Systems Thinking Accident Analysis Models: A Systematic Review for Sustainable Safety Management

Accident models are mental models that make it possible to understand the causality of adverse events. This research was conducted based on five major objectives: (i) to systematically review the relevant literature about AcciMap, STAMP, and FRAM models and synthesize the theoretical and experimenta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-05, Vol.14 (10), p.5869
Hauptverfasser: Delikhoon, Mahdieh, Zarei, Esmaeil, Banda, Osiris Valdez, Faridan, Mohammad, Habibi, Ehsanollah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 5869
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Delikhoon, Mahdieh
Zarei, Esmaeil
Banda, Osiris Valdez
Faridan, Mohammad
Habibi, Ehsanollah
description Accident models are mental models that make it possible to understand the causality of adverse events. This research was conducted based on five major objectives: (i) to systematically review the relevant literature about AcciMap, STAMP, and FRAM models and synthesize the theoretical and experimental findings, as well as the main research flows; (ii) to examine the standalone and hybrid applications for modeling the leading factors of the accident and the behavior of sociotechnical systems; (iii) to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of exploring the research opportunities; (iv) to describe the safety and accident models in terms of safety-I-II-III; and finally, to investigate the impact of the systemic models’ applications in enhancing the system’s sustainability. The systematic models can identify contributory factors, functions, and relationships in different system levels which helps to increase the awareness of systems and enhance the sustainability of safety management. Furthermore, their hybrid extensions can significantly overcome the limitations of these models and provide more reliable information. Applying the safety II and III concepts and their approaches in the system can also progress their safety levels. Finally, the ethical control of sophisticated systems suggests that further research utilizing these methodologies should be conducted to enhance system analysis and safety evaluations.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su14105869
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2670464486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2670464486</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2109-fa838b15241062bd423855a28ceba0245985873a22a1c5affe775af57723411f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF1LwzAYhYMoOOZu_AUB74RqPpvUuzL8gg3Bzuv6NktmZtfOplX6741M0PfmvAceDpyD0DklV5xn5DoMVFAidZodoQkjiibRkeN__ymahbAl8TinGU0n6LUYQ293Aa_efPPumw3OjfFr2_Q4b6Aegw942a5tHW5wjg8w9N7gZ_vp7Rd2bYeLIfTgG6hqiwtwth_xEhrY2F2MOUMnDupgZ786RS93t6v5Q7J4un-c54vEMEqyxIHmuqKSxQYpq9aCcS0lMG1sBYQJmWmpFQfGgBoJzlmlokilGBeUOj5FF4fcfdd-DDb05bYdulghlCxVRKRC6DRSlwfKdG0InXXlvvM76MaSkvJnxPJvRP4NGS5jDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670464486</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systems Thinking Accident Analysis Models: A Systematic Review for Sustainable Safety Management</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Delikhoon, Mahdieh ; Zarei, Esmaeil ; Banda, Osiris Valdez ; Faridan, Mohammad ; Habibi, Ehsanollah</creator><creatorcontrib>Delikhoon, Mahdieh ; Zarei, Esmaeil ; Banda, Osiris Valdez ; Faridan, Mohammad ; Habibi, Ehsanollah</creatorcontrib><description>Accident models are mental models that make it possible to understand the causality of adverse events. This research was conducted based on five major objectives: (i) to systematically review the relevant literature about AcciMap, STAMP, and FRAM models and synthesize the theoretical and experimental findings, as well as the main research flows; (ii) to examine the standalone and hybrid applications for modeling the leading factors of the accident and the behavior of sociotechnical systems; (iii) to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of exploring the research opportunities; (iv) to describe the safety and accident models in terms of safety-I-II-III; and finally, to investigate the impact of the systemic models’ applications in enhancing the system’s sustainability. The systematic models can identify contributory factors, functions, and relationships in different system levels which helps to increase the awareness of systems and enhance the sustainability of safety management. Furthermore, their hybrid extensions can significantly overcome the limitations of these models and provide more reliable information. Applying the safety II and III concepts and their approaches in the system can also progress their safety levels. Finally, the ethical control of sophisticated systems suggests that further research utilizing these methodologies should be conducted to enhance system analysis and safety evaluations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14105869</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accident analysis ; Accident prevention ; Causality ; Human error ; Illnesses ; Literature reviews ; Occupational accidents ; Risk assessment ; Safety ; Safety management ; Sustainability ; Systematic review ; Systems analysis</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-05, Vol.14 (10), p.5869</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2109-fa838b15241062bd423855a28ceba0245985873a22a1c5affe775af57723411f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2109-fa838b15241062bd423855a28ceba0245985873a22a1c5affe775af57723411f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2565-5578 ; 0000-0003-2738-7498</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Delikhoon, Mahdieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarei, Esmaeil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banda, Osiris Valdez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faridan, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habibi, Ehsanollah</creatorcontrib><title>Systems Thinking Accident Analysis Models: A Systematic Review for Sustainable Safety Management</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Accident models are mental models that make it possible to understand the causality of adverse events. This research was conducted based on five major objectives: (i) to systematically review the relevant literature about AcciMap, STAMP, and FRAM models and synthesize the theoretical and experimental findings, as well as the main research flows; (ii) to examine the standalone and hybrid applications for modeling the leading factors of the accident and the behavior of sociotechnical systems; (iii) to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of exploring the research opportunities; (iv) to describe the safety and accident models in terms of safety-I-II-III; and finally, to investigate the impact of the systemic models’ applications in enhancing the system’s sustainability. The systematic models can identify contributory factors, functions, and relationships in different system levels which helps to increase the awareness of systems and enhance the sustainability of safety management. Furthermore, their hybrid extensions can significantly overcome the limitations of these models and provide more reliable information. Applying the safety II and III concepts and their approaches in the system can also progress their safety levels. Finally, the ethical control of sophisticated systems suggests that further research utilizing these methodologies should be conducted to enhance system analysis and safety evaluations.</description><subject>Accident analysis</subject><subject>Accident prevention</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Human error</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Occupational accidents</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF1LwzAYhYMoOOZu_AUB74RqPpvUuzL8gg3Bzuv6NktmZtfOplX6741M0PfmvAceDpyD0DklV5xn5DoMVFAidZodoQkjiibRkeN__ymahbAl8TinGU0n6LUYQ293Aa_efPPumw3OjfFr2_Q4b6Aegw942a5tHW5wjg8w9N7gZ_vp7Rd2bYeLIfTgG6hqiwtwth_xEhrY2F2MOUMnDupgZ786RS93t6v5Q7J4un-c54vEMEqyxIHmuqKSxQYpq9aCcS0lMG1sBYQJmWmpFQfGgBoJzlmlokilGBeUOj5FF4fcfdd-DDb05bYdulghlCxVRKRC6DRSlwfKdG0InXXlvvM76MaSkvJnxPJvRP4NGS5jDQ</recordid><startdate>20220512</startdate><enddate>20220512</enddate><creator>Delikhoon, Mahdieh</creator><creator>Zarei, Esmaeil</creator><creator>Banda, Osiris Valdez</creator><creator>Faridan, Mohammad</creator><creator>Habibi, Ehsanollah</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2565-5578</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2738-7498</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220512</creationdate><title>Systems Thinking Accident Analysis Models: A Systematic Review for Sustainable Safety Management</title><author>Delikhoon, Mahdieh ; Zarei, Esmaeil ; Banda, Osiris Valdez ; Faridan, Mohammad ; Habibi, Ehsanollah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2109-fa838b15241062bd423855a28ceba0245985873a22a1c5affe775af57723411f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accident analysis</topic><topic>Accident prevention</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Human error</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Occupational accidents</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Delikhoon, Mahdieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarei, Esmaeil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banda, Osiris Valdez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faridan, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habibi, Ehsanollah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Delikhoon, Mahdieh</au><au>Zarei, Esmaeil</au><au>Banda, Osiris Valdez</au><au>Faridan, Mohammad</au><au>Habibi, Ehsanollah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systems Thinking Accident Analysis Models: A Systematic Review for Sustainable Safety Management</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-05-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5869</spage><pages>5869-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Accident models are mental models that make it possible to understand the causality of adverse events. This research was conducted based on five major objectives: (i) to systematically review the relevant literature about AcciMap, STAMP, and FRAM models and synthesize the theoretical and experimental findings, as well as the main research flows; (ii) to examine the standalone and hybrid applications for modeling the leading factors of the accident and the behavior of sociotechnical systems; (iii) to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of exploring the research opportunities; (iv) to describe the safety and accident models in terms of safety-I-II-III; and finally, to investigate the impact of the systemic models’ applications in enhancing the system’s sustainability. The systematic models can identify contributory factors, functions, and relationships in different system levels which helps to increase the awareness of systems and enhance the sustainability of safety management. Furthermore, their hybrid extensions can significantly overcome the limitations of these models and provide more reliable information. Applying the safety II and III concepts and their approaches in the system can also progress their safety levels. Finally, the ethical control of sophisticated systems suggests that further research utilizing these methodologies should be conducted to enhance system analysis and safety evaluations.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14105869</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2565-5578</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2738-7498</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-05, Vol.14 (10), p.5869
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2670464486
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Accident analysis
Accident prevention
Causality
Human error
Illnesses
Literature reviews
Occupational accidents
Risk assessment
Safety
Safety management
Sustainability
Systematic review
Systems analysis
title Systems Thinking Accident Analysis Models: A Systematic Review for Sustainable Safety Management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A21%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systems%20Thinking%20Accident%20Analysis%20Models:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20for%20Sustainable%20Safety%20Management&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Delikhoon,%20Mahdieh&rft.date=2022-05-12&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5869&rft.pages=5869-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14105869&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2670464486%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670464486&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true