A comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms for land cover classification using WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and ROSIS imagery
Recent advances in airborne and space-based remote sensing technologies and a rapid increase in the use of machine learning (ML) techniques in digital image processing applications have led to a renewed interest in the classification of satellite imagery. Decision-tree based ensemble learning (EL) a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arabian journal of geosciences 2022, Vol.15 (10), Article 942 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Arabian journal of geosciences |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Colkesen, Ismail Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf |
description | Recent advances in airborne and space-based remote sensing technologies and a rapid increase in the use of machine learning (ML) techniques in digital image processing applications have led to a renewed interest in the classification of satellite imagery. Decision-tree based ensemble learning (EL) algorithms, one of the popular ML techniques, have received considerable attention from researchers due to their simplicity, computational effectiveness and interpretability compared to black-box algorithms. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the supervised classification performance of the advanced decision-tree based EL algorithms, including rotation forest (RotFor), random ferns (RFerns), canonical correlation forest (CCF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM) and categorical boosting (CatBoost) using satellite imagery with different spatial and spectral resolutions. Two well-known EL algorithms, namely, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) and random forest (RF), were also considered to compare their classification performances. In order to achieve the desired goal, three satellite imagery, namely WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and hyperspectral ROSIS, were utilized as the fundamental datasets. Results of the study showed that the highest overall accuracy values (i.e. 92.65% for WorldView-2, 92.80% for Sentinel-2 and 95.70% for Pavia datasets) were estimated using CCF, LightGBM and RotFor algorithms, respectively. According to McNemar’s test result, the difference between the predictions of RotFor and CCF algorithms on test samples of the hyperspectral image was found to be statistically insignificant. On the other hand, the lowest classification accuracy values were obtained by the RFerns algorithm in all cases. In addition, while the CCF showed superior classification performance for high spatial resolution WorldView-2 and Pavia images, the highest classification performance was acquired with the LightGBM algorithm for medium spatial resolution Sentinel-2 image. As a result, the performances of advanced EL algorithms were found to be more robust than the well-known RF and AdaBoost ensemble classifiers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12517-022-10243-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2660383374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2660383374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164x-3279c1fa1f5328fa31202ac3d6f19dedfbbcfd3d5d9e0ea3227bc4ffa4b5dbac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kclOAzEQREcIJMLyA5wsccXgZbYco4hNioREWI6Wx26HiRw72JOQfAm_i8MguHHqOryq7lZl2Rkll5SQ6ipSVtAKE8YwJSzneLOXDWhdlrgqeL3_qyk9zI5inBNS1qSqB9nnCCm_WMogu3YNCNbSrpL0DnmDYic7wN7g7g2wDB0CF2HRWEAWZHCtmyFpZz603dsiIuMDstLpFLiGgJSVMbamVX3cKu7wVx-sfmnhA7MLNAXXtQ4sZmhne3yY3k9Ru5AzCNuT7MBIG-H0Zx5nzzfXT-M7PHm4vR-PJljRMt9gzqqhokZSU3BWG8kpI0wqrktDhxq0aRplNNeFHgIByRmrGpUbI_Om0E0Cj7PzPncZ_PsKYifmfhVcWilYWRJec17liWI9pYKPMYARy5AODVtBidgVIPoCRCpAfBcgNsnEe1NMsEtP_UX_4_oCQfeNHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2660383374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms for land cover classification using WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and ROSIS imagery</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Colkesen, Ismail ; Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</creator><creatorcontrib>Colkesen, Ismail ; Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</creatorcontrib><description>Recent advances in airborne and space-based remote sensing technologies and a rapid increase in the use of machine learning (ML) techniques in digital image processing applications have led to a renewed interest in the classification of satellite imagery. Decision-tree based ensemble learning (EL) algorithms, one of the popular ML techniques, have received considerable attention from researchers due to their simplicity, computational effectiveness and interpretability compared to black-box algorithms. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the supervised classification performance of the advanced decision-tree based EL algorithms, including rotation forest (RotFor), random ferns (RFerns), canonical correlation forest (CCF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM) and categorical boosting (CatBoost) using satellite imagery with different spatial and spectral resolutions. Two well-known EL algorithms, namely, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) and random forest (RF), were also considered to compare their classification performances. In order to achieve the desired goal, three satellite imagery, namely WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and hyperspectral ROSIS, were utilized as the fundamental datasets. Results of the study showed that the highest overall accuracy values (i.e. 92.65% for WorldView-2, 92.80% for Sentinel-2 and 95.70% for Pavia datasets) were estimated using CCF, LightGBM and RotFor algorithms, respectively. According to McNemar’s test result, the difference between the predictions of RotFor and CCF algorithms on test samples of the hyperspectral image was found to be statistically insignificant. On the other hand, the lowest classification accuracy values were obtained by the RFerns algorithm in all cases. In addition, while the CCF showed superior classification performance for high spatial resolution WorldView-2 and Pavia images, the highest classification performance was acquired with the LightGBM algorithm for medium spatial resolution Sentinel-2 image. As a result, the performances of advanced EL algorithms were found to be more robust than the well-known RF and AdaBoost ensemble classifiers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-7511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-7538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12517-022-10243-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adaptive algorithms ; Airborne sensing ; Algorithms ; Classification ; Computer applications ; Datasets ; Decision trees ; Digital imaging ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth science ; Earth Sciences ; Ensemble learning ; Ferns ; Hyperspectral imaging ; Image acquisition ; Image classification ; Image processing ; Imagery ; Land cover ; Machine learning ; Original Paper ; Remote sensing ; Resolution ; Satellite imagery ; Satellites ; Spaceborne remote sensing ; Spatial discrimination ; Spatial resolution ; State-of-the-art reviews ; Statistical methods</subject><ispartof>Arabian journal of geosciences, 2022, Vol.15 (10), Article 942</ispartof><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2022</rights><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164x-3279c1fa1f5328fa31202ac3d6f19dedfbbcfd3d5d9e0ea3227bc4ffa4b5dbac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164x-3279c1fa1f5328fa31202ac3d6f19dedfbbcfd3d5d9e0ea3227bc4ffa4b5dbac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9670-3023</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-022-10243-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12517-022-10243-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colkesen, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms for land cover classification using WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and ROSIS imagery</title><title>Arabian journal of geosciences</title><addtitle>Arab J Geosci</addtitle><description>Recent advances in airborne and space-based remote sensing technologies and a rapid increase in the use of machine learning (ML) techniques in digital image processing applications have led to a renewed interest in the classification of satellite imagery. Decision-tree based ensemble learning (EL) algorithms, one of the popular ML techniques, have received considerable attention from researchers due to their simplicity, computational effectiveness and interpretability compared to black-box algorithms. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the supervised classification performance of the advanced decision-tree based EL algorithms, including rotation forest (RotFor), random ferns (RFerns), canonical correlation forest (CCF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM) and categorical boosting (CatBoost) using satellite imagery with different spatial and spectral resolutions. Two well-known EL algorithms, namely, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) and random forest (RF), were also considered to compare their classification performances. In order to achieve the desired goal, three satellite imagery, namely WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and hyperspectral ROSIS, were utilized as the fundamental datasets. Results of the study showed that the highest overall accuracy values (i.e. 92.65% for WorldView-2, 92.80% for Sentinel-2 and 95.70% for Pavia datasets) were estimated using CCF, LightGBM and RotFor algorithms, respectively. According to McNemar’s test result, the difference between the predictions of RotFor and CCF algorithms on test samples of the hyperspectral image was found to be statistically insignificant. On the other hand, the lowest classification accuracy values were obtained by the RFerns algorithm in all cases. In addition, while the CCF showed superior classification performance for high spatial resolution WorldView-2 and Pavia images, the highest classification performance was acquired with the LightGBM algorithm for medium spatial resolution Sentinel-2 image. As a result, the performances of advanced EL algorithms were found to be more robust than the well-known RF and AdaBoost ensemble classifiers.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adaptive algorithms</subject><subject>Airborne sensing</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ensemble learning</subject><subject>Ferns</subject><subject>Hyperspectral imaging</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Image classification</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Imagery</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Spaceborne remote sensing</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>State-of-the-art reviews</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><issn>1866-7511</issn><issn>1866-7538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kclOAzEQREcIJMLyA5wsccXgZbYco4hNioREWI6Wx26HiRw72JOQfAm_i8MguHHqOryq7lZl2Rkll5SQ6ipSVtAKE8YwJSzneLOXDWhdlrgqeL3_qyk9zI5inBNS1qSqB9nnCCm_WMogu3YNCNbSrpL0DnmDYic7wN7g7g2wDB0CF2HRWEAWZHCtmyFpZz603dsiIuMDstLpFLiGgJSVMbamVX3cKu7wVx-sfmnhA7MLNAXXtQ4sZmhne3yY3k9Ru5AzCNuT7MBIG-H0Zx5nzzfXT-M7PHm4vR-PJljRMt9gzqqhokZSU3BWG8kpI0wqrktDhxq0aRplNNeFHgIByRmrGpUbI_Om0E0Cj7PzPncZ_PsKYifmfhVcWilYWRJec17liWI9pYKPMYARy5AODVtBidgVIPoCRCpAfBcgNsnEe1NMsEtP_UX_4_oCQfeNHA</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Colkesen, Ismail</creator><creator>Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9670-3023</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>A comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms for land cover classification using WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and ROSIS imagery</title><author>Colkesen, Ismail ; Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164x-3279c1fa1f5328fa31202ac3d6f19dedfbbcfd3d5d9e0ea3227bc4ffa4b5dbac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adaptive algorithms</topic><topic>Airborne sensing</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ensemble learning</topic><topic>Ferns</topic><topic>Hyperspectral imaging</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Image classification</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Imagery</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Spaceborne remote sensing</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>State-of-the-art reviews</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colkesen, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colkesen, Ismail</au><au>Ozturk, Muhammed Yusuf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms for land cover classification using WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and ROSIS imagery</atitle><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle><stitle>Arab J Geosci</stitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>10</issue><artnum>942</artnum><issn>1866-7511</issn><eissn>1866-7538</eissn><abstract>Recent advances in airborne and space-based remote sensing technologies and a rapid increase in the use of machine learning (ML) techniques in digital image processing applications have led to a renewed interest in the classification of satellite imagery. Decision-tree based ensemble learning (EL) algorithms, one of the popular ML techniques, have received considerable attention from researchers due to their simplicity, computational effectiveness and interpretability compared to black-box algorithms. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the supervised classification performance of the advanced decision-tree based EL algorithms, including rotation forest (RotFor), random ferns (RFerns), canonical correlation forest (CCF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM) and categorical boosting (CatBoost) using satellite imagery with different spatial and spectral resolutions. Two well-known EL algorithms, namely, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) and random forest (RF), were also considered to compare their classification performances. In order to achieve the desired goal, three satellite imagery, namely WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and hyperspectral ROSIS, were utilized as the fundamental datasets. Results of the study showed that the highest overall accuracy values (i.e. 92.65% for WorldView-2, 92.80% for Sentinel-2 and 95.70% for Pavia datasets) were estimated using CCF, LightGBM and RotFor algorithms, respectively. According to McNemar’s test result, the difference between the predictions of RotFor and CCF algorithms on test samples of the hyperspectral image was found to be statistically insignificant. On the other hand, the lowest classification accuracy values were obtained by the RFerns algorithm in all cases. In addition, while the CCF showed superior classification performance for high spatial resolution WorldView-2 and Pavia images, the highest classification performance was acquired with the LightGBM algorithm for medium spatial resolution Sentinel-2 image. As a result, the performances of advanced EL algorithms were found to be more robust than the well-known RF and AdaBoost ensemble classifiers.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s12517-022-10243-x</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9670-3023</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1866-7511 |
ispartof | Arabian journal of geosciences, 2022, Vol.15 (10), Article 942 |
issn | 1866-7511 1866-7538 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2660383374 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Adaptive algorithms Airborne sensing Algorithms Classification Computer applications Datasets Decision trees Digital imaging Earth and Environmental Science Earth science Earth Sciences Ensemble learning Ferns Hyperspectral imaging Image acquisition Image classification Image processing Imagery Land cover Machine learning Original Paper Remote sensing Resolution Satellite imagery Satellites Spaceborne remote sensing Spatial discrimination Spatial resolution State-of-the-art reviews Statistical methods |
title | A comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms for land cover classification using WorldView-2, Sentinel-2 and ROSIS imagery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A11%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20state-of-the-art%20ensemble%20learning%20algorithms%20for%20land%20cover%20classification%20using%20WorldView-2,%20Sentinel-2%20and%20ROSIS%20imagery&rft.jtitle=Arabian%20journal%20of%20geosciences&rft.au=Colkesen,%20Ismail&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=10&rft.artnum=942&rft.issn=1866-7511&rft.eissn=1866-7538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12517-022-10243-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2660383374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2660383374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |