Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge‐sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line
The paper explores and ranks the key factors that support tacit knowledge sharing in automotive assembly lines. Existing studies on knowledge sharing tend to overwhelmingly focus on knowledge‐intensive, white‐collar work, and despite the acknowledgment of the importance of blue‐collar workers'...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Knowledge and process management 2022-04, Vol.29 (2), p.132-146 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 146 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 132 |
container_title | Knowledge and process management |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Muniz, Jorge Wintersberger, Daniel Hong, Jacky L. F. |
description | The paper explores and ranks the key factors that support tacit knowledge sharing in automotive assembly lines. Existing studies on knowledge sharing tend to overwhelmingly focus on knowledge‐intensive, white‐collar work, and despite the acknowledgment of the importance of blue‐collar workers' tacit knowledge, both the knowledge management and operations management literature have devoted limited attention to manufacturing environments, and, in particular, those working on assembly lines. This study draws on qualitative and quantitative data from workers and plant managers of an automotive assembly line located in the Brazilian automotive Modular Consortium (MC), a unique production concept which produces vehicles in high volume and high variety. MC works with six multinational suppliers, which interact directly on the assembly line, sharing physical space, responsibilities, and quality control. The qualitative element of the study included interviews, informal conversations, and on‐site observations. Transcriptions were interpreted using content analysis. The quantitative element entailed a comparison of worker and management survey responses on the relative importance they ascribe to the different factors contributing to knowledge sharing, by ranking them using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The findings compare and contrast the perspectives of managers and workers on knowledge sharing with reference to factors related to people and processes. Implications for managerial action based on knowledge, HRM, and work management are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/kpm.1693 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2667851792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2667851792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3183-8144f1298f140a4423b2f06c2a8fe63b383fba75c76c90c5b71b01cdbe213be93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OGzEUhUdVkUoBiUew1E03A_6ZeMbdtahABAgWRSxH1449cTJjp7anKKwQT8Az9klwkkpdsbrnSt85V_cUxTHBJwRjerpcDSeEC_ah2CdYiJJUFfm41bSsOK4-FZ9jXGCMBeZ8v3h58GGpAwI3QwM46LJejLNu0C5FBNKPCRlQyYeI0hy2i-1tgqTR0vnHXs86_ff5Nc4hWNd9Q1MXbTfPXhP8gAD9CPCUDeAQjMkPPtk_GkGMepD9GvXW6cNiz0Af9dG_eVDcn__8dXZZXt9eTM--X5eKkYaVTf7EECoaQyoMVUWZpAZzRaExmjPJGmYk1BNVcyWwmsiaSEzUTGpKmNSCHRRfdrmr4H-POqZ24cfg8smWcl43E1ILmqmvO0oFH2PQpl0FO0BYtwS3m4bb3HC7aTijaIdq5Z2N_8GGYCIywjNS7pBH2-v1u1Ht1d3NNvINoHGKSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2667851792</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge‐sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Muniz, Jorge ; Wintersberger, Daniel ; Hong, Jacky L. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Muniz, Jorge ; Wintersberger, Daniel ; Hong, Jacky L. F.</creatorcontrib><description>The paper explores and ranks the key factors that support tacit knowledge sharing in automotive assembly lines. Existing studies on knowledge sharing tend to overwhelmingly focus on knowledge‐intensive, white‐collar work, and despite the acknowledgment of the importance of blue‐collar workers' tacit knowledge, both the knowledge management and operations management literature have devoted limited attention to manufacturing environments, and, in particular, those working on assembly lines. This study draws on qualitative and quantitative data from workers and plant managers of an automotive assembly line located in the Brazilian automotive Modular Consortium (MC), a unique production concept which produces vehicles in high volume and high variety. MC works with six multinational suppliers, which interact directly on the assembly line, sharing physical space, responsibilities, and quality control. The qualitative element of the study included interviews, informal conversations, and on‐site observations. Transcriptions were interpreted using content analysis. The quantitative element entailed a comparison of worker and management survey responses on the relative importance they ascribe to the different factors contributing to knowledge sharing, by ranking them using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The findings compare and contrast the perspectives of managers and workers on knowledge sharing with reference to factors related to people and processes. Implications for managerial action based on knowledge, HRM, and work management are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-4604</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/kpm.1693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Analytic hierarchy process ; Assembly lines ; Automobiles ; Content analysis ; Knowledge management ; Knowledge sharing ; Managers ; Operations management ; Qualitative analysis ; Quality control ; Tacit knowledge ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Knowledge and process management, 2022-04, Vol.29 (2), p.132-146</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3183-8144f1298f140a4423b2f06c2a8fe63b383fba75c76c90c5b71b01cdbe213be93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3183-8144f1298f140a4423b2f06c2a8fe63b383fba75c76c90c5b71b01cdbe213be93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7095-4772 ; 0000-0003-3496-0256 ; 0000-0001-8280-0666</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fkpm.1693$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fkpm.1693$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muniz, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintersberger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Jacky L. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge‐sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line</title><title>Knowledge and process management</title><description>The paper explores and ranks the key factors that support tacit knowledge sharing in automotive assembly lines. Existing studies on knowledge sharing tend to overwhelmingly focus on knowledge‐intensive, white‐collar work, and despite the acknowledgment of the importance of blue‐collar workers' tacit knowledge, both the knowledge management and operations management literature have devoted limited attention to manufacturing environments, and, in particular, those working on assembly lines. This study draws on qualitative and quantitative data from workers and plant managers of an automotive assembly line located in the Brazilian automotive Modular Consortium (MC), a unique production concept which produces vehicles in high volume and high variety. MC works with six multinational suppliers, which interact directly on the assembly line, sharing physical space, responsibilities, and quality control. The qualitative element of the study included interviews, informal conversations, and on‐site observations. Transcriptions were interpreted using content analysis. The quantitative element entailed a comparison of worker and management survey responses on the relative importance they ascribe to the different factors contributing to knowledge sharing, by ranking them using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The findings compare and contrast the perspectives of managers and workers on knowledge sharing with reference to factors related to people and processes. Implications for managerial action based on knowledge, HRM, and work management are discussed.</description><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>Assembly lines</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Knowledge sharing</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Operations management</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Tacit knowledge</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>1092-4604</issn><issn>1099-1441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OGzEUhUdVkUoBiUew1E03A_6ZeMbdtahABAgWRSxH1449cTJjp7anKKwQT8Az9klwkkpdsbrnSt85V_cUxTHBJwRjerpcDSeEC_ah2CdYiJJUFfm41bSsOK4-FZ9jXGCMBeZ8v3h58GGpAwI3QwM46LJejLNu0C5FBNKPCRlQyYeI0hy2i-1tgqTR0vnHXs86_ff5Nc4hWNd9Q1MXbTfPXhP8gAD9CPCUDeAQjMkPPtk_GkGMepD9GvXW6cNiz0Af9dG_eVDcn__8dXZZXt9eTM--X5eKkYaVTf7EECoaQyoMVUWZpAZzRaExmjPJGmYk1BNVcyWwmsiaSEzUTGpKmNSCHRRfdrmr4H-POqZ24cfg8smWcl43E1ILmqmvO0oFH2PQpl0FO0BYtwS3m4bb3HC7aTijaIdq5Z2N_8GGYCIywjNS7pBH2-v1u1Ht1d3NNvINoHGKSA</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Muniz, Jorge</creator><creator>Wintersberger, Daniel</creator><creator>Hong, Jacky L. F.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7095-4772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3496-0256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8280-0666</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge‐sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line</title><author>Muniz, Jorge ; Wintersberger, Daniel ; Hong, Jacky L. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3183-8144f1298f140a4423b2f06c2a8fe63b383fba75c76c90c5b71b01cdbe213be93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>Assembly lines</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Knowledge sharing</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Operations management</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Tacit knowledge</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muniz, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintersberger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Jacky L. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Knowledge and process management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muniz, Jorge</au><au>Wintersberger, Daniel</au><au>Hong, Jacky L. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge‐sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line</atitle><jtitle>Knowledge and process management</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>132-146</pages><issn>1092-4604</issn><eissn>1099-1441</eissn><abstract>The paper explores and ranks the key factors that support tacit knowledge sharing in automotive assembly lines. Existing studies on knowledge sharing tend to overwhelmingly focus on knowledge‐intensive, white‐collar work, and despite the acknowledgment of the importance of blue‐collar workers' tacit knowledge, both the knowledge management and operations management literature have devoted limited attention to manufacturing environments, and, in particular, those working on assembly lines. This study draws on qualitative and quantitative data from workers and plant managers of an automotive assembly line located in the Brazilian automotive Modular Consortium (MC), a unique production concept which produces vehicles in high volume and high variety. MC works with six multinational suppliers, which interact directly on the assembly line, sharing physical space, responsibilities, and quality control. The qualitative element of the study included interviews, informal conversations, and on‐site observations. Transcriptions were interpreted using content analysis. The quantitative element entailed a comparison of worker and management survey responses on the relative importance they ascribe to the different factors contributing to knowledge sharing, by ranking them using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The findings compare and contrast the perspectives of managers and workers on knowledge sharing with reference to factors related to people and processes. Implications for managerial action based on knowledge, HRM, and work management are discussed.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/kpm.1693</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7095-4772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3496-0256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8280-0666</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1092-4604 |
ispartof | Knowledge and process management, 2022-04, Vol.29 (2), p.132-146 |
issn | 1092-4604 1099-1441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2667851792 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Analytic hierarchy process Assembly lines Automobiles Content analysis Knowledge management Knowledge sharing Managers Operations management Qualitative analysis Quality control Tacit knowledge Workers |
title | Worker and manager judgments about factors that facilitate knowledge‐sharing: Insights from a Brazilian automotive assembly line |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A37%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Worker%20and%20manager%20judgments%20about%20factors%20that%20facilitate%20knowledge%E2%80%90sharing:%20Insights%20from%20a%20Brazilian%20automotive%20assembly%20line&rft.jtitle=Knowledge%20and%20process%20management&rft.au=Muniz,%20Jorge&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=132-146&rft.issn=1092-4604&rft.eissn=1099-1441&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/kpm.1693&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2667851792%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2667851792&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |