Validation of published rebound hyperbilirubinemia risk prediction scores during birth hospitalization after initial phototherapy: a retrospective chart review

Background Hyperbilirubinemia commonly affects newborns and may lead to neurotoxicity if untreated. Neonates can experience rebound hyperbilirubinemia (RHB), defined as elevated bilirubin levels requiring re-initiation of treatment. Although studies have formulated risk prediction scores, they lack...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric research 2022-03, Vol.91 (4), p.888-895
Hauptverfasser: So, Vincent, Coo, Helen, Khurshid, Faiza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 895
container_issue 4
container_start_page 888
container_title Pediatric research
container_volume 91
creator So, Vincent
Coo, Helen
Khurshid, Faiza
description Background Hyperbilirubinemia commonly affects newborns and may lead to neurotoxicity if untreated. Neonates can experience rebound hyperbilirubinemia (RHB), defined as elevated bilirubin levels requiring re-initiation of treatment. Although studies have formulated risk prediction scores, they lack external validation. In this study, we examine the discrimination and calibration performance of risk prediction scores for RHB, to provide external validation. Methods We reviewed charts of neonates born ≥35 weeks of gestation between January 2015 and December 2019 receiving phototherapy at birth hospitalization. We plotted predicted probabilities against observed outcome proportions to assess model calibration and evaluated discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated to evaluate variables associated with RHB. Results Of the 271 infants identified, 24% developed RHB. Two- and three-variable prediction scores had lower discrimination in our cohort with AUROC of 0.662 (95% CI 0.590–0.735) and 0.691 (95% CI, 0.619–0.763) compared to 0.876 (95% CI 0.854–0.899) and 0.881 (95% CI 0.859–0.903), respectively, in the published studies. Estimated ORs confirm associations between RHB and variables included in prediction scores. Conclusions Current prediction models for RHB have unclear clinical utility in our patient population. Additional studies are required to further validate these scores. Impact Describes performance characteristics of two- and three-variable risk prediction scores that lack external validation beyond the initial study cohort. Our findings suggest unclear clinical utility in our clinical population of neonates during birth hospitalization, with lower performance of these prediction scores than observed in the derivation cohort. Odds ratios estimated by logistic regression in our study cohort provide further evidence that variables in published risk prediction scores are associated with rebound hyperbilirubinemia. Further studies are required to externally validate these risk prediction scores and to assess their generalizability.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41390-021-01478-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2658985142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2658985142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c896d39078fc6007ee9bc84f1bc11c82053c49b9b781b305c0075eb6d6930de43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2O1iAUhonROJ-jN-DCkLiuQoEC7szEv2QSN-qW8HNqGfuVCnTM5814qzLTUXeuSE6e9znkvAg9peQFJUy9LJwyTTrS045QLlUn76EDFayNOJf30YEQRjumtTpDj0q5Io0Sij9EZ4ypnnMhD-jXFzvHYGtMC04jXjc3xzJBwBlc2paAp9MK2cU55s3FBY7R4hzLN7xmCNHf5opPGQoOW47LV-xirhOeUlljbe6fu9uOFTKOS6zRznidUk11gmzX0yvcjFBzC0DzXQP2k821za4j_HiMHox2LvDk7j1Hn9---XTxvrv8-O7DxevLzjMpaueVHkI7hlSjHwiRANp5xUfqPKVe9UQwz7XTTirqGBG-MQLcEAbNSADOztHz3bvm9H2DUs1V2vLSVpp-EEorQXnfqH6nfPtuyTCaNcejzSdDibnpxOydmNaJue3EyBZ6dqfe3BHC38ifEhrAdqCsNxeE_G_3f7S_ATounCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2658985142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of published rebound hyperbilirubinemia risk prediction scores during birth hospitalization after initial phototherapy: a retrospective chart review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>So, Vincent ; Coo, Helen ; Khurshid, Faiza</creator><creatorcontrib>So, Vincent ; Coo, Helen ; Khurshid, Faiza</creatorcontrib><description>Background Hyperbilirubinemia commonly affects newborns and may lead to neurotoxicity if untreated. Neonates can experience rebound hyperbilirubinemia (RHB), defined as elevated bilirubin levels requiring re-initiation of treatment. Although studies have formulated risk prediction scores, they lack external validation. In this study, we examine the discrimination and calibration performance of risk prediction scores for RHB, to provide external validation. Methods We reviewed charts of neonates born ≥35 weeks of gestation between January 2015 and December 2019 receiving phototherapy at birth hospitalization. We plotted predicted probabilities against observed outcome proportions to assess model calibration and evaluated discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated to evaluate variables associated with RHB. Results Of the 271 infants identified, 24% developed RHB. Two- and three-variable prediction scores had lower discrimination in our cohort with AUROC of 0.662 (95% CI 0.590–0.735) and 0.691 (95% CI, 0.619–0.763) compared to 0.876 (95% CI 0.854–0.899) and 0.881 (95% CI 0.859–0.903), respectively, in the published studies. Estimated ORs confirm associations between RHB and variables included in prediction scores. Conclusions Current prediction models for RHB have unclear clinical