Prediction of Metastatic Relapse in Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Classifiers
The volume and amount of data in cancerology is continuously increasing, yet the vast majority of this data is not being used to uncover useful and hidden insights. As a result, one of the key goals of physicians for therapeutic decision-making during multidisciplinary consultation meetings is to co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of advanced computer science & applications 2022, Vol.13 (2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | International journal of advanced computer science & applications |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Merouane, Ertel Said, Amali Nour-eddine, El Faddouli |
description | The volume and amount of data in cancerology is continuously increasing, yet the vast majority of this data is not being used to uncover useful and hidden insights. As a result, one of the key goals of physicians for therapeutic decision-making during multidisciplinary consultation meetings is to combine prediction tools based on data and best practices (MCM). The current study looked into using CRISP-DM machine learning algorithms to predict metastatic recurrence in patients with early-stage (non-metastatic) breast cancer so that treatment-appropriate medicine may be given to lower the likelihood of metastatic relapse. From 2014 to 2021, data from patients with localized breast cancer were collected at the Regional Oncology Center in Meknes, Morocco. There were 449 records in the dataset, 13 predictor variables and one outcome variable. To create predictive models, we used machine learning techniques such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Nave Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Logistic Regression (LR). The main objective of this article is to compare the performance of these four algorithms on our data in terms of sensitivity, specificity and precision. According to our results, the accuracies of SVM, kNN, LR and NB are 0.906, 0.861, 0.806 and 0.517 respectively. With the fewest errors and maximum accuracy, the SVM classification model predicts metastatic breast cancer relapse. The unbiased prediction accuracy of each model is assessed using a 10-fold cross-validation method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130222 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2652931241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2652931241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c8915e9caaabe729e0f475b1931799b54068ba1fad7b444d06cde1d579168ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGr_gYuA66l5Z7Ksg49Ki6JduAuZzB1NqZmaTBf--04fd3Muh8M58CF0S8mUCqnM_fx1Vn3OpowwNiWUD8Iu0IhRqQopNbk8_mVBif66RpOc12Q4bpgq-Qit3hM0wfehi7hr8RJ6l3vXB48_YOO2GXCI-CHB4OLKRQ8J73KI33jp_E-IgBfgUjwY1cblHNoAKd-gq9ZtMkzOOkarp8dV9VIs3p7n1WxReM5kX_jSUAnGO-dq0MwAaYWWNTWcamNqKYgqa0db1-haCNEQ5RugjdSGqtIDH6O7U-02dX87yL1dd7sUh0XLlGRDDRN0SIlTyqcu5wSt3abw69K_pcQeCdoTQXsgaM8E-R6U8GPp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2652931241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of Metastatic Relapse in Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Classifiers</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Merouane, Ertel ; Said, Amali ; Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</creator><creatorcontrib>Merouane, Ertel ; Said, Amali ; Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</creatorcontrib><description>The volume and amount of data in cancerology is continuously increasing, yet the vast majority of this data is not being used to uncover useful and hidden insights. As a result, one of the key goals of physicians for therapeutic decision-making during multidisciplinary consultation meetings is to combine prediction tools based on data and best practices (MCM). The current study looked into using CRISP-DM machine learning algorithms to predict metastatic recurrence in patients with early-stage (non-metastatic) breast cancer so that treatment-appropriate medicine may be given to lower the likelihood of metastatic relapse. From 2014 to 2021, data from patients with localized breast cancer were collected at the Regional Oncology Center in Meknes, Morocco. There were 449 records in the dataset, 13 predictor variables and one outcome variable. To create predictive models, we used machine learning techniques such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Nave Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Logistic Regression (LR). The main objective of this article is to compare the performance of these four algorithms on our data in terms of sensitivity, specificity and precision. According to our results, the accuracies of SVM, kNN, LR and NB are 0.906, 0.861, 0.806 and 0.517 respectively. With the fewest errors and maximum accuracy, the SVM classification model predicts metastatic breast cancer relapse. The unbiased prediction accuracy of each model is assessed using a 10-fold cross-validation method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2158-107X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-5570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>West Yorkshire: Science and Information (SAI) Organization Limited</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Best practice ; Breast cancer ; Decision making ; Machine learning ; Metastasis ; Model accuracy ; Prediction models ; Support vector machines</subject><ispartof>International journal of advanced computer science & applications, 2022, Vol.13 (2)</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c8915e9caaabe729e0f475b1931799b54068ba1fad7b444d06cde1d579168ce3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merouane, Ertel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Said, Amali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of Metastatic Relapse in Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Classifiers</title><title>International journal of advanced computer science & applications</title><description>The volume and amount of data in cancerology is continuously increasing, yet the vast majority of this data is not being used to uncover useful and hidden insights. As a result, one of the key goals of physicians for therapeutic decision-making during multidisciplinary consultation meetings is to combine prediction tools based on data and best practices (MCM). The current study looked into using CRISP-DM machine learning algorithms to predict metastatic recurrence in patients with early-stage (non-metastatic) breast cancer so that treatment-appropriate medicine may be given to lower the likelihood of metastatic relapse. From 2014 to 2021, data from patients with localized breast cancer were collected at the Regional Oncology Center in Meknes, Morocco. There were 449 records in the dataset, 13 predictor variables and one outcome variable. To create predictive models, we used machine learning techniques such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Nave Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Logistic Regression (LR). The main objective of this article is to compare the performance of these four algorithms on our data in terms of sensitivity, specificity and precision. According to our results, the accuracies of SVM, kNN, LR and NB are 0.906, 0.861, 0.806 and 0.517 respectively. With the fewest errors and maximum accuracy, the SVM classification model predicts metastatic breast cancer relapse. The unbiased prediction accuracy of each model is assessed using a 10-fold cross-validation method.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><issn>2158-107X</issn><issn>2156-5570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGr_gYuA66l5Z7Ksg49Ki6JduAuZzB1NqZmaTBf--04fd3Muh8M58CF0S8mUCqnM_fx1Vn3OpowwNiWUD8Iu0IhRqQopNbk8_mVBif66RpOc12Q4bpgq-Qit3hM0wfehi7hr8RJ6l3vXB48_YOO2GXCI-CHB4OLKRQ8J73KI33jp_E-IgBfgUjwY1cblHNoAKd-gq9ZtMkzOOkarp8dV9VIs3p7n1WxReM5kX_jSUAnGO-dq0MwAaYWWNTWcamNqKYgqa0db1-haCNEQ5RugjdSGqtIDH6O7U-02dX87yL1dd7sUh0XLlGRDDRN0SIlTyqcu5wSt3abw69K_pcQeCdoTQXsgaM8E-R6U8GPp</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Merouane, Ertel</creator><creator>Said, Amali</creator><creator>Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</creator><general>Science and Information (SAI) Organization Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Prediction of Metastatic Relapse in Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Classifiers</title><author>Merouane, Ertel ; Said, Amali ; Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c8915e9caaabe729e0f475b1931799b54068ba1fad7b444d06cde1d579168ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merouane, Ertel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Said, Amali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of advanced computer science & applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merouane, Ertel</au><au>Said, Amali</au><au>Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of Metastatic Relapse in Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Classifiers</atitle><jtitle>International journal of advanced computer science & applications</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>2158-107X</issn><eissn>2156-5570</eissn><abstract>The volume and amount of data in cancerology is continuously increasing, yet the vast majority of this data is not being used to uncover useful and hidden insights. As a result, one of the key goals of physicians for therapeutic decision-making during multidisciplinary consultation meetings is to combine prediction tools based on data and best practices (MCM). The current study looked into using CRISP-DM machine learning algorithms to predict metastatic recurrence in patients with early-stage (non-metastatic) breast cancer so that treatment-appropriate medicine may be given to lower the likelihood of metastatic relapse. From 2014 to 2021, data from patients with localized breast cancer were collected at the Regional Oncology Center in Meknes, Morocco. There were 449 records in the dataset, 13 predictor variables and one outcome variable. To create predictive models, we used machine learning techniques such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Nave Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Logistic Regression (LR). The main objective of this article is to compare the performance of these four algorithms on our data in terms of sensitivity, specificity and precision. According to our results, the accuracies of SVM, kNN, LR and NB are 0.906, 0.861, 0.806 and 0.517 respectively. With the fewest errors and maximum accuracy, the SVM classification model predicts metastatic breast cancer relapse. The unbiased prediction accuracy of each model is assessed using a 10-fold cross-validation method.</abstract><cop>West Yorkshire</cop><pub>Science and Information (SAI) Organization Limited</pub><doi>10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130222</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2158-107X |
ispartof | International journal of advanced computer science & applications, 2022, Vol.13 (2) |
issn | 2158-107X 2156-5570 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2652931241 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Algorithms Best practice Breast cancer Decision making Machine learning Metastasis Model accuracy Prediction models Support vector machines |
title | Prediction of Metastatic Relapse in Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Classifiers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A03%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20Metastatic%20Relapse%20in%20Breast%20Cancer%20using%20Machine%20Learning%20Classifiers&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20advanced%20computer%20science%20&%20applications&rft.au=Merouane,%20Ertel&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=2158-107X&rft.eissn=2156-5570&rft_id=info:doi/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2652931241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2652931241&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |