4CPS-117 Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in a long-term care facility
Background and importanceAntimicrobials are the most frequently prescribed drugs in long-term care facilities (LTCF). Antibiotic prescriptions may be unnecessary; but even when necessary, the antibiotics prescribed are often excessively broad-spectrum or longer duration.Aim and objectivesTo evaluate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice 2022-03, Vol.29 (Suppl 1), p.A69-A69 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A69 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A69 |
container_title | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Cantudo Cuenca, MR Martínez-Dueñas López-Martín, L Muñoz Cejudo, BM Espinosa Rodríguez, A Archilla Amat, MI |
description | Background and importanceAntimicrobials are the most frequently prescribed drugs in long-term care facilities (LTCF). Antibiotic prescriptions may be unnecessary; but even when necessary, the antibiotics prescribed are often excessively broad-spectrum or longer duration.Aim and objectivesTo evaluate appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in a LTCF and analyse possible factors related to inappropriateness.Material and methodsAn 18-month prospective study was conducted in a 264-bed LTCF. Antibiotic prescriptions for suspected lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) or urinary tract infection (UTI) initiated for LTCF residents were included. We excluded confirmed positive COVID-19 infections without suspected bacterial/fungal co-infection and prophylactic antibiotic prescriptions. We obtained demographic and clinical characteristics of residents, variables related to infection and antibiotic prescription, microbiology data and setting of prescription initiation. Each antibiotic prescription was assessed for appropriateness and classified as unnecessary, inappropriate and suboptimal antimicrobial use.1 Associations of variables with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were estimated using logistic regression.ResultsWe included 416 antibiotic prescriptions (out of 489) corresponding to 159 residents, 43.6% women, mean age 83.2 (SD 9.6) years. Fosfomycin-tromethamine was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic (25.0%), followed by cephalosporins (18.8%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (15.9%) and fluoroquinolones (13.0%). Polytherapy: 2.6 % of episodes.Infections: UTI (43.3%), LRTI (34.6%), SSTI (22.1%). Targeted therapy: 16.8%. Median treatment duration: 5 (IQR 1–7) days; 9.4% prescriptions for >7 days. Sample collection was carried out in 29.6%. Positive result: 82.9% of cultures. The most prevalent microorganisms isolated were the Gram-negative bacteria (87.3%). The majority of antibiotic prescriptions were initiated within the LTCF (84.1%), with 12.7% by the emergency department (ED) and 3.2% by hospital or primary care (HPC). Overall, 46.6% of antibiotic prescriptions were judged unsuitable: unnecessary (16.9%), inappropriate (70.6%), suboptimal (12.5%). Multivariable analysis showed that empirical therapy, some classes of antibiotics (cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, fosfomycin calcium, macrolides) and prescription initiation in the emergency department were independent predictors of antimicrobial inappropriatene |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-eahp.145 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2672363570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2672363570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1195-d27a3a248ef70dceec93a47176beaf127799775ca4dbcfdcde7baa0d3b7baa343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtKAzEUhoMoWGpfQQKuU3ObSbMsxRsUFKrrcJLJOCntzJikC3dufFGfxBnqZfX_i49zfj6ELhmdMybKa79t-gbinnDKOfHQ9HMmixM04VQqonUpT_96UZ6jWUrB0kKIhZZCT9BGrp42hDH19fG57PvY9TFA9q1PCXc1hjYHG7ocHO6jTy6GPoeuTTi0GPCua19J9nGPHUSPa3BhF_L7BTqrYZf87Cen6OX25nl1T9aPdw-r5ZpYxnRBKq5AAJcLXytaOe-dFiAVU6X1UDOulNZKFQ5kZV1ducorC0ArYccUUkzR1fHuMPvt4FM22-4Q2-Gl4aXiohSFogPFj5Tdb_8BRs3oz_z6M6M_M_ozgz_xDT8WaRs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672363570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>4CPS-117 Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in a long-term care facility</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cantudo Cuenca, MR ; Martínez-Dueñas López-Martín, L ; Muñoz Cejudo, BM ; Espinosa Rodríguez, A ; Archilla Amat, MI</creator><creatorcontrib>Cantudo Cuenca, MR ; Martínez-Dueñas López-Martín, L ; Muñoz Cejudo, BM ; Espinosa Rodríguez, A ; Archilla Amat, MI</creatorcontrib><description>Background and importanceAntimicrobials are the most frequently prescribed drugs in long-term care facilities (LTCF). Antibiotic prescriptions may be unnecessary; but even when necessary, the antibiotics prescribed are often excessively broad-spectrum or longer duration.Aim and objectivesTo evaluate appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in a LTCF and analyse possible factors related to inappropriateness.Material and methodsAn 18-month prospective study was conducted in a 264-bed LTCF. Antibiotic prescriptions for suspected lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) or urinary tract infection (UTI) initiated for LTCF residents were included. We excluded confirmed positive COVID-19 infections without suspected bacterial/fungal co-infection and prophylactic antibiotic prescriptions. We obtained demographic and clinical characteristics of residents, variables related to infection and antibiotic prescription, microbiology data and setting of prescription initiation. Each antibiotic prescription was assessed for appropriateness and classified as unnecessary, inappropriate and suboptimal antimicrobial use.1 Associations of variables with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were estimated using logistic regression.ResultsWe included 416 antibiotic prescriptions (out of 489) corresponding to 159 residents, 43.6% women, mean age 83.2 (SD 9.6) years. Fosfomycin-tromethamine was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic (25.0%), followed by cephalosporins (18.8%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (15.9%) and fluoroquinolones (13.0%). Polytherapy: 2.6 % of episodes.Infections: UTI (43.3%), LRTI (34.6%), SSTI (22.1%). Targeted therapy: 16.8%. Median treatment duration: 5 (IQR 1–7) days; 9.4% prescriptions for >7 days. Sample collection was carried out in 29.6%. Positive result: 82.9% of cultures. The most prevalent microorganisms isolated were the Gram-negative bacteria (87.3%). The majority of antibiotic prescriptions were initiated within the LTCF (84.1%), with 12.7% by the emergency department (ED) and 3.2% by hospital or primary care (HPC). Overall, 46.6% of antibiotic prescriptions were judged unsuitable: unnecessary (16.9%), inappropriate (70.6%), suboptimal (12.5%). Multivariable analysis showed that empirical therapy, some classes of antibiotics (cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, fosfomycin calcium, macrolides) and prescription initiation in the emergency department were independent predictors of antimicrobial inappropriateness.Conclusion and relevanceAlmost half of antimicrobials prescriptions are inappropriate. Antibiotics initiated in the ED constitutes a small but not unimportant percentage of all prescriptions. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes should include interventions in this setting because of the high inappropriate use.References and/or acknowledgements1. Spivak ES, et al. Measuring appropriate antimicrobial use: attempts at opening the black box. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63(12):1639–1644.Conflict of interestNo conflict of interest</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-9956</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-9964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-eahp.145</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; Conflicts of interest ; Long term health care ; Prescriptions ; Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services ; Urinary tract infections</subject><ispartof>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2022-03, Vol.29 (Suppl 1), p.A69-A69</ispartof><rights>European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2022 European Association of Hospital Pharmacists 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cantudo Cuenca, MR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Dueñas López-Martín, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz Cejudo, BM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinosa Rodríguez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archilla Amat, MI</creatorcontrib><title>4CPS-117 Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in a long-term care facility</title><title>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</title><addtitle>Eur J Hosp Pharm</addtitle><description>Background and importanceAntimicrobials are the most frequently prescribed drugs in long-term care facilities (LTCF). Antibiotic prescriptions may be unnecessary; but even when necessary, the antibiotics prescribed are often excessively broad-spectrum or longer duration.Aim and objectivesTo evaluate appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in a LTCF and analyse possible factors related to inappropriateness.Material and methodsAn 18-month prospective study was conducted in a 264-bed LTCF. Antibiotic