utility in our patient population. Additional studies are required to further validate these scores. Impact Describes performance characteristics of two- and three-variable risk prediction scores that lack external validation beyond the initial study cohort. Our findings suggest unclear clinical utility in our clinical population of neonates during birth hospitalization, with lower performance of these prediction scores than observed in the derivation cohort. Odds ratios estimated by logistic regression in our study cohort provide further evidence that variables in published risk prediction scores are associated with rebound hyperbilirubinemia. Further studies are required to externally validate these risk prediction scores and to assess their generalizability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-3998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41390-021-01478-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33824457</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Nature Publishing Group US</publisher><subject>Clinical Research Article ; Cohort Studies ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal - diagnosis ; Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal - therapy ; Infant, Newborn ; Light therapy ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Pediatric Surgery ; Pediatrics ; Phototherapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Pediatric research, 2022-03, Vol.91 (4), p.888-895</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc 2021. corrected publication 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc 2021. corrected publication 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c896d39078fc6007ee9bc84f1bc11c82053c49b9b781b305c0075eb6d6930de43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c896d39078fc6007ee9bc84f1bc11c82053c49b9b781b305c0075eb6d6930de43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1460-7669</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33824457$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>So, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coo, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khurshid, Faiza</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of published rebound hyperbilirubinemia risk prediction scores during birth hospitalization after initial phototherapy: a retrospective chart review</title><title>Pediatric research</title><addtitle>Pediatr Res</addtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Res</addtitle><description>Background Hyperbilirubinemia commonly affects newborns and may lead to neurotoxicity if untreated. Neonates can experience rebound hyperbilirubinemia (RHB), defined as elevated bilirubin levels requiring re-initiation of treatment. Although studies have formulated risk prediction scores, they lack external validation. In this study, we examine the discrimination and calibration performance of risk prediction scores for RHB, to provide external validation. Methods We reviewed charts of neonates born ≥35 weeks of gestation between January 2015 and December 2019 receiving phototherapy at birth hospitalization. We plotted predicted probabilities against observed outcome proportions to assess model calibration and evaluated discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated to evaluate variables associated with RHB. Results Of the 271 infants identified, 24% developed RHB. Two- and three-variable prediction scores had lower discrimination in our cohort with AUROC of 0.662 (95% CI 0.590–0.735) and 0.691 (95% CI, 0.619–0.763) compared to 0.876 (95% CI 0.854–0.899) and 0.881 (95% CI 0.859–0.903), respectively, in the published studies. Estimated ORs confirm associations between RHB and variables included in prediction scores. Conclusions Current prediction models for RHB have unclear clinical utility in our patient population. Additional studies are required to further validate these scores. Impact Describes performance characteristics of two- and three-variable risk prediction scores that lack external validation beyond the initial study cohort. Our findings suggest unclear clinical utility in our clinical population of neonates during birth hospitalization, with lower performance of these prediction scores than observed in the derivation cohort. Odds ratios estimated by logistic regression in our study cohort provide further evidence that variables in published risk prediction scores are associated with rebound hyperbilirubinemia. Further studies are required to externally validate these risk prediction scores and to assess their generalizability.</description><subject>Clinical Research Article</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal - therapy</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Light therapy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Phototherapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0031-3998</issn><issn>1530-0447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2O1iAUhonROJ-jN-DCkLiuQoEC7szEv2QSN-qW8HNqGfuVCnTM5814qzLTUXeuSE6e9znkvAg9peQFJUy9LJwyTTrS045QLlUn76EDFayNOJf30YEQRjumtTpDj0q5Io0Sij9EZ4ypnnMhD-jXFzvHYGtMC04jXjc3xzJBwBlc2paAp9MK2cU55s3FBY7R4hzLN7xmCNHf5opPGQoOW47LV-xirhOeUlljbe6fu9uOFTKOS6zRznidUk11gmzX0yvcjFBzC0DzXQP2k821za4j_HiMHox2LvDk7j1Hn9---XTxvrv8-O7DxevLzjMpaueVHkI7hlSjHwiRANp5xUfqPKVe9UQwz7XTTirqGBG-MQLcEAbNSADOztHz3bvm9H2DUs1V2vLSVpp-EEorQXnfqH6nfPtuyTCaNcejzSdDibnpxOydmNaJue3EyBZ6dqfe3BHC38ifEhrAdqCsNxeE_G_3f7S_ATounCg</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>So, Vincent</creator><creator>Coo, Helen</creator><creator>Khurshid, Faiza</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group