Assessment of Image-Guided Intratumoral Delivery of Immunotherapeutics in Patients With Cancer
This case series study examines the feasibility and safety of intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy among patients undergoing cancer care in clinical trials. Question What is the feasibility and safety of image-guided intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies in patients with advanced solid organ ma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA network open 2020-07, Vol.3 (7), p.e207911, Article 207911 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e207911 |
container_title | JAMA network open |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Sheth, Rahul A. Murthy, Ravi Hong, David S. Patel, Sapna Overman, Michael J. Diab, Adi Hwu, Patrick Tam, Alda |
description | This case series study examines the feasibility and safety of intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy among patients undergoing cancer care in clinical trials.
Question What is the feasibility and safety of image-guided intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies in patients with advanced solid organ malignancies? Findings In this case series study that included 85 patients, there were no adverse events related to the technical component of the procedure, specifically needle insertion or biopsy. Major adverse events due to immune-related systemic toxic effects occurred in 2% of investigational agents and 4% of standard-of-care procedures (4%). Meaning Intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies is technically feasible with low major complication rates.
Importance Direct intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies is a compelling approach to overcoming barriers to systemic immunotherapy efficacy. While the use of intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy drugs is increasing rapidly in both the investigational and standard of care domains, the feasibility and safety of these interventions, particularly for deeper lesions that require image-guidance, remain unknown. Objective To address current knowledge gaps in image-guided techniques for intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and the safety of these interventions. Design, Setting, and Participants This case series study was performed at a single tertiary cancer center over a 2-year period from January 2016 to January 2018. Patients were followed until January 2019. All patients who underwent image-guided intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy agents in the standard of care, off-label, or investigational setting during the study period were included. Data were analyzed from February 1 to June 1, 2019. Exposures Image-guided biopsies and intratumoral injections of immunotherapies across several clinical trials as well as standard of care talimogene laherparepvec therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures Technical success, defined as the delivery of the prescribed injectate volume in its entirety, for image-guided biopsy and injections and procedure-related adverse events. Results A total of 85 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 61 [47-71] years; 42 [52%] men) underwent 498 encounters during the study period. These encounters comprised 327 image-guided intratumoral investigational agent injections in 67 patients in clinical trials, including 33 patients with melanoma (50%), 14 patients with sarcoma (21%), 3 patients with o |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7911 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2667941556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2667941556</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-8b1d19ef055b1cb0d29f66e6dc15932edb35d0496dfdbfd06fbef6fdff26aab33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFKAzEQhoMoWmpfQVY8ytYk26TdY1m1FgQ9KN5cks1Et3aTmmQtfXuztBbx5Gnm8P3zwzcInRM8JBiTq4VohIGwtu7DrsAMKaZ4OM4JOUA9ysajNJtgdvhrP0ED7xcYR45kOWfH6CSjY8roiPXQ69R78L4BExKrk3kj3iCdtbUClcxNcCK0jXVimVzDsv4Ct9lSTWtseAcnVtCGuvJJbZJHEep4xicvdXhPCmEqcKfoSIulh8Fu9tHz7c1TcZfeP8zmxfQ-FSPCQjqRRJEcNGZMkkpiRXPNOXBVEZZnFJTMmMKjnCutpFaYawmaa6U15ULILOuji-3dlbOfLfhQLmzrTKwsKefjPLYwHql8S1XOeu9AlytXN8JtSoLLTm75R27ZyS07uTF7tmtoZQNqn_xRGYHLLbAGabWvoosK9ljUzzjpSNx9ItKT_9NFHaJbawrbmpB9A3honYM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2667941556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Image-Guided Intratumoral Delivery of Immunotherapeutics in Patients With Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sheth, Rahul A. ; Murthy, Ravi ; Hong, David S. ; Patel, Sapna ; Overman, Michael J. ; Diab, Adi ; Hwu, Patrick ; Tam, Alda</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Rahul A. ; Murthy, Ravi ; Hong, David S. ; Patel, Sapna ; Overman, Michael J. ; Diab, Adi ; Hwu, Patrick ; Tam, Alda</creatorcontrib><description>This case series study examines the feasibility and safety of intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy among patients undergoing cancer care in clinical trials.
