Crack propagation mechanism of single- and double-flawed rock specimens under tension–shear stress condition

The rock mass of underground engineering is often faced with tensile–shear failure disaster due to excavation. However, the failure mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress state is not well understood at present and there is no relevant experimental investigation due to the difficulty o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arabian journal of geosciences 2022-06, Vol.15 (11), Article 1062
Hauptverfasser: Cen, Duofeng, Liu, Chang, Liu, Chao, Huang, Da
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Arabian journal of geosciences
container_volume 15
creator Cen, Duofeng
Liu, Chang
Liu, Chao
Huang, Da
description The rock mass of underground engineering is often faced with tensile–shear failure disaster due to excavation. However, the failure mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress state is not well understood at present and there is no relevant experimental investigation due to the difficulty of test technology. To reveal the crack propagation mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress, experimental investigation using a developed tension–shear auxiliary device and numerical simulation were conducted in this study. The results obtained from direct shear tests of single-flawed sandstone specimens under constant normal tensile stress indicate that the flaw inclination angle and normal tensile stress significantly affect the shear strength and crack pattern. The cracks are mainly subjected to tensioning for different flaw inclination angles. It is easy to develop secondary cracks to produce the nucleation failure with the primary cracks when the flaw inclination angle is an acute angle. Digital image correlation (DIC) analysis suggests that the strain concentrations are greater gradually near the two tips of the flaw and the cracks grow along the strain concentration areas. Furthermore, the crack propagating process and stress field evolution in single-flawed and double-flawed specimens were examined by DEM simulations. The primary cracks are initiated at the tensile stress concentration areas of flaws, and then the concentration areas transfer to the crack tips and impel the crack propagating. The nucleation failure formed by two wing cracks is a main rock bridge failure pattern in double-flawed specimens. The nucleation failure area becomes small and maybe disappeared due to the increase in normal tensile stress. The conclusions can provide the theoretical reference for the stability evaluation of underground rock mass excavation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12517-022-10065-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2670111113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2670111113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a187x-bc191e581315b6a4364e3d8151e316be7c796135f7c4d4ae759ae846ed0bb813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVaWWBsycWynS1TxJ1Viw95y7Emb0jjBTkXZcQduyElwCYIds5ln6X1v5EfIOWSXkGXqKkIuQLEsz1l6S8F2B2QCpZRMCV4e_mqAY3IS4zp5ykyVE-Lnwdhn2oeuN0szNJ2nLdqV8U1saVfT2PjlBhk13lHXbauk6415RUdDl7jYo21a9JFuvcNAhyRTxuf7R1yhCTQOAWOktvOu2YefkqPabCKe_ewpebq9eZrfs8Xj3cP8esEMlGrHKgszQFECB1FJU3BZIHclCEAOskJl1UwCF7WyhSsMKjEzWBYSXVZViZqSizE2_etli3HQ624bfLqoc6ky2A9Prnx02dDFGLDWfWhaE940ZHpfqx5r1alW_V2r3iWIj1BMZr_E8Bf9D_UF_iN9zw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670111113</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crack propagation mechanism of single- and double-flawed rock specimens under tension–shear stress condition</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Cen, Duofeng ; Liu, Chang ; Liu, Chao ; Huang, Da</creator><creatorcontrib>Cen, Duofeng ; Liu, Chang ; Liu, Chao ; Huang, Da</creatorcontrib><description>The rock mass of underground engineering is often faced with tensile–shear failure disaster due to excavation. However, the failure mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress state is not well understood at present and there is no relevant experimental investigation due to the difficulty of test technology. To reveal the crack propagation mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress, experimental investigation using a developed tension–shear auxiliary device and numerical simulation were conducted in this study. The results obtained from direct shear tests of single-flawed sandstone specimens under constant normal tensile stress indicate that the flaw inclination angle and normal tensile stress significantly affect the shear strength and crack pattern. The cracks are mainly subjected to tensioning for different flaw inclination angles. It is easy to develop secondary cracks to produce the nucleation failure with the primary cracks when the flaw inclination angle is an acute angle. Digital image correlation (DIC) analysis suggests that the strain concentrations are greater gradually near the two tips of the flaw and the cracks grow along the strain concentration areas. Furthermore, the crack propagating process and stress field evolution in single-flawed and double-flawed specimens were examined by DEM simulations. The primary cracks are initiated at the tensile stress concentration areas of flaws, and then the concentration areas transfer to the crack tips and impel the crack propagating. The nucleation failure formed by two wing cracks is a main rock bridge failure pattern in double-flawed specimens. The nucleation failure area becomes small and maybe disappeared due to the increase in normal tensile stress. The conclusions can provide the theoretical reference for the stability evaluation of underground rock mass excavation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-7511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-7538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12517-022-10065-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Bridge failure ; Crack propagation ; Crack tips ; Cracks ; Digital imaging ; Dredging ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth science ; Earth Sciences ; Excavation ; Failure mechanisms ; Flawed specimens ; Image processing ; Inclination angle ; Land bridges ; Mathematical models ; Nucleation ; Original Paper ; Rock masses ; Rocks ; Sandstone ; Sedimentary rocks ; Shear strength ; Shear stress ; Shear tests ; Stability analysis ; Strain concentration ; Stress concentration ; Stress distribution ; Stress propagation ; Tensile stress ; Tension ; Tensioning</subject><ispartof>Arabian journal of geosciences, 2022-06, Vol.15 (11), Article 1062</ispartof><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2022</rights><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a187x-bc191e581315b6a4364e3d8151e316be7c796135f7c4d4ae759ae846ed0bb813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a187x-bc191e581315b6a4364e3d8151e316be7c796135f7c4d4ae759ae846ed0bb813</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2795-1354</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-022-10065-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12517-022-10065-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cen, Duofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Da</creatorcontrib><title>Crack propagation mechanism of single- and double-flawed rock specimens under tension–shear stress condition</title><title>Arabian journal of geosciences</title><addtitle>Arab J Geosci</addtitle><description>The rock mass of underground engineering is often faced with tensile–shear failure disaster due to excavation. However, the failure mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress state is not well understood at present and there is no relevant experimental investigation due to the difficulty of test technology. To reveal the crack propagation mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress, experimental investigation using a developed tension–shear auxiliary device and numerical simulation were conducted in this study. The results obtained from direct shear tests of single-flawed sandstone specimens under constant normal tensile stress indicate that the flaw inclination angle and normal tensile stress significantly affect the shear strength and crack pattern. The cracks are mainly subjected to tensioning for different flaw inclination angles. It is easy to develop secondary cracks to produce the nucleation failure with the primary cracks when the flaw inclination angle is an acute angle. Digital image correlation (DIC) analysis suggests that the strain concentrations are greater gradually near the two tips of the flaw and the cracks grow along the strain concentration areas. Furthermore, the crack propagating process and stress field evolution in single-flawed and double-flawed specimens were examined by DEM simulations. The primary cracks are initiated at the tensile stress concentration areas of flaws, and then the concentration areas transfer to the crack tips and impel the crack propagating. The nucleation failure formed by two wing cracks is a main rock bridge failure pattern in double-flawed specimens. The nucleation failure area becomes small and maybe disappeared due to the increase in normal tensile stress. The conclusions can provide the theoretical reference for the stability evaluation of underground rock mass excavation.</description><subject>Bridge failure</subject><subject>Crack propagation</subject><subject>Crack tips</subject><subject>Cracks</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Dredging</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Excavation</subject><subject>Failure mechanisms</subject><subject>Flawed specimens</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Inclination angle</subject><subject>Land bridges</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nucleation</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Rock masses</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Sandstone</subject><subject>Sedimentary rocks</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Shear tests</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Strain concentration</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><subject>Stress distribution</subject><subject>Stress propagation</subject><subject>Tensile stress</subject><subject>Tension</subject><subject>Tensioning</subject><issn>1866-7511</issn><issn>1866-7538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVaWWBsycWynS1TxJ1Viw95y7Emb0jjBTkXZcQduyElwCYIds5ln6X1v5EfIOWSXkGXqKkIuQLEsz1l6S8F2B2QCpZRMCV4e_mqAY3IS4zp5ykyVE-Lnwdhn2oeuN0szNJ2nLdqV8U1saVfT2PjlBhk13lHXbauk6415RUdDl7jYo21a9JFuvcNAhyRTxuf7R1yhCTQOAWOktvOu2YefkqPabCKe_ewpebq9eZrfs8Xj3cP8esEMlGrHKgszQFECB1FJU3BZIHclCEAOskJl1UwCF7WyhSsMKjEzWBYSXVZViZqSizE2_etli3HQ624bfLqoc6ky2A9Prnx02dDFGLDWfWhaE940ZHpfqx5r1alW_V2r3iWIj1BMZr_E8Bf9D_UF_iN9zw</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Cen, Duofeng</creator><creator>Liu, Chang</creator><creator>Liu, Chao</creator><creator>Huang, Da</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2795-1354</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Crack propagation mechanism of single- and double-flawed rock specimens under tension–shear stress condition</title><author>Cen, Duofeng ; Liu, Chang ; Liu, Chao ; Huang, Da</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a187x-bc191e581315b6a4364e3d8151e316be7c796135f7c4d4ae759ae846ed0bb813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bridge failure</topic><topic>Crack propagation</topic><topic>Crack tips</topic><topic>Cracks</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Dredging</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Excavation</topic><topic>Failure mechanisms</topic><topic>Flawed specimens</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Inclination angle</topic><topic>Land bridges</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nucleation</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Rock masses</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Sandstone</topic><topic>Sedimentary rocks</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Shear tests</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Strain concentration</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><topic>Stress distribution</topic><topic>Stress propagation</topic><topic>Tensile stress</topic><topic>Tension</topic><topic>Tensioning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cen, Duofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Da</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cen, Duofeng</au><au>Liu, Chang</au><au>Liu, Chao</au><au>Huang, Da</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crack propagation mechanism of single- and double-flawed rock specimens under tension–shear stress condition</atitle><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle><stitle>Arab J Geosci</stitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><artnum>1062</artnum><issn>1866-7511</issn><eissn>1866-7538</eissn><abstract>The rock mass of underground engineering is often faced with tensile–shear failure disaster due to excavation. However, the failure mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress state is not well understood at present and there is no relevant experimental investigation due to the difficulty of test technology. To reveal the crack propagation mechanism of flawed rocks under tensile–shear stress, experimental investigation using a developed tension–shear auxiliary device and numerical simulation were conducted in this study. The results obtained from direct shear tests of single-flawed sandstone specimens under constant normal tensile stress indicate that the flaw inclination angle and normal tensile stress significantly affect the shear strength and crack pattern. The cracks are mainly subjected to tensioning for different flaw inclination angles. It is easy to develop secondary cracks to produce the nucleation failure with the primary cracks when the flaw inclination angle is an acute angle. Digital image correlation (DIC) analysis suggests that the strain concentrations are greater gradually near the two tips of the flaw and the cracks grow along the strain concentration areas. Furthermore, the crack propagating process and stress field evolution in single-flawed and double-flawed specimens were examined by DEM simulations. The primary cracks are initiated at the tensile stress concentration areas of flaws, and then the concentration areas transfer to the crack tips and impel the crack propagating. The nucleation failure formed by two wing cracks is a main rock bridge failure pattern in double-flawed specimens. The nucleation failure area becomes small and maybe disappeared due to the increase in normal tensile stress. The conclusions can provide the theoretical reference for the stability evaluation of underground rock mass excavation.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s12517-022-10065-x</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2795-1354</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1866-7511
ispartof Arabian journal of geosciences, 2022-06, Vol.15 (11), Article 1062
issn 1866-7511
1866-7538
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2670111113
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Bridge failure
Crack propagation
Crack tips
Cracks
Digital imaging
Dredging
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth science
Earth Sciences
Excavation
Failure mechanisms
Flawed specimens
Image processing
Inclination angle
Land bridges
Mathematical models
Nucleation
Original Paper
Rock masses
Rocks
Sandstone
Sedimentary rocks
Shear strength
Shear stress
Shear tests
Stability analysis
Strain concentration
Stress concentration
Stress distribution
Stress propagation
Tensile stress
Tension
Tensioning
title Crack propagation mechanism of single- and double-flawed rock specimens under tension–shear stress condition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T13%3A24%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crack%20propagation%20mechanism%20of%20single-%20and%20double-flawed%20rock%20specimens%20under%20tension%E2%80%93shear%20stress%20condition&rft.jtitle=Arabian%20journal%20of%20geosciences&rft.au=Cen,%20Duofeng&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=11&rft.artnum=1062&rft.issn=1866-7511&rft.eissn=1866-7538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12517-022-10065-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2670111113%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670111113&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true