Beyond technology: A comparative literature review of campaign context and issues in three countries
Since Barack Obama’s campaign of 2008 and 2012, contemporary discourse and analysis of modern political communication have been variously and increasingly preoccupied with the analysis of the power of new technology-digital media platforms and algorithms as both the main ingredients and infrastructu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of comparative research in anthropology and sociology 2021-12, Vol.12 (1), p.11-30 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 30 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 11 |
container_title | Journal of comparative research in anthropology and sociology |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Ijere, Thomas Chukwuma Williams, Dodeye Uduak |
description | Since Barack Obama’s campaign of 2008 and 2012, contemporary discourse and analysis of modern political communication have been variously and increasingly preoccupied with the analysis of the power of new technology-digital media platforms and algorithms as both the main ingredients and infrastructure for modern campaigns and electioneering. However, as important as these mediated tools and platforms have become, we argue that focus on context, ideas, issues, and campaign rhetoric is equally essential in making sense of factors that contribute in shaping and destabilizing elections and democracy. Drawing from an extensive review of campaign related literature in three countries and a constant comparative method of reading the literature, we illustrate such contextual issues, ideas and campaign rhetoric using examples from America, Britain and Nigeria. In all three examples, the literature reviewed highlight that context – i.e. socio-economic, cultural and political all compete to incentivizes and stimulate the formation of ideas and issues that dominate campaign and election cycles. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2666602617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1262135</ceeol_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7d10ef1ffba343fe9339a89d5747ca80</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1262135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1167-21d3d6db20d46eeb8fcc4958c51d671e495d49f48e3b442cca4fdc1e935d7dce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj01LAzEQhhdRsNT-BCHgeSFfm-x6q8WPQsGLnkM2mbQp203NZqv77w1W0LnMy8zDw8xFMaNY1CVmRF7-y9fFYhj2OBevBMNsVtgHmEJvUQKz60MXttM9WiITDkcddfInQJ1PkOMYAUU4efhEwSGjM-C3fSb7BF8J6ezwwzDCgHyP0i4C5N3Yp-hhuCmunO4GWPz2efH-9Pi2eik3r8_r1XJTGkKELCmxzArbUmy5AGhrZwxvqtpUxApJIGfLG8drYC3n1BjNnTUEGlZZaQ2webE-e23Qe3WM_qDjpIL26mcQ4lbpmLzpQElLMDjiXKsZZy47WKPrxlaSS6NrnF13Z9cxho_8VlL7MMY-n6-oyIWpIDJTt2fKAITuDyFUUMIq9g2qJXfs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2666602617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beyond technology: A comparative literature review of campaign context and issues in three countries</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ijere, Thomas Chukwuma ; Williams, Dodeye Uduak</creator><creatorcontrib>Ijere, Thomas Chukwuma ; Williams, Dodeye Uduak</creatorcontrib><description>Since Barack Obama’s campaign of 2008 and 2012, contemporary discourse and analysis of modern political communication have been variously and increasingly preoccupied with the analysis of the power of new technology-digital media platforms and algorithms as both the main ingredients and infrastructure for modern campaigns and electioneering. However, as important as these mediated tools and platforms have become, we argue that focus on context, ideas, issues, and campaign rhetoric is equally essential in making sense of factors that contribute in shaping and destabilizing elections and democracy. Drawing from an extensive review of campaign related literature in three countries and a constant comparative method of reading the literature, we illustrate such contextual issues, ideas and campaign rhetoric using examples from America, Britain and Nigeria. In all three examples, the literature reviewed highlight that context – i.e. socio-economic, cultural and political all compete to incentivizes and stimulate the formation of ideas and issues that dominate campaign and election cycles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2068-0317</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2068-0317</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bucharest: University of Bucharest, Faculty of Sociology and Social Work</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Communication ; Comparative studies ; Democracy ; Digital media ; Digitization ; Elections ; False information ; ideas ; Infrastructure ; issues and context ; Literature reviews ; Mass media ; Media studies ; New technology ; Political advertising ; Political campaigns ; Political communication ; Political discourse ; Political parties ; Politics and communication ; Rhetoric ; Socioeconomic factors ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Journal of comparative research in anthropology and sociology, 2021-12, Vol.12 (1), p.11-30</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,2096,27325,33755</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ijere, Thomas Chukwuma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Dodeye Uduak</creatorcontrib><title>Beyond technology: A comparative literature review of campaign context and issues in three countries</title><title>Journal of comparative research in anthropology and sociology</title><addtitle>Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology</addtitle><description>Since Barack Obama’s campaign of 2008 and 2012, contemporary discourse and analysis of modern political communication have been variously and increasingly preoccupied with the analysis of the power of new technology-digital media platforms and algorithms as both the main ingredients and infrastructure for modern campaigns and electioneering. However, as important as these mediated tools and platforms have become, we argue that focus on context, ideas, issues, and campaign rhetoric is equally essential in making sense of factors that contribute in shaping and destabilizing elections and democracy. Drawing from an extensive review of campaign related literature in three countries and a constant comparative method of reading the literature, we illustrate such contextual issues, ideas and campaign rhetoric using examples from America, Britain and Nigeria. In all three examples, the literature reviewed highlight that context – i.e. socio-economic, cultural and political all compete to incentivizes and stimulate the formation of ideas and issues that dominate campaign and election cycles.