The return period for land-use planning in snow avalanche terrain
The return period or average time between events as a function of position along an avalanche path is a primary determiner for zoning in snow avalanche terrain. Areas with long times between the occurrences are sought to enable permissions for occupied structures and placement of infrastructure faci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2022-05, Vol.112 (1), p.783-806 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 806 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 783 |
container_title | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | McClung, D. M. Hӧller, Peter Fischer, J. T. |
description | The return period or average time between events as a function of position along an avalanche path is a primary determiner for zoning in snow avalanche terrain. Areas with long times between the occurrences are sought to enable permissions for occupied structures and placement of infrastructure facilities. Generally, both the avalanche frequency and potential destructive effects decrease proceeding down into the runout zone where applications reside. Both the avalanche frequency and the estimated destructive effects are used in zoning methods. In typical zoning problems, the allowable return period exceeds 25 years. In most cases, there are not enough prior data on avalanche occurrences for an avalanche path to specify return periods accurately which implies that models must be used. Both avalanche dynamics and empirical, probabilistic models are used to predict zones for rare avalanche occurrences. However, the return period is a probabilistic quantity which places emphasis on empirical models. In this paper, the common methods for determining return period of avalanches are reviewed. The main emphasis in this paper is on verification, accuracy and quantification of the methods for determining return period through use of case histories. From a scientific perspective, the results here suggest some deficiencies in commonly used zoning strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11069-022-05205-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2664220584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2664220584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-6eba1aab8632a3cd03437d2601ad9765b1553df27f010f112c2f708116d30d493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9GZSZu2x2XxHwheVvAWsk2ydlnTmnQVv73RCt48zTC838ybx9g5wiUCVFcJEVQjgEhASVAKPGAzLCspoC7gkM2gIRQg4fmYnaS0BUBU1MzYYvXieHTjPgY-uNj1lvs-8p0JVuyT40PuQhc2vAs8hf6Dm3eTR22mRhej6cIpO_Jml9zZb52zp5vr1fJOPDze3i8XD6IlgFEotzZozLpWkoxsLchCVpYUoLFNpco1lqW0nioPCB6RWvIV1NmmlWCLRs7ZxbR3iP3b3qVRb_vsOp_UpFRB-eu6yCqaVG3sU4rO6yF2ryZ-agT9HZWeotI5Kv0TlcYMyQlKWRw2Lv6t_of6Aq9ual4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2664220584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The return period for land-use planning in snow avalanche terrain</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>McClung, D. M. ; Hӧller, Peter ; Fischer, J. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>McClung, D. M. ; Hӧller, Peter ; Fischer, J. T.</creatorcontrib><description>The return period or average time between events as a function of position along an avalanche path is a primary determiner for zoning in snow avalanche terrain. Areas with long times between the occurrences are sought to enable permissions for occupied structures and placement of infrastructure facilities. Generally, both the avalanche frequency and potential destructive effects decrease proceeding down into the runout zone where applications reside. Both the avalanche frequency and the estimated destructive effects are used in zoning methods. In typical zoning problems, the allowable return period exceeds 25 years. In most cases, there are not enough prior data on avalanche occurrences for an avalanche path to specify return periods accurately which implies that models must be used. Both avalanche dynamics and empirical, probabilistic models are used to predict zones for rare avalanche occurrences. However, the return period is a probabilistic quantity which places emphasis on empirical models. In this paper, the common methods for determining return period of avalanches are reviewed. The main emphasis in this paper is on verification, accuracy and quantification of the methods for determining return period through use of case histories. From a scientific perspective, the results here suggest some deficiencies in commonly used zoning strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05205-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Avalanche dynamics ; Avalanches ; Case histories ; Civil Engineering ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Empirical models ; Environmental Management ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Land use ; Land use management ; Land use planning ; Landslides ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; Natural Hazards ; Original Paper ; Probabilistic models ; Snow ; Snow avalanches ; Terrain ; Zoning</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2022-05, Vol.112 (1), p.783-806</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-6eba1aab8632a3cd03437d2601ad9765b1553df27f010f112c2f708116d30d493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11069-022-05205-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-022-05205-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McClung, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hӧller, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, J. T.