Prediction of Metastatic Relapse in Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Classifiers

The volume and amount of data in cancerology is continuously increasing, yet the vast majority of this data is not being used to uncover useful and hidden insights. As a result, one of the key goals of physicians for therapeutic decision-making during multidisciplinary consultation meetings is to co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of advanced computer science & applications 2022, Vol.13 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Merouane, Ertel, Said, Amali, Nour-eddine, El Faddouli
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title International journal of advanced computer science & applications
container_volume 13
creator Merouane, Ertel
Said, Amali
Nour-eddine, El Faddouli
description The volume and amount of data in cancerology is continuously increasing, yet the vast majority of this data is not being used to uncover useful and hidden insights. As a result, one of the key goals of physicians for therapeutic decision-making during multidisciplinary consultation meetings is to combine prediction tools based on data and best practices (MCM). The current study looked into using CRISP-DM machine learning algorithms to predict metastatic recurrence in patients with early-stage (non-metastatic) breast cancer so that treatment-appropriate medicine may be given to lower the likelihood of metastatic relapse. From 2014 to 2021, data from patients with localized breast cancer were collected at the Regional Oncology Center in Meknes, Morocco. There were 449 records in the dataset, 13 predictor variables and one outcome variable. To create predictive models, we used machine learning techniques such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Nave Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Logistic Regression (LR). The main objective of this article is to compare the performance of these four algorithms on our data in terms of sensitivity, specificity and precision. According to our results, the accuracies of SVM, kNN, LR and NB are 0.906, 0.861, 0.806 and 0.517 respectively. With the fewest errors and maximum accuracy, the SVM classification model predicts metastatic breast cancer relapse. The unbiased prediction accuracy of each model is assessed using a 10-fold cross-validation method.
doi_str_mv 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130222
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2652931241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2652931241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c8915e9caaabe729e0f475b1931799b54068ba1fad7b444d06cde1d579168ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGr_gYuA66l5Z7Ksg49Ki6JduAuZzB1NqZmaTBf--04fd3Muh8M58CF0S8mUCqnM_fx1Vn3OpowwNiWUD8Iu0IhRqQopNbk8_mVBif66RpOc12Q4bpgq-Qit3hM0wfehi7hr8RJ6l3vXB48_YOO2GXCI-CHB4OLKRQ8J73KI33jp_E-IgBfgUjwY1cblHNoAKd-gq9ZtMkzOOkarp8dV9VIs3p7n1WxReM5kX_jSUAnGO-dq0MwAaYWWNTWcamNqKYgqa0db1-haCNEQ5RugjdSGqtIDH6O7U-02dX87yL1dd7sUh0XLlGRDDRN0SIlTyqcu5wSt3abw69K_pcQeCdoTQXsgaM8E-R6U8GPp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2652931241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of Metastatic Relapse in Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Classifiers</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Merouane, Ertel ; Said, Amali ; Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</creator><creatorcontrib>Merouane, Ertel ; Said, Amali ; Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</creatorcontrib><description>The volume and amount of data in cancerology is continuously increasing, yet the vast majority of this data is not being used to uncover useful and hidden insights. As a result, one of the key goals of physicians for therapeutic decision-making during multidisciplinary consultation meetings is to combine prediction tools based on data and best practices (MCM). The current study looked into using CRISP-DM machine learning algorithms to predict metastatic recurrence in patients with early-stage (non-metastatic) breast cancer so that treatment-appropriate medicine may be given to lower the likelihood of metastatic relapse. From 2014 to 2021, data from patients with localized breast cancer were collected at the Regional Oncology Center in Meknes, Morocco. There were 449 records in the dataset, 13 predictor variables and one outcome variable. To create predictive models, we used machine learning techniques such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Nave Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Logistic Regression (LR). The main objective of this article is to compare the performance of these four algorithms on our data in terms of sensitivity, specificity and precision. According to our results, the accuracies of SVM, kNN, LR and NB are 0.906, 0.861, 0.806 and 0.517 respectively. With the fewest errors and maximum accuracy, the SVM classification model predicts metastatic breast cancer relapse. The unbiased prediction accuracy of each model is assessed using a 10-fold cross-validation method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2158-107X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-5570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>West Yorkshire: Science and Information (SAI) Organization Limited</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Best practice ; Breast cancer ; Decision making ; Machine learning ; Metastasis ; Model accuracy ; Prediction models ; Support vector machines</subject><ispartof>International journal of advanced computer science &amp; applications, 2022, Vol.13 (2)</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c8915e9caaabe729e0f475b1931799b54068ba1fad7b444d06cde1d579168ce3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merouane, Ertel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Said, Amali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of Metastatic Relapse in Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Classifiers</title><title>International journal of advanced computer science &amp; applications</title><description>The volume and amount of data in cancerology is continuously increasing, yet the vast majority of this data is not being used to uncover useful and hidden insights. As a result, one of the key goals of physicians for therapeutic decision-making during multidisciplinary consultation meetings is to combine prediction tools based on data and best practices (MCM). The current study looked into using CRISP-DM machine learning algorithms to predict metastatic recurrence in patients with early-stage (non-metastatic) breast cancer so that treatment-appropriate medicine may be given to lower the likelihood of metastatic relapse. From 2014 to 2021, data from patients with localized breast cancer were collected at the Regional Oncology Center in Meknes, Morocco. There were 449 records in the dataset, 13 predictor variables and one outcome variable. To create predictive models, we used machine learning techniques such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Nave Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Logistic Regression (LR). The main objective of this article is to compare the performance of these four algorithms on our data in terms of sensitivity, specificity and precision. According to our results, the accuracies of SVM, kNN, LR and NB are 0.906, 0.861, 0.806 and 0.517 respectively. With the fewest errors and maximum accuracy, the SVM classification model predicts metastatic breast cancer relapse. The unbiased prediction accuracy of each model is assessed using a 10-fold cross-validation method.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><issn>2158-107X</issn><issn>2156-5570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGr_gYuA66l5Z7Ksg49Ki6JduAuZzB1NqZmaTBf--04fd3Muh8M58CF0S8mUCqnM_fx1Vn3OpowwNiWUD8Iu0IhRqQopNbk8_mVBif66RpOc12Q4bpgq-Qit3hM0wfehi7hr8RJ6l3vXB48_YOO2GXCI-CHB4OLKRQ8J73KI33jp_E-IgBfgUjwY1cblHNoAKd-gq9ZtMkzOOkarp8dV9VIs3p7n1WxReM5kX_jSUAnGO-dq0MwAaYWWNTWcamNqKYgqa0db1-haCNEQ5RugjdSGqtIDH6O7U-02dX87yL1dd7sUh0XLlGRDDRN0SIlTyqcu5wSt3abw69K_pcQeCdoTQXsgaM8E-R6U8GPp</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Merouane, Ertel</creator><creator>Said, Amali</creator><creator>Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</creator><general>Science and Information (SAI) Organization Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Prediction of Metastatic Relapse in Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Classifiers</title><author>Merouane, Ertel ; Said, Amali ; Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-c8915e9caaabe729e0f475b1931799b54068ba1fad7b444d06cde1d579168ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merouane, Ertel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Said, Amali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of advanced computer science &amp; applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merouane, Ertel</au><au>Said, Amali</au><au>Nour-eddine, El Faddouli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of Metastatic Relapse in Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Classifiers</atitle><jtitle>International journal of advanced computer science &amp; applications</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>2158-107X</issn><eissn>2156-5570</eissn><abstract>The volume and amount of data in cancerology is continuously increasing, yet the vast majority of this data is not being used to uncover useful and hidden insights. As a result, one of the key goals of physicians for therapeutic decision-making during multidisciplinary consultation meetings is to combine prediction tools based on data and best practices (MCM). The current study looked into using CRISP-DM machine learning algorithms to predict metastatic recurrence in patients with early-stage (non-metastatic) breast cancer so that treatment-appropriate medicine may be given to lower the likelihood of metastatic relapse. From 2014 to 2021, data from patients with localized breast cancer were collected at the Regional Oncology Center in Meknes, Morocco. There were 449 records in the dataset, 13 predictor variables and one outcome variable. To create predictive models, we used machine learning techniques such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Nave Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Logistic Regression (LR). The main objective of this article is to compare the performance of these four algorithms on our data in terms of sensitivity, specificity and precision. According to our results, the accuracies of SVM, kNN, LR and NB are 0.906, 0.861, 0.806 and 0.517 respectively. With the fewest errors and maximum accuracy, the SVM classification model predicts metastatic breast cancer relapse. The unbiased prediction accuracy of each model is assessed using a 10-fold cross-validation method.</abstract><cop>West Yorkshire</cop><pub>Science and Information (SAI) Organization Limited</pub><doi>10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130222</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2158-107X
ispartof International journal of advanced computer science & applications, 2022, Vol.13 (2)
issn 2158-107X
2156-5570
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2652931241
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Algorithms
Best practice
Breast cancer
Decision making
Machine learning
Metastasis
Model accuracy
Prediction models
Support vector machines
title Prediction of Metastatic Relapse in Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Classifiers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A03%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20Metastatic%20Relapse%20in%20Breast%20Cancer%20using%20Machine%20Learning%20Classifiers&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20advanced%20computer%20science%20&%20applications&rft.au=Merouane,%20Ertel&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=2158-107X&rft.eissn=2156-5570&rft_id=info:doi/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2652931241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2652931241&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true