed sector, regional distribution, and industry category. Results show that the corporate governance ability of mixed-ownership reform enterprises on the small and medium-sized board is superior to that of the mainboard. Comparing the difference in levels within cities, it can be concluded that internal differences from big to small, respectively are Hangzhou &gt; Quzhou&gt; Ningbo &gt; Shaoxing &gt; Taizhou &gt; Jinhua &gt; Jiaxing &gt; Wenzhou = Huzhou. Most industries in Zhejiang of China have good corporate governance systems, and only a few industries have deficiencies. From the perspective of variance, except for the computer, medicine biological, real estate, and construction industries, other industries have a small gap and relatively balanced development. Overall, there are problems such as insufficient resource recognition ability and resource allocation ability, obvious regional differences, and inadequate control of organisational remodeling ability. Conclusions obtained from this study have theoretical implications for improving the corporate governance ability of mixed-ownership reform enterprises .</description><subject>Ability</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mixed ownership</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Regional variations</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Small &amp; medium sized enterprises-SME</subject><issn>1648-4460</issn><issn>2538-872X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjV1rwjAYhcvYYOL8D4FdF9IkzcfusvpWA20iaXXuSqpNLmRMZ_X_r7JdHTgfz3lIJiSnMpWCbB-TScaZTBnj-DmZDcMRY0xpxjCVk-RWg27WHmqwLdJ2jmCjq7VujbPIlahwfuW8bgEt3Aa81bYApN9NZdrPe16bLcxT92HBN0uzQh5K52s0wsCvvGmgeRuJZg73XeldjYqlsfoleYrd1xBm_zpN1iW0xTKt3MIUukrPGePXdN-xg8hDjJIrJYQKe8KY7HORiVxEEmkMSnaEZKPTHfqx0EsVIj-IPsoQMJ0mr3_c8-X0cwvDdXc83S7f4-WOcMEw40Ip-gtidE_m</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Du, Yunchao</creator><creator>Wang, Renxiang</creator><creator>Li, Mingwei</creator><general>Vilnius University, Kaunas Faculty of Humanities</general><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ABILITY OF MIXED-OWNERSHIP REFORM ENTERPRISES: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA</title><author>Du, Yunchao ; Wang, Renxiang ; Li, Mingwei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p146t-ba4c75eff8699779eb2448d571757f2f3fe98a221571acd79ed89ef6c7df8ee03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ability</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mixed ownership</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Regional variations</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Small &amp; medium sized enterprises-SME</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Du, Yunchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Renxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Mingwei</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS &amp; ECONOMICS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Du, Yunchao</au><au>Wang, Renxiang</au><au>Li, Mingwei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ABILITY OF MIXED-OWNERSHIP REFORM ENTERPRISES: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA</atitle><jtitle>TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS &amp; ECONOMICS</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>233</spage><pages>233-</pages><issn>1648-4460</issn><eissn>2538-872X</eissn><abstract>With the deepening of mixed ownership economy, good corporate governance ability has become an important guarantee for the growth and development of an enterprise, and therefore the governance ability of the mixed-ownership reform enterprises needs to be accurately identified. To evaluate the governance capacity of the mixed-ownership reform enterprises, a measurement system including 16 second-level indicators and 53 third-level indicators was constructed from four aspects of resource integration ability, organizational remodelling ability, relationship coordination ability, and internal and external supervision ability. Using the data of listed companies in Zhejiang, China in 2020 and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, the corporate governance capability of the mixed-ownership reform enterprise was measured from three dimensions of the listed sector, regional distribution, and industry category. Results show that the corporate governance ability of mixed-ownership reform enterprises on the small and medium-sized board is superior to that of the mainboard. Comparing the difference in levels within cities, it can be concluded that internal differences from big to small, respectively are Hangzhou &gt; Quzhou&gt; Ningbo &gt; Shaoxing &gt; Taizhou &gt; Jinhua &gt; Jiaxing &gt; Wenzhou = Huzhou. Most industries in Zhejiang of China have good corporate governance systems, and only a few industries have deficiencies. From the perspective of variance, except for the computer, medicine biological, real estate, and construction industries, other industries have a small gap and relatively balanced development. Overall, there are problems such as insufficient resource recognition ability and resource allocation ability, obvious regional differences, and inadequate control of organisational remodeling ability. Conclusions obtained from this study have theoretical implications for improving the corporate governance ability of mixed-ownership reform enterprises .</abstract><cop>Kaunas</cop><pub>Vilnius University, Kaunas Faculty of Humanities</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1648-4460
ispartof TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2022-01, Vol.21 (2), p.233
issn 1648-4460
2538-872X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2674046799
source Business Source Complete
subjects Ability
Construction industry
Coordination
Corporate governance
Economic development
Measurement
Mixed ownership
Real estate
Reforms
Regional variations
Resource allocation
Small & medium sized enterprises-SME
title MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ABILITY OF MIXED-OWNERSHIP REFORM ENTERPRISES: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T12%3A58%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MEASUREMENT%20AND%20EVALUATION%20OF%20CORPORATE%20GOVERNANCE%20ABILITY%20OF%20MIXED-OWNERSHIP%20REFORM%20ENTERPRISES:%20EVIDENCE%20FROM%20CHINA&rft.jtitle=TRANSFORMATIONS%20IN%20BUSINESS%20&%20ECONOMICS&rft.au=Du,%20Yunchao&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=233&rft.pages=233-&rft.issn=1648-4460&rft.eissn=2538-872X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2674046799%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674046799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true