A project prioritization approach considering uncertainty, reliability, criteria prioritization, and robustness

Given the limitation of resources in organizations (time, money, staff, material, etc.), deciding which projects should be given priority – among many competing projects – is a constant and continuous challenge for decision makers. As a result, a proliferation of methods and solutions for project pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Decision Support Systems 2022-05, Vol.156, p.113731, Article 113731
Hauptverfasser: Jafarzadeh, Hamed, Heidary-Dahooie, Jalil, Akbari, Pouria, Qorbani, Alireza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 113731
container_title Decision Support Systems
container_volume 156
creator Jafarzadeh, Hamed
Heidary-Dahooie, Jalil
Akbari, Pouria
Qorbani, Alireza
description Given the limitation of resources in organizations (time, money, staff, material, etc.), deciding which projects should be given priority – among many competing projects – is a constant and continuous challenge for decision makers. As a result, a proliferation of methods and solutions for project prioritization has been developed, each with its own strengths and limitations. In this paper, we propose a hybrid approach for prioritizing projects taking into consideration four pervasive challenges in decision making: 1) uncertainty (imprecision and vagueness) of human decisions, 2) reliability (extent of sureness) of decision makers, 3) systematic identification of selection criteria, and 4) robustness of decision making (reasonable tolerance against insignificant changes to decision makers' evaluations during the process). In doing so, we propose integrating Z-numbers theory with Quality Function Development (ZQFD), four Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (Z-MCDM) methods, ensemble ranking aggregation, and sensitivity analysis. The proposed method is then applied in a real-world organization with twenty IT projects to illustrate how our approach might be used in practice. Furthermore, we elaborate on the trustworthiness of the proposed method in light of 16 criteria available in the literature of structured decision making. •Project prioritization is a constant challenge for organizations.•A hybrid model is proposed to simultaneously address four issues in this decision.•Issues are uncertainty, reliability, identification of criteria, and robustness.•Model integrates QFD, z-numbers, MCDM, and sensitivity analysis.•A case study illustrates how the proposed approach may be used in practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.dss.2022.113731
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2654391328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167923622000021</els_id><sourcerecordid>2654391328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-ed1e38abda3e4cd0370d82b47b5e55248df434d0a95cb6880f1ce444567d5e353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Fr9uaz6bF07L4BQte9BzSZKopa7MmqaC_3iz15MHTMMz7zrzzIHRJcEUwqa-HysZYUUxpRQiTjByhBWkkK4Vs5TFaZI0sW8rqU3QW44BxzWRTL5BfF_vgBzApV-eDS-5bJ-fHQu_zQJu3wvgxOgvBja_FNBoISbsxfa2KADunO7dzh8Zka9boP2tWhR5tEXw3xTRCjOfopNe7CBe_dYle7m6fNw_l9un-cbPeloZRkUqwBFijO6sZcGMxk9g2tOOyEyAE5Y3tOeMW61aYrm4a3BMDnHNRSyuACbZEV_Pe_MTHBDGpwU9hzCcVrQVnLWG0ySoyq0zwMQboVU7_rsOXIlgduKpBZa7qwFXNXLPnZvZAjv_pIKhoHGQu1oWMUVnv_nH_ABeIgzE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2654391328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A project prioritization approach considering uncertainty, reliability, criteria prioritization, and robustness</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jafarzadeh, Hamed ; Heidary-Dahooie, Jalil ; Akbari, Pouria ; Qorbani, Alireza</creator><creatorcontrib>Jafarzadeh, Hamed ; Heidary-Dahooie, Jalil ; Akbari, Pouria ; Qorbani, Alireza</creatorcontrib><description>Given the limitation of resources in organizations (time, money, staff, material, etc.), deciding which projects should be given priority – among many competing projects – is a constant and continuous challenge for decision makers. As a result, a proliferation of methods and solutions for project prioritization has been developed, each with its own strengths and limitations. In this paper, we propose a hybrid approach for prioritizing projects taking into consideration four pervasive challenges in decision making: 1) uncertainty (imprecision and vagueness) of human decisions, 2) reliability (extent of sureness) of decision makers, 3) systematic identification of selection criteria, and 4) robustness of decision making (reasonable tolerance against insignificant changes to decision makers' evaluations during the process). In doing so, we propose integrating Z-numbers theory with Quality Function Development (ZQFD), four Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (Z-MCDM) methods, ensemble ranking aggregation, and sensitivity analysis. The proposed method is then applied in a real-world organization with twenty IT projects to illustrate how our approach might be used in practice. Furthermore, we elaborate on the trustworthiness of the proposed method in light of 16 criteria available in the literature of structured decision making. •Project prioritization is a constant challenge for organizations.