Social workers use of knowledge in an evidence-based framework: a mixed methods study
Since the 1990s, evidence-based practice has become part of social work, grounded in the notion that social work should be a research-based profession. However, recent studies show that social workers struggle with bridging research and practice. This study analysed Norwegian social workers' us...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of social work 2022-05, Vol.25 (3), p.443-456 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 456 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 443 |
container_title | European journal of social work |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Finne, Joakim Ekeland, Tor-Johan Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira |
description | Since the 1990s, evidence-based practice has become part of social work, grounded in the notion that social work should be a research-based profession. However, recent studies show that social workers struggle with bridging research and practice. This study analysed Norwegian social workers' use of knowledge in their daily practice, drawing on data from a survey consisting of 2060 social workers in different practice fields as well as qualitative interviews with 25 social workers from social services and child welfare services. Analyses of the quantitative data revealed that clients, work experience, and colleagues were the three most common sources of knowledge among the social workers. The use of knowledge could be divided into two subgroups: (a) theory-oriented and (b) practice-oriented. The qualitative interviews revealed that social workers valued work experience, colleagues, supervisors, and clients as their main sources of knowledge. Lack of time was identified as the main barrier for engaging in research. The findings in this study are contextualised with theories on knowledge production and translation in social work, arguing that field instructors, supervisors, and social work education play an essential role both in facilitating evidence-based practice and, more broadly, in bridging the gap between research and practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13691457.2020.1783214 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2660785892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2660785892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-5d872c8969b48001823d4b01be15089d9d8e06324a953ca73531a22393d03ec03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_ghDwvDXfm_WkFL-g4EF7Dtkkq7G7m5rsWvvvTWm9eppheN-ZeR8ALjGaYyTRNaaiwoyXc4JIHpWSEsxOwAQzIQsiBDvNfdYUe9E5mKXka4Sx5FwKMQGr12C8buE2xLWLCY7JwdDAdR-2rbPvDvoe6h66b29db1xR6-QsbKLu3N5yAzXs_E8edW74CDbBNIx2dwHOGt0mNzvWKVg93L8tnorly-Pz4m5ZGEblUHArS2JkJaqaSYSwJNSy_F3tMEeyspWVDglKmK44NbqknGJNCK2oRdQZRKfg6rB3E8PX6NKgPsMY-3xS5eiolFxWJKv4QWViSCm6Rm2i73TcKYzUHqL6g6j2ENURYvbdHny-b0LsdA7cWjXoXRtiJtAbnxT9f8Uvvh126Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2660785892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social workers use of knowledge in an evidence-based framework: a mixed methods study</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Finne, Joakim ; Ekeland, Tor-Johan ; Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</creator><creatorcontrib>Finne, Joakim ; Ekeland, Tor-Johan ; Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</creatorcontrib><description>Since the 1990s, evidence-based practice has become part of social work, grounded in the notion that social work should be a research-based profession. However, recent studies show that social workers struggle with bridging research and practice. This study analysed Norwegian social workers' use of knowledge in their daily practice, drawing on data from a survey consisting of 2060 social workers in different practice fields as well as qualitative interviews with 25 social workers from social services and child welfare services. Analyses of the quantitative data revealed that clients, work experience, and colleagues were the three most common sources of knowledge among the social workers. The use of knowledge could be divided into two subgroups: (a) theory-oriented and (b) practice-oriented. The qualitative interviews revealed that social workers valued work experience, colleagues, supervisors, and clients as their main sources of knowledge. Lack of time was identified as the main barrier for engaging in research. The findings in this study are contextualised with theories on knowledge production and translation in social work, arguing that field instructors, supervisors, and social work education play an essential role both in facilitating evidence-based practice and, more broadly, in bridging the gap between research and practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-1457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2020.1783214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Routledge</publisher><subject>Child welfare ; Colleagues ; Data ; Evidence based research ; Evidence-based practice ; evidensbasert praksis ; Interviews ; Knowledge ; knowledge production ; knowledge utilisation ; kunnskapsproduksjon ; metodetriangulering ; mixed methods ; Mixed methods research ; Professional practice ; Professional training ; Social services ; Social work ; Social work education ; Social workers ; sosialt arbeid ; Supervisors ; Translation ; Welfare services ; Work ; Work experience</subject><ispartof>European journal of social work, 2022-05, Vol.25 (3), p.443-456</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-5d872c8969b48001823d4b01be15089d9d8e06324a953ca73531a22393d03ec03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-5d872c8969b48001823d4b01be15089d9d8e06324a953ca73531a22393d03ec03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3732-0126 ; 0000-0002-7211-4125</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finne, Joakim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekeland, Tor-Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</creatorcontrib><title>Social workers use of knowledge in an evidence-based framework: a mixed methods study</title><title>European journal of social work</title><description>Since the 1990s, evidence-based practice has become part of social work, grounded in the notion that social work should be a research-based profession. However, recent studies show that social workers struggle with bridging research and practice. This study analysed Norwegian social workers' use of knowledge in their daily practice, drawing on data from a survey consisting of 2060 social workers in different practice fields as well as qualitative interviews with 25 social workers from social services and child welfare services. Analyses of the quantitative data revealed that clients, work experience, and colleagues were the three most common sources of knowledge among the social workers. The use of knowledge could be divided into two subgroups: (a) theory-oriented and (b) practice-oriented. The qualitative interviews revealed that social workers valued work experience, colleagues, supervisors, and clients as their main sources of knowledge. Lack of time was identified as the main barrier for engaging in research. The findings in this study are contextualised with theories on knowledge production and translation in social work, arguing that field instructors, supervisors, and social work education play an essential role both in facilitating evidence-based practice and, more broadly, in bridging the gap between research and practice.