A comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms for land cover classification using WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and ROSIS imagery

Recent advances in airborne and space-based remote sensing technologies and a rapid increase in the use of machine learning (ML) techniques in digital image processing applications have led to a renewed interest in the classification of satellite imagery. Decision-tree based ensemble learning (EL) a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arabian journal of geosciences 2022, Vol.15 (10), Article 942
Hauptverfasser: Colkesen, Ismail, Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Arabian journal of geosciences
container_volume 15
creator Colkesen, Ismail
Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf
description Recent advances in airborne and space-based remote sensing technologies and a rapid increase in the use of machine learning (ML) techniques in digital image processing applications have led to a renewed interest in the classification of satellite imagery. Decision-tree based ensemble learning (EL) algorithms, one of the popular ML techniques, have received considerable attention from researchers due to their simplicity, computational effectiveness and interpretability compared to black-box algorithms. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the supervised classification performance of the advanced decision-tree based EL algorithms, including rotation forest (RotFor), random ferns (RFerns), canonical correlation forest (CCF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM) and categorical boosting (CatBoost) using satellite imagery with different spatial and spectral resolutions. Two well-known EL algorithms, namely, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) and random forest (RF), were also considered to compare their classification performances. In order to achieve the desired goal, three satellite imagery, namely WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and hyperspectral ROSIS, were utilized as the fundamental datasets. Results of the study showed that the highest overall accuracy values (i.e. 92.65% for WorldView-2, 92.80% for Sentinel-2 and 95.70% for Pavia datasets) were estimated using CCF, LightGBM and RotFor algorithms, respectively. According to McNemar’s test result, the difference between the predictions of RotFor and CCF algorithms on test samples of the hyperspectral image was found to be statistically insignificant. On the other hand, the lowest classification accuracy values were obtained by the RFerns algorithm in all cases. In addition, while the CCF showed superior classification performance for high spatial resolution WorldView-2 and Pavia images, the highest classification performance was acquired with the LightGBM algorithm for medium spatial resolution Sentinel-2 image. As a result, the performances of advanced EL algorithms were found to be more robust than the well-known RF and AdaBoost ensemble classifiers.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12517-022-10243-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2660383374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2660383374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164x-3279c1fa1f5328fa31202ac3d6f19dedfbbcfd3d5d9e0ea3227bc4ffa4b5dbac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kclOAzEQREcIJMLyA5wsccXgZbYco4hNioREWI6Wx26HiRw72JOQfAm_i8MguHHqOryq7lZl2Rkll5SQ6ipSVtAKE8YwJSzneLOXDWhdlrgqeL3_qyk9zI5inBNS1qSqB9nnCCm_WMogu3YNCNbSrpL0DnmDYic7wN7g7g2wDB0CF2HRWEAWZHCtmyFpZz603dsiIuMDstLpFLiGgJSVMbamVX3cKu7wVx-sfmnhA7MLNAXXtQ4sZmhne3yY3k9Ru5AzCNuT7MBIG-H0Zx5nzzfXT-M7PHm4vR-PJljRMt9gzqqhokZSU3BWG8kpI0wqrktDhxq0aRplNNeFHgIByRmrGpUbI_Om0E0Cj7PzPncZ_PsKYifmfhVcWilYWRJec17liWI9pYKPMYARy5AODVtBidgVIPoCRCpAfBcgNsnEe1NMsEtP_UX_4_oCQfeNHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2660383374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms for land cover classification using WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and ROSIS imagery</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Colkesen, Ismail ; Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</creator><creatorcontrib>Colkesen, Ismail ; Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</creatorcontrib><description>Recent advances in airborne and space-based remote sensing technologies and a rapid increase in the use of machine learning (ML) techniques in digital image processing applications have led to a renewed interest in the classification of satellite imagery. Decision-tree based ensemble learning (EL) algorithms, one of the popular ML techniques, have received considerable attention from researchers due to their simplicity, computational effectiveness and interpretability compared to black-box algorithms. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the supervised classification performance of the advanced decision-tree based EL algorithms, including rotation forest (RotFor), random ferns (RFerns), canonical correlation forest (CCF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM) and categorical boosting (CatBoost) using satellite imagery with different spatial and spectral resolutions. Two well-known EL algorithms, namely, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) and random forest (RF), were also considered to compare their classification performances. In order to achieve the desired goal, three satellite imagery, namely WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and hyperspectral ROSIS, were utilized as the fundamental datasets. Results of the study showed that the highest overall accuracy values (i.e. 92.65% for WorldView-2, 92.80% for Sentinel-2 and 95.70% for Pavia datasets) were estimated using CCF, LightGBM and RotFor algorithms, respectively. According to McNemar’s test result, the difference between the predictions of RotFor and CCF algorithms on test samples of the hyperspectral image was found to be statistically insignificant. On the other hand, the lowest classification accuracy values were obtained by the RFerns algorithm in all cases. In addition, while the CCF showed superior classification performance for high spatial resolution WorldView-2 and Pavia images, the highest classification performance was acquired with the LightGBM algorithm for medium spatial resolution Sentinel-2 image. As a result, the performances of advanced EL algorithms were found to be more robust than the well-known RF and AdaBoost ensemble classifiers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-7511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-7538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12517-022-10243-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adaptive algorithms ; Airborne sensing ; Algorithms ; Classification ; Computer applications ; Datasets ; Decision trees ; Digital imaging ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth science ; Earth Sciences ; Ensemble learning ; Ferns ; Hyperspectral imaging ; Image acquisition ; Image classification ; Image processing ; Imagery ; Land cover ; Machine learning ; Original Paper ; Remote sensing ; Resolution ; Satellite imagery ; Satellites ; Spaceborne remote sensing ; Spatial discrimination ; Spatial resolution ; State-of-the-art reviews ; Statistical methods</subject><ispartof>Arabian journal of geosciences, 2022, Vol.15 (10), Article 942</ispartof><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2022</rights><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164x-3279c1fa1f5328fa31202ac3d6f19dedfbbcfd3d5d9e0ea3227bc4ffa4b5dbac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164x-3279c1fa1f5328fa31202ac3d6f19dedfbbcfd3d5d9e0ea3227bc4ffa4b5dbac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9670-3023</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-022-10243-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12517-022-10243-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colkesen, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms for land cover classification using WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and ROSIS imagery</title><title>Arabian journal of geosciences</title><addtitle>Arab J Geosci</addtitle><description>Recent advances in airborne and space-based remote sensing technologies and a rapid increase in the use of machine learning (ML) techniques in digital image processing applications have led to a renewed interest in the classification of satellite imagery. Decision-tree based ensemble learning (EL) algorithms, one of the popular ML techniques, have received considerable attention from researchers due to their simplicity, computational effectiveness and interpretability compared to black-box algorithms. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the supervised classification performance of the advanced decision-tree based EL algorithms, including rotation forest (RotFor), random ferns (RFerns), canonical correlation forest (CCF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM) and categorical boosting (CatBoost) using satellite imagery with different spatial and spectral resolutions. Two well-known EL algorithms, namely, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) and random forest (RF), were also considered to compare their classification performances. In order to achieve the desired goal, three satellite imagery, namely WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and hyperspectral ROSIS, were utilized as the fundamental datasets. Results of the study showed that the highest overall accuracy values (i.e. 92.65% for WorldView-2, 92.80% for Sentinel-2 and 95.70% for Pavia datasets) were estimated using CCF, LightGBM and RotFor algorithms, respectively. According to McNemar’s test result, the difference between the predictions of RotFor and CCF algorithms on test samples of the hyperspectral image was found to be statistically insignificant. On the other hand, the lowest classification accuracy values were obtained by the RFerns algorithm in all cases. In addition, while the CCF showed superior classification performance for high spatial resolution WorldView-2 and Pavia images, the highest classification performance was acquired with the LightGBM algorithm for medium spatial resolution Sentinel-2 image. As a result, the performances of advanced EL algorithms were found to be more robust than the well-known RF and AdaBoost ensemble classifiers.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adaptive algorithms</subject><subject>Airborne sensing</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ensemble learning</subject><subject>Ferns</subject><subject>Hyperspectral imaging</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Image classification</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Imagery</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Spaceborne remote sensing</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>State-of-the-art reviews</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><issn>1866-7511</issn><issn>1866-7538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kclOAzEQREcIJMLyA5wsccXgZbYco4hNioREWI6Wx26HiRw72JOQfAm_i8MguHHqOryq7lZl2Rkll5SQ6ipSVtAKE8YwJSzneLOXDWhdlrgqeL3_qyk9zI5inBNS1qSqB9nnCCm_WMogu3YNCNbSrpL0DnmDYic7wN7g7g2wDB0CF2HRWEAWZHCtmyFpZz603dsiIuMDstLpFLiGgJSVMbamVX3cKu7wVx-sfmnhA7MLNAXXtQ4sZmhne3yY3k9Ru5AzCNuT7MBIG-H0Zx5nzzfXT-M7PHm4vR-PJljRMt9gzqqhokZSU3BWG8kpI0wqrktDhxq0aRplNNeFHgIByRmrGpUbI_Om0E0Cj7PzPncZ_PsKYifmfhVcWilYWRJec17liWI9pYKPMYARy5AODVtBidgVIPoCRCpAfBcgNsnEe1NMsEtP_UX_4_oCQfeNHA</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Colkesen, Ismail</creator><creator>Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9670-3023</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>A comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms for land cover classification using WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and ROSIS imagery</title><author>Colkesen, Ismail ; Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164x-3279c1fa1f5328fa31202ac3d6f19dedfbbcfd3d5d9e0ea3227bc4ffa4b5dbac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adaptive algorithms</topic><topic>Airborne sensing</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ensemble learning</topic><topic>Ferns</topic><topic>Hyperspectral imaging</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Image classification</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Imagery</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Spaceborne remote sensing</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>State-of-the-art reviews</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colkesen, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colkesen, Ismail</au><au>Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms for land cover classification using WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and ROSIS imagery</atitle><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle><stitle>Arab J Geosci</stitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>10</issue><artnum>942</artnum><issn>1866-7511</issn><eissn>1866-7538</eissn><abstract>Recent advances in airborne and space-based remote sensing technologies and a rapid increase in the use of machine learning (ML) techniques in digital image processing applications have led to a renewed interest in the classification of satellite imagery. Decision-tree based ensemble learning (EL) algorithms, one of the popular ML techniques, have received considerable attention from researchers due to their simplicity, computational effectiveness and interpretability compared to black-box algorithms. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the supervised classification performance of the advanced decision-tree based EL algorithms, including rotation forest (RotFor), random ferns (RFerns), canonical correlation forest (CCF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM) and categorical boosting (CatBoost) using satellite imagery with different spatial and spectral resolutions. Two well-known EL algorithms, namely, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) and random forest (RF), were also considered to compare their classification performances. In order to achieve the desired goal, three satellite imagery, namely WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and hyperspectral ROSIS, were utilized as the fundamental datasets. Results of the study showed that the highest overall accuracy values (i.e. 92.65% for WorldView-2, 92.80% for Sentinel-2 and 95.70% for Pavia datasets) were estimated using CCF, LightGBM and RotFor algorithms, respectively. According to McNemar’s test result, the difference between the predictions of RotFor and CCF algorithms on test samples of the hyperspectral image was found to be statistically insignificant. On the other hand, the lowest classification accuracy values were obtained by the RFerns algorithm in all cases. In addition, while the CCF showed superior classification performance for high spatial resolution WorldView-2 and Pavia images, the highest classification performance was acquired with the LightGBM algorithm for medium spatial resolution Sentinel-2 image. As a result, the performances of advanced EL algorithms were found to be more robust than the well-known RF and AdaBoost ensemble classifiers.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s12517-022-10243-x</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9670-3023</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1866-7511
ispartof Arabian journal of geosciences, 2022, Vol.15 (10), Article 942
issn 1866-7511
1866-7538
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2660383374
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Accuracy
Adaptive algorithms
Airborne sensing
Algorithms
Classification
Computer applications
Datasets
Decision trees
Digital imaging
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth science
Earth Sciences
Ensemble learning
Ferns
Hyperspectral imaging
Image acquisition
Image classification
Image processing
Imagery
Land cover
Machine learning
Original Paper
Remote sensing
Resolution
Satellite imagery
Satellites
Spaceborne remote sensing
Spatial discrimination
Spatial resolution
State-of-the-art reviews
Statistical methods
title A comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms for land cover classification using WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and ROSIS imagery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A11%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20state-of-the-art%20ensemble%20learning%20algorithms%20for%20land%20cover%20classification%20using%20WorldView-2,%20Sentinel-2%20and%20ROSIS%20imagery&rft.jtitle=Arabian%20journal%20of%20geosciences&rft.au=Colkesen,%20Ismail&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=10&rft.artnum=942&rft.issn=1866-7511&rft.eissn=1866-7538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12517-022-10243-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2660383374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2660383374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true