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Digitization</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>False information</subject><subject>ideas</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>issues and context</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Media studies</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Political advertising</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political communication</subject><subject>Political discourse</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politics and communication</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>2068-0317</issn><issn>2068-0317</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNj01LAzEQhhdRsNT-BCHgeSFfm-x6q8WPQsGLnkM2mbQp203NZqv77w1W0LnMy8zDw8xFMaNY1CVmRF7-y9fFYhj2OBevBMNsVtgHmEJvUQKz60MXttM9WiITDkcddfInQJ1PkOMYAUU4efhEwSGjM-C3fSb7BF8J6ezwwzDCgHyP0i4C5N3Yp-hhuCmunO4GWPz2efH-9Pi2eik3r8_r1XJTGkKELCmxzArbUmy5AGhrZwxvqtpUxApJIGfLG8drYC3n1BjNnTUEGlZZaQ2webE-e23Qe3WM_qDjpIL26mcQ4lbpmLzpQElLMDjiXKsZZy47WKPrxlaSS6NrnF13Z9cxho_8VlL7MMY-n6-oyIWpIDJTt2fKAITuDyFUUMIq9g2qJXfs</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Ijere, Thomas Chukwuma</creator><creator>Williams, Dodeye Uduak</creator><general>University of Bucharest, Faculty of Sociology and Social Work</general><general>Universitatea din Bucuresti, Facultatea de Sociologie si Asistenta Sociala</general><general>University of Bucharest, Department of Sociology, Doctoral School of Sociology</general><general>University of Bucharest</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Beyond technology: A comparative literature review of campaign context and issues in three countries</title><author>Ijere, Thomas Chukwuma ; Williams, Dodeye Uduak</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1167-21d3d6db20d46eeb8fcc4958c51d671e495d49f48e3b442cca4fdc1e935d7dce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Digitization</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>False information</topic><topic>ideas</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>issues and context</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Media studies</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Political advertising</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political communication</topic><topic>Political discourse</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politics and communication</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ijere, Thomas Chukwuma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Dodeye Uduak</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of comparative research in anthropology and sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ijere, Thomas Chukwuma</au><au>Williams, Dodeye Uduak</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beyond technology: A comparative literature review of campaign context and issues in three countries</atitle><jtitle>Journal of comparative research in anthropology and sociology</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>11-30</pages><issn>2068-0317</issn><eissn>2068-0317</eissn><abstract>Since Barack Obama’s campaign of 2008 and 2012, contemporary discourse and analysis of modern political communication have been variously and increasingly preoccupied with the analysis of the power of new technology-digital media platforms and algorithms as both the main ingredients and infrastructure for modern campaigns and electioneering. However, as important as these mediated tools and platforms have become, we argue that focus on context, ideas, issues, and campaign rhetoric is equally essential in making sense of factors that contribute in shaping and destabilizing elections and democracy. Drawing from an extensive review of campaign related literature in three countries and a constant comparative method of reading the literature, we illustrate such contextual issues, ideas and campaign rhetoric using examples from America, Britain and Nigeria. In all three examples, the literature reviewed highlight that context – i.e. socio-economic, cultural and political all compete to incentivizes and stimulate the formation of ideas and issues that dominate campaign and election cycles.</abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>University of Bucharest, Faculty of Sociology and Social Work</pub><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2068-0317 |
ispartof | Journal of comparative research in anthropology and sociology, 2021-12, Vol.12 (1), p.11-30 |
issn | 2068-0317 2068-0317 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2666602617 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Algorithms Communication Comparative studies Democracy Digital media Digitization Elections False information ideas Infrastructure issues and context Literature reviews Mass media Media studies New technology Political advertising Political campaigns Political communication Political discourse Political parties Politics and communication Rhetoric Socioeconomic factors Technology |
title | Beyond technology: A comparative literature review of campaign context and issues in three countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T23%3A53%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beyond%20technology:%20A%20comparative%20literature%20review%20of%20campaign%20context%20and%20issues%20in%20three%20countries&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20comparative%20research%20in%20anthropology%20and%20sociology&rft.au=Ijere,%20Thomas%20Chukwuma&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=11-30&rft.issn=2068-0317&rft.eissn=2068-0317&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E1262135%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2666602617&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1262135&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_7d10ef1ffba343fe9339a89d5747ca80&rfr_iscdi=true |