Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process
Magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) was developed as a new precision finishing process for complicated geometries using smart magnetorheological polishing fluid. This process introduces determinism and in-process controllability of rheological behaviour of abrasive laden medium used f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 2007-07, Vol.33 (7-8), p.725-729 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 729 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7-8 |
container_start_page | 725 |
container_title | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Jha, Sunil Jain, V. K. Komanduri, Ranga |
description | Magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) was developed as a new precision finishing process for complicated geometries using smart magnetorheological polishing fluid. This process introduces determinism and in-process controllability of rheological behaviour of abrasive laden medium used for finishing intricate shapes. Magnetorheological polishing (MRP) fluid is comprised of carbonyl iron powder and silicon carbide abrasives dispersed in a viscoplastic base of grease and mineral oil and exhibits change in rheological behaviour in presence of external magnetic field. This smart behaviour of MRP fluid is utilized to precisely control finishing forces. The process performance in terms of surface roughness reduction depends on process variables like hydraulic extrusion pressure, magnetic flux density in the finishing zone, number of finishing cycles, and composition of MRP fluid. In the present work, experiments were conducted on a hydraulically powered MRAFF experimental setup to study the effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on the change in surface roughness of stainless steel grounded workpieces. A new observation of “illusive polishing” action with the initial increase in number of finishing cycles is reported. The actual finishing action is possible only after removal of initial loosely held material remaining after grinding. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00170-006-0502-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2665366610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2665366610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-dccc49523907448eb9643bce9406bc5695e6437f80546f30bd844d041bd3015a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFLxDAQhYMouK7-AG8BL3qoTpp02h5FXBUUQfQc0jTZ7dJNNGl190_4m82yHjx5Ghi-9x4zj5BTBpcMoLyKAKyEDAAzKCDP1ntkwgTnGQdW7JMJ5FhlvMTqkBzFuEw0Mqwm5PvWWqMH6i016yGMsfOOvgcT4xgMVa6lblw1JmwB27kuLjo3p3qjexNpQhNmlTY0-HG-cElGO0dXau7M4MPC-N7PO616qpqgYvdpqO391x-n86eX69nsIkV6ndTH5MCqPpqT3zklb7Pb15v77PH57uHm-jHT6Z4ha7XWoi5yXkMpRGWaGgVvtKkFYKMLrAuTFqWtoBBoOTRtJUQLgjXt9h-KT8nZzjflfowmDnLpx-BSpMwRC46IDP6lcswLQKxZotiO0sHHGIyV76FbqbCRDOS2HLkrR6Zy5LYcueY_xC2DQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2262506691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Jha, Sunil ; Jain, V. K. ; Komanduri, Ranga</creator><creatorcontrib>Jha, Sunil ; Jain, V. K. ; Komanduri, Ranga</creatorcontrib><description>Magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) was developed as a new precision finishing process for complicated geometries using smart magnetorheological polishing fluid. This process introduces determinism and in-process controllability of rheological behaviour of abrasive laden medium used for finishing intricate shapes. Magnetorheological polishing (MRP) fluid is comprised of carbonyl iron powder and silicon carbide abrasives dispersed in a viscoplastic base of grease and mineral oil and exhibits change in rheological behaviour in presence of external magnetic field. This smart behaviour of MRP fluid is utilized to precisely control finishing forces. The process performance in terms of surface roughness reduction depends on process variables like hydraulic extrusion pressure, magnetic flux density in the finishing zone, number of finishing cycles, and composition of MRP fluid. In the present work, experiments were conducted on a hydraulically powered MRAFF experimental setup to study the effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on the change in surface roughness of stainless steel grounded workpieces. A new observation of “illusive polishing” action with the initial increase in number of finishing cycles is reported. The actual finishing action is possible only after removal of initial loosely held material remaining after grinding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0502-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Abrasive finishing ; Abrasives ; Carbonyl powders ; Controllability ; Extrusion ; Flux density ; Magnetic flux ; Magnetorheological fluids ; Material requirements planning ; Mineral oils ; Polishing ; Precision finishing ; Pressure effects ; Process variables ; Rheological properties ; Rheology ; Silicon carbide ; Stability ; Stainless steels ; Surface roughness ; Workpieces</subject><ispartof>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2007-07, Vol.33 (7-8), p.725-729</ispartof><rights>The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology is a copyright of Springer, (2006). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-dccc49523907448eb9643bce9406bc5695e6437f80546f30bd844d041bd3015a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-dccc49523907448eb9643bce9406bc5695e6437f80546f30bd844d041bd3015a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jha, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, V. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komanduri, Ranga</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process</title><title>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</title><description>Magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) was developed as a new precision finishing process for complicated geometries using smart magnetorheological polishing fluid. This process introduces determinism and in-process controllability of rheological behaviour of abrasive laden medium used for finishing intricate shapes. Magnetorheological polishing (MRP) fluid is comprised of carbonyl iron powder and silicon carbide abrasives dispersed in a viscoplastic base of grease and mineral oil and exhibits change in rheological behaviour in presence of external magnetic field. This smart behaviour of MRP fluid is utilized to precisely control finishing forces. The process performance in terms of surface roughness reduction depends on process variables like hydraulic extrusion pressure, magnetic flux density in the finishing zone, number of finishing cycles, and composition of MRP fluid. In the present work, experiments were conducted on a hydraulically powered MRAFF experimental setup to study the effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on the change in surface roughness of stainless steel grounded workpieces. A new observation of “illusive polishing” action with the initial increase in number of finishing cycles is reported. The actual finishing action is possible only after removal of initial loosely held material remaining after grinding.</description><subject>Abrasive finishing</subject><subject>Abrasives</subject><subject>Carbonyl powders</subject><subject>Controllability</subject><subject>Extrusion</subject><subject>Flux density</subject><subject>Magnetic flux</subject><subject>Magnetorheological fluids</subject><subject>Material requirements planning</subject><subject>Mineral oils</subject><subject>Polishing</subject><subject>Precision finishing</subject><subject>Pressure effects</subject><subject>Process variables</subject><subject>Rheological properties</subject><subject>Rheology</subject><subject>Silicon carbide</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Stainless steels</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><subject>Workpieces</subject><issn>0268-3768</issn><issn>1433-3015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFLxDAQhYMouK7-AG8BL3qoTpp02h5FXBUUQfQc0jTZ7dJNNGl190_4m82yHjx5Ghi-9x4zj5BTBpcMoLyKAKyEDAAzKCDP1ntkwgTnGQdW7JMJ5FhlvMTqkBzFuEw0Mqwm5PvWWqMH6i016yGMsfOOvgcT4xgMVa6lblw1JmwB27kuLjo3p3qjexNpQhNmlTY0-HG-cElGO0dXau7M4MPC-N7PO616qpqgYvdpqO391x-n86eX69nsIkV6ndTH5MCqPpqT3zklb7Pb15v77PH57uHm-jHT6Z4ha7XWoi5yXkMpRGWaGgVvtKkFYKMLrAuTFqWtoBBoOTRtJUQLgjXt9h-KT8nZzjflfowmDnLpx-BSpMwRC46IDP6lcswLQKxZotiO0sHHGIyV76FbqbCRDOS2HLkrR6Zy5LYcueY_xC2DQA</recordid><startdate>20070701</startdate><enddate>20070701</enddate><creator>Jha, Sunil</creator><creator>Jain, V. K.</creator><creator>Komanduri, Ranga</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070701</creationdate><title>Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process</title><author>Jha, Sunil ; Jain, V. K. ; Komanduri, Ranga</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-dccc49523907448eb9643bce9406bc5695e6437f80546f30bd844d041bd3015a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Abrasive finishing</topic><topic>Abrasives</topic><topic>Carbonyl powders</topic><topic>Controllability</topic><topic>Extrusion</topic><topic>Flux density</topic><topic>Magnetic flux</topic><topic>Magnetorheological fluids</topic><topic>Material requirements planning</topic><topic>Mineral oils</topic><topic>Polishing</topic><topic>Precision finishing</topic><topic>Pressure effects</topic><topic>Process variables</topic><topic>Rheological properties</topic><topic>Rheology</topic><topic>Silicon carbide</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Stainless steels</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><topic>Workpieces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jha, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, V. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komanduri, Ranga</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jha, Sunil</au><au>Jain, V. K.</au><au>Komanduri, Ranga</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process</atitle><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle><date>2007-07-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>7-8</issue><spage>725</spage><epage>729</epage><pages>725-729</pages><issn>0268-3768</issn><eissn>1433-3015</eissn><abstract>Magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) was developed as a new precision finishing process for complicated geometries using smart magnetorheological polishing fluid. This process introduces determinism and in-process controllability of rheological behaviour of abrasive laden medium used for finishing intricate shapes. Magnetorheological polishing (MRP) fluid is comprised of carbonyl iron powder and silicon carbide abrasives dispersed in a viscoplastic base of grease and mineral oil and exhibits change in rheological behaviour in presence of external magnetic field. This smart behaviour of MRP fluid is utilized to precisely control finishing forces. The process performance in terms of surface roughness reduction depends on process variables like hydraulic extrusion pressure, magnetic flux density in the finishing zone, number of finishing cycles, and composition of MRP fluid. In the present work, experiments were conducted on a hydraulically powered MRAFF experimental setup to study the effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on the change in surface roughness of stainless steel grounded workpieces. A new observation of “illusive polishing” action with the initial increase in number of finishing cycles is reported. The actual finishing action is possible only after removal of initial loosely held material remaining after grinding.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00170-006-0502-x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-3768 |
ispartof | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2007-07, Vol.33 (7-8), p.725-729 |
issn | 0268-3768 1433-3015 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2665366610 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Abrasive finishing Abrasives Carbonyl powders Controllability Extrusion Flux density Magnetic flux Magnetorheological fluids Material requirements planning Mineral oils Polishing Precision finishing Pressure effects Process variables Rheological properties Rheology Silicon carbide Stability Stainless steels Surface roughness Workpieces |
title | Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T10%3A21%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20extrusion%20pressure%20and%20number%20of%20finishing%20cycles%20on%20surface%20roughness%20in%20magnetorheological%20abrasive%20flow%20finishing%20(MRAFF)%20process&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20technology&rft.au=Jha,%20Sunil&rft.date=2007-07-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=7-8&rft.spage=725&rft.epage=729&rft.pages=725-729&rft.issn=0268-3768&rft.eissn=1433-3015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00170-006-0502-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2665366610%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2262506691&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |