Social workers use of knowledge in an evidence-based framework: a mixed methods study

Since the 1990s, evidence-based practice has become part of social work, grounded in the notion that social work should be a research-based profession. However, recent studies show that social workers struggle with bridging research and practice. This study analysed Norwegian social workers' us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of social work 2022-05, Vol.25 (3), p.443-456
Hauptverfasser: Finne, Joakim, Ekeland, Tor-Johan, Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 456
container_issue 3
container_start_page 443
container_title European journal of social work
container_volume 25
creator Finne, Joakim
Ekeland, Tor-Johan
Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira
description Since the 1990s, evidence-based practice has become part of social work, grounded in the notion that social work should be a research-based profession. However, recent studies show that social workers struggle with bridging research and practice. This study analysed Norwegian social workers' use of knowledge in their daily practice, drawing on data from a survey consisting of 2060 social workers in different practice fields as well as qualitative interviews with 25 social workers from social services and child welfare services. Analyses of the quantitative data revealed that clients, work experience, and colleagues were the three most common sources of knowledge among the social workers. The use of knowledge could be divided into two subgroups: (a) theory-oriented and (b) practice-oriented. The qualitative interviews revealed that social workers valued work experience, colleagues, supervisors, and clients as their main sources of knowledge. Lack of time was identified as the main barrier for engaging in research. The findings in this study are contextualised with theories on knowledge production and translation in social work, arguing that field instructors, supervisors, and social work education play an essential role both in facilitating evidence-based practice and, more broadly, in bridging the gap between research and practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13691457.2020.1783214
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2660785892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2660785892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-5d872c8969b48001823d4b01be15089d9d8e06324a953ca73531a22393d03ec03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_ghDwvDXfm_WkFL-g4EF7Dtkkq7G7m5rsWvvvTWm9eppheN-ZeR8ALjGaYyTRNaaiwoyXc4JIHpWSEsxOwAQzIQsiBDvNfdYUe9E5mKXka4Sx5FwKMQGr12C8buE2xLWLCY7JwdDAdR-2rbPvDvoe6h66b29db1xR6-QsbKLu3N5yAzXs_E8edW74CDbBNIx2dwHOGt0mNzvWKVg93L8tnorly-Pz4m5ZGEblUHArS2JkJaqaSYSwJNSy_F3tMEeyspWVDglKmK44NbqknGJNCK2oRdQZRKfg6rB3E8PX6NKgPsMY-3xS5eiolFxWJKv4QWViSCm6Rm2i73TcKYzUHqL6g6j2ENURYvbdHny-b0LsdA7cWjXoXRtiJtAbnxT9f8Uvvh126Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2660785892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social workers use of knowledge in an evidence-based framework: a mixed methods study</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Finne, Joakim ; Ekeland, Tor-Johan ; Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</creator><creatorcontrib>Finne, Joakim ; Ekeland, Tor-Johan ; Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</creatorcontrib><description>Since the 1990s, evidence-based practice has become part of social work, grounded in the notion that social work should be a research-based profession. However, recent studies show that social workers struggle with bridging research and practice. This study analysed Norwegian social workers' use of knowledge in their daily practice, drawing on data from a survey consisting of 2060 social workers in different practice fields as well as qualitative interviews with 25 social workers from social services and child welfare services. Analyses of the quantitative data revealed that clients, work experience, and colleagues were the three most common sources of knowledge among the social workers. The use of knowledge could be divided into two subgroups: (a) theory-oriented and (b) practice-oriented. The qualitative interviews revealed that social workers valued work experience, colleagues, supervisors, and clients as their main sources of knowledge. Lack of time was identified as the main barrier for engaging in research. The findings in this study are contextualised with theories on knowledge production and translation in social work, arguing that field instructors, supervisors, and social work education play an essential role both in facilitating evidence-based practice and, more broadly, in bridging the gap between research and practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-1457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2020.1783214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Routledge</publisher><subject>Child welfare ; Colleagues ; Data ; Evidence based research ; Evidence-based practice ; evidensbasert praksis ; Interviews ; Knowledge ; knowledge production ; knowledge utilisation ; kunnskapsproduksjon ; metodetriangulering ; mixed methods ; Mixed methods research ; Professional practice ; Professional training ; Social services ; Social work ; Social work education ; Social workers ; sosialt arbeid ; Supervisors ; Translation ; Welfare services ; Work ; Work experience</subject><ispartof>European journal of social work, 2022-05, Vol.25 (3), p.443-456</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-5d872c8969b48001823d4b01be15089d9d8e06324a953ca73531a22393d03ec03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-5d872c8969b48001823d4b01be15089d9d8e06324a953ca73531a22393d03ec03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3732-0126 ; 0000-0002-7211-4125</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finne, Joakim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekeland, Tor-Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</creatorcontrib><title>Social workers use of knowledge in an evidence-based framework: a mixed methods study</title><title>European journal of social work</title><description>Since the 1990s, evidence-based practice has become part of social work, grounded in the notion that social work should be a research-based profession. However, recent studies show that social workers struggle with bridging research and practice. This study analysed Norwegian social workers' use of knowledge in their daily practice, drawing on data from a survey consisting of 2060 social workers in different practice fields as well as qualitative interviews with 25 social workers from social services and child welfare services. Analyses of the quantitative data revealed that clients, work experience, and colleagues were the three most common sources of knowledge among the social workers. The use of knowledge could be divided into two subgroups: (a) theory-oriented and (b) practice-oriented. The qualitative interviews revealed that social workers valued work experience, colleagues, supervisors, and clients as their main sources of knowledge. Lack of time was identified as the main barrier for engaging in research. The findings in this study are contextualised with theories on knowledge production and translation in social work, arguing that field instructors, supervisors, and social work education play an essential role both in facilitating evidence-based practice and, more broadly, in bridging the gap between research and practice.