</description><subject>Child welfare</subject><subject>Colleagues</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Evidence based research</subject><subject>Evidence-based practice</subject><subject>evidensbasert praksis</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>knowledge production</subject><subject>knowledge utilisation</subject><subject>kunnskapsproduksjon</subject><subject>metodetriangulering</subject><subject>mixed methods</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Professional training</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Social work</subject><subject>Social work education</subject><subject>Social workers</subject><subject>sosialt arbeid</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Welfare services</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>Work experience</subject><issn>1369-1457</issn><issn>1468-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_ghDwvDXfm_WkFL-g4EF7Dtkkq7G7m5rsWvvvTWm9eppheN-ZeR8ALjGaYyTRNaaiwoyXc4JIHpWSEsxOwAQzIQsiBDvNfdYUe9E5mKXka4Sx5FwKMQGr12C8buE2xLWLCY7JwdDAdR-2rbPvDvoe6h66b29db1xR6-QsbKLu3N5yAzXs_E8edW74CDbBNIx2dwHOGt0mNzvWKVg93L8tnorly-Pz4m5ZGEblUHArS2JkJaqaSYSwJNSy_F3tMEeyspWVDglKmK44NbqknGJNCK2oRdQZRKfg6rB3E8PX6NKgPsMY-3xS5eiolFxWJKv4QWViSCm6Rm2i73TcKYzUHqL6g6j2ENURYvbdHny-b0LsdA7cWjXoXRtiJtAbnxT9f8Uvvh126Q</recordid><startdate>20220504</startdate><enddate>20220504</enddate><creator>Finne, Joakim</creator><creator>Ekeland, Tor-Johan</creator><creator>Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3732-0126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7211-4125</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220504</creationdate><title>Social workers use of knowledge in an evidence-based framework: a mixed methods study</title><author>Finne, Joakim ; Ekeland, Tor-Johan ; Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-5d872c8969b48001823d4b01be15089d9d8e06324a953ca73531a22393d03ec03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Child welfare</topic><topic>Colleagues</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Evidence based research</topic><topic>Evidence-based practice</topic><topic>evidensbasert praksis</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>knowledge production</topic><topic>knowledge utilisation</topic><topic>kunnskapsproduksjon</topic><topic>metodetriangulering</topic><topic>mixed methods</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Professional training</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Social work</topic><topic>Social work education</topic><topic>Social workers</topic><topic>sosialt arbeid</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Welfare services</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>Work experience</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finne, Joakim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekeland, Tor-Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European journal of social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finne, Joakim</au><au>Ekeland, Tor-Johan</au><au>Malmberg-Heimonen, Ira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social workers use of knowledge in an evidence-based framework: a mixed methods study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of social work</jtitle><date>2022-05-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>443</spage><epage>456</epage><pages>443-456</pages><issn>1369-1457</issn><eissn>1468-2664</eissn><abstract>Since the 1990s, evidence-based practice has become part of social work, grounded in the notion that social work should be a research-based profession. However, recent studies show that social workers struggle with bridging research and practice. This study analysed Norwegian social workers' use of knowledge in their daily practice, drawing on data from a survey consisting of 2060 social workers in different practice fields as well as qualitative interviews with 25 social workers from social services and child welfare services. Analyses of the quantitative data revealed that clients, work experience, and colleagues were the three most common sources of knowledge among the social workers. The use of knowledge could be divided into two subgroups: (a) theory-oriented and (b) practice-oriented. The qualitative interviews revealed that social workers valued work experience, colleagues, supervisors, and clients as their main sources of knowledge. Lack of time was identified as the main barrier for engaging in research. The findings in this study are contextualised with theories on knowledge production and translation in social work, arguing that field instructors, supervisors, and social work education play an essential role both in facilitating evidence-based practice and, more broadly, in bridging the gap between research and practice.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13691457.2020.1783214</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3732-0126</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7211-4125</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1369-1457 |
ispartof | European journal of social work, 2022-05, Vol.25 (3), p.443-456 |
issn | 1369-1457 1468-2664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2660785892 |
source | Political Science Complete; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Child welfare Colleagues Data Evidence based research Evidence-based practice evidensbasert praksis Interviews Knowledge knowledge production knowledge utilisation kunnskapsproduksjon metodetriangulering mixed methods Mixed methods research Professional practice Professional training Social services Social work Social work education Social workers sosialt arbeid Supervisors Translation Welfare services Work Work experience |
title | Social workers use of knowledge in an evidence-based framework: a mixed methods study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A48%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20workers%20use%20of%20knowledge%20in%20an%20evidence-based%20framework:%20a%20mixed%20methods%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20social%20work&rft.au=Finne,%20Joakim&rft.date=2022-05-04&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=443&rft.epage=456&rft.pages=443-456&rft.issn=1369-1457&rft.eissn=1468-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13691457.2020.1783214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2660785892%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2660785892&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |