A CENTENNIAL AMBIGUITY: THE CHALLENGE OF RESOLVING THE DATE OF THE JEAN-BAPTISTE LAINÉ (MANTLE), ONTARIO, SITE—AROUND AD 1500 OR AD 1600?—AND THE CASE FOR WOOD-CHARCOAL AS A TERMINUS POST QUEM

Considered in isolation, the radiocarbon (14C) dates on short-lived plant remains from the Jean-Baptiste Lainé (formerly Mantle) site, Ontario, yield an ambiguous result: more or less similar probability around AD 1500 or alternatively around AD 1600. This village site, likely of no more than ca. 20...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiocarbon 2022-04, Vol.64 (2), p.279-308
Hauptverfasser: Manning, Sturt W, Birch, Jennifer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 308
container_issue 2
container_start_page 279
container_title Radiocarbon
container_volume 64
creator Manning, Sturt W
Birch, Jennifer
description Considered in isolation, the radiocarbon (14C) dates on short-lived plant remains from the Jean-Baptiste Lainé (formerly Mantle) site, Ontario, yield an ambiguous result: more or less similar probability around AD 1500 or alternatively around AD 1600. This village site, likely of no more than ca. 20–30 years total duration, illustrates the challenges of high-resolution dating across periods with a reversal/plateau in the 14C calibration curve. Another problem we identify is the tendency for dating probability for short-duration sites to sometimes be overly compressed as dating intensity increases under analysis with OxCal, and for probability to shift away from the real age range especially during reversal/plateau episodes. To address both issues additional constraints are necessary. While a tree-ring sequenced 14C “wiggle-match” is the best option where available, we investigate how, in the absence of such an option, use of the in-built age in wood-charcoal samples can be used to distinguish the likely correct date range. This approach can resolve ambiguities in dating, e.g., for shorter-duration Late Woodland village sites in northeastern North America, but also other short-duration cases corresponding with reversal/plateau episodes on the 14C calibration curve. We place the Jean-Baptiste Lainé site most likely in a range between ca. AD 1595–1626 (95.4% probability).
doi_str_mv 10.1017/RDC.2022.23
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2666397226</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_RDC_2022_23</cupid><sourcerecordid>2666397226</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-f2c0d2f1e4b623be339bed11cac7fed3e785859e9ed3e0cb2676b93b9704b01b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1O20AUhUdVkUgpK17gSt20AqfzE4_jbqrBniSDnBlqj1t1ZWWccQUqhNqw6I4t-74R4kV4ktoBiQ2re3TPp3uPdBA6IHhMMIk-52kyppjSMWVv0IjEkzAIozB8i0YYMxZMKaW76F3XnWNMCZ9GI_QgIJHaSq2VyEAsj9W8VPbnF7ALCclCZJnUcwlmBrksTPZd6fnWSoXdbgd9IoUOjsWpVUW_zITS93fwcSm0zeSnIzDailyZIyiUlY-3_0RuSp2CSIGEGIPJt5Jj_HUwe2f7WhQSZr33w5g06IPkiRkCFiDAynypdFnAqSksfCvl8j3aaVa_O7__PPdQOZM2WQSZmatEZEHNGL8OGlrjNW2InzhOmfOMxc6vCalXddT4NfPRNJyGsY8HjWtHecRdzFwc4YnDxLE99OHp7lW7-XPju-vqfHPTXvYvK8o5Z3FEKe-pwyeqbjdd1_qmumrPLlbt34rgauip6nuqhp4qyno6eKZXF649W__yL0df4_8DtBGFoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2666397226</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A CENTENNIAL AMBIGUITY: THE CHALLENGE OF RESOLVING THE DATE OF THE JEAN-BAPTISTE LAINÉ (MANTLE), ONTARIO, SITE—AROUND AD 1500 OR AD 1600?—AND THE CASE FOR WOOD-CHARCOAL AS A TERMINUS POST QUEM</title><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Manning, Sturt W ; Birch, Jennifer</creator><creatorcontrib>Manning, Sturt W ; Birch, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><description>Considered in isolation, the radiocarbon (14C) dates on short-lived plant remains from the Jean-Baptiste Lainé (formerly Mantle) site, Ontario, yield an ambiguous result: more or less similar probability around AD 1500 or alternatively around AD 1600. This village site, likely of no more than ca. 20–30 years total duration, illustrates the challenges of high-resolution dating across periods with a reversal/plateau in the 14C calibration curve. Another problem we identify is the tendency for dating probability for short-duration sites to sometimes be overly compressed as dating intensity increases under analysis with OxCal, and for probability to shift away from the real age range especially during reversal/plateau episodes. To address both issues additional constraints are necessary. While a tree-ring sequenced 14C “wiggle-match” is the best option where available, we investigate how, in the absence of such an option, use of the in-built age in wood-charcoal samples can be used to distinguish the likely correct date range. This approach can resolve ambiguities in dating, e.g., for shorter-duration Late Woodland village sites in northeastern North America, but also other short-duration cases corresponding with reversal/plateau episodes on the 14C calibration curve. We place the Jean-Baptiste Lainé site most likely in a range between ca. AD 1595–1626 (95.4% probability).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8222</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-5755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/RDC.2022.23</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>16th century ; Ambiguity ; Archaeology ; Calibration ; Charcoal ; Material culture ; Tree rings ; Villages ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Radiocarbon, 2022-04, Vol.64 (2), p.279-308</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press for the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press for the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/reusing-open-access-and-sage-choice-content</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-f2c0d2f1e4b623be339bed11cac7fed3e785859e9ed3e0cb2676b93b9704b01b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-f2c0d2f1e4b623be339bed11cac7fed3e785859e9ed3e0cb2676b93b9704b01b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6917-0927 ; 0000-0001-9208-9783</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0033822222000236/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manning, Sturt W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birch, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><title>A CENTENNIAL AMBIGUITY: THE CHALLENGE OF RESOLVING THE DATE OF THE JEAN-BAPTISTE LAINÉ (MANTLE), ONTARIO, SITE—AROUND AD 1500 OR AD 1600?—AND THE CASE FOR WOOD-CHARCOAL AS A TERMINUS POST QUEM</title><title>Radiocarbon</title><addtitle>Radiocarbon</addtitle><description>Considered in isolation, the radiocarbon (14C) dates on short-lived plant remains from the Jean-Baptiste Lainé (formerly Mantle) site, Ontario, yield an ambiguous result: more or less similar probability around AD 1500 or alternatively around AD 1600. This village site, likely of no more than ca. 20–30 years total duration, illustrates the challenges of high-resolution dating across periods with a reversal/plateau in the 14C calibration curve. Another problem we identify is the tendency for dating probability for short-duration sites to sometimes be overly compressed as dating intensity increases under analysis with OxCal, and for probability to shift away from the real age range especially during reversal/plateau episodes. To address both issues additional constraints are necessary. While a tree-ring sequenced 14C “wiggle-match” is the best option where available, we investigate how, in the absence of such an option, use of the in-built age in wood-charcoal samples can be used to distinguish the likely correct date range. This approach can resolve ambiguities in dating, e.g., for shorter-duration Late Woodland village sites in northeastern North America, but also other short-duration cases corresponding with reversal/plateau episodes on the 14C calibration curve. We place the Jean-Baptiste Lainé site most likely in a range between ca. AD 1595–1626 (95.4% probability).</description><subject>16th century</subject><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Charcoal</subject><subject>Material culture</subject><subject>Tree rings</subject><subject>Villages</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0033-8222</issn><issn>1945-5755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1O20AUhUdVkUgpK17gSt20AqfzE4_jbqrBniSDnBlqj1t1ZWWccQUqhNqw6I4t-74R4kV4ktoBiQ2re3TPp3uPdBA6IHhMMIk-52kyppjSMWVv0IjEkzAIozB8i0YYMxZMKaW76F3XnWNMCZ9GI_QgIJHaSq2VyEAsj9W8VPbnF7ALCclCZJnUcwlmBrksTPZd6fnWSoXdbgd9IoUOjsWpVUW_zITS93fwcSm0zeSnIzDailyZIyiUlY-3_0RuSp2CSIGEGIPJt5Jj_HUwe2f7WhQSZr33w5g06IPkiRkCFiDAynypdFnAqSksfCvl8j3aaVa_O7__PPdQOZM2WQSZmatEZEHNGL8OGlrjNW2InzhOmfOMxc6vCalXddT4NfPRNJyGsY8HjWtHecRdzFwc4YnDxLE99OHp7lW7-XPju-vqfHPTXvYvK8o5Z3FEKe-pwyeqbjdd1_qmumrPLlbt34rgauip6nuqhp4qyno6eKZXF649W__yL0df4_8DtBGFoA</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Manning, Sturt W</creator><creator>Birch, Jennifer</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6917-0927</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-9783</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>A CENTENNIAL AMBIGUITY: THE CHALLENGE OF RESOLVING THE DATE OF THE JEAN-BAPTISTE LAINÉ (MANTLE), ONTARIO, SITE—AROUND AD 1500 OR AD 1600?—AND THE CASE FOR WOOD-CHARCOAL AS A TERMINUS POST QUEM</title><author>Manning, Sturt W ; Birch, Jennifer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-f2c0d2f1e4b623be339bed11cac7fed3e785859e9ed3e0cb2676b93b9704b01b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>16th century</topic><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Charcoal</topic><topic>Material culture</topic><topic>Tree rings</topic><topic>Villages</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manning, Sturt W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birch, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Radiocarbon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manning, Sturt W</au><au>Birch, Jennifer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A CENTENNIAL AMBIGUITY: THE CHALLENGE OF RESOLVING THE DATE OF THE JEAN-BAPTISTE LAINÉ (MANTLE), ONTARIO, SITE—AROUND AD 1500 OR AD 1600?—AND THE CASE FOR WOOD-CHARCOAL AS A TERMINUS POST QUEM</atitle><jtitle>Radiocarbon</jtitle><addtitle>Radiocarbon</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>279-308</pages><issn>0033-8222</issn><eissn>1945-5755</eissn><abstract>Considered in isolation, the radiocarbon (14C) dates on short-lived plant remains from the Jean-Baptiste Lainé (formerly Mantle) site, Ontario, yield an ambiguous result: more or less similar probability around AD 1500 or alternatively around AD 1600. This village site, likely of no more than ca. 20–30 years total duration, illustrates the challenges of high-resolution dating across periods with a reversal/plateau in the 14C calibration curve. Another problem we identify is the tendency for dating probability for short-duration sites to sometimes be overly compressed as dating intensity increases under analysis with OxCal, and for probability to shift away from the real age range especially during reversal/plateau episodes. To address both issues additional constraints are necessary. While a tree-ring sequenced 14C “wiggle-match” is the best option where available, we investigate how, in the absence of such an option, use of the in-built age in wood-charcoal samples can be used to distinguish the likely correct date range. This approach can resolve ambiguities in dating, e.g., for shorter-duration Late Woodland village sites in northeastern North America, but also other short-duration cases corresponding with reversal/plateau episodes on the 14C calibration curve. We place the Jean-Baptiste Lainé site most likely in a range between ca. AD 1595–1626 (95.4% probability).</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/RDC.2022.23</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6917-0927</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-9783</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-8222
ispartof Radiocarbon, 2022-04, Vol.64 (2), p.279-308
issn 0033-8222
1945-5755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2666397226
source Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects 16th century
Ambiguity
Archaeology
Calibration
Charcoal
Material culture
Tree rings
Villages
Woodlands
title A CENTENNIAL AMBIGUITY: THE CHALLENGE OF RESOLVING THE DATE OF THE JEAN-BAPTISTE LAINÉ (MANTLE), ONTARIO, SITE—AROUND AD 1500 OR AD 1600?—AND THE CASE FOR WOOD-CHARCOAL AS A TERMINUS POST QUEM
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T23%3A09%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20CENTENNIAL%20AMBIGUITY:%20THE%20CHALLENGE%20OF%20RESOLVING%20THE%20DATE%20OF%20THE%20JEAN-BAPTISTE%20LAIN%C3%89%20(MANTLE),%20ONTARIO,%20SITE%E2%80%94AROUND%20AD%201500%20OR%20AD%201600?%E2%80%94AND%20THE%20CASE%20FOR%20WOOD-CHARCOAL%20AS%20A%20TERMINUS%20POST%20QUEM&rft.jtitle=Radiocarbon&rft.au=Manning,%20Sturt%20W&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=279-308&rft.issn=0033-8222&rft.eissn=1945-5755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/RDC.2022.23&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2666397226%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2666397226&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_RDC_2022_23&rfr_iscdi=true