</description><subject>Child welfare</subject><subject>Colleagues</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Evidence based research</subject><subject>Evidence-based practice</subject><subject>evidensbasert praksis</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>knowledge production</subject><subject>knowledge utilisation</subject><subject>kunnskapsproduksjon</subject><subject>metodetriangulering</subject><subject>mixed methods</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Professional training</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Social work</subject><subject>Social work education</subject><subject>Social workers</subject><subject>sosialt arbeid</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Welfare services</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>Work experience</subject><issn>1369-1457</issn><issn>1468-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_ghDwvDXfm_WkFL-g4EF7Dtkkq7G7m5rsWvvvTWm9eppheN-ZeR8ALjGaYyTRNaaiwoyXc4JIHpWSEsxOwAQzIQsiBDvNfdYUe9E5mKXka4Sx5FwKMQGr12C8buE2xLWLCY7JwdDAdR-2rbPvDvoe6h66b29db1xR6-QsbKLu3N5yAzXs_E8edW74CDbBNIx2dwHOGt0mNzvWKVg93L8tnorly-Pz4m5ZGEblUHArS2JkJaqaSYSwJNSy_F3tMEeyspWVDglKmK44NbqknGJNCK2oRdQZRKfg6rB3E8PX6NKgPsMY-3xS5eiolFxWJKv4QWViSCm6Rm2i73TcKYzUHqL6g6j2ENURYvbdHny-b0LsdA7cWjXoXRtiJtAbnxT9f8Uvvh126Q</recordid><startdate>20220504</startdate><enddate>20220504</enddate><creator>Finne, Joakim</creator><creator>Ekeland, Tor-Johan</creator><creator>Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3732-0126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7211-4125</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220504</creationdate><title>Social workers use of knowledge in an evidence-based framework: a mixed methods study</title><author>Finne, Joakim ; Ekeland, Tor-Johan ; Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-5d872c8969b48001823d4b01be15089d9d8e06324a953ca73531a22393d03ec03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Child welfare</topic><topic>Colleagues</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Evidence based research</topic><topic>Evidence-based practice</topic><topic>evidensbasert praksis</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>knowledge production</topic><topic>knowledge utilisation</topic><topic>kunnskapsproduksjon</topic><topic>metodetriangulering</topic><topic>mixed methods</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Professional training</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Social work</topic><topic>Social work education</topic><topic>Social workers</topic><topic>sosialt arbeid</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Welfare services</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>Work experience</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finne, Joakim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekeland, Tor-Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European journal of social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finne, Joakim</au><au>Ekeland, Tor-Johan</au><au>Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social workers use of knowledge in an evidence-based framework: a mixed methods study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of social work</jtitle><date>2022-05-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>443</spage><epage>456</epage><pages>443-456</pages><issn>1369-1457</issn><eissn>1468-2664</eissn><abstract>Since the 1990s, evidence-based practice has become part of social work, grounded in the notion that social work should be a research-based profession. However, recent studies show that social workers struggle with bridging research and practice. This study analysed Norwegian social workers' use of knowledge in their daily practice, drawing on data from a survey consisting of 2060 social workers in different practice fields as well as qualitative interviews with 25 social workers from social services and child welfare services. Analyses of the quantitative data revealed that clients, work experience, and colleagues were the three most common sources of knowledge among the social workers. The use of knowledge could be divided into two subgroups: (a) theory-oriented and (b) practice-oriented. The qualitative interviews revealed that social workers valued work experience, colleagues, supervisors, and clients as their main sources of knowledge. Lack of time was identified as the main barrier for engaging in research. The findings in this study are contextualised with theories on knowledge production and translation in social work, arguing that field instructors, supervisors, and social work education play an essential role both in facilitating evidence-based practice and, more broadly, in bridging the gap between research and practice.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13691457.2020.1783214</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3732-0126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7211-4125</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1369-1457
ispartof European journal of social work, 2022-05, Vol.25 (3), p.443-456
issn 1369-1457
1468-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2660785892
source Political Science Complete; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Child welfare
Colleagues
Data
Evidence based research
Evidence-based practice
evidensbasert praksis
Interviews
Knowledge
knowledge production
knowledge utilisation
kunnskapsproduksjon
metodetriangulering
mixed methods
Mixed methods research
Professional practice
Professional training
Social services
Social work
Social work education
Social workers
sosialt arbeid
Supervisors
Translation
Welfare services
Work
Work experience
title Social workers use of knowledge in an evidence-based framework: a mixed methods study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A48%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20workers%20use%20of%20knowledge%20in%20an%20evidence-based%20framework:%20a%20mixed%20methods%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20social%20work&rft.au=Finne,%20Joakim&rft.date=2022-05-04&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=443&rft.epage=456&rft.pages=443-456&rft.issn=1369-1457&rft.eissn=1468-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13691457.2020.1783214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2660785892%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2660785892&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true