Heavy metal pollution level and potential ecological risk assessment of sludge landfill

The level of heavy metals of the sludge in the landfills has attracted the environmental researchers due to their non‐biodegradability, persistence, toxicity and biomagnification. Heavy metals contamination and ecological risk assessment in the sludge landfills were assessed. In this work, the enric...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental progress 2022-05, Vol.41 (3), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Jian, Tang, Hengjun, Sima, Weiping, Wang, Haiyue, Zou, Dongbing, Qiu, Biao, Qu, Jiang, Liang, Rui, Dong, Jianwei, Liao, Yi, Liang, Chao, Wan, Shan, Li, Zhihua, Qiu, Zhongping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 3
container_start_page
container_title Environmental progress
container_volume 41
creator Tang, Jian
Tang, Hengjun
Sima, Weiping
Wang, Haiyue
Zou, Dongbing
Qiu, Biao
Qu, Jiang
Liang, Rui
Dong, Jianwei
Liao, Yi
Liang, Chao
Wan, Shan
Li, Zhihua
Qiu, Zhongping
description The level of heavy metals of the sludge in the landfills has attracted the environmental researchers due to their non‐biodegradability, persistence, toxicity and biomagnification. Heavy metals contamination and ecological risk assessment in the sludge landfills were assessed. In this work, the enrichment factor (EF) and geo‐accumulation index were used to analyze heavy metal pollution degree in the sludge landfills. Meanwhile, the potential ecological risk index was used to assess heavy metals potential ecological risk in the sludge landfills. Results indicated that heavy metal concentrations order was Cr > Cd > Ni > Zn > As>Cu = Pb > Hg. Cr, Cd and Ni coefficient variation were 57%, 53% and 38%, respectively, which indicated that Cr, Cd and Ni content have a large range variation. EF and geo‐accumulation index analyze heavy metal pollution degree in the sludge landfills. Results demonstrated that Hg, Cd, Cu and Zn obtained a high pollution degree. However, Cr, Ni, As and Pb have a low pollution in the sludge landfills. Potential ecological risk index indicated that Hg obtained the highest pollution degree, which demonstrated that the potential ecological risk level is the highest value (Eri ≥ 3500, RI ≥ 4163). Whereas, other heavy metals have a low pollution degree in the sludge landfills. Therefore, Hg, Cd and Cu content of sludge should be strictly restricted in agricultural use. Meanwhile, it should be strictly restricted Hg, Cd and Cu content of wastewater discharge, and reduced heavy metal content of sludge.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ep.13795
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2661294075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2661294075</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-e8a4699260206abf2c36f0c62a1c73baa974144b5d47a53158874bb93a9d4d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKvgRwh48bI1_zZpjlJqKxT0UPAYstnZsjXdrJvdSr-90RVvnuYx7zfz4CF0S8mMEsIeoJ1RrnR-hiZUC5EpkZPzPy3YJbqKcU-I5ELrCXpbgz2e8AF663EbvB_6OjTYwxE8tk2Zdj00fZ1ccMGHXe2S7Or4jm2MEOMhuThUOPqh3AH26aaqvb9GF5X1EW5-5xRtn5bbxTrbvKyeF4-bzDHN8wzmVkitmSSMSFtUzHFZESeZpU7xwlqtBBWiyEuhbM5pPp8rURSaW12KkvMpuhvftl34GCD2Zh-GrkmJhklJmRZE5Ym6HynXhRg7qEzb1QfbnQwl5rs1A635aS2h2Yh-1h5O_3Jm-TryX9qubU8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2661294075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heavy metal pollution level and potential ecological risk assessment of sludge landfill</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Tang, Jian ; Tang, Hengjun ; Sima, Weiping ; Wang, Haiyue ; Zou, Dongbing ; Qiu, Biao ; Qu, Jiang ; Liang, Rui ; Dong, Jianwei ; Liao, Yi ; Liang, Chao ; Wan, Shan ; Li, Zhihua ; Qiu, Zhongping</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jian ; Tang, Hengjun ; Sima, Weiping ; Wang, Haiyue ; Zou, Dongbing ; Qiu, Biao ; Qu, Jiang ; Liang, Rui ; Dong, Jianwei ; Liao, Yi ; Liang, Chao ; Wan, Shan ; Li, Zhihua ; Qiu, Zhongping</creatorcontrib><description>The level of heavy metals of the sludge in the landfills has attracted the environmental researchers due to their non‐biodegradability, persistence, toxicity and biomagnification. Heavy metals contamination and ecological risk assessment in the sludge landfills were assessed. In this work, the enrichment factor (EF) and geo‐accumulation index were used to analyze heavy metal pollution degree in the sludge landfills. Meanwhile, the potential ecological risk index was used to assess heavy metals potential ecological risk in the sludge landfills. Results indicated that heavy metal concentrations order was Cr &gt; Cd &gt; Ni &gt; Zn &gt; As&gt;Cu = Pb &gt; Hg. Cr, Cd and Ni coefficient variation were 57%, 53% and 38%, respectively, which indicated that Cr, Cd and Ni content have a large range variation. EF and geo‐accumulation index analyze heavy metal pollution degree in the sludge landfills. Results demonstrated that Hg, Cd, Cu and Zn obtained a high pollution degree. However, Cr, Ni, As and Pb have a low pollution in the sludge landfills. Potential ecological risk index indicated that Hg obtained the highest pollution degree, which demonstrated that the potential ecological risk level is the highest value (Eri ≥ 3500, RI ≥ 4163). Whereas, other heavy metals have a low pollution degree in the sludge landfills. Therefore, Hg, Cd and Cu content of sludge should be strictly restricted in agricultural use. Meanwhile, it should be strictly restricted Hg, Cd and Cu content of wastewater discharge, and reduced heavy metal