prescriptions for suspected lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) or urinary tract infection (UTI) initiated for LTCF residents were included. We excluded confirmed positive COVID-19 infections without suspected bacterial/fungal co-infection and prophylactic antibiotic prescriptions. We obtained demographic and clinical characteristics of residents, variables related to infection and antibiotic prescription, microbiology data and setting of prescription initiation. Each antibiotic prescription was assessed for appropriateness and classified as unnecessary, inappropriate and suboptimal antimicrobial use.1 Associations of variables with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were estimated using logistic regression.ResultsWe included 416 antibiotic prescriptions (out of 489) corresponding to 159 residents, 43.6% women, mean age 83.2 (SD 9.6) years. Fosfomycin-tromethamine was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic (25.0%), followed by cephalosporins (18.8%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (15.9%) and fluoroquinolones (13.0%). Polytherapy: 2.6 % of episodes.Infections: UTI (43.3%), LRTI (34.6%), SSTI (22.1%). Targeted therapy: 16.8%. Median treatment duration: 5 (IQR 1–7) days; 9.4% prescriptions for >7 days. Sample collection was carried out in 29.6%. Positive result: 82.9% of cultures. The most prevalent microorganisms isolated were the Gram-negative bacteria (87.3%). The majority of antibiotic prescriptions were initiated within the LTCF (84.1%), with 12.7% by the emergency department (ED) and 3.2% by hospital or primary care (HPC). Overall, 46.6% of antibiotic prescriptions were judged unsuitable: unnecessary (16.9%), inappropriate (70.6%), suboptimal (12.5%). Multivariable analysis showed that empirical therapy, some classes of antibiotics (cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, fosfomycin calcium, macrolides) and prescription initiation in the emergency department were independent predictors of antimicrobial inappropriateness.Conclusion and relevanceAlmost half of antimicrobials prescriptions are inappropriate. Antibiotics initiated in the ED constitutes a small but not unimportant percentage of all prescriptions. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes should include interventions in this setting because of the high inappropriate use.References and/or acknowledgements1. Spivak ES, et al. Measuring appropriate antimicrobial use: attempts at opening the black box. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63(12):1639–1644.Conflict of interestNo conflict of interest</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Long term health care</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><issn>2047-9956</issn><issn>2047-9964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtKAzEUhoMoWGpfQQKuU3ObSbMsxRsUFKrrcJLJOCntzJikC3dufFGfxBnqZfX_i49zfj6ELhmdMybKa79t-gbinnDKOfHQ9HMmixM04VQqonUpT_96UZ6jWUrB0kKIhZZCT9BGrp42hDH19fG57PvY9TFA9q1PCXc1hjYHG7ocHO6jTy6GPoeuTTi0GPCua19J9nGPHUSPa3BhF_L7BTqrYZf87Cen6OX25nl1T9aPdw-r5ZpYxnRBKq5AAJcLXytaOe-dFiAVU6X1UDOulNZKFQ5kZV1ducorC0ArYccUUkzR1fHuMPvt4FM22-4Q2-Gl4aXiohSFogPFj5Tdb_8BRs3oz_z6M6M_M_ozgz_xDT8WaRs</recordid><startdate>20220323</startdate><enddate>20220323</enddate><creator>Cantudo Cuenca, MR</creator><creator>Martínez-Dueñas López-Martín, L</creator><creator>Muñoz Cejudo, BM</creator><creator>Espinosa Rodríguez, A</creator><creator>Archilla Amat, MI</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220323</creationdate><title>4CPS-117 Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in a long-term care facility</title><author>Cantudo Cuenca, MR ; Martínez-Dueñas López-Martín, L ; Muñoz Cejudo, BM ; Espinosa Rodríguez, A ; Archilla Amat, MI</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1195-d27a3a248ef70dceec93a47176beaf127799775ca4dbcfdcde7baa0d3b7baa343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Long term health care</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cantudo Cuenca, MR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Dueñas López-Martín, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz Cejudo, BM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinosa Rodríguez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archilla Amat, MI</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cantudo Cuenca, MR</au><au>Martínez-Dueñas López-Martín, L</au><au>Muñoz Cejudo, BM</au><au>Espinosa Rodríguez, A</au><au>Archilla Amat, MI</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>4CPS-117 Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in a long-term care facility</atitle><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Hosp Pharm</stitle><date>2022-03-23</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A69</spage><epage>A69</epage><pages>A69-A69</pages><issn>2047-9956</issn><eissn>2047-9964</eissn><abstract>Background and importanceAntimicrobials are the most frequently prescribed drugs in long-term care facilities (LTCF). Antibiotic prescriptions may be unnecessary; but even when necessary, the antibiotics prescribed are often excessively broad-spectrum or longer duration.Aim and objectivesTo evaluate appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in a LTCF and analyse possible factors related to inappropriateness.Material and methodsAn 18-month prospective study was conducted in a 264-bed LTCF. Antibiotic prescriptions for suspected lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) or urinary tract infection (UTI) initiated for LTCF residents were included. We excluded confirmed positive COVID-19 infections without suspected bacterial/fungal co-infection and prophylactic antibiotic prescriptions. We obtained demographic and clinical characteristics of residents, variables related to infection and antibiotic prescription, microbiology data and setting of prescription initiation. Each antibiotic prescription was assessed for appropriateness and classified as unnecessary, inappropriate and suboptimal antimicrobial use.1 Associations of variables with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were estimated using logistic regression.ResultsWe included 416 antibiotic prescriptions (out of 489) corresponding to 159 residents, 43.6% women, mean age 83.2 (SD 9.6) years. Fosfomycin-tromethamine was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic (25.0%), followed by cephalosporins (18.8%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (15.9%) and fluoroquinolones (13.0%). Polytherapy: 2.6 % of episodes.Infections: UTI (43.3%), LRTI (34.6%), SSTI (22.1%). Targeted therapy: 16.8%. Median treatment duration: 5 (IQR 1–7) days; 9.4% prescriptions for >7 days. Sample collection was carried out in 29.6%. Positive result: 82.9% of cultures. The most prevalent microorganisms isolated were the Gram-negative bacteria (87.3%). The majority of antibiotic prescriptions were initiated within the LTCF (84.1%), with 12.7% by the emergency department (ED) and 3.2% by hospital or primary care (HPC). Overall, 46.6% of antibiotic prescriptions were judged unsuitable: unnecessary (16.9%), inappropriate (70.6%), suboptimal (12.5%). Multivariable analysis showed that empirical therapy, some classes of antibiotics (cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, fosfomycin calcium, macrolides) and prescription initiation in the emergency department were independent predictors of antimicrobial inappropriateness.Conclusion and relevanceAlmost half of antimicrobials prescriptions are inappropriate. Antibiotics initiated in the ED constitutes a small but not unimportant percentage of all prescriptions. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes should include interventions in this setting because of the high inappropriate use.References and/or acknowledgements1. Spivak ES, et al. Measuring appropriate antimicrobial use: attempts at opening the black box. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63(12):1639–1644.Conflict of interestNo conflict of interest</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><doi>10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-eahp.145</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2047-9956 |
ispartof | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2022-03, Vol.29 (Suppl 1), p.A69-A69 |
issn | 2047-9956 2047-9964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2672363570 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Antibiotics Antimicrobial agents Conflicts of interest Long term health care Prescriptions Section 4: Clinical pharmacy services Urinary tract infections |
title | 4CPS-117 Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in a long-term care facility |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A42%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=4CPS-117%E2%80%85Appropriateness%20of%20antibiotic%20prescriptions%20in%20a%20long-term%20care%20facility&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20hospital%20pharmacy.%20Science%20and%20practice&rft.au=Cantudo%20Cuenca,%20MR&rft.date=2022-03-23&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A69&rft.epage=A69&rft.pages=A69-A69&rft.issn=2047-9956&rft.eissn=2047-9964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-eahp.145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_j%3E2672363570%3C/proquest_bmj_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672363570&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |