Sweetpotato tolerance and Palmer amaranth control with indaziflam
Field studies were conducted in North Carolina in 2018 and 2019 to determine sweetpotato tolerance to indaziflam and its effectiveness in controlling Palmer amaranth in sweetpotato. Treatments included indaziflam pre-transplant; 7 d after transplanting (DATr) or 14 DATr at 29, 44, 58, or 73 g ai ha–...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Weed technology 2022-04, Vol.36 (2), p.202-206 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 206 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 202 |
| container_title | Weed technology |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Smith, Stephen C. Jennings, Katherine M. Monks, David W. Jordan, David L. Reberg-Horton, S. Chris Schwarz, Michael R. |
| description | Field studies were conducted in North Carolina in 2018 and 2019 to determine sweetpotato tolerance to indaziflam and its effectiveness in controlling Palmer amaranth in sweetpotato. Treatments included indaziflam pre-transplant; 7 d after transplanting (DATr) or 14 DATr at 29, 44, 58, or 73 g ai ha–1; and checks (weedy and weed-free). Indaziflam applied postemergence caused transient foliar injury to sweetpotato. Indaziflam pretransplant caused less injury to sweetpotato than other application timings regardless of rate. Palmer amaranth control was greatest when indaziflam was applied pretransplant or 7 DATr. In a weed-free environment, sweetpotato marketable yield decreased as indaziflam application was delayed. No differences in storage root length to width ratio were observed. Nomenclature: indaziflam; Palmer amaranth; Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson; sweetpotato; Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/wet.2022.13 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2668806326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2668806326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b332t-da073f71634c71b4f4bb3a1834d10757270fc8de139c864ec5ff38e5323df9833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsn_8CCJ5Gtk8xukh5L8QsKCip4C9nsBLdsNzWbsuivd0s9exre4eEd5mHsksOMA1e3A6WZACFmHI_YhJcl5EIVcMwmoOeQA6qPU3bW92sALoWACVu8DkRpG5JNIUuhpWg7R5nt6uzFthuKmd3YcZc-Mxe6FEObDc0Ymq62P41v7eacnXjb9nTxN6fs_f7ubfmYr54fnpaLVV4hipTXFhR6xSUWTvGq8EVVoeUai5qDKpVQ4J2uiePcaVmQK71HTSUKrP1cI07Z1aF3G8PXjvpk1mEXu_GkEVJqDRKFHKmbA-Vi6PtI3mxjM37wbTiYvSMzOjJ7R4bvO68PdNWE0NG_7C92QGbs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2668806326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sweetpotato tolerance and Palmer amaranth control with indaziflam</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Smith, Stephen C. ; Jennings, Katherine M. ; Monks, David W. ; Jordan, David L. ; Reberg-Horton, S. Chris ; Schwarz, Michael R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Stephen C. ; Jennings, Katherine M. ; Monks, David W. ; Jordan, David L. ; Reberg-Horton, S. Chris ; Schwarz, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><description>Field studies were conducted in North Carolina in 2018 and 2019 to determine sweetpotato tolerance to indaziflam and its effectiveness in controlling Palmer amaranth in sweetpotato. Treatments included indaziflam pre-transplant; 7 d after transplanting (DATr) or 14 DATr at 29, 44, 58, or 73 g ai ha–1; and checks (weedy and weed-free). Indaziflam applied postemergence caused transient foliar injury to sweetpotato. Indaziflam pretransplant caused less injury to sweetpotato than other application timings regardless of rate. Palmer amaranth control was greatest when indaziflam was applied pretransplant or 7 DATr. In a weed-free environment, sweetpotato marketable yield decreased as indaziflam application was delayed. No differences in storage root length to width ratio were observed. Nomenclature: indaziflam; Palmer amaranth; Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson; sweetpotato; Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2022.13</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Amaranth ; Amaranthus palmeri ; Crops ; herbicide ; Herbicides ; Horticulture ; Ipomoea batatas ; Science ; Soil sciences ; Sweet potatoes ; Variance analysis ; vegetable ; Weed control ; Weed management ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2022-04, Vol.36 (2), p.202-206</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/reusing-open-access-and-sage-choice-content</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b332t-da073f71634c71b4f4bb3a1834d10757270fc8de139c864ec5ff38e5323df9833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b332t-da073f71634c71b4f4bb3a1834d10757270fc8de139c864ec5ff38e5323df9833</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1798-7943 ; 0000-0002-8713-7119 ; 0000-0003-3708-3973</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, Katherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monks, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reberg-Horton, S. Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><title>Sweetpotato tolerance and Palmer amaranth control with indaziflam</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>Field studies were conducted in North Carolina in 2018 and 2019 to determine sweetpotato tolerance to indaziflam and its effectiveness in controlling Palmer amaranth in sweetpotato. Treatments included indaziflam pre-transplant; 7 d after transplanting (DATr) or 14 DATr at 29, 44, 58, or 73 g ai ha–1; and checks (weedy and weed-free). Indaziflam applied postemergence caused transient foliar injury to sweetpotato. Indaziflam pretransplant caused less injury to sweetpotato than other application timings regardless of rate. Palmer amaranth control was greatest when indaziflam was applied pretransplant or 7 DATr. In a weed-free environment, sweetpotato marketable yield decreased as indaziflam application was delayed. No differences in storage root length to width ratio were observed. Nomenclature: indaziflam; Palmer amaranth; Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson; sweetpotato; Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Amaranth</subject><subject>Amaranthus palmeri</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>herbicide</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>Ipomoea batatas</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Sweet potatoes</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>vegetable</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weed management</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsn_8CCJ5Gtk8xukh5L8QsKCip4C9nsBLdsNzWbsuivd0s9exre4eEd5mHsksOMA1e3A6WZACFmHI_YhJcl5EIVcMwmoOeQA6qPU3bW92sALoWACVu8DkRpG5JNIUuhpWg7R5nt6uzFthuKmd3YcZc-Mxe6FEObDc0Ymq62P41v7eacnXjb9nTxN6fs_f7ubfmYr54fnpaLVV4hipTXFhR6xSUWTvGq8EVVoeUai5qDKpVQ4J2uiePcaVmQK71HTSUKrP1cI07Z1aF3G8PXjvpk1mEXu_GkEVJqDRKFHKmbA-Vi6PtI3mxjM37wbTiYvSMzOjJ7R4bvO68PdNWE0NG_7C92QGbs</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Smith, Stephen C.</creator><creator>Jennings, Katherine M.</creator><creator>Monks, David W.</creator><creator>Jordan, David L.</creator><creator>Reberg-Horton, S. Chris</creator><creator>Schwarz, Michael R.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1798-7943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8713-7119</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3708-3973</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Sweetpotato tolerance and Palmer amaranth control with indaziflam</title><author>Smith, Stephen C. ; Jennings, Katherine M. ; Monks, David W. ; Jordan, David L. ; Reberg-Horton, S. Chris ; Schwarz, Michael R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b332t-da073f71634c71b4f4bb3a1834d10757270fc8de139c864ec5ff38e5323df9833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Amaranth</topic><topic>Amaranthus palmeri</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>herbicide</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>Ipomoea batatas</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Sweet potatoes</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>vegetable</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weed management</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, Katherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monks, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reberg-Horton, S. Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Stephen C.</au><au>Jennings, Katherine M.</au><au>Monks, David W.</au><au>Jordan, David L.</au><au>Reberg-Horton, S. Chris</au><au>Schwarz, Michael R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sweetpotato tolerance and Palmer amaranth control with indaziflam</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>202-206</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Field studies were conducted in North Carolina in 2018 and 2019 to determine sweetpotato tolerance to indaziflam and its effectiveness in controlling Palmer amaranth in sweetpotato. Treatments included indaziflam pre-transplant; 7 d after transplanting (DATr) or 14 DATr at 29, 44, 58, or 73 g ai ha–1; and checks (weedy and weed-free). Indaziflam applied postemergence caused transient foliar injury to sweetpotato. Indaziflam pretransplant caused less injury to sweetpotato than other application timings regardless of rate. Palmer amaranth control was greatest when indaziflam was applied pretransplant or 7 DATr. In a weed-free environment, sweetpotato marketable yield decreased as indaziflam application was delayed. No differences in storage root length to width ratio were observed. Nomenclature: indaziflam; Palmer amaranth; Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson; sweetpotato; Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2022.13</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1798-7943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8713-7119</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3708-3973</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
| ispartof | Weed technology, 2022-04, Vol.36 (2), p.202-206 |
| issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2668806326 |
| source | Cambridge Journals Online |
| subjects | Agricultural production Amaranth Amaranthus palmeri Crops herbicide Herbicides Horticulture Ipomoea batatas Science Soil sciences Sweet potatoes Variance analysis vegetable Weed control Weed management Weeds |
| title | Sweetpotato tolerance and Palmer amaranth control with indaziflam |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A17%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sweetpotato%20tolerance%20and%20Palmer%20amaranth%20control%20with%20indaziflam&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Smith,%20Stephen%20C.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=202-206&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2022.13&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2668806326%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2668806326&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |