CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE CERTIFICATION: A CALL FOR FEDERAL ACTION
Agriculture systems are extremely susceptible to the consequences of climate change. Extreme weather events, changing temperature patterns, and invasive pests and weeds threaten our nation’s crop yields and food security. U.S. agriculture is also a leading contributor to climate change, as industria...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Columbia law review 2022-04, Vol.122 (3), p.37-60 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 60 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Columbia law review |
container_volume | 122 |
creator | Thurman, MacKenzie |
description | Agriculture systems are extremely susceptible to the consequences of climate change. Extreme weather events, changing temperature patterns, and invasive pests and weeds threaten our nation’s crop yields and food security. U.S. agriculture is also a leading contributor to climate change, as industrial farming and land management practices emit around a third of nationwide greenhouse gases. Certain climate-friendly agriculture practices have the potential to combat climate change by sequestering carbon and reducing emissions. Despite this opportunity, current federal farming policies, heavily influenced by “big-ag” lobbyists and consolidated farming industries, do not incentivize such “climate-smart” agriculture practices.
This Comment proposes a federal climate-smart certification program for producers who use such practices. In comparison to USDA organic certification, where the government responded to fears about pesticide and synthetic fertilizer use by creating a trustworthy indicator for organic producers, it asks Congress to now take action to identify those producers who practice climate-smart agriculture and to catalyze a widespread transition through Farm Bill policy. It argues that certification would standardize climate-smart agriculture throughout the United States by establishing minimum best practices, assuring consumers of the truthfulness of producers’ environmental claims, and incentivizing farmers through government subsidies and benefits. A USDA-enforced seal could create a lucrative and environmentally sustainable market for climate-smart commodities. With government support, consumer buy-in, and broad farmer adoption, U.S. agriculture could in fact combat climate change, rather than exacerbate it. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2659300304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20220421065893</informt_id><jstor_id>27132238</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27132238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j1153-9354d1a01b335bcb3a767b094f01276e614568f823a1242e892f0d11fa4e82d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1jc1qg0AYRaW00DTtIxQCXXQlfD8z47gUMYlgGrBmPYxRU6WJ6WgWfftK064u93I498abYSikT6T0rTcDQPAxlPreexiGDqYuNc281zhLN1GR-O-bKC8W0SpP411W7PJkESd5kS7TOCrS7dujd9fYz6F--su5VyyTIl772XY1IZnfIUr2Q5aiQgtYMstyX7INVFBCKBpAClStUEilG01skQTVOqQGKsTGilpTxXPv5ao9u_7rUg-j6fqLO02PhpQMGYBBTNT6SrljOxp7aIfzaIbauv2HaU9N_zv37mCqvjUIhhnVP0ZABIIQlNQhT6rnq6obxt6Zs2uP1n0bCpCJWPMP20hZnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2659300304</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE CERTIFICATION: A CALL FOR FEDERAL ACTION</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Thurman, MacKenzie</creator><creatorcontrib>Thurman, MacKenzie</creatorcontrib><description>Agriculture systems are extremely susceptible to the consequences of climate change. Extreme weather events, changing temperature patterns, and invasive pests and weeds threaten our nation’s crop yields and food security. U.S. agriculture is also a leading contributor to climate change, as industrial farming and land management practices emit around a third of nationwide greenhouse gases. Certain climate-friendly agriculture practices have the potential to combat climate change by sequestering carbon and reducing emissions. Despite this opportunity, current federal farming policies, heavily influenced by “big-ag” lobbyists and consolidated farming industries, do not incentivize such “climate-smart” agriculture practices.
This Comment proposes a federal climate-smart certification program for producers who use such practices. In comparison to USDA organic certification, where the government responded to fears about pesticide and synthetic fertilizer use by creating a trustworthy indicator for organic producers, it asks Congress to now take action to identify those producers who practice climate-smart agriculture and to catalyze a widespread transition through Farm Bill policy. It argues that certification would standardize climate-smart agriculture throughout the United States by establishing minimum best practices, assuring consumers of the truthfulness of producers’ environmental claims, and incentivizing farmers through government subsidies and benefits. A USDA-enforced seal could create a lucrative and environmentally sustainable market for climate-smart commodities. With government support, consumer buy-in, and broad farmer adoption, U.S. agriculture could in fact combat climate change, rather than exacerbate it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-1958</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-2268</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Columbia Law Review Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Action ; Agricultural policy ; Agriculture ; Best practice ; Certification ; Claims ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climatic changes ; COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW FORUM ; Commodities ; Consumers ; Emissions ; Environmental impact ; Environmental law ; Farmers ; Farming ; Fear & phobias ; Food security ; Government ; Government aid ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Greenhouses ; Incentives ; Legislation ; Legislatures ; Markets ; Pesticides ; State supervision ; Subsidies ; Sustainability ; Weather</subject><ispartof>Columbia law review, 2022-04, Vol.122 (3), p.37-60</ispartof><rights>Copyright Columbia Law Review Association, Inc. Apr 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27132238$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27132238$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,12845,27866,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thurman, MacKenzie</creatorcontrib><title>CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE CERTIFICATION: A CALL FOR FEDERAL ACTION</title><title>Columbia law review</title><description>Agriculture systems are extremely susceptible to the consequences of climate change. Extreme weather events, changing temperature patterns, and invasive pests and weeds threaten our nation’s crop yields and food security. U.S. agriculture is also a leading contributor to climate change, as industrial farming and land management practices emit around a third of nationwide greenhouse gases. Certain climate-friendly agriculture practices have the potential to combat climate change by sequestering carbon and reducing emissions. Despite this opportunity, current federal farming policies, heavily influenced by “big-ag” lobbyists and consolidated farming industries, do not incentivize such “climate-smart” agriculture practices.
This Comment proposes a federal climate-smart certification program for producers who use such practices. In comparison to USDA organic certification, where the government responded to fears about pesticide and synthetic fertilizer use by creating a trustworthy indicator for organic producers, it asks Congress to now take action to identify those producers who practice climate-smart agriculture and to catalyze a widespread transition through Farm Bill policy. It argues that certification would standardize climate-smart agriculture throughout the United States by establishing minimum best practices, assuring consumers of the truthfulness of producers’ environmental claims, and incentivizing farmers through government subsidies and benefits. A USDA-enforced seal could create a lucrative and environmentally sustainable market for climate-smart commodities. With government support, consumer buy-in, and broad farmer adoption, U.S. agriculture could in fact combat climate change, rather than exacerbate it.</description><subject>Action</subject><subject>Agricultural policy</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Claims</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW FORUM</subject><subject>Commodities</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Fear & phobias</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government aid</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>State supervision</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>0010-1958</issn><issn>1945-2268</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo1jc1qg0AYRaW00DTtIxQCXXQlfD8z47gUMYlgGrBmPYxRU6WJ6WgWfftK064u93I498abYSikT6T0rTcDQPAxlPreexiGDqYuNc281zhLN1GR-O-bKC8W0SpP411W7PJkESd5kS7TOCrS7dujd9fYz6F--su5VyyTIl772XY1IZnfIUr2Q5aiQgtYMstyX7INVFBCKBpAClStUEilG01skQTVOqQGKsTGilpTxXPv5ao9u_7rUg-j6fqLO02PhpQMGYBBTNT6SrljOxp7aIfzaIbauv2HaU9N_zv37mCqvjUIhhnVP0ZABIIQlNQhT6rnq6obxt6Zs2uP1n0bCpCJWPMP20hZnw</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Thurman, MacKenzie</creator><general>Columbia Law Review Association, Inc</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE CERTIFICATION</title><author>Thurman, MacKenzie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j1153-9354d1a01b335bcb3a767b094f01276e614568f823a1242e892f0d11fa4e82d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Action</topic><topic>Agricultural policy</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Claims</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW FORUM</topic><topic>Commodities</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Fear & phobias</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government aid</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>State supervision</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thurman, MacKenzie</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Columbia law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thurman, MacKenzie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE CERTIFICATION: A CALL FOR FEDERAL ACTION</atitle><jtitle>Columbia law review</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>37-60</pages><issn>0010-1958</issn><eissn>1945-2268</eissn><abstract>Agriculture systems are extremely susceptible to the consequences of climate change. Extreme weather events, changing temperature patterns, and invasive pests and weeds threaten our nation’s crop yields and food security. U.S. agriculture is also a leading contributor to climate change, as industrial farming and land management practices emit around a third of nationwide greenhouse gases. Certain climate-friendly agriculture practices have the potential to combat climate change by sequestering carbon and reducing emissions. Despite this opportunity, current federal farming policies, heavily influenced by “big-ag” lobbyists and consolidated farming industries, do not incentivize such “climate-smart” agriculture practices.
This Comment proposes a federal climate-smart certification program for producers who use such practices. In comparison to USDA organic certification, where the government responded to fears about pesticide and synthetic fertilizer use by creating a trustworthy indicator for organic producers, it asks Congress to now take action to identify those producers who practice climate-smart agriculture and to catalyze a widespread transition through Farm Bill policy. It argues that certification would standardize climate-smart agriculture throughout the United States by establishing minimum best practices, assuring consumers of the truthfulness of producers’ environmental claims, and incentivizing farmers through government subsidies and benefits. A USDA-enforced seal could create a lucrative and environmentally sustainable market for climate-smart commodities. With government support, consumer buy-in, and broad farmer adoption, U.S. agriculture could in fact combat climate change, rather than exacerbate it.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Columbia Law Review Association, Inc</pub><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-1958 |
ispartof | Columbia law review, 2022-04, Vol.122 (3), p.37-60 |
issn | 0010-1958 1945-2268 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2659300304 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Action Agricultural policy Agriculture Best practice Certification Claims Climate Climate change Climatic changes COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW FORUM Commodities Consumers Emissions Environmental impact Environmental law Farmers Farming Fear & phobias Food security Government Government aid Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Greenhouses Incentives Legislation Legislatures Markets Pesticides State supervision Subsidies Sustainability Weather |
title | CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURE CERTIFICATION: A CALL FOR FEDERAL ACTION |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A22%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CLIMATE-SMART%20AGRICULTURE%20CERTIFICATION:%20A%20CALL%20FOR%20FEDERAL%20ACTION&rft.jtitle=Columbia%20law%20review&rft.au=Thurman,%20MacKenzie&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=37-60&rft.issn=0010-1958&rft.eissn=1945-2268&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27132238%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2659300304&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20220421065893&rft_jstor_id=27132238&rfr_iscdi=true |