Crack propagation mechanism of single- and double-flawed rock specimens under tension–shear stress condition
The rock mass of underground engineering is often faced with tensile–shear failure disaster due to excavation. However, the failure mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress state is not well understood at present and there is no relevant experimental investigation due to the difficulty o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arabian journal of geosciences 2022-06, Vol.15 (11), Article 1062 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Arabian journal of geosciences |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Cen, Duofeng Liu, Chang Liu, Chao Huang, Da |
description | The rock mass of underground engineering is often faced with tensile–shear failure disaster due to excavation. However, the failure mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress state is not well understood at present and there is no relevant experimental investigation due to the difficulty of test technology. To reveal the crack propagation mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress, experimental investigation using a developed tension–shear auxiliary device and numerical simulation were conducted in this study. The results obtained from direct shear tests of single-flawed sandstone specimens under constant normal tensile stress indicate that the flaw inclination angle and normal tensile stress significantly affect the shear strength and crack pattern. The cracks are mainly subjected to tensioning for different flaw inclination angles. It is easy to develop secondary cracks to produce the nucleation failure with the primary cracks when the flaw inclination angle is an acute angle. Digital image correlation (DIC) analysis suggests that the strain concentrations are greater gradually near the two tips of the flaw and the cracks grow along the strain concentration areas. Furthermore, the crack propagating process and stress field evolution in single-flawed and double-flawed specimens were examined by DEM simulations. The primary cracks are initiated at the tensile stress concentration areas of flaws, and then the concentration areas transfer to the crack tips and impel the crack propagating. The nucleation failure formed by two wing cracks is a main rock bridge failure pattern in double-flawed specimens. The nucleation failure area becomes small and maybe disappeared due to the increase in normal tensile stress. The conclusions can provide the theoretical reference for the stability evaluation of underground rock mass excavation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12517-022-10065-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2670111113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2670111113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a187x-bc191e581315b6a4364e3d8151e316be7c796135f7c4d4ae759ae846ed0bb813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVaWWBsycWynS1TxJ1Viw95y7Emb0jjBTkXZcQduyElwCYIds5ln6X1v5EfIOWSXkGXqKkIuQLEsz1l6S8F2B2QCpZRMCV4e_mqAY3IS4zp5ykyVE-Lnwdhn2oeuN0szNJ2nLdqV8U1saVfT2PjlBhk13lHXbauk6415RUdDl7jYo21a9JFuvcNAhyRTxuf7R1yhCTQOAWOktvOu2YefkqPabCKe_ewpebq9eZrfs8Xj3cP8esEMlGrHKgszQFECB1FJU3BZIHclCEAOskJl1UwCF7WyhSsMKjEzWBYSXVZViZqSizE2_etli3HQ624bfLqoc6ky2A9Prnx02dDFGLDWfWhaE940ZHpfqx5r1alW_V2r3iWIj1BMZr_E8Bf9D_UF_iN9zw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670111113</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crack propagation mechanism of single- and double-flawed rock specimens under tension–shear stress condition</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Cen, Duofeng ; Liu, Chang ; Liu, Chao ; Huang, Da</creator><creatorcontrib>Cen, Duofeng ; Liu, Chang ; Liu, Chao ; Huang, Da</creatorcontrib><description>The rock mass of underground engineering is often faced with tensile–shear failure disaster due to excavation. However, the failure mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress state is not well understood at present and there is no relevant experimental investigation due to the difficulty of test technology. To reveal the crack propagation mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress, experimental investigation using a developed tension–shear auxiliary device and numerical simulation were conducted in this study. The results obtained from direct shear tests of single-flawed sandstone specimens under constant normal tensile stress indicate that the flaw inclination angle and normal tensile stress significantly affect the shear strength and crack pattern. The cracks are mainly subjected to tensioning for different flaw inclination angles. It is easy to develop secondary cracks to produce the nucleation failure with the primary cracks when the flaw inclination angle is an acute angle. Digital image correlation (DIC) analysis suggests that the strain concentrations are greater gradually near the two tips of the flaw and the cracks grow along the strain concentration areas. Furthermore, the crack propagating process and stress field evolution in single-flawed and double-flawed specimens were examined by DEM simulations. The primary cracks are initiated at the tensile stress concentration areas of flaws, and then the concentration areas transfer to the crack tips and impel the crack propagating. The nucleation failure formed by two wing cracks is a main rock bridge failure pattern in double-flawed specimens. The nucleation failure area becomes small and maybe disappeared due to the increase