Approaches to the Detection of Hybridization Events and Genetic Introgression upon Phylogenetic Incongruence

Introgressive hybridization is a widespread phenomenon in the evolution of plants and animals. The conclusion of interspecific gene flow is often made in the detection of discordance among gene trees. However, the found phylogenetic incongruence can also be caused by other evolutionary processes, su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biology bulletin reviews 2022, Vol.12 (3), p.240-253
Hauptverfasser: Komarova, V. A., Lavrenchenko, L. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 253
container_issue 3
container_start_page 240
container_title Biology bulletin reviews
container_volume 12
creator Komarova, V. A.
Lavrenchenko, L. A.
description Introgressive hybridization is a widespread phenomenon in the evolution of plants and animals. The conclusion of interspecific gene flow is often made in the detection of discordance among gene trees. However, the found phylogenetic incongruence can also be caused by other evolutionary processes, such as incomplete lineage sorting. In this case, the detection and quantitative characterization of introgression is a very difficult task. This review briefly characterizes the main processes (hybridization and introgression, incomplete lineage sorting) that are responsible for the incongruence between gene tree topologies. Data on classical phylogenetic and analytical methods that make it possible to detect and distinguish hybridization and introgression from incomplete lineage sorting in the comparison of phylogenetic trees built based on individual genetic markers are summarized. Approaches developed not only for the detection of introgression patterns in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting but also for the quantification of the detected introgression (proportion of admixture, direction, time) are considered; the advantages and methodological limitations of each of them are briefly considered. The methods of phylogenetic networks, which seem to be an indispensable tool for the reconstruction of complex evolutionary histories in the presence of reticulate events (hybridization, introgression, and others), are also considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1134/S2079086422030045
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2671700751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2671700751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1135-5187a650a1656246cdee0920717a504f36f532616e4d7a5a2e23d18069273bc23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEUDKJgqf0B3gKeV_O9u8dSa1soKKjnJc2-3W6pyZqkQv31plbqQcwheUxm5jGD0DUlt5RycffMSF6SQgnGCCdEyDM0OEAZKXJ2fpqVuESjEDYkHVFSkvMB2o773jtt1hBwdDiuAd9DBBM7Z7Fr8Hy_8l3dfepvYPoBNgasbY1nYCF2Bi9s9K71EMKBsOvT9bTeb117-jfOtn4H1sAVumj0NsDo5x2i14fpy2SeLR9ni8l4mZkUR2aSFrlWkmiqpGJCmRqAlCkEzbUkouGqkZwpqkDUCdEMGK9pQVTJcr4yjA_RzdE3RXvfQYjVxu28TSsrppILIbmkiUWPLONdCB6aqvfdm_b7ipLq0Gv1p9ekYUdNSFzbgv91_l_0BU2NePw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2671700751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Approaches to the Detection of Hybridization Events and Genetic Introgression upon Phylogenetic Incongruence</title><source>Springer journals</source><creator>Komarova, V. A. ; Lavrenchenko, L. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Komarova, V. A. ; Lavrenchenko, L. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Introgressive hybridization is a widespread phenomenon in the evolution of plants and animals. The conclusion of interspecific gene flow is often made in the detection of discordance among gene trees. However, the found phylogenetic incongruence can also be caused by other evolutionary processes, such as incomplete lineage sorting. In this case, the detection and quantitative characterization of introgression is a very difficult task. This review briefly characterizes the main processes (hybridization and introgression, incomplete lineage sorting) that are responsible for the incongruence between gene tree topologies. Data on classical phylogenetic and analytical methods that make it possible to detect and distinguish hybridization and introgression from incomplete lineage sorting in the comparison of phylogenetic trees built based on individual genetic markers are summarized. Approaches developed not only for the detection of introgression patterns in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting but also for the quantification of the detected introgression (proportion of admixture, direction, time) are considered; the advantages and methodological limitations of each of them are briefly considered. The methods of phylogenetic networks, which seem to be an indispensable tool for the reconstruction of complex evolutionary histories in the presence of reticulate events (hybridization, introgression, and others), are also considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-0864</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-0872</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S2079086422030045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Biochemistry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cell Biology ; Discordance ; Ecology ; Evolution ; Gene flow ; Genetic markers ; Hybridization ; Life Sciences ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Biology bulletin reviews, 2022, Vol.12 (3), p.240-253</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2022. ISSN 2079-0864, Biology Bulletin Reviews, 2022, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 240–253. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2022. Russian Text © The Author(s), 2021, published in Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii, 2021, Vol. 82, No. 6, pp. 403–418.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1135-5187a650a1656246cdee0920717a504f36f532616e4d7a5a2e23d18069273bc23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S2079086422030045$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079086422030045$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Komarova, V. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavrenchenko, L. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Approaches to the Detection of Hybridization Events and Genetic Introgression upon Phylogenetic Incongruence</title><title>Biology bulletin reviews</title><addtitle>Biol Bull Rev</addtitle><description>Introgressive hybridization is a widespread phenomenon in the evolution of plants and animals. The conclusion of interspecific gene flow is often made in the detection of discordance among gene trees. However, the found phylogenetic incongruence can also be caused by other evolutionary processes, such as incomplete lineage sorting. In this case, the detection and quantitative characterization of introgression is a very difficult task. This review briefly characterizes the main processes (hybridization and introgression, incomplete lineage sorting) that are responsible for the incongruence between gene tree topologies. Data on classical phylogenetic and analytical methods that make it possible to detect and distinguish hybridization and introgression from incomplete lineage sorting in the comparison of phylogenetic trees built based on individual genetic markers are summarized. Approaches developed not only for the detection of introgression patterns in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting but also for the quantification of the detected introgression (proportion of admixture, direction, time) are considered; the advantages and methodological limitations of each of them are briefly considered. The methods of phylogenetic networks, which seem to be an indispensable tool for the reconstruction of complex evolutionary histories in the presence of reticulate events (hybridization, introgression, and others), are also considered.</description><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Discordance</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Gene flow</subject><subject>Genetic markers</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>2079-0864</issn><issn>2079-0872</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEUDKJgqf0B3gKeV_O9u8dSa1soKKjnJc2-3W6pyZqkQv31plbqQcwheUxm5jGD0DUlt5RycffMSF6SQgnGCCdEyDM0OEAZKXJ2fpqVuESjEDYkHVFSkvMB2o773jtt1hBwdDiuAd9DBBM7Z7Fr8Hy_8l3dfepvYPoBNgasbY1nYCF2Bi9s9K71EMKBsOvT9bTeb117-jfOtn4H1sAVumj0NsDo5x2i14fpy2SeLR9ni8l4mZkUR2aSFrlWkmiqpGJCmRqAlCkEzbUkouGqkZwpqkDUCdEMGK9pQVTJcr4yjA_RzdE3RXvfQYjVxu28TSsrppILIbmkiUWPLONdCB6aqvfdm_b7ipLq0Gv1p9ekYUdNSFzbgv91_l_0BU2NePw</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Komarova, V. A.</creator><creator>Lavrenchenko, L. A.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Approaches to the Detection of Hybridization Events and Genetic Introgression upon Phylogenetic Incongruence</title><author>Komarova, V. A. ; Lavrenchenko, L. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1135-5187a650a1656246cdee0920717a504f36f532616e4d7a5a2e23d18069273bc23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Discordance</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Gene flow</topic><topic>Genetic markers</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Komarova, V. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavrenchenko, L. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Biology bulletin reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Komarova, V. A.</au><au>Lavrenchenko, L. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Approaches to the Detection of Hybridization Events and Genetic Introgression upon Phylogenetic Incongruence</atitle><jtitle>Biology bulletin reviews</jtitle><stitle>Biol Bull Rev</stitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>240</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>240-253</pages><issn>2079-0864</issn><eissn>2079-0872</eissn><abstract>Introgressive hybridization is a widespread phenomenon in the evolution of plants and animals. The conclusion of interspecific gene flow is often made in the detection of discordance among gene trees. However, the found phylogenetic incongruence can also be caused by other evolutionary processes, such as incomplete lineage sorting. In this case, the detection and quantitative characterization of introgression is a very difficult task. This review briefly characterizes the main processes (hybridization and introgression, incomplete lineage sorting) that are responsible for the incongruence between gene tree topologies. Data on classical phylogenetic and analytical methods that make it possible to detect and distinguish hybridization and introgression from incomplete lineage sorting in the comparison of phylogenetic trees built based on individual genetic markers are summarized. Approaches developed not only for the detection of introgression patterns in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting but also for the quantification of the detected introgression (proportion of admixture, direction, time) are considered; the advantages and methodological limitations of each of them are briefly considered. The methods of phylogenetic networks, which seem to be an indispensable tool for the reconstruction of complex evolutionary histories in the presence of reticulate events (hybridization, introgression, and others), are also considered.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S2079086422030045</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2079-0864
ispartof Biology bulletin reviews, 2022, Vol.12 (3), p.240-253
issn 2079-0864
2079-0872
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2671700751
source Springer journals
subjects Biochemistry
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cell Biology
Discordance
Ecology
Evolution
Gene flow
Genetic markers
Hybridization
Life Sciences
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Zoology
title Approaches to the Detection of Hybridization Events and Genetic Introgression upon Phylogenetic Incongruence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A42%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Approaches%20to%20the%20Detection%20of%20Hybridization%20Events%20and%20Genetic%20Introgression%20upon%20Phylogenetic%20Incongruence&rft.jtitle=Biology%20bulletin%20reviews&rft.au=Komarova,%20V.%20A.&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=240-253&rft.issn=2079-0864&rft.eissn=2079-0872&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S2079086422030045&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2671700751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2671700751&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true