Question What is the feasibility and safety of image-guided intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies in patients with advanced solid organ malignancies? Findings In this case series study that included 85 patients, there were no adverse events related to the technical component of the procedure, specifically needle insertion or biopsy. Major adverse events due to immune-related systemic toxic effects occurred in 2% of investigational agents and 4% of standard-of-care procedures (4%). Meaning Intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies is technically feasible with low major complication rates.
Importance Direct intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies is a compelling approach to overcoming barriers to systemic immunotherapy efficacy. While the use of intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy drugs is increasing rapidly in both the investigational and standard of care domains, the feasibility and safety of these interventions, particularly for deeper lesions that require image-guidance, remain unknown. Objective To address current knowledge gaps in image-guided techniques for intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and the safety of these interventions. Design, Setting, and Participants This case series study was performed at a single tertiary cancer center over a 2-year period from January 2016 to January 2018. Patients were followed until January 2019. All patients who underwent image-guided intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy agents in the standard of care, off-label, or investigational setting during the study period were included. Data were analyzed from February 1 to June 1, 2019. Exposures Image-guided biopsies and intratumoral injections of immunotherapies across several clinical trials as well as standard of care talimogene laherparepvec therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures Technical success, defined as the delivery of the prescribed injectate volume in its entirety, for image-guided biopsy and injections and procedure-related adverse events. Results A total of 85 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 61 [47-71] years; 42 [52%] men) underwent 498 encounters during the study period. These encounters comprised 327 image-guided intratumoral investigational agent injections in 67 patients in clinical trials, including 33 patients with melanoma (50%), 14 patients with sarcoma (21%), 3 patients with ovarian cancer (4.5%), 2 patients with breast cancer (3%), and 2 patients with colon cancer (3%). An additional 18 patients with melanoma underwent 113 image-guided talimogene laherparepvec injections. There were no adverse events reported related to the technical component of the procedure, specifically needle insertion or biopsy. Serious adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events score >= 3), including dyspnea and severe flu-like symptoms developing within 24 hours of the injection and requiring hospitalization, occurred after 3 of 327 investigational agent injections (2%) and 4 of 113 talimogene laherparepvec injections (4%). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this case series study suggest that intratumoral injections of immunotherapies were feasible across a range of histological conditions and target organs. Immediate postdelivery anticipated adverse events occurred in a small number of instances. Performing physicians should have the necessary safeguards in place to respond as needed. Optimal methods for intratumoral drug delivery remain unresolved, and efforts to standardize drug delivery techniques are required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7911</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32725245</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>CHICAGO: Amer Medical Assoc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - administration & dosage ; Biological Products - administration & dosage ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion ; Clinical trials ; Colorectal cancer ; Drug Delivery Systems - methods ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; General & Internal Medicine ; Herpesvirus 1, Human ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy - methods ; Immunotherapy ; Immunotherapy - methods ; Injections, Intralesional - adverse effects ; Injections, Intralesional - methods ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Male ; Medicine, General & Internal ; Melanoma ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - immunology ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care ; Ovarian cancer ; Science & Technology ; Terminology]]></subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2020-07, Vol.3 (7), p.e207911, Article 207911</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>72</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000561252400002</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-8b1d19ef055b1cb0d29f66e6dc15932edb35d0496dfdbfd06fbef6fdff26aab33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-8b1d19ef055b1cb0d29f66e6dc15932edb35d0496dfdbfd06fbef6fdff26aab33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2107,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32725245$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Rahul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Ravi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Sapna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overman, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diab, Adi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwu, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Alda</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Image-Guided Intratumoral Delivery of Immunotherapeutics in Patients With Cancer</title><title>JAMA network open</title><addtitle>JAMA NETW OPEN</addtitle><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><description>This case series study examines the feasibility and safety of intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy among patients undergoing cancer care in clinical trials.
Question What is the feasibility and safety of image-guided intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies in patients with advanced solid organ malignancies? Findings In this case series study that included 85 patients, there were no adverse events related to the technical component of the procedure, specifically needle insertion or biopsy. Major adverse events due to immune-related systemic toxic effects occurred in 2% of investigational agents and 4% of standard-of-care procedures (4%). Meaning Intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies is technically feasible with low major complication rates.