•A hybrid model is proposed to simultaneously address four issues in this decision.•Issues are uncertainty, reliability, identification of criteria, and robustness.•Model integrates QFD, z-numbers, MCDM, and sensitivity analysis.•A case study illustrates how the proposed approach may be used in practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-9236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5797</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2022.113731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Decision analysis ; Decision making ; Decision theory ; Multiple criterion ; Project portfolio ; Project selection ; Reliability ; Robustness ; Sensitivity analysis ; Uncertainty ; Z-ARAS ; Z-CODAS ; Z-MABAC ; Z-numbers ; ZCOPRAS ; ZQFD</subject><ispartof>Decision Support Systems, 2022-05, Vol.156, p.113731, Article 113731</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. May 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-ed1e38abda3e4cd0370d82b47b5e55248df434d0a95cb6880f1ce444567d5e353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-ed1e38abda3e4cd0370d82b47b5e55248df434d0a95cb6880f1ce444567d5e353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923622000021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jafarzadeh, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidary-Dahooie, Jalil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akbari, Pouria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qorbani, Alireza</creatorcontrib><title>A project prioritization approach considering uncertainty, reliability, criteria prioritization, and robustness</title><title>Decision Support Systems</title><description>Given the limitation of resources in organizations (time, money, staff, material, etc.), deciding which projects should be given priority – among many competing projects – is a constant and continuous challenge for decision makers. As a result, a proliferation of methods and solutions for project prioritization has been developed, each with its own strengths and limitations. In this paper, we propose a hybrid approach for prioritizing projects taking into consideration four pervasive challenges in decision making: 1) uncertainty (imprecision and vagueness) of human decisions, 2) reliability (extent of sureness) of decision makers, 3) systematic identification of selection criteria, and 4) robustness of decision making (reasonable tolerance against insignificant changes to decision makers' evaluations during the process). In doing so, we propose integrating Z-numbers theory with Quality Function Development (ZQFD), four Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (Z-MCDM) methods, ensemble ranking aggregation, and sensitivity analysis. The proposed method is then applied in a real-world organization with twenty IT projects to illustrate how our approach might be used in practice. Furthermore, we elaborate on the trustworthiness of the proposed method in light of 16 criteria available in the literature of structured decision making. •Project prioritization is a constant challenge for organizations.•A hybrid model is proposed to simultaneously address four issues in this decision.•Issues are uncertainty, reliability, identification of criteria, and robustness.•Model integrates QFD, z-numbers, MCDM, and sensitivity analysis.•A case study illustrates how the proposed approach may be used in practice.</description><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Project portfolio</subject><subject>Project selection</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Z-ARAS</subject><subject>Z-CODAS</subject><subject>Z-MABAC</subject><subject>Z-numbers</subject><subject>ZCOPRAS</subject><subject>ZQFD</subject><issn>0167-9236</issn><issn>1873-5797</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Fr9uaz6bF07L4BQte9BzSZKopa7MmqaC_3iz15MHTMMz7zrzzIHRJcEUwqa-HysZYUUxpRQiTjByhBWkkK4Vs5TFaZI0sW8rqU3QW44BxzWRTL5BfF_vgBzApV-eDS-5bJ-fHQu_zQJu3wvgxOgvBja_FNBoISbsxfa2KADunO7dzh8Zka9boP2tWhR5tEXw3xTRCjOfopNe7CBe_dYle7m6fNw_l9un-cbPeloZRkUqwBFijO6sZcGMxk9g2tOOyEyAE5Y3tOeMW61aYrm4a3BMDnHNRSyuACbZEV_Pe_MTHBDGpwU9hzCcVrQVnLWG0ySoyq0zwMQboVU7_rsOXIlgduKpBZa7qwFXNXLPnZvZAjv_pIKhoHGQu1oWMUVnv_nH_ABeIgzE</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Jafarzadeh, Hamed</creator><creator>Heidary-Dahooie, Jalil</creator><creator>Akbari, Pouria</creator><creator>Qorbani, Alireza</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>A