The Two Sophistics of Philostratus

AbstractThe overview of Sophistic proposed by Philostratus in the introduction to theLives of the Sophistscreates a serious problem of interpretation. The system of two Sophistics: Old Sophistic and Second Sophistic as the author of theLivesdefines them, appears to involve weaknesses and contradicti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Rhetorica 2006-02, Vol.24 (1), p.1-35
1. Verfasser:	Côté, Dominique
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	(PN) Literature Aristotelianism Classical rhetoric Consuls Contradictories Credibility Divination Oratory Philology Philosophy Philostratus, the Athenian (C 2nd and 3rd century) Platonism Rhetoric Sophistry Tableaux Teachers
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	35
container_issue	1
container_start_page	1
container_title	Rhetorica
container_volume	24
creator	Côté, Dominique
description	AbstractThe overview of Sophistic proposed by Philostratus in the introduction to theLives of the Sophistscreates a serious problem of interpretation. The system of two Sophistics: Old Sophistic and Second Sophistic as the author of theLivesdefines them, appears to involve weaknesses and contradictions which bring into question the credibility of Philostratus. One might therefore believe that the Philostratean sysem of two Sophistics , through its apparent incoherence, in no way clarifies the question of the definition of a sophist. This article proposes, in contrast, to make visible the conception of Sophistic that hides behind the opposition between Old Sophistic and Second Sophistic, by analysing the introduction and the preface of theLives of the Sophists.
doi_str_mv	10.1525/rh.2006.24.1.1
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2655992632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1525/rh.2006.24.1.1</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1525/rh.2006.24.1.1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1342-7f73a931e15143f2de0fd9fd07a0292d6e300c45a460a7dced6e37b062b0a9313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMoWEe37oSi69b7SPpYyuALBhQc1yHTJrTDaGrSQfz3tox4N_dy-c45cIS4RMhRkboNXU4ARU4yxxyPRIKKOauUxGORQMlyuit5Ks5i3MI0FVeJuF53Nl1_-_TND10fx76JqXfpa9fvfByDGffxXJw4s4v24m8vxPvD_Xr5lK1eHp-Xd6usQZaUla5kUzNaVCjZUWvBtbVroTRANbWFZYBGKiMLMGXb2PlTbqCgDcw6Xoibg-8Q_NfexlFv_T58TpGaCqXqmgqmicoPVBN8jME6PYT-w4QfjaDnHnTo9NyDJqlRz7ZXB8E2jj780wTIqgbFv8wvV9s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2655992632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Two Sophistics of Philostratus</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Côté, Dominique</creator><creatorcontrib>Côté, Dominique</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThe overview of Sophistic proposed by Philostratus in the introduction to theLives of the Sophistscreates a serious problem of interpretation. The system of two Sophistics: Old Sophistic and Second Sophistic as the author of theLivesdefines them, appears to involve weaknesses and contradictions which bring into question the credibility of Philostratus. One might therefore believe that the Philostratean sysem of two Sophistics , through its apparent incoherence, in no way clarifies the question of the definition of a sophist. This article proposes, in contrast, to make visible the conception of Sophistic that hides behind the opposition between Old Sophistic and Second Sophistic, by analysing the introduction and the preface of theLives of the Sophists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-8584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-8541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/rh.2006.24.1.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley: University of California Press</publisher><subject>(PN) Literature ; Aristotelianism ; Classical rhetoric ; Consuls ; Contradictories ; Credibility ; Divination ; Oratory ; Philology ; Philosophy ; Philostratus, the Athenian (C 2nd and 3rd century) ; Platonism ; Rhetoric ; Sophistry ; Tableaux ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>Rhetorica, 2006-02, Vol.24 (1), p.1-35</ispartof><rights>The International Society for the History of Rhetoric</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1342-7f73a931e15143f2de0fd9fd07a0292d6e300c45a460a7dced6e37b062b0a9313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1342-7f73a931e15143f2de0fd9fd07a0292d6e300c45a460a7dced6e37b062b0a9313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Côté, Dominique</creatorcontrib><title>The Two Sophistics of Philostratus</title><title>Rhetorica</title><description>AbstractThe overview of Sophistic proposed by Philostratus in the introduction to theLives of the Sophistscreates a serious problem of interpretation. The system of two Sophistics: Old Sophistic and Second Sophistic as the author of theLivesdefines them, appears to involve weaknesses and contradictions which bring into question the credibility of Philostratus. One might therefore believe that the Philostratean sysem of two Sophistics , through its apparent incoherence, in no way clarifies the question of the definition of a sophist. This article proposes, in contrast, to make visible the conception of Sophistic that hides behind the opposition between Old Sophistic and Second Sophistic, by analysing the introduction and the preface of theLives of the Sophists.</description><subject>(PN) Literature</subject><subject>Aristotelianism</subject><subject>Classical rhetoric</subject><subject>Consuls</subject><subject>Contradictories</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Divination</subject><subject>Oratory</subject><subject>Philology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philostratus, the Athenian (C 2nd and 3rd century)</subject><subject>Platonism</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Sophistry</subject><subject>Tableaux</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>0734-8584</issn><issn>1533-8541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhYMoWEe37oSi69b7SPpYyuALBhQc1yHTJrTDaGrSQfz3tox4N_dy-c45cIS4RMhRkboNXU4ARU4yxxyPRIKKOauUxGORQMlyuit5Ks5i3MI0FVeJuF53Nl1_-_TND10fx76JqXfpa9fvfByDGffxXJw4s4v24m8vxPvD_Xr5lK1eHp-Xd6usQZaUla5kUzNaVCjZUWvBtbVroTRANbWFZYBGKiMLMGXb2PlTbqCgDcw6Xoibg-8Q_NfexlFv_T58TpGaCqXqmgqmicoPVBN8jME6PYT-w4QfjaDnHnTo9NyDJqlRz7ZXB8E2jj780wTIqgbFv8wvV9s</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Côté, Dominique</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>The Two Sophistics of Philostratus</title><author>Côté, Dominique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1342-7f73a931e15143f2de0fd9fd07a0292d6e300c45a460a7dced6e37b062b0a9313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>(PN) Literature</topic><topic>Aristotelianism</topic><topic>Classical rhetoric</topic><topic>Consuls</topic><topic>Contradictories</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Divination</topic><topic>Oratory</topic><topic>Philology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philostratus, the Athenian (C 2nd and 3rd century)</topic><topic>Platonism</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Sophistry</topic><topic>Tableaux</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Côté, Dominique</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Rhetorica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Côté, Dominique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Two Sophistics of Philostratus</atitle><jtitle>Rhetorica</jtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>1-35</pages><issn>0734-8584</issn><eissn>1533-8541</eissn><abstract>AbstractThe overview of Sophistic proposed by Philostratus in the introduction to theLives of the Sophistscreates a serious problem of interpretation. The system of two Sophistics: Old Sophistic and Second Sophistic as the author of theLivesdefines them, appears to involve weaknesses and contradictions which bring into question the credibility of Philostratus. One might therefore believe that the Philostratean sysem of two Sophistics , through its apparent incoherence, in no way clarifies the question of the definition of a sophist. This article proposes, in contrast, to make visible the conception of Sophistic that hides behind the opposition between Old Sophistic and Second Sophistic, by analysing the introduction and the preface of theLives of the Sophists.</abstract><cop>Berkeley</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/rh.2006.24.1.1</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0734-8584
ispartof	Rhetorica, 2006-02, Vol.24 (1), p.1-35
issn	0734-8584 1533-8541
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_journals_2655992632
source	JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects	(PN) Literature Aristotelianism Classical rhetoric Consuls Contradictories Credibility Divination Oratory Philology Philosophy Philostratus, the Athenian (C 2nd and 3rd century) Platonism Rhetoric Sophistry Tableaux Teachers
title	The Two Sophistics of Philostratus
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T06%3A02%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Two%20Sophistics%20of%20Philostratus&rft.jtitle=Rhetorica&rft.au=C%C3%B4t%C3%A9,%20Dominique&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=1-35&rft.issn=0734-8584&rft.eissn=1533-8541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/rh.2006.24.1.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1525/rh.2006.24.1.1%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2655992632&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1525/rh.2006.24.1.1&rfr_iscdi=true