Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina
To effectively conserve forests and the ecosystem services they provide, mechanisms are needed to promote conservation on private lands that reduce forest fragmentation, secure lands with high conservation value, and enhance landscape connectivity. Incentive-based programs like payments for ecosyste...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest policy and economics 2022-05, Vol.138, p.102708, Article 102708 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102708 |
container_title | Forest policy and economics |
container_volume | 138 |
creator | Nunez Godoy, Cristina C. Pienaar, Elizabeth F. Branch, Lyn C. |
description | To effectively conserve forests and the ecosystem services they provide, mechanisms are needed to promote conservation on private lands that reduce forest fragmentation, secure lands with high conservation value, and enhance landscape connectivity. Incentive-based programs like payments for ecosystem services (PES) are important policy tools for attaining conservation on private lands. In 2019, we conducted 81 in-person surveys with private forestland owners, whose properties are located on the border of protected areas and in corridors connecting protected areas in Argentina's Chaco forest. We examined landowners' preferences for alternative conservation incentives, how Argentina's current PES program could be altered to increase landowner enrollment, and the amount of compensation landowners require to enroll in PES. We found that knowledge of Argentina's PES program, motivations for forest ownership, attitudes toward forest conservation policy, and property characteristics influenced landowners' preferences for conservation program design. Although indigenous communities preferred conservation easements, other private landowners were more likely to choose a PES program. Research participants preferred PES programs with shorter contract lengths or that permitted them to engage in silvopasture. The payments research participants required to engage in land uses currently authorized under Argentina's PES program exceed current PES funding. Relying solely on PES to engage landowners in conservation may result in lost opportunities to conserve forest on private lands.
•We examined landowners' preference for forest conservation incentives.•We used a mix of landscape ecology, socio-psychological and economics methods.•PES was often chosen over selling land or property tax reductions.•Respondents preferred shorter conservation contract durations.•Respondents preferred programs which allow them to engage in silvopasture. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102708 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2655165734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S138993412200020X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2655165734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b1cc204e7e3444b574bbda9e4b57caf9c775a83182f192e6b5b465b6f667646a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMcfcLDEOcVvJxekquIlVeIC4mg5zqZ1Fexgp0X8PY7CmdOuZmdndqcobgheEkzk3X7ZhTiEfkkxpRmiClcnxYJUipYKC3yae1bVZc04OS8uUtpjTBQmbFHsPlzfO7_1kBIKHRqiO5oRUG98G749xITGgAYTR2fdME2cR9kN0ohs8AliprvgJ3jcAVrvjA0ownbCst4qbsGPzpur4qwzfYLrv3pZvD8-vK2fy83r08t6tSktq_BYNsRaijkoYJzzRijeNK2pYWqt6WqrlDAVIxXtSE1BNqLhUjSyk1JJLg27LG5n3SGGr0M-U-_DIfpsqakUgkihGM8sPrNsDClF6HR-_NPEH02wnjLVez1nqqdM9ZxpXruf1yB_cHQQdbIOvIXWRbCjboP7X-AXpVmC-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2655165734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C. ; Pienaar, Elizabeth F. ; Branch, Lyn C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C. ; Pienaar, Elizabeth F. ; Branch, Lyn C.</creatorcontrib><description>To effectively conserve forests and the ecosystem services they provide, mechanisms are needed to promote conservation on private lands that reduce forest fragmentation, secure lands with high conservation value, and enhance landscape connectivity. Incentive-based programs like payments for ecosystem services (PES) are important policy tools for attaining conservation on private lands. In 2019, we conducted 81 in-person surveys with private forestland owners, whose properties are located on the border of protected areas and in corridors connecting protected areas in Argentina's Chaco forest. We examined landowners' preferences for alternative conservation incentives, how Argentina's current PES program could be altered to increase landowner enrollment, and the amount of compensation landowners require to enroll in PES. We found that knowledge of Argentina's PES program, motivations for forest ownership, attitudes toward forest conservation policy, and property characteristics influenced landowners' preferences for conservation program design. Although indigenous communities preferred conservation easements, other private landowners were more likely to choose a PES program. Research participants preferred PES programs with shorter contract lengths or that permitted them to engage in silvopasture. The payments research participants required to engage in land uses currently authorized under Argentina's PES program exceed current PES funding. Relying solely on PES to engage landowners in conservation may result in lost opportunities to conserve forest on private lands.
•We examined landowners' preference for forest conservation incentives.•We used a mix of landscape ecology, socio-psychological and economics methods.•PES was often chosen over selling land or property tax reductions.•Respondents preferred shorter conservation contract durations.•Respondents preferred programs which allow them to engage in silvopasture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-9341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Compensation ; Conservation ; Conservation easements ; Corridors ; Easements ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Enrollments ; Environmental policy ; Forest conservation ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Forests ; Habitat fragmentation ; Incentives ; Indigenous peoples ; Land ; Landowners ; Ownership ; Payments ; Payments for ecosystem services ; Private lands ; Property ; Protected areas ; Silvopasture ; Socio-psychological characteristics ; Stated preference choice experiments ; Voluntary enrollment</subject><ispartof>Forest policy and economics, 2022-05, Vol.138, p.102708, Article 102708</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b1cc204e7e3444b574bbda9e4b57caf9c775a83182f192e6b5b465b6f667646a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b1cc204e7e3444b574bbda9e4b57caf9c775a83182f192e6b5b465b6f667646a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412200020X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pienaar, Elizabeth F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branch, Lyn C.</creatorcontrib><title>Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina</title><title>Forest policy and economics</title><description>To effectively conserve forests and the ecosystem services they provide, mechanisms are needed to promote conservation on private lands that reduce forest fragmentation, secure lands with high conservation value, and enhance landscape connectivity. Incentive-based programs like payments for ecosystem services (PES) are important policy tools for attaining conservation on private lands. In 2019, we conducted 81 in-person surveys with private forestland owners, whose properties are located on the border of protected areas and in corridors connecting protected areas in Argentina's Chaco forest. We examined landowners' preferences for alternative conservation incentives, how Argentina's current PES program could be altered to increase landowner enrollment, and the amount of compensation landowners require to enroll in PES. We found that knowledge of Argentina's PES program, motivations for forest ownership, attitudes toward forest conservation policy, and property characteristics influenced landowners' preferences for conservation program design. Although indigenous communities preferred conservation easements, other private landowners were more likely to choose a PES program. Research participants preferred PES programs with shorter contract lengths or that permitted them to engage in silvopasture. The payments research participants required to engage in land uses currently authorized under Argentina's PES program exceed current PES funding. Relying solely on PES to engage landowners in conservation may result in lost opportunities to conserve forest on private lands.
•We examined landowners' preference for forest conservation incentives.•We used a mix of landscape ecology, socio-psychological and economics methods.•PES was often chosen over selling land or property tax reductions.•Respondents preferred shorter conservation contract durations.•Respondents preferred programs which allow them to engage in silvopasture.</description><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation easements</subject><subject>Corridors</subject><subject>Easements</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Payments for ecosystem services</subject><subject>Private lands</subject><subject>Property</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Silvopasture</subject><subject>Socio-psychological characteristics</subject><subject>Stated preference choice experiments</subject><subject>Voluntary enrollment</subject><issn>1389-9341</issn><issn>1872-7050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMcfcLDEOcVvJxekquIlVeIC4mg5zqZ1Fexgp0X8PY7CmdOuZmdndqcobgheEkzk3X7ZhTiEfkkxpRmiClcnxYJUipYKC3yae1bVZc04OS8uUtpjTBQmbFHsPlzfO7_1kBIKHRqiO5oRUG98G749xITGgAYTR2fdME2cR9kN0ohs8AliprvgJ3jcAVrvjA0ownbCst4qbsGPzpur4qwzfYLrv3pZvD8-vK2fy83r08t6tSktq_BYNsRaijkoYJzzRijeNK2pYWqt6WqrlDAVIxXtSE1BNqLhUjSyk1JJLg27LG5n3SGGr0M-U-_DIfpsqakUgkihGM8sPrNsDClF6HR-_NPEH02wnjLVez1nqqdM9ZxpXruf1yB_cHQQdbIOvIXWRbCjboP7X-AXpVmC-A</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C.</creator><creator>Pienaar, Elizabeth F.</creator><creator>Branch, Lyn C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina</title><author>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C. ; Pienaar, Elizabeth F. ; Branch, Lyn C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b1cc204e7e3444b574bbda9e4b57caf9c775a83182f192e6b5b465b6f667646a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation easements</topic><topic>Corridors</topic><topic>Easements</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Payments for ecosystem services</topic><topic>Private lands</topic><topic>Property</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Silvopasture</topic><topic>Socio-psychological characteristics</topic><topic>Stated preference choice experiments</topic><topic>Voluntary enrollment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pienaar, Elizabeth F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branch, Lyn C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C.</au><au>Pienaar, Elizabeth F.</au><au>Branch, Lyn C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina</atitle><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>138</volume><spage>102708</spage><pages>102708-</pages><artnum>102708</artnum><issn>1389-9341</issn><eissn>1872-7050</eissn><abstract>To effectively conserve forests and the ecosystem services they provide, mechanisms are needed to promote conservation on private lands that reduce forest fragmentation, secure lands with high conservation value, and enhance landscape connectivity. Incentive-based programs like payments for ecosystem services (PES) are important policy tools for attaining conservation on private lands. In 2019, we conducted 81 in-person surveys with private forestland owners, whose properties are located on the border of protected areas and in corridors connecting protected areas in Argentina's Chaco forest. We examined landowners' preferences for alternative conservation incentives, how Argentina's current PES program could be altered to increase landowner enrollment, and the amount of compensation landowners require to enroll in PES. We found that knowledge of Argentina's PES program, motivations for forest ownership, attitudes toward forest conservation policy, and property characteristics influenced landowners' preferences for conservation program design. Although indigenous communities preferred conservation easements, other private landowners were more likely to choose a PES program. Research participants preferred PES programs with shorter contract lengths or that permitted them to engage in silvopasture. The payments research participants required to engage in land uses currently authorized under Argentina's PES program exceed current PES funding. Relying solely on PES to engage landowners in conservation may result in lost opportunities to conserve forest on private lands.
•We examined landowners' preference for forest conservation incentives.•We used a mix of landscape ecology, socio-psychological and economics methods.•PES was often chosen over selling land or property tax reductions.•Respondents preferred shorter conservation contract durations.•Respondents preferred programs which allow them to engage in silvopasture.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102708</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1389-9341 |
ispartof | Forest policy and economics, 2022-05, Vol.138, p.102708, Article 102708 |
issn | 1389-9341 1872-7050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2655165734 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index |
subjects | Compensation Conservation Conservation easements Corridors Easements Ecosystem services Ecosystems Enrollments Environmental policy Forest conservation Forest ecosystems Forest management Forestry Forests Habitat fragmentation Incentives Indigenous peoples Land Landowners Ownership Payments Payments for ecosystem services Private lands Property Protected areas Silvopasture Socio-psychological characteristics Stated preference choice experiments Voluntary enrollment |
title | Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T07%3A40%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Willingness%20of%20private%20landowners%20to%20participate%20in%20forest%20conservation%20in%20the%20Chaco%20region%20of%20Argentina&rft.jtitle=Forest%20policy%20and%20economics&rft.au=Nunez%20Godoy,%20Cristina%20C.&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=138&rft.spage=102708&rft.pages=102708-&rft.artnum=102708&rft.issn=1389-9341&rft.eissn=1872-7050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102708&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2655165734%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2655165734&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S138993412200020X&rfr_iscdi=true |