Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge‐sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line

The paper explores and ranks the key factors that support tacit knowledge sharing in automotive assembly lines. Existing studies on knowledge sharing tend to overwhelmingly focus on knowledge‐intensive, white‐collar work, and despite the acknowledgment of the importance of blue‐collar workers'...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Knowledge and process management 2022-04, Vol.29 (2), p.132-146
Hauptverfasser: Muniz, Jorge, Wintersberger, Daniel, Hong, Jacky L. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 146
container_issue 2
container_start_page 132
container_title Knowledge and process management
container_volume 29
creator Muniz, Jorge
Wintersberger, Daniel
Hong, Jacky L. F.
description The paper explores and ranks the key factors that support tacit knowledge sharing in automotive assembly lines. Existing studies on knowledge sharing tend to overwhelmingly focus on knowledge‐intensive, white‐collar work, and despite the acknowledgment of the importance of blue‐collar workers' tacit knowledge, both the knowledge management and operations management literature have devoted limited attention to manufacturing environments, and, in particular, those working on assembly lines. This study draws on qualitative and quantitative data from workers and plant managers of an automotive assembly line located in the Brazilian automotive Modular Consortium (MC), a unique production concept which produces vehicles in high volume and high variety. MC works with six multinational suppliers, which interact directly on the assembly line, sharing physical space, responsibilities, and quality control. The qualitative element of the study included interviews, informal conversations, and on‐site observations. Transcriptions were interpreted using content analysis. The quantitative element entailed a comparison of worker and management survey responses on the relative importance they ascribe to the different factors contributing to knowledge sharing, by ranking them using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The findings compare and contrast the perspectives of managers and workers on knowledge sharing with reference to factors related to people and processes. Implications for managerial action based on knowledge, HRM, and work management are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/kpm.1693
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2667851792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2667851792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3183-8144f1298f140a4423b2f06c2a8fe63b383fba75c76c90c5b71b01cdbe213be93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OGzEUhUdVkUoBiUew1E03A_6ZeMbdtahABAgWRSxH1449cTJjp7anKKwQT8Az9klwkkpdsbrnSt85V_cUxTHBJwRjerpcDSeEC_ah2CdYiJJUFfm41bSsOK4-FZ9jXGCMBeZ8v3h58GGpAwI3QwM46LJejLNu0C5FBNKPCRlQyYeI0hy2i-1tgqTR0vnHXs86_ff5Nc4hWNd9Q1MXbTfPXhP8gAD9CPCUDeAQjMkPPtk_GkGMepD9GvXW6cNiz0Af9dG_eVDcn__8dXZZXt9eTM--X5eKkYaVTf7EECoaQyoMVUWZpAZzRaExmjPJGmYk1BNVcyWwmsiaSEzUTGpKmNSCHRRfdrmr4H-POqZ24cfg8smWcl43E1ILmqmvO0oFH2PQpl0FO0BYtwS3m4bb3HC7aTijaIdq5Z2N_8GGYCIywjNS7pBH2-v1u1Ht1d3NNvINoHGKSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2667851792</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge‐sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Muniz, Jorge ; Wintersberger, Daniel ; Hong, Jacky L. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Muniz, Jorge ; Wintersberger, Daniel ; Hong, Jacky L. F.</creatorcontrib><description>The paper explores and ranks the key factors that support tacit knowledge sharing in automotive assembly lines. Existing studies on knowledge sharing tend to overwhelmingly focus on knowledge‐intensive, white‐collar work, and despite the acknowledgment of the importance of blue‐collar workers' tacit knowledge, both the knowledge management and operations management literature have devoted limited attention to manufacturing environments, and, in particular, those working on assembly lines. This study draws on qualitative and quantitative data from workers and plant managers of an automotive assembly line located in the Brazilian automotive Modular Consortium (MC), a unique production concept which produces vehicles in high volume and high variety. MC works with six multinational suppliers, which interact directly on the assembly line, sharing physical space, responsibilities, and quality control. The qualitative element of the study included interviews, informal conversations, and on‐site observations. Transcriptions were interpreted using content analysis. The quantitative element entailed a comparison of worker and management survey responses on the relative importance they ascribe to the different factors contributing to knowledge sharing, by ranking them using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The findings compare and contrast the perspectives of managers and workers on knowledge sharing with reference to factors related to people and processes. Implications for managerial action based on knowledge, HRM, and work management are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-4604</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/kpm.1693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Analytic hierarchy process ; Assembly lines ; Automobiles ; Content analysis ; Knowledge management ; Knowledge sharing ; Managers ; Operations management ; Qualitative analysis ; Quality control ; Tacit knowledge ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Knowledge and process management, 2022-04, Vol.29 (2), p.132-146</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3183-8144f1298f140a4423b2f06c2a8fe63b383fba75c76c90c5b71b01cdbe213be93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3183-8144f1298f140a4423b2f06c2a8fe63b383fba75c76c90c5b71b01cdbe213be93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7095-4772 ; 0000-0003-3496-0256 ; 0000-0001-8280-0666</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fkpm.1693$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fkpm.1693$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muniz, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintersberger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Jacky L. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge‐sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line</title><title>Knowledge and process management</title><description>The paper explores and ranks the key factors that support tacit knowledge sharing in automotive assembly lines. Existing studies on knowledge sharing tend to overwhelmingly focus on knowledge‐intensive, white‐collar work, and despite the acknowledgment of the importance of blue‐collar workers' tacit knowledge, both the knowledge management and operations management literature have devoted limited attention to manufacturing environments, and, in particular, those working on assembly lines. This study draws on qualitative and quantitative data from workers and plant managers of an automotive assembly line located in the Brazilian automotive Modular Consortium (MC), a unique production concept which produces vehicles in high volume and high variety. MC works with six multinational suppliers, which interact directly on the assembly line, sharing physical space, responsibilities, and quality control. The qualitative element of the study included interviews, informal conversations, and on‐site observations. Transcriptions were interpreted using content analysis. The quantitative element entailed a comparison of worker and management survey responses on the relative importance they ascribe to the different factors contributing to knowledge sharing, by ranking them using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The findings compare and contrast the perspectives of managers and workers on knowledge sharing with reference to factors related to people and processes. Implications for managerial action based on knowledge, HRM, and work management are discussed.</description><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>Assembly lines</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Knowledge sharing</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Operations management</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Tacit knowledge</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>1092-4604</issn><issn>1099-1441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OGzEUhUdVkUoBiUew1E03A_6ZeMbdtahABAgWRSxH1449cTJjp7anKKwQT8Az9klwkkpdsbrnSt85V_cUxTHBJwRjerpcDSeEC_ah2CdYiJJUFfm41bSsOK4-FZ9jXGCMBeZ8v3h58GGpAwI3QwM46LJejLNu0C5FBNKPCRlQyYeI0hy2i-1tgqTR0vnHXs86_ff5Nc4hWNd9Q1MXbTfPXhP8gAD9CPCUDeAQjMkPPtk_GkGMepD9GvXW6cNiz0Af9dG_eVDcn__8dXZZXt9eTM--X5eKkYaVTf7EECoaQyoMVUWZpAZzRaExmjPJGmYk1BNVcyWwmsiaSEzUTGpKmNSCHRRfdrmr4H-POqZ24cfg8smWcl43E1ILmqmvO0oFH2PQpl0FO0BYtwS3m4bb3HC7aTijaIdq5Z2N_8GGYCIywjNS7pBH2-v1u1Ht1d3NNvINoHGKSA</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Muniz, Jorge</creator><creator>Wintersberger, Daniel</creator><creator>Hong, Jacky L. F.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7095-4772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3496-0256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8280-0666</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge‐sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line</title><author>Muniz, Jorge ; Wintersberger, Daniel ; Hong, Jacky L. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3183-8144f1298f140a4423b2f06c2a8fe63b383fba75c76c90c5b71b01cdbe213be93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>Assembly lines</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Knowledge sharing</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Operations management</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Tacit knowledge</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muniz, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintersberger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Jacky L. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Knowledge and process management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muniz, Jorge</au><au>Wintersberger, Daniel</au><au>Hong, Jacky L. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge‐sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line</atitle><jtitle>Knowledge and process management</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>132-146</pages><issn>1092-4604</issn><eissn>1099-1441</eissn><abstract>The paper explores and ranks the key factors that support tacit knowledge sharing in automotive assembly lines. Existing studies on knowledge sharing tend to overwhelmingly focus on knowledge‐intensive, white‐collar work, and despite the acknowledgment of the importance of blue‐collar workers' tacit knowledge, both the knowledge management and operations management literature have devoted limited attention to manufacturing environments, and, in particular, those working on assembly lines. This study draws on qualitative and quantitative data from workers and plant managers of an automotive assembly line located in the Brazilian automotive Modular Consortium (MC), a unique production concept which produces vehicles in high volume and high variety. MC works with six multinational suppliers, which interact directly on the assembly line, sharing physical space, responsibilities, and quality control. The qualitative element of the study included interviews, informal conversations, and on‐site observations. Transcriptions were interpreted using content analysis. The quantitative element entailed a comparison of worker and management survey responses on the relative importance they ascribe to the different factors contributing to knowledge sharing, by ranking them using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The findings compare and contrast the perspectives of managers and workers on knowledge sharing with reference to factors related to people and processes. Implications for managerial action based on knowledge, HRM, and work management are discussed.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/kpm.1693</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7095-4772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3496-0256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8280-0666</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-4604
ispartof Knowledge and process management, 2022-04, Vol.29 (2), p.132-146
issn 1092-4604
1099-1441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2667851792
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete
subjects Analytic hierarchy process
Assembly lines
Automobiles
Content analysis
Knowledge management
Knowledge sharing
Managers
Operations management
Qualitative analysis
Quality control
Tacit knowledge
Workers
title Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge‐sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A37%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Worker%20and%20manager%20judgments%20about%20factors%20that%20facilitate%20knowledge%E2%80%90sharing:%20Insights%20from%20a%20Brazilian%20automotive%20assembly%20line&rft.jtitle=Knowledge%20and%20process%20management&rft.au=Muniz,%20Jorge&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=132-146&rft.issn=1092-4604&rft.eissn=1099-1441&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/kpm.1693&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2667851792%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2667851792&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true