Importance Direct intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies is a compelling approach to overcoming barriers to systemic immunotherapy efficacy. While the use of intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy drugs is increasing rapidly in both the investigational and standard of care domains, the feasibility and safety of these interventions, particularly for deeper lesions that require image-guidance, remain unknown. Objective To address current knowledge gaps in image-guided techniques for intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and the safety of these interventions. Design, Setting, and Participants This case series study was performed at a single tertiary cancer center over a 2-year period from January 2016 to January 2018. Patients were followed until January 2019. All patients who underwent image-guided intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy agents in the standard of care, off-label, or investigational setting during the study period were included. Data were analyzed from February 1 to June 1, 2019. Exposures Image-guided biopsies and intratumoral injections of immunotherapies across several clinical trials as well as standard of care talimogene laherparepvec therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures Technical success, defined as the delivery of the prescribed injectate volume in its entirety, for image-guided biopsy and injections and procedure-related adverse events. Results A total of 85 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 61 [47-71] years; 42 [52%] men) underwent 498 encounters during the study period. These encounters comprised 327 image-guided intratumoral investigational agent injections in 67 patients in clinical trials, including 33 patients with melanoma (50%), 14 patients with sarcoma (21%), 3 patients with ovarian cancer (4.5%), 2 patients with breast cancer (3%), and 2 patients with colon cancer (3%). An additional 18 patients with melanoma underwent 113 image-guided talimogene laherparepvec injections. There were no adverse events reported related to the technical component of the procedure, specifically needle insertion or biopsy. Serious adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events score >= 3), including dyspnea and severe flu-like symptoms developing within 24 hours of the injection and requiring hospitalization, occurred after 3 of 327 investigational agent injections (2%) and 4 of 113 talimogene laherparepvec injections (4%). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this case series study suggest that intratumoral injections of immunotherapies were feasible across a range of histological conditions and target organs. Immediate postdelivery anticipated adverse events occurred in a small number of instances. Performing physicians should have the necessary safeguards in place to respond as needed. Optimal methods for intratumoral drug delivery remain unresolved, and efforts to standardize drug delivery techniques are required.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Biological Products - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Drug Delivery Systems - methods</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General & Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Herpesvirus 1, Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Immunotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Injections, Intralesional - adverse effects</subject><subject>Injections, Intralesional - methods</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine, General & Internal</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFKAzEQhoMoWmpfQVY8ytYk26TdY1m1FgQ9KN5cks1Et3aTmmQtfXuztBbx5Gnm8P3zwzcInRM8JBiTq4VohIGwtu7DrsAMKaZ4OM4JOUA9ysajNJtgdvhrP0ED7xcYR45kOWfH6CSjY8roiPXQ69R78L4BExKrk3kj3iCdtbUClcxNcCK0jXVimVzDsv4Ct9lSTWtseAcnVtCGuvJJbZJHEep4xicvdXhPCmEqcKfoSIulh8Fu9tHz7c1TcZfeP8zmxfQ-FSPCQjqRRJEcNGZMkkpiRXPNOXBVEZZnFJTMmMKjnCutpFaYawmaa6U15ULILOuji-3dlbOfLfhQLmzrTKwsKefjPLYwHql8S1XOeu9AlytXN8JtSoLLTm75R27ZyS07uTF7tmtoZQNqn_xRGYHLLbAGabWvoosK9ljUzzjpSNx9ItKT_9NFHaJbawrbmpB9A3honYM</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Sheth, Rahul A.</creator><creator>Murthy, Ravi</creator><creator>Hong, David S.</creator><creator>Patel, Sapna</creator><creator>Overman, Michael J.</creator><creator>Diab, Adi</creator><creator>Hwu, Patrick</creator><creator>Tam, Alda</creator><general>Amer Medical Assoc</general><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Assessment of Image-Guided Intratumoral Delivery of Immunotherapeutics in Patients With Cancer</title><author>Sheth, Rahul A. ; Murthy, Ravi ; Hong, David S. ; Patel, Sapna ; Overman, Michael J. ; Diab, Adi ; Hwu, Patrick ; Tam, Alda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a415t-8b1d19ef055b1cb0d29f66e6dc15932edb35d0496dfdbfd06fbef6fdff26aab33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Biological Products - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Drug Delivery Systems - methods</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General & Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Herpesvirus 1, Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Immunotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Injections, Intralesional - adverse effects</topic><topic>Injections, Intralesional - methods</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine, General & Internal</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Rahul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Ravi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Sapna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overman, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diab, Adi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwu, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Alda</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheth, Rahul A.</au><au>Murthy, Ravi</au><au>Hong, David S.</au><au>Patel, Sapna</au><au>Overman, Michael J.</au><au>Diab, Adi</au><au>Hwu, Patrick</au><au>Tam, Alda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Image-Guided Intratumoral Delivery of Immunotherapeutics in Patients With Cancer</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><stitle>JAMA NETW OPEN</stitle><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e207911</spage><pages>e207911-</pages><artnum>207911</artnum><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>This case series study examines the feasibility and safety of intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy among patients undergoing cancer care in clinical trials.
Question What is the feasibility and safety of image-guided intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies in patients with advanced solid organ malignancies? Findings In this case series study that included 85 patients, there were no adverse events related to the technical component of the procedure, specifically needle insertion or biopsy. Major adverse events due to immune-related systemic toxic effects occurred in 2% of investigational agents and 4% of standard-of-care procedures (4%). Meaning Intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies is technically feasible with low major complication rates.
Importance Direct intratumoral delivery of immunotherapies is a compelling approach to overcoming barriers to systemic immunotherapy efficacy. While the use of intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy drugs is increasing rapidly in both the investigational and standard of care domains, the feasibility and safety of these interventions, particularly for deeper lesions that require image-guidance, remain unknown. Objective To address current knowledge gaps in image-guided techniques for intratumoral immunotherapy delivery and the safety of these interventions. Design, Setting, and Participants This case series study was performed at a single tertiary cancer center over a 2-year period from January 2016 to January 2018. Patients were followed until January 2019. All patients who underwent image-guided intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy agents in the standard of care, off-label, or investigational setting during the study period were included. Data were analyzed from February 1 to June 1, 2019. Exposures Image-guided biopsies and intratumoral injections of immunotherapies across several clinical trials as well as standard of care talimogene laherparepvec therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures Technical success, defined as the delivery of the prescribed injectate volume in its entirety, for image-guided biopsy and injections and procedure-related adverse events. Results A total of 85 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 61 [47-71] years; 42 [52%] men) underwent 498 encounters during the study period. These encounters comprised 327 image-guided intratumoral investigational agent injections in 67 patients in clinical trials, including 33 patients with melanoma (50%), 14 patients with sarcoma (21%), 3 patients with ovarian cancer (4.5%), 2 patients with breast cancer (3%), and 2 patients with colon cancer (3%). An additional 18 patients with melanoma underwent 113 image-guided talimogene laherparepvec injections. There were no adverse events reported related to the technical component of the procedure, specifically needle insertion or biopsy. Serious adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events score >= 3), including dyspnea and severe flu-like symptoms developing within 24 hours of the injection and requiring hospitalization, occurred after 3 of 327 investigational agent injections (2%) and 4 of 113 talimogene laherparepvec injections (4%). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this case series study suggest that intratumoral injections of immunotherapies were feasible across a range of histological conditions and target organs. Immediate postdelivery anticipated adverse events occurred in a small number of instances. Performing physicians should have the necessary safeguards in place to respond as needed. Optimal methods for intratumoral drug delivery remain unresolved, and efforts to standardize drug delivery techniques are required.</abstract><cop>CHICAGO</cop><pub>Amer Medical Assoc</pub><pmid>32725245</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7911</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2574-3805 |
ispartof | JAMA network open, 2020-07, Vol.3 (7), p.e207911, Article 207911 |
issn | 2574-3805 2574-3805 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2667941556 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - administration & dosage Biological Products - administration & dosage Biopsy Breast cancer Cancer Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion Clinical trials Colorectal cancer Drug Delivery Systems - methods Feasibility Studies Female General & Internal Medicine Herpesvirus 1, Human Humans Image-Guided Biopsy - methods Immunotherapy Immunotherapy - methods Injections, Intralesional - adverse effects Injections, Intralesional - methods Life Sciences & Biomedicine Male Medicine, General & Internal Melanoma Middle Aged Neoplasms - immunology Neoplasms - pathology Neoplasms - therapy Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care Ovarian cancer Science & Technology Terminology |
title | Assessment of Image-Guided Intratumoral Delivery of Immunotherapeutics in Patients With Cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T21%3A39%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Image-Guided%20Intratumoral%20Delivery%20of%20Immunotherapeutics%20in%20Patients%20With%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Sheth,%20Rahul%20A.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e207911&rft.pages=e207911-&rft.artnum=207911&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7911&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2667941556%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2667941556&rft_id=info:pmid/32725245&rfr_iscdi=true |