</creatorcontrib><title>The return period for land-use planning in snow avalanche terrain</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>The return period or average time between events as a function of position along an avalanche path is a primary determiner for zoning in snow avalanche terrain. Areas with long times between the occurrences are sought to enable permissions for occupied structures and placement of infrastructure facilities. Generally, both the avalanche frequency and potential destructive effects decrease proceeding down into the runout zone where applications reside. Both the avalanche frequency and the estimated destructive effects are used in zoning methods. In typical zoning problems, the allowable return period exceeds 25 years. In most cases, there are not enough prior data on avalanche occurrences for an avalanche path to specify return periods accurately which implies that models must be used. Both avalanche dynamics and empirical, probabilistic models are used to predict zones for rare avalanche occurrences. However, the return period is a probabilistic quantity which places emphasis on empirical models. In this paper, the common methods for determining return period of avalanches are reviewed. The main emphasis in this paper is on verification, accuracy and quantification of the methods for determining return period through use of case histories. From a scientific perspective, the results here suggest some deficiencies in commonly used zoning strategies.</description><subject>Avalanche dynamics</subject><subject>Avalanches</subject><subject>Case histories</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Empirical models</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Landslides</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Probabilistic models</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snow avalanches</subject><subject>Terrain</subject><subject>Zoning</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9GZSZu2x2XxHwheVvAWsk2ydlnTmnQVv73RCt48zTC838ybx9g5wiUCVFcJEVQjgEhASVAKPGAzLCspoC7gkM2gIRQg4fmYnaS0BUBU1MzYYvXieHTjPgY-uNj1lvs-8p0JVuyT40PuQhc2vAs8hf6Dm3eTR22mRhej6cIpO_Jml9zZb52zp5vr1fJOPDze3i8XD6IlgFEotzZozLpWkoxsLchCVpYUoLFNpco1lqW0nioPCB6RWvIV1NmmlWCLRs7ZxbR3iP3b3qVRb_vsOp_UpFRB-eu6yCqaVG3sU4rO6yF2ryZ-agT9HZWeotI5Kv0TlcYMyQlKWRw2Lv6t_of6Aq9ual4</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>McClung, D. M.</creator><creator>Hӧller, Peter</creator><creator>Fischer, J. T.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>The return period for land-use planning in snow avalanche terrain</title><author>McClung, D. M. ; Hӧller, Peter ; Fischer, J. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-6eba1aab8632a3cd03437d2601ad9765b1553df27f010f112c2f708116d30d493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Avalanche dynamics</topic><topic>Avalanches</topic><topic>Case histories</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Empirical models</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Landslides</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Probabilistic models</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snow avalanches</topic><topic>Terrain</topic><topic>Zoning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McClung, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hӧller, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, J. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McClung, D. M.</au><au>Hӧller, Peter</au><au>Fischer, J. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The return period for land-use planning in snow avalanche terrain</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>783</spage><epage>806</epage><pages>783-806</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>The return period or average time between events as a function of position along an avalanche path is a primary determiner for zoning in snow avalanche terrain. Areas with long times between the occurrences are sought to enable permissions for occupied structures and placement of infrastructure facilities. Generally, both the avalanche frequency and potential destructive effects decrease proceeding down into the runout zone where applications reside. Both the avalanche frequency and the estimated destructive effects are used in zoning methods. In typical zoning problems, the allowable return period exceeds 25 years. In most cases, there are not enough prior data on avalanche occurrences for an avalanche path to specify return periods accurately which implies that models must be used. Both avalanche dynamics and empirical, probabilistic models are used to predict zones for rare avalanche occurrences. However, the return period is a probabilistic quantity which places emphasis on empirical models. In this paper, the common methods for determining return period of avalanches are reviewed. The main emphasis in this paper is on verification, accuracy and quantification of the methods for determining return period through use of case histories. From a scientific perspective, the results here suggest some deficiencies in commonly used zoning strategies.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-022-05205-1</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-030X |
ispartof | Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2022-05, Vol.112 (1), p.783-806 |
issn | 0921-030X 1573-0840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2664220584 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Avalanche dynamics Avalanches Case histories Civil Engineering Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Empirical models Environmental Management Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Hydrogeology Land use Land use management Land use planning Landslides Mathematical models Methods Natural Hazards Original Paper Probabilistic models Snow Snow avalanches Terrain Zoning |
title | The return period for land-use planning in snow avalanche terrain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A15%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20return%20period%20for%20land-use%20planning%20in%20snow%20avalanche%20terrain&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=McClung,%20D.%20M.&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=783&rft.epage=806&rft.pages=783-806&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-022-05205-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2664220584%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2664220584&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |