Assessing the impact of de‐escalation training on police behavior: Reducing police use of force in the Louisville, KY Metro Police Department

Research summary Changing police use of force policies and training to incorporate de‐escalation tactics is one of the most routinely recommended police reform measures. Despite widespread promotion and proliferation of de‐escalation trainings, to date, no research has empirically demonstrated that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Criminology & public policy 2022-05, Vol.21 (2), p.199-233
Hauptverfasser: Engel, Robin S., Corsaro, Nicholas, Isaza, Gabrielle T., McManus, Hannah D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 233
container_issue 2
container_start_page 199
container_title Criminology & public policy
container_volume 21
creator Engel, Robin S.
Corsaro, Nicholas
Isaza, Gabrielle T.
McManus, Hannah D.
description Research summary Changing police use of force policies and training to incorporate de‐escalation tactics is one of the most routinely recommended police reform measures. Despite widespread promotion and proliferation of de‐escalation trainings, to date, no research has empirically demonstrated that these trainings reduce use of force in the field (Engel, R. S., McManus, H. D., & Herold, T. D., 2020). Therefore, it is unknown if de‐escalation trainings actually reduce force, have no impact, or have unintended consequences that possibly increase injuries to officers or citizens. We collaborated with the Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD) in 2019 to evaluate the impact of the Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics (ICAT) de‐escalation training developed by the Police Executive Research Forum. Using a stepped‐wedge randomized controlled trial research design, the panel regression results demonstrated statistically significant reductions in use of force incidents (−28.1%), citizen injuries (−26.3%), and officer injuries (−36.0%) in the post‐training period. These significant reductions were larger than any changes in LMPD arrest patterns during the same period. Other possible time‐based confounders were also considered; the combined analyses show robust, consistent, and immediate impacts on use of force counts after training. Policy implications Our findings suggest that agencies should continue to implement and evaluate de‐escalation trainings and adopt other resiliency‐based approaches to police training. To facilitate long‐term changes in police behavior, a holistic approach is recommended that supports training tenets with complementary policies, supervisory oversight, managerial support, and community involvement in reform efforts. Finally, researchers must continue to support police executives willing to open their agencies for evaluation and oversight. Due to the LMPD's partnership with researchers, evidence now exists that de‐escalation training can make police encounters with the public safer for all. Continuing to implement and evaluate innovative police trainings is our best opportunity for meaningful changes in policing.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1745-9133.12574
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2652742268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2652742268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-49df239797e48cbec9454c6b5812af3d95540a2fc8f497c562399550c0a8dd023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZmuJLWljx86DXVWeoogKwYKV5ToTMErjYCdF3fEH8I18CU5TsWU2M54591q6CB2TcER8jUnCeJCRKBoRyhO2gwZ_m10_8ygNYpZE--jAubcwJJwTPkBfE-fAOV294OYVsF7WUjXYFDiHn89vcEqWstGmwo2VuuowP9em1ArwAl7lSht7hh8gb1V33F5aB51HYax_6GpjPTOtditdlnCKb5_xHTTW4HnPn0MtbbOEqjlEe4UsHRxt-xA9XV48Tq-D2f3VzXQyC1REYhawLC9olCVZAixVC1AZ40zFC54SKosozzhnoaSFSguWJYrHHva7UIUyzfOQRkN00vvW1ry34BrxZlpb-S8FjTlNGKVx6qlxTylrnLNQiNrqpbRrQULRpS66jEWXsdik7hVxr_jQJaz_w8V0Mp_3wl-Q5YXV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2652742268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the impact of de‐escalation training on police behavior: Reducing police use of force in the Louisville, KY Metro Police Department</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Engel, Robin S. ; Corsaro, Nicholas ; Isaza, Gabrielle T. ; McManus, Hannah D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Engel, Robin S. ; Corsaro, Nicholas ; Isaza, Gabrielle T. ; McManus, Hannah D.</creatorcontrib><description>Research summary Changing police use of force policies and training to incorporate de‐escalation tactics is one of the most routinely recommended police reform measures. Despite widespread promotion and proliferation of de‐escalation trainings, to date, no research has empirically demonstrated that these trainings reduce use of force in the field (Engel, R. S., McManus, H. D., &amp; Herold, T. D., 2020). Therefore, it is unknown if de‐escalation trainings actually reduce force, have no impact, or have unintended consequences that possibly increase injuries to officers or citizens. We collaborated with the Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD) in 2019 to evaluate the impact of the Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics (ICAT) de‐escalation training developed by the Police Executive Research Forum. Using a stepped‐wedge randomized controlled trial research design, the panel regression results demonstrated statistically significant reductions in use of force incidents (−28.1%), citizen injuries (−26.3%), and officer injuries (−36.0%) in the post‐training period. These significant reductions were larger than any changes in LMPD arrest patterns during the same period. Other possible time‐based confounders were also considered; the combined analyses show robust, consistent, and immediate impacts on use of force counts after training. Policy implications Our findings suggest that agencies should continue to implement and evaluate de‐escalation trainings and adopt other resiliency‐based approaches to police training. To facilitate long‐term changes in police behavior, a holistic approach is recommended that supports training tenets with complementary policies, supervisory oversight, managerial support, and community involvement in reform efforts. Finally, researchers must continue to support police executives willing to open their agencies for evaluation and oversight. Due to the LMPD's partnership with researchers, evidence now exists that de‐escalation training can make police encounters with the public safer for all. Continuing to implement and evaluate innovative police trainings is our best opportunity for meaningful changes in policing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-6473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-9133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1745-9133.12574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: American Society of Criminology</publisher><subject>Behavior modification ; Citizen participation ; Citizens ; Community involvement ; de‐escalation ; Escalation ; Executives ; Injuries ; Police departments ; Police reform ; Police training ; police use of force ; policing ; Policy analysis ; Research design ; Resilience ; Training</subject><ispartof>Criminology &amp; public policy, 2022-05, Vol.21 (2), p.199-233</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society of Criminology</rights><rights>2022 of The American Society of Criminology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-49df239797e48cbec9454c6b5812af3d95540a2fc8f497c562399550c0a8dd023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-49df239797e48cbec9454c6b5812af3d95540a2fc8f497c562399550c0a8dd023</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6810-2685</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1745-9133.12574$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1745-9133.12574$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27866,27924,27925,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Engel, Robin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corsaro, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaza, Gabrielle T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McManus, Hannah D.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the impact of de‐escalation training on police behavior: Reducing police use of force in the Louisville, KY Metro Police Department</title><title>Criminology &amp; public policy</title><description>Research summary Changing police use of force policies and training to incorporate de‐escalation tactics is one of the most routinely recommended police reform measures. Despite widespread promotion and proliferation of de‐escalation trainings, to date, no research has empirically demonstrated that these trainings reduce use of force in the field (Engel, R. S., McManus, H. D., &amp; Herold, T. D., 2020). Therefore, it is unknown if de‐escalation trainings actually reduce force, have no impact, or have unintended consequences that possibly increase injuries to officers or citizens. We collaborated with the Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD) in 2019 to evaluate the impact of the Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics (ICAT) de‐escalation training developed by the Police Executive Research Forum. Using a stepped‐wedge randomized controlled trial research design, the panel regression results demonstrated statistically significant reductions in use of force incidents (−28.1%), citizen injuries (−26.3%), and officer injuries (−36.0%) in the post‐training period. These significant reductions were larger than any changes in LMPD arrest patterns during the same period. Other possible time‐based confounders were also considered; the combined analyses show robust, consistent, and immediate impacts on use of force counts after training. Policy implications Our findings suggest that agencies should continue to implement and evaluate de‐escalation trainings and adopt other resiliency‐based approaches to police training. To facilitate long‐term changes in police behavior, a holistic approach is recommended that supports training tenets with complementary policies, supervisory oversight, managerial support, and community involvement in reform efforts. Finally, researchers must continue to support police executives willing to open their agencies for evaluation and oversight. Due to the LMPD's partnership with researchers, evidence now exists that de‐escalation training can make police encounters with the public safer for all. Continuing to implement and evaluate innovative police trainings is our best opportunity for meaningful changes in policing.</description><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>de‐escalation</subject><subject>Escalation</subject><subject>Executives</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Police departments</subject><subject>Police reform</subject><subject>Police training</subject><subject>police use of force</subject><subject>policing</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1538-6473</issn><issn>1745-9133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZmuJLWljx86DXVWeoogKwYKV5ToTMErjYCdF3fEH8I18CU5TsWU2M54591q6CB2TcER8jUnCeJCRKBoRyhO2gwZ_m10_8ygNYpZE--jAubcwJJwTPkBfE-fAOV294OYVsF7WUjXYFDiHn89vcEqWstGmwo2VuuowP9em1ArwAl7lSht7hh8gb1V33F5aB51HYax_6GpjPTOtditdlnCKb5_xHTTW4HnPn0MtbbOEqjlEe4UsHRxt-xA9XV48Tq-D2f3VzXQyC1REYhawLC9olCVZAixVC1AZ40zFC54SKosozzhnoaSFSguWJYrHHva7UIUyzfOQRkN00vvW1ry34BrxZlpb-S8FjTlNGKVx6qlxTylrnLNQiNrqpbRrQULRpS66jEWXsdik7hVxr_jQJaz_w8V0Mp_3wl-Q5YXV</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Engel, Robin S.</creator><creator>Corsaro, Nicholas</creator><creator>Isaza, Gabrielle T.</creator><creator>McManus, Hannah D.</creator><general>American Society of Criminology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-2685</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Assessing the impact of de‐escalation training on police behavior: Reducing police use of force in the Louisville, KY Metro Police Department</title><author>Engel, Robin S. ; Corsaro, Nicholas ; Isaza, Gabrielle T. ; McManus, Hannah D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-49df239797e48cbec9454c6b5812af3d95540a2fc8f497c562399550c0a8dd023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>de‐escalation</topic><topic>Escalation</topic><topic>Executives</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Police departments</topic><topic>Police reform</topic><topic>Police training</topic><topic>police use of force</topic><topic>policing</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Engel, Robin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corsaro, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaza, Gabrielle T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McManus, Hannah D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Criminology &amp; public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Engel, Robin S.</au><au>Corsaro, Nicholas</au><au>Isaza, Gabrielle T.</au><au>McManus, Hannah D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the impact of de‐escalation training on police behavior: Reducing police use of force in the Louisville, KY Metro Police Department</atitle><jtitle>Criminology &amp; public policy</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>199-233</pages><issn>1538-6473</issn><eissn>1745-9133</eissn><abstract>Research summary Changing police use of force policies and training to incorporate de‐escalation tactics is one of the most routinely recommended police reform measures. Despite widespread promotion and proliferation of de‐escalation trainings, to date, no research has empirically demonstrated that these trainings reduce use of force in the field (Engel, R. S., McManus, H. D., &amp; Herold, T. D., 2020). Therefore, it is unknown if de‐escalation trainings actually reduce force, have no impact, or have unintended consequences that possibly increase injuries to officers or citizens. We collaborated with the Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD) in 2019 to evaluate the impact of the Integrating Communications, Assessment, and Tactics (ICAT) de‐escalation training developed by the Police Executive Research Forum. Using a stepped‐wedge randomized controlled trial research design, the panel regression results demonstrated statistically significant reductions in use of force incidents (−28.1%), citizen injuries (−26.3%), and officer injuries (−36.0%) in the post‐training period. These significant reductions were larger than any changes in LMPD arrest patterns during the same period. Other possible time‐based confounders were also considered; the combined analyses show robust, consistent, and immediate impacts on use of force counts after training. Policy implications Our findings suggest that agencies should continue to implement and evaluate de‐escalation trainings and adopt other resiliency‐based approaches to police training. To facilitate long‐term changes in police behavior, a holistic approach is recommended that supports training tenets with complementary policies, supervisory oversight, managerial support, and community involvement in reform efforts. Finally, researchers must continue to support police executives willing to open their agencies for evaluation and oversight. Due to the LMPD's partnership with researchers, evidence now exists that de‐escalation training can make police encounters with the public safer for all. Continuing to implement and evaluate innovative police trainings is our best opportunity for meaningful changes in policing.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>American Society of Criminology</pub><doi>10.1111/1745-9133.12574</doi><tpages>35</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-2685</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1538-6473
ispartof Criminology & public policy, 2022-05, Vol.21 (2), p.199-233
issn 1538-6473
1745-9133
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2652742268
source PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Behavior modification
Citizen participation
Citizens
Community involvement
de‐escalation
Escalation
Executives
Injuries
Police departments
Police reform
Police training
police use of force
policing
Policy analysis
Research design
Resilience
Training
title Assessing the impact of de‐escalation training on police behavior: Reducing police use of force in the Louisville, KY Metro Police Department
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A05%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20impact%20of%20de%E2%80%90escalation%20training%20on%20police%20behavior:%20Reducing%20police%20use%20of%20force%20in%20the%20Louisville,%20KY%20Metro%20Police%20Department&rft.jtitle=Criminology%20&%20public%20policy&rft.au=Engel,%20Robin%20S.&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=199-233&rft.issn=1538-6473&rft.eissn=1745-9133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1745-9133.12574&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2652742268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2652742268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true