Value of ovarian positional assessment on 4D hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography
To investigate the positional relationship between the ovary and Fallopian tube and the relationship between the ovarian position and tubal morphology. A total of 195 patients with 338 fallopian tubes were enrolled in this retrospective study. The ovarian and tubal positions were defined relative to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical ultrasonography 2022-05, Vol.24 (2), p.167-173 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 173 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 167 |
container_title | Medical ultrasonography |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Zheng, Wu-Wu Chen, Lixia Chen, Shunping Zhu, Jian Lin, Feng Xu, Shihao |
description | To investigate the positional relationship between the ovary and Fallopian tube and the relationship between the ovarian position and tubal morphology.
A total of 195 patients with 338 fallopian tubes were enrolled in this retrospective study. The ovarian and tubal positions were defined relative to the uterus in all directions. Tubal morphology was classified as smooth or tortuous.
The distribution of the Fallopian tubes corresponded to the positions of the ipsilateral ovaries in the superoinferior direction (χ2 =197.653, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.11152/mu-3209 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2670463439</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2670463439</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-e417f98963195b2f15cbe8634fe19b9a6ff3004968dbe3ec087203315909d5d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1KxDAURoMozjAO-AQScOOmmpukabMU_2FAF-q2pG0yU2mbmpsK8_ZWZ3T1bQ4fh0PIKbBLAEj5VTcmgjN9QOacKZXkSopDModcykRCxmdkidiUjAtQWarZMZkJmbJcgZqTl3fTjpZ6R_2XCY3p6eCxiY3vTUsNokXsbB-p76m8pZstRhs8mnZo-rVPKt_HYDBS9L1fBzNstifkyJkW7XK_C_J2f_d685isnh-ebq5XSSUAYmInM6dzrQTotOQO0qq0uRLSWdClNso5wZjUKq9LK2zF8owzIWDy13Vac7Eg57vfIfjP0WIsPvwYJmssuMqYnK6EnqiLHVVN1hisK4bQdCZsC2DFb72iG4ufehN6tj8cy87W_-BfK_ENhTdpvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670463439</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value of ovarian positional assessment on 4D hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Zheng, Wu-Wu ; Chen, Lixia ; Chen, Shunping ; Zhu, Jian ; Lin, Feng ; Xu, Shihao</creator><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Wu-Wu ; Chen, Lixia ; Chen, Shunping ; Zhu, Jian ; Lin, Feng ; Xu, Shihao</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the positional relationship between the ovary and Fallopian tube and the relationship between the ovarian position and tubal morphology.
A total of 195 patients with 338 fallopian tubes were enrolled in this retrospective study. The ovarian and tubal positions were defined relative to the uterus in all directions. Tubal morphology was classified as smooth or tortuous.
The distribution of the Fallopian tubes corresponded to the positions of the ipsilateral ovaries in the superoinferior direction (χ2 =197.653, p<0.001), mediolateral direction (χ2 =237.447, p <0.001) and anteroposterior direction (χ2 =109.746, p<0.001). Tubal morphology differed according to ovarian position in the superoinferior (χ2 =21.804, p<0.001), mediolateral directions (χ2 =4.679, p=0.031) but not in the anteroposterior direction (χ2 =0.793, p=0.373).
Evaluating the ovarian position can provide preliminary information on the distribution and shapeof the Fallopian tube, helping the operator choose the appropriate initial plane and the necessary approaches for inspection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1844-4172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2066-8643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11152/mu-3209</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34508616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Romania: Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Cervix ; Fallopian tubes ; Infertility ; Medical imaging ; Menstruation ; Morphology ; Ovaries ; Patients ; Radiation effects ; Side effects ; Three dimensional imaging ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Uterus</subject><ispartof>Medical ultrasonography, 2022-05, Vol.24 (2), p.167-173</ispartof><rights>Copyright Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology 2022</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-e417f98963195b2f15cbe8634fe19b9a6ff3004968dbe3ec087203315909d5d23</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-2287-998X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34508616$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Wu-Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Lixia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shunping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Shihao</creatorcontrib><title>Value of ovarian positional assessment on 4D hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography</title><title>Medical ultrasonography</title><addtitle>Med Ultrason</addtitle><description>To investigate the positional relationship between the ovary and Fallopian tube and the relationship between the ovarian position and tubal morphology.
A total of 195 patients with 338 fallopian tubes were enrolled in this retrospective study. The ovarian and tubal positions were defined relative to the uterus in all directions. Tubal morphology was classified as smooth or tortuous.
The distribution of the Fallopian tubes corresponded to the positions of the ipsilateral ovaries in the superoinferior direction (χ2 =197.653, p<0.001), mediolateral direction (χ2 =237.447, p <0.001) and anteroposterior direction (χ2 =109.746, p<0.001). Tubal morphology differed according to ovarian position in the superoinferior (χ2 =21.804, p<0.001), mediolateral directions (χ2 =4.679, p=0.031) but not in the anteroposterior direction (χ2 =0.793, p=0.373).
Evaluating the ovarian position can provide preliminary information on the distribution and shapeof the Fallopian tube, helping the operator choose the appropriate initial plane and the necessary approaches for inspection.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Fallopian tubes</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Menstruation</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiation effects</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Three dimensional imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><issn>1844-4172</issn><issn>2066-8643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1KxDAURoMozjAO-AQScOOmmpukabMU_2FAF-q2pG0yU2mbmpsK8_ZWZ3T1bQ4fh0PIKbBLAEj5VTcmgjN9QOacKZXkSopDModcykRCxmdkidiUjAtQWarZMZkJmbJcgZqTl3fTjpZ6R_2XCY3p6eCxiY3vTUsNokXsbB-p76m8pZstRhs8mnZo-rVPKt_HYDBS9L1fBzNstifkyJkW7XK_C_J2f_d685isnh-ebq5XSSUAYmInM6dzrQTotOQO0qq0uRLSWdClNso5wZjUKq9LK2zF8owzIWDy13Vac7Eg57vfIfjP0WIsPvwYJmssuMqYnK6EnqiLHVVN1hisK4bQdCZsC2DFb72iG4ufehN6tj8cy87W_-BfK_ENhTdpvg</recordid><startdate>20220525</startdate><enddate>20220525</enddate><creator>Zheng, Wu-Wu</creator><creator>Chen, Lixia</creator><creator>Chen, Shunping</creator><creator>Zhu, Jian</creator><creator>Lin, Feng</creator><creator>Xu, Shihao</creator><general>Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2287-998X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220525</creationdate><title>Value of ovarian positional assessment on 4D hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography</title><author>Zheng, Wu-Wu ; Chen, Lixia ; Chen, Shunping ; Zhu, Jian ; Lin, Feng ; Xu, Shihao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-e417f98963195b2f15cbe8634fe19b9a6ff3004968dbe3ec087203315909d5d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Fallopian tubes</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Menstruation</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiation effects</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Three dimensional imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Wu-Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Lixia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shunping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Shihao</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Medical ultrasonography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zheng, Wu-Wu</au><au>Chen, Lixia</au><au>Chen, Shunping</au><au>Zhu, Jian</au><au>Lin, Feng</au><au>Xu, Shihao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value of ovarian positional assessment on 4D hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography</atitle><jtitle>Medical ultrasonography</jtitle><addtitle>Med Ultrason</addtitle><date>2022-05-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>167-173</pages><issn>1844-4172</issn><eissn>2066-8643</eissn><abstract>To investigate the positional relationship between the ovary and Fallopian tube and the relationship between the ovarian position and tubal morphology.
A total of 195 patients with 338 fallopian tubes were enrolled in this retrospective study. The ovarian and tubal positions were defined relative to the uterus in all directions. Tubal morphology was classified as smooth or tortuous.
The distribution of the Fallopian tubes corresponded to the positions of the ipsilateral ovaries in the superoinferior direction (χ2 =197.653, p<0.001), mediolateral direction (χ2 =237.447, p <0.001) and anteroposterior direction (χ2 =109.746, p<0.001). Tubal morphology differed according to ovarian position in the superoinferior (χ2 =21.804, p<0.001), mediolateral directions (χ2 =4.679, p=0.031) but not in the anteroposterior direction (χ2 =0.793, p=0.373).
Evaluating the ovarian position can provide preliminary information on the distribution and shapeof the Fallopian tube, helping the operator choose the appropriate initial plane and the necessary approaches for inspection.</abstract><cop>Romania</cop><pub>Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology</pub><pmid>34508616</pmid><doi>10.11152/mu-3209</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2287-998X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1844-4172 |
ispartof | Medical ultrasonography, 2022-05, Vol.24 (2), p.167-173 |
issn | 1844-4172 2066-8643 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2670463439 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Accuracy Cervix Fallopian tubes Infertility Medical imaging Menstruation Morphology Ovaries Patients Radiation effects Side effects Three dimensional imaging Ultrasonic imaging Uterus |
title | Value of ovarian positional assessment on 4D hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T08%3A46%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20of%20ovarian%20positional%20assessment%20on%204D%20hysterosalpingo-contrast%20sonography&rft.jtitle=Medical%20ultrasonography&rft.au=Zheng,%20Wu-Wu&rft.date=2022-05-25&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=167-173&rft.issn=1844-4172&rft.eissn=2066-8643&rft_id=info:doi/10.11152/mu-3209&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2670463439%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670463439&rft_id=info:pmid/34508616&rfr_iscdi=true |