project prioritization approach considering uncertainty, reliability, criteria prioritization, and robustness</title><author>Jafarzadeh, Hamed ; Heidary-Dahooie, Jalil ; Akbari, Pouria ; Qorbani, Alireza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-ed1e38abda3e4cd0370d82b47b5e55248df434d0a95cb6880f1ce444567d5e353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Project portfolio</topic><topic>Project selection</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Z-ARAS</topic><topic>Z-CODAS</topic><topic>Z-MABAC</topic><topic>Z-numbers</topic><topic>ZCOPRAS</topic><topic>ZQFD</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jafarzadeh, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidary-Dahooie, Jalil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akbari, Pouria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qorbani, Alireza</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Decision Support Systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jafarzadeh, Hamed</au><au>Heidary-Dahooie, Jalil</au><au>Akbari, Pouria</au><au>Qorbani, Alireza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A project prioritization approach considering uncertainty, reliability, criteria prioritization, and robustness</atitle><jtitle>Decision Support Systems</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>156</volume><spage>113731</spage><pages>113731-</pages><artnum>113731</artnum><issn>0167-9236</issn><eissn>1873-5797</eissn><abstract>Given the limitation of resources in organizations (time, money, staff, material, etc.), deciding which projects should be given priority – among many competing projects – is a constant and continuous challenge for decision makers. As a result, a proliferation of methods and solutions for project prioritization has been developed, each with its own strengths and limitations. In this paper, we propose a hybrid approach for prioritizing projects taking into consideration four pervasive challenges in decision making: 1) uncertainty (imprecision and vagueness) of human decisions, 2) reliability (extent of sureness) of decision makers, 3) systematic identification of selection criteria, and 4) robustness of decision making (reasonable tolerance against insignificant changes to decision makers' evaluations during the process). In doing so, we propose integrating Z-numbers theory with Quality Function Development (ZQFD), four Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (Z-MCDM) methods, ensemble ranking aggregation, and sensitivity analysis. The proposed method is then applied in a real-world organization with twenty IT projects to illustrate how our approach might be used in practice. Furthermore, we elaborate on the trustworthiness of the proposed method in light of 16 criteria available in the literature of structured decision making. •Project prioritization is a constant challenge for organizations.•A hybrid model is proposed to simultaneously address four issues in this decision.•Issues are uncertainty, reliability, identification of criteria, and robustness.•Model integrates QFD, z-numbers, MCDM, and sensitivity analysis.•A case study illustrates how the proposed approach may be used in practice.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.dss.2022.113731</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-9236
ispartof Decision Support Systems, 2022-05, Vol.156, p.113731, Article 113731
issn 0167-9236
1873-5797
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2654391328
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Decision analysis
Decision making
Decision theory
Multiple criterion
Project portfolio
Project selection
Reliability
Robustness
Sensitivity analysis
Uncertainty
Z-ARAS
Z-CODAS
Z-MABAC
Z-numbers
ZCOPRAS
ZQFD
title A project prioritization approach considering uncertainty, reliability, criteria prioritization, and robustness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A17%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20project%20prioritization%20approach%20considering%20uncertainty,%20reliability,%20criteria%20prioritization,%20and%20robustness&rft.jtitle=Decision%20Support%20Systems&rft.au=Jafarzadeh,%20Hamed&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=156&rft.spage=113731&rft.pages=113731-&rft.artnum=113731&rft.issn=0167-9236&rft.eissn=1873-5797&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dss.2022.113731&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2654391328%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2654391328&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167923622000021&rfr_iscdi=true