content of sludge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-7442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ep.13795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bioaccumulation ; Biodegradability ; Biodegradation ; Biological magnification ; Cadmium ; Chromium ; Coefficient of variation ; Contamination ; Copper ; Ecological effects ; ecological risk ; Ecological risk assessment ; Environmental risk ; heavy metal ; Heavy metal content ; Heavy metals ; Landfill ; Landfills ; Lead ; Mercury ; Mercury (metal) ; Metal concentrations ; Nickel ; Pollution index ; pollution level ; Pollution levels ; potential ecological risk index ; Risk assessment ; Risk levels ; Sludge ; Toxicity ; Waste disposal sites ; Wastewater ; Wastewater discharges ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Environmental progress, 2022-05, Vol.41 (3), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 American Institute of Chemical Engineers.</rights><rights>2022 American Institute of Chemical Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-e8a4699260206abf2c36f0c62a1c73baa974144b5d47a53158874bb93a9d4d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-e8a4699260206abf2c36f0c62a1c73baa974144b5d47a53158874bb93a9d4d33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0824-7417</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fep.13795$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fep.13795$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Hengjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sima, Weiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haiyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Dongbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Biao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Jianwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Zhongping</creatorcontrib><title>Heavy metal pollution level and potential ecological risk assessment of sludge landfill</title><title>Environmental progress</title><description>The level of heavy metals of the sludge in the landfills has attracted the environmental researchers due to their non‐biodegradability, persistence, toxicity and biomagnification. Heavy metals contamination and ecological risk assessment in the sludge landfills were assessed. In this work, the enrichment factor (EF) and geo‐accumulation index were used to analyze heavy metal pollution degree in the sludge landfills. Meanwhile, the potential ecological risk index was used to assess heavy metals potential ecological risk in the sludge landfills. Results indicated that heavy metal concentrations order was Cr &gt; Cd &gt; Ni &gt; Zn &gt; As&gt;Cu = Pb &gt; Hg. Cr, Cd and Ni coefficient variation were 57%, 53% and 38%, respectively, which indicated that Cr, Cd and Ni content have a large range variation. EF and geo‐accumulation index analyze heavy metal pollution degree in the sludge landfills. Results demonstrated that Hg, Cd, Cu and Zn obtained a high pollution degree. However, Cr, Ni, As and Pb have a low pollution in the sludge landfills. Potential ecological risk index indicated that Hg obtained the highest pollution degree, which demonstrated that the potential ecological risk level is the highest value (Eri ≥ 3500, RI ≥ 4163). Whereas, other heavy metals have a low pollution degree in the sludge landfills. Therefore, Hg, Cd and Cu content of sludge should be strictly restricted in agricultural use. Meanwhile, it should be strictly restricted Hg, Cd and Cu content of wastewater discharge, and reduced heavy metal content of sludge.</description><subject>Bioaccumulation</subject><subject>Biodegradability</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Biological magnification</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>ecological risk</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>heavy metal</subject><subject>Heavy metal content</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Mercury</subject><subject>Mercury (metal)</subject><subject>Metal concentrations</subject><subject>Nickel</subject><subject>Pollution index</subject><subject>pollution level</subject><subject>Pollution levels</subject><subject>potential ecological risk index</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk levels</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Waste disposal sites</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater discharges</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>1944-7442</issn><issn>1944-7450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKvgRwh48bI1_zZpjlJqKxT0UPAYstnZsjXdrJvdSr-90RVvnuYx7zfz4CF0S8mMEsIeoJ1RrnR-hiZUC5EpkZPzPy3YJbqKcU-I5ELrCXpbgz2e8AF663EbvB_6OjTYwxE8tk2Zdj00fZ1ccMGHXe2S7Or4jm2MEOMhuThUOPqh3AH26aaqvb9GF5X1EW5-5xRtn5bbxTrbvKyeF4-bzDHN8wzmVkitmSSMSFtUzHFZESeZpU7xwlqtBBWiyEuhbM5pPp8rURSaW12KkvMpuhvftl34GCD2Zh-GrkmJhklJmRZE5Ym6HynXhRg7qEzb1QfbnQwl5rs1A635aS2h2Yh-1h5O_3Jm-TryX9qubU8</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Tang, Jian</creator><creator>Tang, Hengjun</creator><creator>Sima, Weiping</creator><creator>Wang, Haiyue</creator><creator>Zou, Dongbing</creator><creator>Qiu, Biao</creator><creator>Qu, Jiang</creator><creator>Liang, Rui</creator><creator>Dong, Jianwei</creator><creator>Liao, Yi</creator><creator>Liang, Chao</creator><creator>Wan, Shan</creator><creator>Li, Zhihua</creator><creator>Qiu, Zhongping</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0824-7417</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Heavy metal pollution level and potential ecological risk assessment of sludge landfill</title><author>Tang, Jian ; Tang, Hengjun ; Sima, Weiping ; Wang, Haiyue ; Zou, Dongbing ; Qiu, Biao ; Qu, Jiang ; Liang, Rui ; Dong, Jianwei ; Liao, Yi ; Liang, Chao ; Wan, Shan ; Li, Zhihua ; Qiu, Zhongping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-e8a4699260206abf2c36f0c62a1c73baa974144b5d47a53158874bb93a9d4d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bioaccumulation</topic><topic>Biodegradability</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Biological magnification</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>ecological risk</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>heavy metal</topic><topic>Heavy metal content</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Mercury</topic><topic>Mercury (metal)</topic><topic>Metal concentrations</topic><topic>Nickel</topic><topic>Pollution index</topic><topic>pollution level</topic><topic>Pollution levels</topic><topic>potential ecological risk index</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk levels</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Waste disposal sites</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater discharges</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Hengjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sima, Weiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haiyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Dongbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Biao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Jianwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhihua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Zhongping</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental progress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Jian</au><au>Tang, Hengjun</au><au>Sima, Weiping</au><au>Wang, Haiyue</au><au>Zou, Dongbing</au><au>Qiu, Biao</au><au>Qu, Jiang</au><au>Liang, Rui</au><au>Dong, Jianwei</au><au>Liao, Yi</au><au>Liang, Chao</au><au>Wan, Shan</au><au>Li, Zhihua</au><au>Qiu, Zhongping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heavy metal pollution level and potential ecological risk assessment of sludge landfill</atitle><jtitle>Environmental progress</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1944-7442</issn><eissn>1944-7450</eissn><abstract>The level of heavy metals of the sludge in the landfills has attracted the environmental researchers due to their non‐biodegradability, persistence, toxicity and biomagnification. Heavy metals contamination and ecological risk assessment in the sludge landfills were assessed. In this work, the enrichment factor (EF) and geo‐accumulation index were used to analyze heavy metal pollution degree in the sludge landfills. Meanwhile, the potential ecological risk index was used to assess heavy metals potential ecological risk in the sludge landfills. Results indicated that heavy metal concentrations order was Cr &gt; Cd &gt; Ni &gt; Zn &gt; As&gt;Cu = Pb &gt; Hg. Cr, Cd and Ni coefficient variation were 57%, 53% and 38%, respectively, which indicated that Cr, Cd and Ni content have a large range variation. EF and geo‐accumulation index analyze heavy metal pollution degree in the sludge landfills. Results demonstrated that Hg, Cd, Cu and Zn obtained a high pollution degree. However, Cr, Ni, As and Pb have a low pollution in the sludge landfills. Potential ecological risk index indicated that Hg obtained the highest pollution degree, which demonstrated that the potential ecological risk level is the highest value (Eri ≥ 3500, RI ≥ 4163). Whereas, other heavy metals have a low pollution degree in the sludge landfills. Therefore, Hg, Cd and Cu content of sludge should be strictly restricted in agricultural use. Meanwhile, it should be strictly restricted Hg, Cd and Cu content of wastewater discharge, and reduced heavy metal content of sludge.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ep.13795</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0824-7417</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1944-7442
ispartof Environmental progress, 2022-05, Vol.41 (3), p.n/a
issn 1944-7442
1944-7450
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2661294075
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Bioaccumulation
Biodegradability
Biodegradation
Biological magnification
Cadmium
Chromium
Coefficient of variation
Contamination
Copper
Ecological effects
ecological risk
Ecological risk assessment
Environmental risk
heavy metal
Heavy metal content
Heavy metals
Landfill
Landfills
Lead
Mercury
Mercury (metal)
Metal concentrations
Nickel
Pollution index
pollution level
Pollution levels
potential ecological risk index
Risk assessment
Risk levels
Sludge
Toxicity
Waste disposal sites
Wastewater
Wastewater discharges
Zinc
title Heavy metal pollution level and potential ecological risk assessment of sludge landfill
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T23%3A41%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heavy%20metal%20pollution%20level%20and%20potential%20ecological%20risk%20assessment%20of%20sludge%20landfill&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20progress&rft.au=Tang,%20Jian&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1944-7442&rft.eissn=1944-7450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ep.13795&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2661294075%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2661294075&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true