Cetacean sensitivity and threats analysis to assess effectiveness of protection measures: an example of integrated approach for cetacean conservation in the Bonifacio Bouches
The conservation of the highly mobile marine mammals species is challenging. One of the primary tools for conservation of marine species and the maintenance of ecosystem processes is the establishment of marine protected areas which is based on the identification of areas of high ecological value, o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Biodiversity and conservation 2022-02, Vol.31 (2), p.517-541 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 541 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 517 |
| container_title | Biodiversity and conservation |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Campana, I. Angeletti, D. Giovani, G. Paraboschi, M. Arcangeli, A. |
| description | The conservation of the highly mobile marine mammals species is challenging. One of the primary tools for conservation of marine species and the maintenance of ecosystem processes is the establishment of marine protected areas which is based on the identification of areas of high ecological value, or the identification of effective mitigation measures for the main threats. Bonifacio Bouches is mainly a coastal area which encompasses several Natura 2000 sites and is included in the Pelagos Sanctuary for the protection of marine mammals. Numerous regulations are applied here targeting shipping and related activities for environmental protection and navigation safety. Integrated data on cetacean species, maritime traffic and marine litter were collected from systematic surveys performed on board ferries crossing the Bonifacio Strait (2013–2019). Data were seasonally investigated considering spring/summer and autumn/winter as potentially different for ecological and anthropogenic conditions. Seasonal models of preferred habitat for fin whale, striped dolphin and bottlenose dolphin were compared with the existing protected areas, evidencing gaps of spatial protection measures for the species. A species sensitivity score was integrated with threats analyses highlighting the priority areas/seasons requiring enhanced conservation efforts. Despite the existing regulations, results showed that the intense anthropogenic pressure represents a risk for the ecological richness in many areas lacking of protection. Outcomes provide us indication on candidate areas where an extension of spatial protection measures could favour the priority bottlenose dolphin species, and the areas/seasons that need improved mitigation of the main threats. The application of similar approach in wider areas can be useful to verify protection measures for highly mobile species. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10531-021-02346-w |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2653639393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A703421637</galeid><sourcerecordid>A703421637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-27d3cfe5a11aab805a5c50fb84e69ad50fcff282f14b94aa456c3ee1bd12d33e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2PEzEMhkcIJMrCH-AUifMs-ZjMdLgtFV_SSlzgHLkZp82qTUqc7tI_xW_EswPihqwoTvQ-tpO3aV4rea2kHN6SktaoVup5ma5vH540K2UH3Y6Dkk-blRx72Rql7PPmBdGdZMj2atX82mAFj5AEYaJY432sFwFpEnVfECpxDocLRRI1CyBCIoEhoGcppvmUgziVXOebnMQRgc4F6R2DAn_C8XTAWRJTxV2BipOAE-vB70XIRfi__X1OhOUeHqvExP1RvM8pBvAxc3b2e6SXzbMAB8JXf_ar5vvHD982n9vbr5--bG5uW2_surZ6mIwPaEEpgO1aWrDeyrBdd9iPMHHqQ9BrHVS3HTuAzvbeIKrtpPRkDJqr5s1Slyf9cUaq7i6fC_8EOd1b05uRg1XXi2oHB3QxhVwLeI4Jj5HfgyHy_c0gTadVbwYG9AL4kokKBncq8Qjl4pR0s5FuMdKxke7RSPfAkFkgYnHaYfk3y3-o3wEfppY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2653639393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cetacean sensitivity and threats analysis to assess effectiveness of protection measures: an example of integrated approach for cetacean conservation in the Bonifacio Bouches</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Campana, I. ; Angeletti, D. ; Giovani, G. ; Paraboschi, M. ; Arcangeli, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Campana, I. ; Angeletti, D. ; Giovani, G. ; Paraboschi, M. ; Arcangeli, A.</creatorcontrib><description>The conservation of the highly mobile marine mammals species is challenging. One of the primary tools for conservation of marine species and the maintenance of ecosystem processes is the establishment of marine protected areas which is based on the identification of areas of high ecological value, or the identification of effective mitigation measures for the main threats. Bonifacio Bouches is mainly a coastal area which encompasses several Natura 2000 sites and is included in the Pelagos Sanctuary for the protection of marine mammals. Numerous regulations are applied here targeting shipping and related activities for environmental protection and navigation safety. Integrated data on cetacean species, maritime traffic and marine litter were collected from systematic surveys performed on board ferries crossing the Bonifacio Strait (2013–2019). Data were seasonally investigated considering spring/summer and autumn/winter as potentially different for ecological and anthropogenic conditions. Seasonal models of preferred habitat for fin whale, striped dolphin and bottlenose dolphin were compared with the existing protected areas, evidencing gaps of spatial protection measures for the species. A species sensitivity score was integrated with threats analyses highlighting the priority areas/seasons requiring enhanced conservation efforts. Despite the existing regulations, results showed that the intense anthropogenic pressure represents a risk for the ecological richness in many areas lacking of protection. Outcomes provide us indication on candidate areas where an extension of spatial protection measures could favour the priority bottlenose dolphin species, and the areas/seasons that need improved mitigation of the main threats. The application of similar approach in wider areas can be useful to verify protection measures for highly mobile species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9710</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10531-021-02346-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic mammals ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cetacea ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Coastal and marine biodiversity ; Coastal zone ; Conservation ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Delphinidae ; Dolphins ; Dolphins & porpoises ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Environmental protection ; Ferries ; Fins ; Identification ; Integrated approach ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Life Sciences ; Marine debris ; Marine ecosystems ; Marine mammals ; Marine pollution ; Marine protected areas ; Mitigation ; Nature conservation ; Navigation ; Navigation safety ; Original Paper ; Passenger ships ; Protected areas ; Protection ; Protection and preservation ; Regulations ; Sanctuaries ; Seasons ; Sensitivity analysis ; Shipping ; Species ; Surveys ; Threat evaluation ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity and conservation, 2022-02, Vol.31 (2), p.517-541</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-27d3cfe5a11aab805a5c50fb84e69ad50fcff282f14b94aa456c3ee1bd12d33e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-27d3cfe5a11aab805a5c50fb84e69ad50fcff282f14b94aa456c3ee1bd12d33e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2156-9987 ; 0000-0003-0801-0927 ; 0000-0002-4053-5259</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10531-021-02346-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10531-021-02346-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campana, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angeletti, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovani, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paraboschi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcangeli, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Cetacean sensitivity and threats analysis to assess effectiveness of protection measures: an example of integrated approach for cetacean conservation in the Bonifacio Bouches</title><title>Biodiversity and conservation</title><addtitle>Biodivers Conserv</addtitle><description>The conservation of the highly mobile marine mammals species is challenging. One of the primary tools for conservation of marine species and the maintenance of ecosystem processes is the establishment of marine protected areas which is based on the identification of areas of high ecological value, or the identification of effective mitigation measures for the main threats. Bonifacio Bouches is mainly a coastal area which encompasses several Natura 2000 sites and is included in the Pelagos Sanctuary for the protection of marine mammals. Numerous regulations are applied here targeting shipping and related activities for environmental protection and navigation safety. Integrated data on cetacean species, maritime traffic and marine litter were collected from systematic surveys performed on board ferries crossing the Bonifacio Strait (2013–2019). Data were seasonally investigated considering spring/summer and autumn/winter as potentially different for ecological and anthropogenic conditions. Seasonal models of preferred habitat for fin whale, striped dolphin and bottlenose dolphin were compared with the existing protected areas, evidencing gaps of spatial protection measures for the species. A species sensitivity score was integrated with threats analyses highlighting the priority areas/seasons requiring enhanced conservation efforts. Despite the existing regulations, results showed that the intense anthropogenic pressure represents a risk for the ecological richness in many areas lacking of protection. Outcomes provide us indication on candidate areas where an extension of spatial protection measures could favour the priority bottlenose dolphin species, and the areas/seasons that need improved mitigation of the main threats. The application of similar approach in wider areas can be useful to verify protection measures for highly mobile species.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic mammals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cetacea</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Coastal and marine biodiversity</subject><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Delphinidae</subject><subject>Dolphins</subject><subject>Dolphins & porpoises</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Ferries</subject><subject>Fins</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Integrated approach</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine debris</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Marine pollution</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Navigation safety</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Passenger ships</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Sanctuaries</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Shipping</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Threat evaluation</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0960-3115</issn><issn>1572-9710</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2PEzEMhkcIJMrCH-AUifMs-ZjMdLgtFV_SSlzgHLkZp82qTUqc7tI_xW_EswPihqwoTvQ-tpO3aV4rea2kHN6SktaoVup5ma5vH540K2UH3Y6Dkk-blRx72Rql7PPmBdGdZMj2atX82mAFj5AEYaJY432sFwFpEnVfECpxDocLRRI1CyBCIoEhoGcppvmUgziVXOebnMQRgc4F6R2DAn_C8XTAWRJTxV2BipOAE-vB70XIRfi__X1OhOUeHqvExP1RvM8pBvAxc3b2e6SXzbMAB8JXf_ar5vvHD982n9vbr5--bG5uW2_surZ6mIwPaEEpgO1aWrDeyrBdd9iPMHHqQ9BrHVS3HTuAzvbeIKrtpPRkDJqr5s1Slyf9cUaq7i6fC_8EOd1b05uRg1XXi2oHB3QxhVwLeI4Jj5HfgyHy_c0gTadVbwYG9AL4kokKBncq8Qjl4pR0s5FuMdKxke7RSPfAkFkgYnHaYfk3y3-o3wEfppY</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Campana, I.</creator><creator>Angeletti, D.</creator><creator>Giovani, G.</creator><creator>Paraboschi, M.</creator><creator>Arcangeli, A.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-9987</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-0927</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4053-5259</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Cetacean sensitivity and threats analysis to assess effectiveness of protection measures: an example of integrated approach for cetacean conservation in the Bonifacio Bouches</title><author>Campana, I. ; Angeletti, D. ; Giovani, G. ; Paraboschi, M. ; Arcangeli, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-27d3cfe5a11aab805a5c50fb84e69ad50fcff282f14b94aa456c3ee1bd12d33e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic mammals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cetacea</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Coastal and marine biodiversity</topic><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Delphinidae</topic><topic>Dolphins</topic><topic>Dolphins & porpoises</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Ferries</topic><topic>Fins</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Integrated approach</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine debris</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Marine pollution</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Navigation safety</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Passenger ships</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Sanctuaries</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Shipping</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Threat evaluation</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campana, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angeletti, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovani, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paraboschi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcangeli, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campana, I.</au><au>Angeletti, D.</au><au>Giovani, G.</au><au>Paraboschi, M.</au><au>Arcangeli, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cetacean sensitivity and threats analysis to assess effectiveness of protection measures: an example of integrated approach for cetacean conservation in the Bonifacio Bouches</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle><stitle>Biodivers Conserv</stitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>517</spage><epage>541</epage><pages>517-541</pages><issn>0960-3115</issn><eissn>1572-9710</eissn><abstract>The conservation of the highly mobile marine mammals species is challenging. One of the primary tools for conservation of marine species and the maintenance of ecosystem processes is the establishment of marine protected areas which is based on the identification of areas of high ecological value, or the identification of effective mitigation measures for the main threats. Bonifacio Bouches is mainly a coastal area which encompasses several Natura 2000 sites and is included in the Pelagos Sanctuary for the protection of marine mammals. Numerous regulations are applied here targeting shipping and related activities for environmental protection and navigation safety. Integrated data on cetacean species, maritime traffic and marine litter were collected from systematic surveys performed on board ferries crossing the Bonifacio Strait (2013–2019). Data were seasonally investigated considering spring/summer and autumn/winter as potentially different for ecological and anthropogenic conditions. Seasonal models of preferred habitat for fin whale, striped dolphin and bottlenose dolphin were compared with the existing protected areas, evidencing gaps of spatial protection measures for the species. A species sensitivity score was integrated with threats analyses highlighting the priority areas/seasons requiring enhanced conservation efforts. Despite the existing regulations, results showed that the intense anthropogenic pressure represents a risk for the ecological richness in many areas lacking of protection. Outcomes provide us indication on candidate areas where an extension of spatial protection measures could favour the priority bottlenose dolphin species, and the areas/seasons that need improved mitigation of the main threats. The application of similar approach in wider areas can be useful to verify protection measures for highly mobile species.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10531-021-02346-w</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-9987</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-0927</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4053-5259</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0960-3115 |
| ispartof | Biodiversity and conservation, 2022-02, Vol.31 (2), p.517-541 |
| issn | 0960-3115 1572-9710 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2653639393 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Analysis Animal behavior Anthropogenic factors Aquatic mammals Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Cetacea Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Coastal and marine biodiversity Coastal zone Conservation Conservation Biology/Ecology Delphinidae Dolphins Dolphins & porpoises Ecological effects Ecology Ecosystems Environmental protection Ferries Fins Identification Integrated approach Laws, regulations and rules Life Sciences Marine debris Marine ecosystems Marine mammals Marine pollution Marine protected areas Mitigation Nature conservation Navigation Navigation safety Original Paper Passenger ships Protected areas Protection Protection and preservation Regulations Sanctuaries Seasons Sensitivity analysis Shipping Species Surveys Threat evaluation Wildlife conservation |
| title | Cetacean sensitivity and threats analysis to assess effectiveness of protection measures: an example of integrated approach for cetacean conservation in the Bonifacio Bouches |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A23%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cetacean%20sensitivity%20and%20threats%20analysis%20to%20assess%20effectiveness%20of%20protection%20measures:%20an%20example%20of%20integrated%20approach%20for%20cetacean%20conservation%20in%20the%20Bonifacio%20Bouches&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Campana,%20I.&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=517&rft.epage=541&rft.pages=517-541&rft.issn=0960-3115&rft.eissn=1572-9710&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10531-021-02346-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA703421637%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2653639393&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A703421637&rfr_iscdi=true |