Effect of CPRF on nonlinear seismic response of an NPP structure considering raft-pile-soil-structure-interaction
A number of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) in India are coming up in soft soil condition particularly on alluvium in active seismic zone on Combined Piled-Raft Foundation (CPRF). So far, no study has been reported considering nonlinearity of soil for the NPP structures founded on CPRF considering earth...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) 2022-07, Vol.158, p.107295, Article 107295 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 107295 |
| container_title | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) |
| container_volume | 158 |
| creator | Firoj, Mohd Maheshwari, B.K. |
| description | A number of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) in India are coming up in soft soil condition particularly on alluvium in active seismic zone on Combined Piled-Raft Foundation (CPRF). So far, no study has been reported considering nonlinearity of soil for the NPP structures founded on CPRF considering earthquake loads.
In the present study, the dynamic responses of raft, pile group and CPRF of a NPP are investigated by simulating the nonlinear finite element model. The effects of nonreflecting boundary condition, pile-soil-interaction by the embedded constraint, raft-pile interaction by the tie constraint and raft-soil-interaction by the penalty constraint, were considered. The material nonlinearity of soil was taken into account using an advanced constitutive model Drucker-Prager with cap plasticity. The geometrical nonlinearity is also considered using the concept of the contact surface. Thus, a complete 3D finite element numerical model of a nuclear structure considering raft-pile-soil-structure interaction (RPSSI) for nonlinear seismic analysis is developed. The validation is carried out by comparing the results from the present study with experimental and numerical results available in the literature. Nonlinear analyses of raft, pile group and CPRF in the time domain finite element formulation carried out and results are compared with that using the linear analysis.
A comparison of two analyses shows that linear analysis underestimates the response of soil, piles and structure. The effect of type of boundary used in the analyses is significant. It was also observed that the response of NPP structure is significantly affected by the type of foundation used under the superstructure. The effect of SSI is examined with two major novelty i.e. (a) Effect of CPRF (b) Consideration of Nonlinearity of Soil. Effect of frequency of excitation and PGA of earthquake motion is examined. This study indicates the importance of CPRF over the raft foundation and pile group foundation for the design of nuclear power plants. Also, it examines the effects of nonlinearity on the response.
•Advantage of using Combined Pile-Raft-Foundation (CPRF) for Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Structures.•Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of a Nuclear Power Plant founded on CPRF for Seismic Loads. Consideration of Raft-Pile-Soil-Structure Interaction (RPSSI).•Effects of Geometrical and Soil Nonlinearity on the response of Structure and of Foundation.•Comparison of Response of NPP Structure fo |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107295 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2672768538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0267726122001440</els_id><sourcerecordid>2672768538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a290t-d04f04f2059119315de4fe18cbb4829c6f84cb5b77ade89e0a3f3fe9235314733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNtKAzEQhoMoWKuPIAS8Ts1hd7N7JVJaFYoWUfAuZLMTSWmTNtkKfXtTtngrDAzM_P8cPoRuGZ0wyqr71SQFt-4OfsIp57kmeVOeoRGrZUNEwb7O0YjyShLJK3aJrlJaUcokq6sR2s2sBdPjYPF0-T7HwWMf_Np50BEncGnjDI6QtsEnOKq0x6_LJU593Jt-HwGb3HEdROe_cdS2J1u3BnK8iPyJiPM9RG16F_w1urB6neDmlMfocz77mD6TxdvTy_RxQTRvaE86WtgcnJYNY41gZQeFBVabti1q3pjK1oVpy1ZK3UHdANXCCgsNF6VghRRijO6GudsYdntIvVqFffR5pcosuKzqUtRZVQ4qE0NKEazaRrfR8aAYVUe6aqVOdNWRrhroZt_D4IP8wo-DqJJx4A10Lmaeqgvunwm_LOGHXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672768538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of CPRF on nonlinear seismic response of an NPP structure considering raft-pile-soil-structure-interaction</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Firoj, Mohd ; Maheshwari, B.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Firoj, Mohd ; Maheshwari, B.K.</creatorcontrib><description>A number of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) in India are coming up in soft soil condition particularly on alluvium in active seismic zone on Combined Piled-Raft Foundation (CPRF). So far, no study has been reported considering nonlinearity of soil for the NPP structures founded on CPRF considering earthquake loads.
In the present study, the dynamic responses of raft, pile group and CPRF of a NPP are investigated by simulating the nonlinear finite element model. The effects of nonreflecting boundary condition, pile-soil-interaction by the embedded constraint, raft-pile interaction by the tie constraint and raft-soil-interaction by the penalty constraint, were considered. The material nonlinearity of soil was taken into account using an advanced constitutive model Drucker-Prager with cap plasticity. The geometrical nonlinearity is also considered using the concept of the contact surface. Thus, a complete 3D finite element numerical model of a nuclear structure considering raft-pile-soil-structure interaction (RPSSI) for nonlinear seismic analysis is developed. The validation is carried out by comparing the results from the present study with experimental and numerical results available in the literature. Nonlinear analyses of raft, pile group and CPRF in the time domain finite element formulation carried out and results are compared with that using the linear analysis.
A comparison of two analyses shows that linear analysis underestimates the response of soil, piles and structure. The effect of type of boundary used in the analyses is significant. It was also observed that the response of NPP structure is significantly affected by the type of foundation used under the superstructure. The effect of SSI is examined with two major novelty i.e. (a) Effect of CPRF (b) Consideration of Nonlinearity of Soil. Effect of frequency of excitation and PGA of earthquake motion is examined. This study indicates the importance of CPRF over the raft foundation and pile group foundation for the design of nuclear power plants. Also, it examines the effects of nonlinearity on the response.
•Advantage of using Combined Pile-Raft-Foundation (CPRF) for Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Structures.•Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of a Nuclear Power Plant founded on CPRF for Seismic Loads. Consideration of Raft-Pile-Soil-Structure Interaction (RPSSI).•Effects of Geometrical and Soil Nonlinearity on the response of Structure and of Foundation.•Comparison of Response of NPP Structure founded on Raft, Piles and CPRF.•Effect of CPRF on the response of NPP for different earthquakes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-7261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-341X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107295</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alluvial deposits ; Alluvium ; Boundary conditions ; Combined piled raft foundation ; Constitutive models ; Earthquake loads ; Earthquakes ; Finite element method ; Linear analysis ; Mathematical models ; Nonlinear response ; Nonlinear seismic analysis ; Nonlinear systems ; Nonlinearity ; Nonreflecting boundaries ; Nuclear energy ; Nuclear power plants ; Nuclear reactors ; Nuclear structure ; Numerical models ; Pile groups ; Piles ; Raft foundations ; Raft-pile-soil-structure-interaction ; Seismic activity ; Seismic analysis ; Seismic response ; Seismic zones ; Soil conditions ; Soil-structure interaction ; Soils ; Superstructures</subject><ispartof>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2022-07, Vol.158, p.107295, Article 107295</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jul 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a290t-d04f04f2059119315de4fe18cbb4829c6f84cb5b77ade89e0a3f3fe9235314733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a290t-d04f04f2059119315de4fe18cbb4829c6f84cb5b77ade89e0a3f3fe9235314733</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7306-4932</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107295$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Firoj, Mohd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maheshwari, B.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of CPRF on nonlinear seismic response of an NPP structure considering raft-pile-soil-structure-interaction</title><title>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</title><description>A number of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) in India are coming up in soft soil condition particularly on alluvium in active seismic zone on Combined Piled-Raft Foundation (CPRF). So far, no study has been reported considering nonlinearity of soil for the NPP structures founded on CPRF considering earthquake loads.
In the present study, the dynamic responses of raft, pile group and CPRF of a NPP are investigated by simulating the nonlinear finite element model. The effects of nonreflecting boundary condition, pile-soil-interaction by the embedded constraint, raft-pile interaction by the tie constraint and raft-soil-interaction by the penalty constraint, were considered. The material nonlinearity of soil was taken into account using an advanced constitutive model Drucker-Prager with cap plasticity. The geometrical nonlinearity is also considered using the concept of the contact surface. Thus, a complete 3D finite element numerical model of a nuclear structure considering raft-pile-soil-structure interaction (RPSSI) for nonlinear seismic analysis is developed. The validation is carried out by comparing the results from the present study with experimental and numerical results available in the literature. Nonlinear analyses of raft, pile group and CPRF in the time domain finite element formulation carried out and results are compared with that using the linear analysis.
A comparison of two analyses shows that linear analysis underestimates the response of soil, piles and structure. The effect of type of boundary used in the analyses is significant. It was also observed that the response of NPP structure is significantly affected by the type of foundation used under the superstructure. The effect of SSI is examined with two major novelty i.e. (a) Effect of CPRF (b) Consideration of Nonlinearity of Soil. Effect of frequency of excitation and PGA of earthquake motion is examined. This study indicates the importance of CPRF over the raft foundation and pile group foundation for the design of nuclear power plants. Also, it examines the effects of nonlinearity on the response.
•Advantage of using Combined Pile-Raft-Foundation (CPRF) for Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Structures.•Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of a Nuclear Power Plant founded on CPRF for Seismic Loads. Consideration of Raft-Pile-Soil-Structure Interaction (RPSSI).•Effects of Geometrical and Soil Nonlinearity on the response of Structure and of Foundation.•Comparison of Response of NPP Structure founded on Raft, Piles and CPRF.•Effect of CPRF on the response of NPP for different earthquakes.</description><subject>Alluvial deposits</subject><subject>Alluvium</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Combined piled raft foundation</subject><subject>Constitutive models</subject><subject>Earthquake loads</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Linear analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nonlinear response</subject><subject>Nonlinear seismic analysis</subject><subject>Nonlinear systems</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Nonreflecting boundaries</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Nuclear reactors</subject><subject>Nuclear structure</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Pile groups</subject><subject>Piles</subject><subject>Raft foundations</subject><subject>Raft-pile-soil-structure-interaction</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic analysis</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Seismic zones</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Soil-structure interaction</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Superstructures</subject><issn>0267-7261</issn><issn>1879-341X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkNtKAzEQhoMoWKuPIAS8Ts1hd7N7JVJaFYoWUfAuZLMTSWmTNtkKfXtTtngrDAzM_P8cPoRuGZ0wyqr71SQFt-4OfsIp57kmeVOeoRGrZUNEwb7O0YjyShLJK3aJrlJaUcokq6sR2s2sBdPjYPF0-T7HwWMf_Np50BEncGnjDI6QtsEnOKq0x6_LJU593Jt-HwGb3HEdROe_cdS2J1u3BnK8iPyJiPM9RG16F_w1urB6neDmlMfocz77mD6TxdvTy_RxQTRvaE86WtgcnJYNY41gZQeFBVabti1q3pjK1oVpy1ZK3UHdANXCCgsNF6VghRRijO6GudsYdntIvVqFffR5pcosuKzqUtRZVQ4qE0NKEazaRrfR8aAYVUe6aqVOdNWRrhroZt_D4IP8wo-DqJJx4A10Lmaeqgvunwm_LOGHXg</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Firoj, Mohd</creator><creator>Maheshwari, B.K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7306-4932</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Effect of CPRF on nonlinear seismic response of an NPP structure considering raft-pile-soil-structure-interaction</title><author>Firoj, Mohd ; Maheshwari, B.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a290t-d04f04f2059119315de4fe18cbb4829c6f84cb5b77ade89e0a3f3fe9235314733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Alluvial deposits</topic><topic>Alluvium</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Combined piled raft foundation</topic><topic>Constitutive models</topic><topic>Earthquake loads</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Linear analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nonlinear response</topic><topic>Nonlinear seismic analysis</topic><topic>Nonlinear systems</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Nonreflecting boundaries</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Nuclear reactors</topic><topic>Nuclear structure</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Pile groups</topic><topic>Piles</topic><topic>Raft foundations</topic><topic>Raft-pile-soil-structure-interaction</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic analysis</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Seismic zones</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Soil-structure interaction</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Superstructures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Firoj, Mohd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maheshwari, B.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Firoj, Mohd</au><au>Maheshwari, B.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of CPRF on nonlinear seismic response of an NPP structure considering raft-pile-soil-structure-interaction</atitle><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>158</volume><spage>107295</spage><pages>107295-</pages><artnum>107295</artnum><issn>0267-7261</issn><eissn>1879-341X</eissn><abstract>A number of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) in India are coming up in soft soil condition particularly on alluvium in active seismic zone on Combined Piled-Raft Foundation (CPRF). So far, no study has been reported considering nonlinearity of soil for the NPP structures founded on CPRF considering earthquake loads.
In the present study, the dynamic responses of raft, pile group and CPRF of a NPP are investigated by simulating the nonlinear finite element model. The effects of nonreflecting boundary condition, pile-soil-interaction by the embedded constraint, raft-pile interaction by the tie constraint and raft-soil-interaction by the penalty constraint, were considered. The material nonlinearity of soil was taken into account using an advanced constitutive model Drucker-Prager with cap plasticity. The geometrical nonlinearity is also considered using the concept of the contact surface. Thus, a complete 3D finite element numerical model of a nuclear structure considering raft-pile-soil-structure interaction (RPSSI) for nonlinear seismic analysis is developed. The validation is carried out by comparing the results from the present study with experimental and numerical results available in the literature. Nonlinear analyses of raft, pile group and CPRF in the time domain finite element formulation carried out and results are compared with that using the linear analysis.
A comparison of two analyses shows that linear analysis underestimates the response of soil, piles and structure. The effect of type of boundary used in the analyses is significant. It was also observed that the response of NPP structure is significantly affected by the type of foundation used under the superstructure. The effect of SSI is examined with two major novelty i.e. (a) Effect of CPRF (b) Consideration of Nonlinearity of Soil. Effect of frequency of excitation and PGA of earthquake motion is examined. This study indicates the importance of CPRF over the raft foundation and pile group foundation for the design of nuclear power plants. Also, it examines the effects of nonlinearity on the response.
•Advantage of using Combined Pile-Raft-Foundation (CPRF) for Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) Structures.•Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of a Nuclear Power Plant founded on CPRF for Seismic Loads. Consideration of Raft-Pile-Soil-Structure Interaction (RPSSI).•Effects of Geometrical and Soil Nonlinearity on the response of Structure and of Foundation.•Comparison of Response of NPP Structure founded on Raft, Piles and CPRF.•Effect of CPRF on the response of NPP for different earthquakes.</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107295</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7306-4932</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0267-7261 |
| ispartof | Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2022-07, Vol.158, p.107295, Article 107295 |
| issn | 0267-7261 1879-341X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2672768538 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Alluvial deposits Alluvium Boundary conditions Combined piled raft foundation Constitutive models Earthquake loads Earthquakes Finite element method Linear analysis Mathematical models Nonlinear response Nonlinear seismic analysis Nonlinear systems Nonlinearity Nonreflecting boundaries Nuclear energy Nuclear power plants Nuclear reactors Nuclear structure Numerical models Pile groups Piles Raft foundations Raft-pile-soil-structure-interaction Seismic activity Seismic analysis Seismic response Seismic zones Soil conditions Soil-structure interaction Soils Superstructures |
| title | Effect of CPRF on nonlinear seismic response of an NPP structure considering raft-pile-soil-structure-interaction |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T04%3A09%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20CPRF%20on%20nonlinear%20seismic%20response%20of%20an%20NPP%20structure%20considering%20raft-pile-soil-structure-interaction&rft.jtitle=Soil%20dynamics%20and%20earthquake%20engineering%20(1984)&rft.au=Firoj,%20Mohd&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=158&rft.spage=107295&rft.pages=107295-&rft.artnum=107295&rft.issn=0267-7261&rft.eissn=1879-341X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107295&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2672768538%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672768538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0267726122001440&rfr_iscdi=true |