US</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1460-7669</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Validation of published rebound hyperbilirubinemia risk prediction scores during birth hospitalization after initial phototherapy: a retrospective chart review</title><author>So, Vincent ; Coo, Helen ; Khurshid, Faiza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c896d39078fc6007ee9bc84f1bc11c82053c49b9b781b305c0075eb6d6930de43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clinical Research Article</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal - therapy</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Light therapy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Phototherapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>So, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coo, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khurshid, Faiza</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Pediatric research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>So, Vincent</au><au>Coo, Helen</au><au>Khurshid, Faiza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of published rebound hyperbilirubinemia risk prediction scores during birth hospitalization after initial phototherapy: a retrospective chart review</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric research</jtitle><stitle>Pediatr Res</stitle><addtitle>Pediatr Res</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>888</spage><epage>895</epage><pages>888-895</pages><issn>0031-3998</issn><eissn>1530-0447</eissn><abstract>Background Hyperbilirubinemia commonly affects newborns and may lead to neurotoxicity if untreated. Neonates can experience rebound hyperbilirubinemia (RHB), defined as elevated bilirubin levels requiring re-initiation of treatment. Although studies have formulated risk prediction scores, they lack external validation. In this study, we examine the discrimination and calibration performance of risk prediction scores for RHB, to provide external validation. Methods We reviewed charts of neonates born ≥35 weeks of gestation between January 2015 and December 2019 receiving phototherapy at birth hospitalization. We plotted predicted probabilities against observed outcome proportions to assess model calibration and evaluated discrimination using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated to evaluate variables associated with RHB. Results Of the 271 infants identified, 24% developed RHB. Two- and three-variable prediction scores had lower discrimination in our cohort with AUROC of 0.662 (95% CI 0.590–0.735) and 0.691 (95% CI, 0.619–0.763) compared to 0.876 (95% CI 0.854–0.899) and 0.881 (95% CI 0.859–0.903), respectively, in the published studies. Estimated ORs confirm associations between RHB and variables included in prediction scores. Conclusions Current prediction models for RHB have unclear clinical utility in our patient population. Additional studies are required to further validate these scores. Impact Describes performance characteristics of two- and three-variable risk prediction scores that lack external validation beyond the initial study cohort. Our findings suggest unclear clinical utility in our clinical population of neonates during birth hospitalization, with lower performance of these prediction scores than observed in the derivation cohort. Odds ratios estimated by logistic regression in our study cohort provide further evidence that variables in published risk prediction scores are associated with rebound hyperbilirubinemia. Further studies are required to externally validate these risk prediction scores and to assess their generalizability.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group US</pub><pmid>33824457</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41390-021-01478-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1460-7669</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-3998
ispartof Pediatric research, 2022-03, Vol.91 (4), p.888-895
issn 0031-3998
1530-0447
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2658985142
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Clinical Research Article
Cohort Studies
Hospitalization
Humans
Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal - diagnosis
Hyperbilirubinemia, Neonatal - therapy
Infant, Newborn
Light therapy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Pediatric Surgery
Pediatrics
Phototherapy
Retrospective Studies
Variables
title Validation of published rebound hyperbilirubinemia risk prediction scores during birth hospitalization after initial phototherapy: a retrospective chart review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A51%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20published%20rebound%20hyperbilirubinemia%20risk%20prediction%20scores%20during%20birth%20hospitalization%20after%20initial%20phototherapy:%20a%20retrospective%20chart%20review&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20research&rft.au=So,%20Vincent&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=888&rft.epage=895&rft.pages=888-895&rft.issn=0031-3998&rft.eissn=1530-0447&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41390-021-01478-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2658985142%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2658985142&rft_id=info:pmid/33824457&rfr_iscdi=true