Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina

To effectively conserve forests and the ecosystem services they provide, mechanisms are needed to promote conservation on private lands that reduce forest fragmentation, secure lands with high conservation value, and enhance landscape connectivity. Incentive-based programs like payments for ecosyste...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forest policy and economics 2022-05, Vol.138, p.102708, Article 102708
Hauptverfasser: Nunez Godoy, Cristina C., Pienaar, Elizabeth F., Branch, Lyn C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102708
container_title Forest policy and economics
container_volume 138
creator Nunez Godoy, Cristina C.
Pienaar, Elizabeth F.
Branch, Lyn C.
description To effectively conserve forests and the ecosystem services they provide, mechanisms are needed to promote conservation on private lands that reduce forest fragmentation, secure lands with high conservation value, and enhance landscape connectivity. Incentive-based programs like payments for ecosystem services (PES) are important policy tools for attaining conservation on private lands. In 2019, we conducted 81 in-person surveys with private forestland owners, whose properties are located on the border of protected areas and in corridors connecting protected areas in Argentina's Chaco forest. We examined landowners' preferences for alternative conservation incentives, how Argentina's current PES program could be altered to increase landowner enrollment, and the amount of compensation landowners require to enroll in PES. We found that knowledge of Argentina's PES program, motivations for forest ownership, attitudes toward forest conservation policy, and property characteristics influenced landowners' preferences for conservation program design. Although indigenous communities preferred conservation easements, other private landowners were more likely to choose a PES program. Research participants preferred PES programs with shorter contract lengths or that permitted them to engage in silvopasture. The payments research participants required to engage in land uses currently authorized under Argentina's PES program exceed current PES funding. Relying solely on PES to engage landowners in conservation may result in lost opportunities to conserve forest on private lands. •We examined landowners' preference for forest conservation incentives.•We used a mix of landscape ecology, socio-psychological and economics methods.•PES was often chosen over selling land or property tax reductions.•Respondents preferred shorter conservation contract durations.•Respondents preferred programs which allow them to engage in silvopasture.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102708
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2655165734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S138993412200020X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2655165734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b1cc204e7e3444b574bbda9e4b57caf9c775a83182f192e6b5b465b6f667646a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMcfcLDEOcVvJxekquIlVeIC4mg5zqZ1Fexgp0X8PY7CmdOuZmdndqcobgheEkzk3X7ZhTiEfkkxpRmiClcnxYJUipYKC3yae1bVZc04OS8uUtpjTBQmbFHsPlzfO7_1kBIKHRqiO5oRUG98G749xITGgAYTR2fdME2cR9kN0ohs8AliprvgJ3jcAVrvjA0ownbCst4qbsGPzpur4qwzfYLrv3pZvD8-vK2fy83r08t6tSktq_BYNsRaijkoYJzzRijeNK2pYWqt6WqrlDAVIxXtSE1BNqLhUjSyk1JJLg27LG5n3SGGr0M-U-_DIfpsqakUgkihGM8sPrNsDClF6HR-_NPEH02wnjLVez1nqqdM9ZxpXruf1yB_cHQQdbIOvIXWRbCjboP7X-AXpVmC-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2655165734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C. ; Pienaar, Elizabeth F. ; Branch, Lyn C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C. ; Pienaar, Elizabeth F. ; Branch, Lyn C.</creatorcontrib><description>To effectively conserve forests and the ecosystem services they provide, mechanisms are needed to promote conservation on private lands that reduce forest fragmentation, secure lands with high conservation value, and enhance landscape connectivity. Incentive-based programs like payments for ecosystem services (PES) are important policy tools for attaining conservation on private lands. In 2019, we conducted 81 in-person surveys with private forestland owners, whose properties are located on the border of protected areas and in corridors connecting protected areas in Argentina's Chaco forest. We examined landowners' preferences for alternative conservation incentives, how Argentina's current PES program could be altered to increase landowner enrollment, and the amount of compensation landowners require to enroll in PES. We found that knowledge of Argentina's PES program, motivations for forest ownership, attitudes toward forest conservation policy, and property characteristics influenced landowners' preferences for conservation program design. Although indigenous communities preferred conservation easements, other private landowners were more likely to choose a PES program. Research participants preferred PES programs with shorter contract lengths or that permitted them to engage in silvopasture. The payments research participants required to engage in land uses currently authorized under Argentina's PES program exceed current PES funding. Relying solely on PES to engage landowners in conservation may result in lost opportunities to conserve forest on private lands. •We examined landowners' preference for forest conservation incentives.•We used a mix of landscape ecology, socio-psychological and economics methods.•PES was often chosen over selling land or property tax reductions.•Respondents preferred shorter conservation contract durations.•Respondents preferred programs which allow them to engage in silvopasture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-9341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Compensation ; Conservation ; Conservation easements ; Corridors ; Easements ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Enrollments ; Environmental policy ; Forest conservation ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Forests ; Habitat fragmentation ; Incentives ; Indigenous peoples ; Land ; Landowners ; Ownership ; Payments ; Payments for ecosystem services ; Private lands ; Property ; Protected areas ; Silvopasture ; Socio-psychological characteristics ; Stated preference choice experiments ; Voluntary enrollment</subject><ispartof>Forest policy and economics, 2022-05, Vol.138, p.102708, Article 102708</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b1cc204e7e3444b574bbda9e4b57caf9c775a83182f192e6b5b465b6f667646a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b1cc204e7e3444b574bbda9e4b57caf9c775a83182f192e6b5b465b6f667646a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412200020X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pienaar, Elizabeth F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branch, Lyn C.</creatorcontrib><title>Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina</title><title>Forest policy and economics</title><description>To effectively conserve forests and the ecosystem services they provide, mechanisms are needed to promote conservation on private lands that reduce forest fragmentation, secure lands with high conservation value, and enhance landscape connectivity. Incentive-based programs like payments for ecosystem services (PES) are important policy tools for attaining conservation on private lands. In 2019, we conducted 81 in-person surveys with private forestland owners, whose properties are located on the border of protected areas and in corridors connecting protected areas in Argentina's Chaco forest. We examined landowners' preferences for alternative conservation incentives, how Argentina's current PES program could be altered to increase landowner enrollment, and the amount of compensation landowners require to enroll in PES. We found that knowledge of Argentina's PES program, motivations for forest ownership, attitudes toward forest conservation policy, and property characteristics influenced landowners' preferences for conservation program design. Although indigenous communities preferred conservation easements, other private landowners were more likely to choose a PES program. Research participants preferred PES programs with shorter contract lengths or that permitted them to engage in silvopasture. The payments research participants required to engage in land uses currently authorized under Argentina's PES program exceed current PES funding. Relying solely on PES to engage landowners in conservation may result in lost opportunities to conserve forest on private lands. •We examined landowners' preference for forest conservation incentives.•We used a mix of landscape ecology, socio-psychological and economics methods.•PES was often chosen over selling land or property tax reductions.•Respondents preferred shorter conservation contract durations.•Respondents preferred programs which allow them to engage in silvopasture.</description><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation easements</subject><subject>Corridors</subject><subject>Easements</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Payments for ecosystem services</subject><subject>Private lands</subject><subject>Property</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Silvopasture</subject><subject>Socio-psychological characteristics</subject><subject>Stated preference choice experiments</subject><subject>Voluntary enrollment</subject><issn>1389-9341</issn><issn>1872-7050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMcfcLDEOcVvJxekquIlVeIC4mg5zqZ1Fexgp0X8PY7CmdOuZmdndqcobgheEkzk3X7ZhTiEfkkxpRmiClcnxYJUipYKC3yae1bVZc04OS8uUtpjTBQmbFHsPlzfO7_1kBIKHRqiO5oRUG98G749xITGgAYTR2fdME2cR9kN0ohs8AliprvgJ3jcAVrvjA0ownbCst4qbsGPzpur4qwzfYLrv3pZvD8-vK2fy83r08t6tSktq_BYNsRaijkoYJzzRijeNK2pYWqt6WqrlDAVIxXtSE1BNqLhUjSyk1JJLg27LG5n3SGGr0M-U-_DIfpsqakUgkihGM8sPrNsDClF6HR-_NPEH02wnjLVez1nqqdM9ZxpXruf1yB_cHQQdbIOvIXWRbCjboP7X-AXpVmC-A</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C.</creator><creator>Pienaar, Elizabeth F.</creator><creator>Branch, Lyn C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina</title><author>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C. ; Pienaar, Elizabeth F. ; Branch, Lyn C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b1cc204e7e3444b574bbda9e4b57caf9c775a83182f192e6b5b465b6f667646a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation easements</topic><topic>Corridors</topic><topic>Easements</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Payments for ecosystem services</topic><topic>Private lands</topic><topic>Property</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Silvopasture</topic><topic>Socio-psychological characteristics</topic><topic>Stated preference choice experiments</topic><topic>Voluntary enrollment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pienaar, Elizabeth F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branch, Lyn C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nunez Godoy, Cristina C.</au><au>Pienaar, Elizabeth F.</au><au>Branch, Lyn C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina</atitle><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>138</volume><spage>102708</spage><pages>102708-</pages><artnum>102708</artnum><issn>1389-9341</issn><eissn>1872-7050</eissn><abstract>To effectively conserve forests and the ecosystem services they provide, mechanisms are needed to promote conservation on private lands that reduce forest fragmentation, secure lands with high conservation value, and enhance landscape connectivity. Incentive-based programs like payments for ecosystem services (PES) are important policy tools for attaining conservation on private lands. In 2019, we conducted 81 in-person surveys with private forestland owners, whose properties are located on the border of protected areas and in corridors connecting protected areas in Argentina's Chaco forest. We examined landowners' preferences for alternative conservation incentives, how Argentina's current PES program could be altered to increase landowner enrollment, and the amount of compensation landowners require to enroll in PES. We found that knowledge of Argentina's PES program, motivations for forest ownership, attitudes toward forest conservation policy, and property characteristics influenced landowners' preferences for conservation program design. Although indigenous communities preferred conservation easements, other private landowners were more likely to choose a PES program. Research participants preferred PES programs with shorter contract lengths or that permitted them to engage in silvopasture. The payments research participants required to engage in land uses currently authorized under Argentina's PES program exceed current PES funding. Relying solely on PES to engage landowners in conservation may result in lost opportunities to conserve forest on private lands. •We examined landowners' preference for forest conservation incentives.•We used a mix of landscape ecology, socio-psychological and economics methods.•PES was often chosen over selling land or property tax reductions.•Respondents preferred shorter conservation contract durations.•Respondents preferred programs which allow them to engage in silvopasture.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102708</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1389-9341
ispartof Forest policy and economics, 2022-05, Vol.138, p.102708, Article 102708
issn 1389-9341
1872-7050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2655165734
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Compensation
Conservation
Conservation easements
Corridors
Easements
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Enrollments
Environmental policy
Forest conservation
Forest ecosystems
Forest management
Forestry
Forests
Habitat fragmentation
Incentives
Indigenous peoples
Land
Landowners
Ownership
Payments
Payments for ecosystem services
Private lands
Property
Protected areas
Silvopasture
Socio-psychological characteristics
Stated preference choice experiments
Voluntary enrollment
title Willingness of private landowners to participate in forest conservation in the Chaco region of Argentina
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T07%3A40%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Willingness%20of%20private%20landowners%20to%20participate%20in%20forest%20conservation%20in%20the%20Chaco%20region%20of%20Argentina&rft.jtitle=Forest%20policy%20and%20economics&rft.au=Nunez%20Godoy,%20Cristina%20C.&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=138&rft.spage=102708&rft.pages=102708-&rft.artnum=102708&rft.issn=1389-9341&rft.eissn=1872-7050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102708&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2655165734%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2655165734&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S138993412200020X&rfr_iscdi=true