The Effects of Surface Curvature and Temperature on Charge Transfer During Ice‐Ice Collisions
Repetitive collisions of sublimating ice surfaces, created by freezing liquid water, produced charge separation Q of a magnitude (pC) comparable to earlier results of vapor‐grown ice crystals repetitively collided in a saturated environment. Those results had been explained by a theory of charge dis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2022-05, Vol.127 (10), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 127 |
creator | Turner, G. J. Stow, C. D. |
description | Repetitive collisions of sublimating ice surfaces, created by freezing liquid water, produced charge separation Q of a magnitude (pC) comparable to earlier results of vapor‐grown ice crystals repetitively collided in a saturated environment. Those results had been explained by a theory of charge distribution in a quasi‐liquid surface layer quasi‐liquid layer (QLL) mediated at the moment of impact by collisional melting. The present results are from long‐duration contacts (15 ms) with transfer of kinetic energy estimated to be a factor of 104 greater and charging rate 98% slower. They do not support an assumption in the proposed mechanism of collisional melting and are contrary to the basic assumptions of that theory: that significant Q occurs only in growing surfaces (i.e., in a supersaturated condition that implies the presence of liquid water) that were originally grown from vapor, and for which the contact is less than 1 ms. The results are opposite to a rule that in the case of differing surfaces (vapor‐grown and rimed), the greater sublimating surface would charge negatively. Here, for surfaces of frozen water, the surface further from equilibrium becomes positively charged. The results are not inconsistent with recent reports of simulations that suggest that the thickness of a QLL in sublimating surfaces may not be less than the equilibrium value. Apparently, for differing ice surfaces, Q is of the order of 1 fC, whereas for collisions of similar ices on metal substrates (whether both vapor‐deposited, or both frozen liquid water), Q is of the order of 1 pC.
Plain Language Summary
Results of charge separation between two pieces of ice in repeated collisions give results of similar magnitude (picoCoulombs) to an earlier experiment but of polarity which can be explained in terms of the difference in curvature (and inferred relative thicknesses of a quasi‐liquid surface layer) of the two pieces (in contrast to the earlier work which collided two similar pieces). These results are distinguishable from those which are the basis of a theory based on collisions between vapor‐grown crystals and rimed ice.
Key Points
Charge transfer between ice surfaces is from a curved surface to a flat surface in undersaturated and near‐saturation environments
Conditions for a quasi‐liquid layer (QLL) disappear at contact; a new QLL must be established about any bridging spicules
Flow in the QLL is parallel (not transverse) to the QLL‐bulk interface |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2021JD035552 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2669522948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2669522948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1797-cde8fc514dc507d21786ec5012b5afbfb9f09eba1b449fed9234cad2588996403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRsNTefIAFr0Z3N7tJ9ihprS0FQSN4Wzab2TYlTepuU-nNR_AZfRJTIuLJucw_8M0M_4_QJSU3lDB5ywij8zEJhRDsBA0YjWSQSBmd_ur49RyNvF-TrhIScsEHSGUrwBNrwew8bix-bp3VBnDaur3etQ6wrgucwWYLrp-bGqcr7ZaAM6drb8HhcevKeolnBr4-PmfH7aaqSl82tb9AZ1ZXHkY_fYhe7idZ-hAsHqez9G4RGBrLODAFJNYIygsjSFwwGicRdJKyXGib21xaIiHXNOdcWigkC7nRBRPJ0SIn4RBd9Xe3rnlrwe_Uumld3b1ULIqkYEzypKOue8q4xnsHVm1dudHuoChRxxTV3xQ7POzx97KCw7-smk-fxiLuvITfvp1z0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2669522948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Surface Curvature and Temperature on Charge Transfer During Ice‐Ice Collisions</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Turner, G. J. ; Stow, C. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Turner, G. J. ; Stow, C. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Repetitive collisions of sublimating ice surfaces, created by freezing liquid water, produced charge separation Q of a magnitude (pC) comparable to earlier results of vapor‐grown ice crystals repetitively collided in a saturated environment. Those results had been explained by a theory of charge distribution in a quasi‐liquid surface layer quasi‐liquid layer (QLL) mediated at the moment of impact by collisional melting. The present results are from long‐duration contacts (15 ms) with transfer of kinetic energy estimated to be a factor of 104 greater and charging rate 98% slower. They do not support an assumption in the proposed mechanism of collisional melting and are contrary to the basic assumptions of that theory: that significant Q occurs only in growing surfaces (i.e., in a supersaturated condition that implies the presence of liquid water) that were originally grown from vapor, and for which the contact is less than 1 ms. The results are opposite to a rule that in the case of differing surfaces (vapor‐grown and rimed), the greater sublimating surface would charge negatively. Here, for surfaces of frozen water, the surface further from equilibrium becomes positively charged. The results are not inconsistent with recent reports of simulations that suggest that the thickness of a QLL in sublimating surfaces may not be less than the equilibrium value. Apparently, for differing ice surfaces, Q is of the order of 1 fC, whereas for collisions of similar ices on metal substrates (whether both vapor‐deposited, or both frozen liquid water), Q is of the order of 1 pC.
Plain Language Summary
Results of charge separation between two pieces of ice in repeated collisions give results of similar magnitude (picoCoulombs) to an earlier experiment but of polarity which can be explained in terms of the difference in curvature (and inferred relative thicknesses of a quasi‐liquid surface layer) of the two pieces (in contrast to the earlier work which collided two similar pieces). These results are distinguishable from those which are the basis of a theory based on collisions between vapor‐grown crystals and rimed ice.
Key Points
Charge transfer between ice surfaces is from a curved surface to a flat surface in undersaturated and near‐saturation environments
Conditions for a quasi‐liquid layer (QLL) disappear at contact; a new QLL must be established about any bridging spicules
Flow in the QLL is parallel (not transverse) to the QLL‐bulk interface</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021JD035552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>charge carriers ; Charge distribution ; Charge transfer ; charge transport ; Collisions ; Contact melting ; Crystal growth ; Crystals ; Curvature ; Freezing ; Geophysics ; growth processes ; Ice ; Ice crystals ; ice surfaces ; interfaces ; Kinetic energy ; Liquid surfaces ; Melting ; Metals ; quasi‐liquid layer ; Separation ; Substrates ; Surface boundary layer ; Surface charge ; Surface layers ; Temperature effects ; Theories ; Thickness ; topological diode ; Vapors ; Water</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2022-05, Vol.127 (10), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1797-cde8fc514dc507d21786ec5012b5afbfb9f09eba1b449fed9234cad2588996403</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2298-0751</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021JD035552$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021JD035552$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turner, G. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stow, C. D.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Surface Curvature and Temperature on Charge Transfer During Ice‐Ice Collisions</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>Repetitive collisions of sublimating ice surfaces, created by freezing liquid water, produced charge separation Q of a magnitude (pC) comparable to earlier results of vapor‐grown ice crystals repetitively collided in a saturated environment. Those results had been explained by a theory of charge distribution in a quasi‐liquid surface layer quasi‐liquid layer (QLL) mediated at the moment of impact by collisional melting. The present results are from long‐duration contacts (15 ms) with transfer of kinetic energy estimated to be a factor of 104 greater and charging rate 98% slower. They do not support an assumption in the proposed mechanism of collisional melting and are contrary to the basic assumptions of that theory: that significant Q occurs only in growing surfaces (i.e., in a supersaturated condition that implies the presence of liquid water) that were originally grown from vapor, and for which the contact is less than 1 ms. The results are opposite to a rule that in the case of differing surfaces (vapor‐grown and rimed), the greater sublimating surface would charge negatively. Here, for surfaces of frozen water, the surface further from equilibrium becomes positively charged. The results are not inconsistent with recent reports of simulations that suggest that the thickness of a QLL in sublimating surfaces may not be less than the equilibrium value. Apparently, for differing ice surfaces, Q is of the order of 1 fC, whereas for collisions of similar ices on metal substrates (whether both vapor‐deposited, or both frozen liquid water), Q is of the order of 1 pC.
Plain Language Summary
Results of charge separation between two pieces of ice in repeated collisions give results of similar magnitude (picoCoulombs) to an earlier experiment but of polarity which can be explained in terms of the difference in curvature (and inferred relative thicknesses of a quasi‐liquid surface layer) of the two pieces (in contrast to the earlier work which collided two similar pieces). These results are distinguishable from those which are the basis of a theory based on collisions between vapor‐grown crystals and rimed ice.