in normal tensile stress. The conclusions can provide the theoretical reference for the stability evaluation of underground rock mass excavation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-7511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-7538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12517-022-10065-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Bridge failure ; Crack propagation ; Crack tips ; Cracks ; Digital imaging ; Dredging ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth science ; Earth Sciences ; Excavation ; Failure mechanisms ; Flawed specimens ; Image processing ; Inclination angle ; Land bridges ; Mathematical models ; Nucleation ; Original Paper ; Rock masses ; Rocks ; Sandstone ; Sedimentary rocks ; Shear strength ; Shear stress ; Shear tests ; Stability analysis ; Strain concentration ; Stress concentration ; Stress distribution ; Stress propagation ; Tensile stress ; Tension ; Tensioning</subject><ispartof>Arabian journal of geosciences, 2022-06, Vol.15 (11), Article 1062</ispartof><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2022</rights><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a187x-bc191e581315b6a4364e3d8151e316be7c796135f7c4d4ae759ae846ed0bb813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a187x-bc191e581315b6a4364e3d8151e316be7c796135f7c4d4ae759ae846ed0bb813</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2795-1354</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-022-10065-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12517-022-10065-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cen, Duofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Da</creatorcontrib><title>Crack propagation mechanism of single- and double-flawed rock specimens under tension–shear stress condition</title><title>Arabian journal of geosciences</title><addtitle>Arab J Geosci</addtitle><description>The rock mass of underground engineering is often faced with tensile–shear failure disaster due to excavation. However, the failure mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress state is not well understood at present and there is no relevant experimental investigation due to the difficulty of test technology. To reveal the crack propagation mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress, experimental investigation using a developed tension–shear auxiliary device and numerical simulation were conducted in this study. The results obtained from direct shear tests of single-flawed sandstone specimens under constant normal tensile stress indicate that the flaw inclination angle and normal tensile stress significantly affect the shear strength and crack pattern. The cracks are mainly subjected to tensioning for different flaw inclination angles. It is easy to develop secondary cracks to produce the nucleation failure with the primary cracks when the flaw inclination angle is an acute angle. Digital image correlation (DIC) analysis suggests that the strain concentrations are greater gradually near the two tips of the flaw and the cracks grow along the strain concentration areas. Furthermore, the crack propagating process and stress field evolution in single-flawed and double-flawed specimens were examined by DEM simulations. The primary cracks are initiated at the tensile stress concentration areas of flaws, and then the concentration areas transfer to the crack tips and impel the crack propagating. The nucleation failure formed by two wing cracks is a main rock bridge failure pattern in double-flawed specimens. The nucleation failure area becomes small and maybe disappeared due to the increase in normal tensile stress. The conclusions can provide the theoretical reference for the stability evaluation of underground rock mass excavation.</description><subject>Bridge failure</subject><subject>Crack propagation</subject><subject>Crack tips</subject><subject>Cracks</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Dredging</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Excavation</subject><subject>Failure mechanisms</subject><subject>Flawed specimens</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Inclination angle</subject><subject>Land bridges</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nucleation</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Rock masses</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Sandstone</subject><subject>Sedimentary rocks</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Shear tests</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Strain concentration</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><subject>Stress distribution</subject><subject>Stress propagation</subject><subject>Tensile stress</subject><subject>Tension</subject><subject>Tensioning</subject><issn>1866-7511</issn><issn>1866-7538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVaWWBsycWynS1TxJ1Viw95y7Emb0jjBTkXZcQduyElwCYIds5ln6X1v5EfIOWSXkGXqKkIuQLEsz1l6S8F2B2QCpZRMCV4e_mqAY3IS4zp5ykyVE-Lnwdhn2oeuN0szNJ2nLdqV8U1saVfT2PjlBhk13lHXbauk6415RUdDl7jYo21a9JFuvcNAhyRTxuf7R1yhCTQOAWOktvOu2YefkqPabCKe_ewpebq9eZrfs8Xj3cP8esEMlGrHKgszQFECB1FJU3BZIHclCEAOskJl1UwCF7WyhSsMKjEzWBYSXVZViZqSizE2_etli3HQ624bfLqoc6ky2A9Prnx02dDFGLDWfWhaE940ZHpfqx5r1alW_V2r3iWIj1BMZr_E8Bf9D_UF_iN9zw</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Cen, Duofeng</creator><creator>Liu, Chang</creator><creator>Liu, Chao</creator><creator>Huang, Da</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2795-1354</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Crack propagation mechanism of single- and double-flawed rock specimens under tension–shear stress condition</title><author>Cen, Duofeng ; Liu, Chang ; Liu, Chao ; Huang, Da</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a187x-bc191e581315b6a4364e3d8151e316be7c796135f7c4d4ae759ae846ed0bb813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bridge failure</topic><topic>Crack propagation</topic><topic>Crack tips</topic><topic>Cracks</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Dredging</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Excavation</topic><topic>Failure mechanisms</topic><topic>Flawed specimens</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Inclination angle</topic><topic>Land bridges</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nucleation</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Rock masses</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Sandstone</topic><topic>Sedimentary rocks</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Shear tests</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Strain concentration</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><topic>Stress distribution</topic><topic>Stress propagation</topic><topic>Tensile stress</topic><topic>Tension</topic><topic>Tensioning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cen, Duofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Da</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cen, Duofeng</au><au>Liu, Chang</au><au>Liu, Chao</au><au>Huang, Da</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crack propagation mechanism of single- and double-flawed rock specimens under tension–shear stress condition</atitle><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle><stitle>Arab J Geosci</stitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><artnum>1062</artnum><issn>1866-7511</issn><eissn>1866-7538</eissn><abstract>The rock mass of underground engineering is often faced with tensile–shear failure disaster due to excavation. However, the failure mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress state is not well understood at present and there is no relevant experimental investigation due to the difficulty of test technology. To reveal the crack propagation mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress, experimental investigation using a developed tension–shear auxiliary device and numerical simulation were conducted in this study. The results obtained from direct shear tests of single-flawed sandstone specimens under constant normal tensile stress indicate that the flaw inclination angle and normal tensile stress significantly affect the shear strength and crack pattern. The cracks are mainly subjected to tensioning for different flaw inclination angles. It is easy to develop secondary cracks to produce the nucleation failure with the primary cracks when the flaw inclination angle is an acute angle. Digital image correlation (DIC) analysis suggests that the strain concentrations are greater gradually near the two tips of the flaw and the cracks grow along the strain concentration areas. Furthermore, the crack propagating process and stress field evolution in single-flawed and double-flawed specimens were examined by DEM simulations. The primary cracks are initiated at the tensile stress concentration areas of flaws, and then the concentration areas transfer to the crack tips and impel the crack propagating. The nucleation failure formed by two wing cracks is a main rock bridge failure pattern in double-flawed specimens. The nucleation failure area becomes small and maybe disappeared due to the increase in normal tensile stress. The conclusions can provide the theoretical reference for the stability evaluation of underground rock mass excavation.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s12517-022-10065-x</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2795-1354</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1866-7511 |
ispartof | Arabian journal of geosciences, 2022-06, Vol.15 (11), Article 1062 |
issn | 1866-7511 1866-7538 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2670111113 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Bridge failure Crack propagation Crack tips Cracks Digital imaging Dredging Earth and Environmental Science Earth science Earth Sciences Excavation Failure mechanisms Flawed specimens Image processing Inclination angle Land bridges Mathematical models Nucleation Original Paper Rock masses Rocks Sandstone Sedimentary rocks Shear strength Shear stress Shear tests Stability analysis Strain concentration Stress concentration Stress distribution Stress propagation Tensile stress Tension Tensioning |
title | Crack propagation mechanism of single- and double-flawed rock specimens under tension–shear stress condition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T13%3A24%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crack%20propagation%20mechanism%20of%20single-%20and%20double-flawed%20rock%20specimens%20under%20tension%E2%80%93shear%20stress%20condition&rft.jtitle=Arabian%20journal%20of%20geosciences&rft.au=Cen,%20Duofeng&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=11&rft.artnum=1062&rft.issn=1866-7511&rft.eissn=1866-7538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12517-022-10065-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2670111113%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670111113&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |