Comparative analysis on the mechanical properties of mortise-tenon joints in heritage timber buildings with and without a ‘Que-Ti’ component

Three kinds of typical Chinese traditional mortise-tenon joints were tested. The effects of sparging on the deformation, hysteretic behavior, strength and stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation of the mortise-tenon joints were studied via low-cycle reversed loading tests with and without a ‘Q...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresources 2022-08, Vol.17 (3), p.4116-4135
Hauptverfasser: Li, Yuanhe, Yao, Lihong, Guo, Yu, Liu, Ruijng, Wu, Yueqi, Jia, Honglei, Yu, Xia, Wang, Ce, Hu, Zhibang, Chen, Chang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4135
container_issue 3
container_start_page 4116
container_title Bioresources
container_volume 17
creator Li, Yuanhe
Yao, Lihong
Guo, Yu
Liu, Ruijng
Wu, Yueqi
Jia, Honglei
Yu, Xia
Wang, Ce
Hu, Zhibang
Chen, Chang
description Three kinds of typical Chinese traditional mortise-tenon joints were tested. The effects of sparging on the deformation, hysteretic behavior, strength and stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation of the mortise-tenon joints were studied via low-cycle reversed loading tests with and without a ‘Que-Ti’ component. The results showed the following: the bearing capacity of the straight-tenon joint was the strongest, and the hysteretic loop of the through-tenon joint and half-tenon joint were asymmetric due to the asymmetry of the tenon form. The half-tenon joint was most likely to pull out the tenon, and the tenon pulling condition of the half-tenon joint can be effectively alleviated by adding a ‘Que-Ti’ component. From the perspective of energy consumption, it was found that the energy consumption capacity of the mortise-tenon joints after adding a ‘Que-Ti’ component was stronger than the joints without a ‘Que-Ti’ component. This shows that the ‘Que-Ti’ can be used as an effective component in terms of enhancing the mechanical properties of the mortise-tenon joints.
doi_str_mv 10.15376/biores.17.3.4116-4135
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2670981946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2670981946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-db5324f99bb2cf345a7292f31b0c28bcc31e90cc5282cd8b8ffd0c1dc78516263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtKAzEUhgdRsFZfQQKuZ8xlrksp3qAgQl2HJHOmkzKT1CSjdNdHcKmv1ydx2rpwdX44Hz_nfFF0TXBCMlbkt1JbBz4hRcKSlJA8TgnLTqIJqRiOKaH56b98Hl14v8I4LRnBk-hrZvu1cCLoD0DCiG7jtUfWoNAC6kG1wmglOrR2dg0uaBiXDertGD3EAcyIrqw2wSNtUAtOB7EEFHQvwSE56K7WZunRpw7t2F8fgh0CEmi3_X4dIF7o3fYHqfEMa8CEy-isEZ2Hq785jd4e7hezp3j-8vg8u5vHihZliGuZMZo2VSUlVQ1LM1HQijaMSKxoKZViBCqsVEZLqupSlk1TY0VqVZQZyWnOptHNsXf87H0AH_jKDm4U4DnNC1yVpEr3VH6klLPeO2j42uleuA0nmB_s86N9TgrO-N4-39tnv_qnf5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670981946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analysis on the mechanical properties of mortise-tenon joints in heritage timber buildings with and without a ‘Que-Ti’ component</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Li, Yuanhe ; Yao, Lihong ; Guo, Yu ; Liu, Ruijng ; Wu, Yueqi ; Jia, Honglei ; Yu, Xia ; Wang, Ce ; Hu, Zhibang ; Chen, Chang</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Yuanhe ; Yao, Lihong ; Guo, Yu ; Liu, Ruijng ; Wu, Yueqi ; Jia, Honglei ; Yu, Xia ; Wang, Ce ; Hu, Zhibang ; Chen, Chang</creatorcontrib><description>Three kinds of typical Chinese traditional mortise-tenon joints were tested. The effects of sparging on the deformation, hysteretic behavior, strength and stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation of the mortise-tenon joints were studied via low-cycle reversed loading tests with and without a ‘Que-Ti’ component. The results showed the following: the bearing capacity of the straight-tenon joint was the strongest, and the hysteretic loop of the through-tenon joint and half-tenon joint were asymmetric due to the asymmetry of the tenon form. The half-tenon joint was most likely to pull out the tenon, and the tenon pulling condition of the half-tenon joint can be effectively alleviated by adding a ‘Que-Ti’ component. From the perspective of energy consumption, it was found that the energy consumption capacity of the mortise-tenon joints after adding a ‘Que-Ti’ component was stronger than the joints without a ‘Que-Ti’ component. This shows that the ‘Que-Ti’ can be used as an effective component in terms of enhancing the mechanical properties of the mortise-tenon joints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15376/biores.17.3.4116-4135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Raleigh: North Carolina State University</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Asymmetry ; Bearing capacity ; Comparative analysis ; Deformation effects ; Energy consumption ; Energy dissipation ; Hysteresis ; Mechanical properties ; Open source software ; Seismic engineering ; Sparging ; Stiffness</subject><ispartof>Bioresources, 2022-08, Vol.17 (3), p.4116-4135</ispartof><rights>2022. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms available at https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/about-the-journal/editorial-policies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Yuanhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Lihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ruijng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yueqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Honglei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Zhibang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chang</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis on the mechanical properties of mortise-tenon joints in heritage timber buildings with and without a ‘Que-Ti’ component</title><title>Bioresources</title><description>Three kinds of typical Chinese traditional mortise-tenon joints were tested. The effects of sparging on the deformation, hysteretic behavior, strength and stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation of the mortise-tenon joints were studied via low-cycle reversed loading tests with and without a ‘Que-Ti’ component. The results showed the following: the bearing capacity of the straight-tenon joint was the strongest, and the hysteretic loop of the through-tenon joint and half-tenon joint were asymmetric due to the asymmetry of the tenon form. The half-tenon joint was most likely to pull out the tenon, and the tenon pulling condition of the half-tenon joint can be effectively alleviated by adding a ‘Que-Ti’ component. From the perspective of energy consumption, it was found that the energy consumption capacity of the mortise-tenon joints after adding a ‘Que-Ti’ component was stronger than the joints without a ‘Que-Ti’ component. This shows that the ‘Que-Ti’ can be used as an effective component in terms of enhancing the mechanical properties of the mortise-tenon joints.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Bearing capacity</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Deformation effects</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy dissipation</subject><subject>Hysteresis</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Open source software</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Sparging</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><issn>1930-2126</issn><issn>1930-2126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtKAzEUhgdRsFZfQQKuZ8xlrksp3qAgQl2HJHOmkzKT1CSjdNdHcKmv1ydx2rpwdX44Hz_nfFF0TXBCMlbkt1JbBz4hRcKSlJA8TgnLTqIJqRiOKaH56b98Hl14v8I4LRnBk-hrZvu1cCLoD0DCiG7jtUfWoNAC6kG1wmglOrR2dg0uaBiXDertGD3EAcyIrqw2wSNtUAtOB7EEFHQvwSE56K7WZunRpw7t2F8fgh0CEmi3_X4dIF7o3fYHqfEMa8CEy-isEZ2Hq785jd4e7hezp3j-8vg8u5vHihZliGuZMZo2VSUlVQ1LM1HQijaMSKxoKZViBCqsVEZLqupSlk1TY0VqVZQZyWnOptHNsXf87H0AH_jKDm4U4DnNC1yVpEr3VH6klLPeO2j42uleuA0nmB_s86N9TgrO-N4-39tnv_qnf5g</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Li, Yuanhe</creator><creator>Yao, Lihong</creator><creator>Guo, Yu</creator><creator>Liu, Ruijng</creator><creator>Wu, Yueqi</creator><creator>Jia, Honglei</creator><creator>Yu, Xia</creator><creator>Wang, Ce</creator><creator>Hu, Zhibang</creator><creator>Chen, Chang</creator><general>North Carolina State University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis on the mechanical properties of mortise-tenon joints in heritage timber buildings with and without a ‘Que-Ti’ component</title><author>Li, Yuanhe ; Yao, Lihong ; Guo, Yu ; Liu, Ruijng ; Wu, Yueqi ; Jia, Honglei ; Yu, Xia ; Wang, Ce ; Hu, Zhibang ; Chen, Chang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-db5324f99bb2cf345a7292f31b0c28bcc31e90cc5282cd8b8ffd0c1dc78516263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Bearing capacity</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Deformation effects</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy dissipation</topic><topic>Hysteresis</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Open source software</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Sparging</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Yuanhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Lihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ruijng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yueqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Honglei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Zhibang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Yuanhe</au><au>Yao, Lihong</au><au>Guo, Yu</au><au>Liu, Ruijng</au><au>Wu, Yueqi</au><au>Jia, Honglei</au><au>Yu, Xia</au><au>Wang, Ce</au><au>Hu, Zhibang</au><au>Chen, Chang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis on the mechanical properties of mortise-tenon joints in heritage timber buildings with and without a ‘Que-Ti’ component</atitle><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>4116</spage><epage>4135</epage><pages>4116-4135</pages><issn>1930-2126</issn><eissn>1930-2126</eissn><abstract>Three kinds of typical Chinese traditional mortise-tenon joints were tested. The effects of sparging on the deformation, hysteretic behavior, strength and stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation of the mortise-tenon joints were studied via low-cycle reversed loading tests with and without a ‘Que-Ti’ component. The results showed the following: the bearing capacity of the straight-tenon joint was the strongest, and the hysteretic loop of the through-tenon joint and half-tenon joint were asymmetric due to the asymmetry of the tenon form. The half-tenon joint was most likely to pull out the tenon, and the tenon pulling condition of the half-tenon joint can be effectively alleviated by adding a ‘Que-Ti’ component. From the perspective of energy consumption, it was found that the energy consumption capacity of the mortise-tenon joints after adding a ‘Que-Ti’ component was stronger than the joints without a ‘Que-Ti’ component. This shows that the ‘Que-Ti’ can be used as an effective component in terms of enhancing the mechanical properties of the mortise-tenon joints.</abstract><cop>Raleigh</cop><pub>North Carolina State University</pub><doi>10.15376/biores.17.3.4116-4135</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1930-2126
ispartof Bioresources, 2022-08, Vol.17 (3), p.4116-4135
issn 1930-2126
1930-2126
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2670981946
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adhesives
Asymmetry
Bearing capacity
Comparative analysis
Deformation effects
Energy consumption
Energy dissipation
Hysteresis
Mechanical properties
Open source software
Seismic engineering
Sparging
Stiffness
title Comparative analysis on the mechanical properties of mortise-tenon joints in heritage timber buildings with and without a ‘Que-Ti’ component
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T17%3A03%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20on%20the%20mechanical%20properties%20of%20mortise-tenon%20joints%20in%20heritage%20timber%20buildings%20with%20and%20without%20a%20%E2%80%98Que-Ti%E2%80%99%20component&rft.jtitle=Bioresources&rft.au=Li,%20Yuanhe&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=4116&rft.epage=4135&rft.pages=4116-4135&rft.issn=1930-2126&rft.eissn=1930-2126&rft_id=info:doi/10.15376/biores.17.3.4116-4135&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2670981946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670981946&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true