Key Points
Charge transfer between ice surfaces is from a curved surface to a flat surface in undersaturated and near‐saturation environments
Conditions for a quasi‐liquid layer (QLL) disappear at contact; a new QLL must be established about any bridging spicules
Flow in the QLL is parallel (not transverse) to the QLL‐bulk interface</description><subject>charge carriers</subject><subject>Charge distribution</subject><subject>Charge transfer</subject><subject>charge transport</subject><subject>Collisions</subject><subject>Contact melting</subject><subject>Crystal growth</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>Curvature</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>growth processes</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Ice crystals</subject><subject>ice surfaces</subject><subject>interfaces</subject><subject>Kinetic energy</subject><subject>Liquid surfaces</subject><subject>Melting</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>quasi‐liquid layer</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Surface boundary layer</subject><subject>Surface charge</subject><subject>Surface layers</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>topological diode</subject><subject>Vapors</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRsNTefIAFr0Z3N7tJ9ihprS0FQSN4Wzab2TYlTepuU-nNR_AZfRJTIuLJucw_8M0M_4_QJSU3lDB5ywij8zEJhRDsBA0YjWSQSBmd_ur49RyNvF-TrhIScsEHSGUrwBNrwew8bix-bp3VBnDaur3etQ6wrgucwWYLrp-bGqcr7ZaAM6drb8HhcevKeolnBr4-PmfH7aaqSl82tb9AZ1ZXHkY_fYhe7idZ-hAsHqez9G4RGBrLODAFJNYIygsjSFwwGicRdJKyXGib21xaIiHXNOdcWigkC7nRBRPJ0SIn4RBd9Xe3rnlrwe_Uumld3b1ULIqkYEzypKOue8q4xnsHVm1dudHuoChRxxTV3xQ7POzx97KCw7-smk-fxiLuvITfvp1z0g</recordid><startdate>20220527</startdate><enddate>20220527</enddate><creator>Turner, G. J.</creator><creator>Stow, C. D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-0751</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220527</creationdate><title>The Effects of Surface Curvature and Temperature on Charge Transfer During Ice‐Ice Collisions</title><author>Turner, G. J. ; Stow, C. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1797-cde8fc514dc507d21786ec5012b5afbfb9f09eba1b449fed9234cad2588996403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>charge carriers</topic><topic>Charge distribution</topic><topic>Charge transfer</topic><topic>charge transport</topic><topic>Collisions</topic><topic>Contact melting</topic><topic>Crystal growth</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>Curvature</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>growth processes</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Ice crystals</topic><topic>ice surfaces</topic><topic>interfaces</topic><topic>Kinetic energy</topic><topic>Liquid surfaces</topic><topic>Melting</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>quasi‐liquid layer</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Surface boundary layer</topic><topic>Surface charge</topic><topic>Surface layers</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>topological diode</topic><topic>Vapors</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turner, G. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stow, C. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turner, G. J.</au><au>Stow, C. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Surface Curvature and Temperature on Charge Transfer During Ice‐Ice Collisions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2022-05-27</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>10</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Repetitive collisions of sublimating ice surfaces, created by freezing liquid water, produced charge separation Q of a magnitude (pC) comparable to earlier results of vapor‐grown ice crystals repetitively collided in a saturated environment. Those results had been explained by a theory of charge distribution in a quasi‐liquid surface layer quasi‐liquid layer (QLL) mediated at the moment of impact by collisional melting. The present results are from long‐duration contacts (15 ms) with transfer of kinetic energy estimated to be a factor of 104 greater and charging rate 98% slower. They do not support an assumption in the proposed mechanism of collisional melting and are contrary to the basic assumptions of that theory: that significant Q occurs only in growing surfaces (i.e., in a supersaturated condition that implies the presence of liquid water) that were originally grown from vapor, and for which the contact is less than 1 ms. The results are opposite to a rule that in the case of differing surfaces (vapor‐grown and rimed), the greater sublimating surface would charge negatively. Here, for surfaces of frozen water, the surface further from equilibrium becomes positively charged. The results are not inconsistent with recent reports of simulations that suggest that the thickness of a QLL in sublimating surfaces may not be less than the equilibrium value. Apparently, for differing ice surfaces, Q is of the order of 1 fC, whereas for collisions of similar ices on metal substrates (whether both vapor‐deposited, or both frozen liquid water), Q is of the order of 1 pC.
Plain Language Summary
Results of charge separation between two pieces of ice in repeated collisions give results of similar magnitude (picoCoulombs) to an earlier experiment but of polarity which can be explained in terms of the difference in curvature (and inferred relative thicknesses of a quasi‐liquid surface layer) of the two pieces (in contrast to the earlier work which collided two similar pieces). These results are distinguishable from those which are the basis of a theory based on collisions between vapor‐grown crystals and rimed ice.
Key Points
Charge transfer between ice surfaces is from a curved surface to a flat surface in undersaturated and near‐saturation environments
Conditions for a quasi‐liquid layer (QLL) disappear at contact; a new QLL must be established about any bridging spicules
Flow in the QLL is parallel (not transverse) to the QLL‐bulk interface</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2021JD035552</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-0751</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2022-05, Vol.127 (10), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2669522948 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | charge carriers Charge distribution Charge transfer charge transport Collisions Contact melting Crystal growth Crystals Curvature Freezing Geophysics growth processes Ice Ice crystals ice surfaces interfaces Kinetic energy Liquid surfaces Melting Metals quasi‐liquid layer Separation Substrates Surface boundary layer Surface charge Surface layers Temperature effects Theories Thickness topological diode Vapors Water |
title | The Effects of Surface Curvature and Temperature on Charge Transfer During Ice‐Ice Collisions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T03%3A09%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Surface%20Curvature%20and%20Temperature%20on%20Charge%20Transfer%20During%20Ice%E2%80%90Ice%20Collisions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Turner,%20G.%20J.&rft.date=2022-05-27&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=10&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021JD035552&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2669522948%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2669522948&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |