Experimental investigation on the cross-tensile properties of tubular rivet-reinforced joints
To decrease the exterior protrusion height and improve the tensile strength of the clinched joint, a rivet-reinforcing method was implemented on the clinched joint in this study. Solid rivets and tubular rivets with the wall thickness of 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm were employed to conduct the rivet-...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part E, Journal of process mechanical engineering Journal of process mechanical engineering, 2022-04, Vol.236 (2), p.480-490 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 490 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 480 |
| container_title | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part E, Journal of process mechanical engineering |
| container_volume | 236 |
| creator | Ren, Xiaoqiang Chen, Chao Peng, Hao Ran, Xiangkun Qin, Denglin |
| description | To decrease the exterior protrusion height and improve the tensile strength of the clinched joint, a rivet-reinforcing method was implemented on the clinched joint in this study. Solid rivets and tubular rivets with the wall thickness of 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm were employed to conduct the rivet-reinforcing experiments on the clinched joints. Mechanical interlock structure measurements and mechanical properties tests were performed on the above-mentioned reinforced joints. The results show that the rivet-reinforcing technology can significantly increase the tensile strength and improve the mechanical behavior of the clinched joint. Compared with the NRJ joint (the reinforced joint with no rivet), the static tensile strength of TRJ-1.0 (the rivet-reinforced joint with the tubular rivet of 1 mm wall thickness), TRJ-1.5 (the rivet-reinforced joint with the tubular rivet of 1.5 mm wall thickness), TRJ-2.0 (the rivet-reinforced joint with the tubular rivet of 2 mm wall thickness), and SRJ joint (the rivet-reinforced joint with the solid rivet) is separately increased by 30.05%, 24.59%, 16.28%, and 7.19%. The TRJ-1.0 joint has the highest tensile strength (1489.57 N) among the five types of reinforced joints in the cross-lap-tensile test. The energy absorption capacity of the rivet-reinforced joints decreases as the wall thickness of the tubular rivet increases. Therefore, the TRJ-1.0 joint has the highest energy absorption that is 5.890 J, while the energy absorption of the SRJ joint is the lowest, which is 2.868 J. The TRJ-1.0 joint has the most excellent strength performance in the lightweight evaluation, which with a lightweight evaluation value of
S
1.0
=
2.326
kN
/
g
. However, the TRJ-1.5 joint has the most outstanding energy absorption performance in the aspect of lightweight evaluation, with a lightweight evaluation value of
E
1.5
=
5.231
J
/
g
. The experiment has proven that the clinched joints reinforced with 1 mm wall thickness tubular rivets have the best mechanical properties. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/09544089211043629 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2651652186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_09544089211043629</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2651652186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-69adffef935a6535002bd6a836c129e5fa0b94630272a7bf5848c0db12f0e7933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LxDAQDaLguvoDvAU8d50kTdocZVk_YMGLHqWk7WTNUts1SRf996au4EEcBuYw772Z9wi5ZLBgrCiuQcs8h1JzxiAXiusjMuOQs0wA6GMym_bZBDglZyFsIVUOxYy8rD526N0b9tF01PV7DNFtTHRDT1PHV6SNH0LIIvbBdUh3fkiE6DDQwdI41mNnPPVujzHz6Ho7-AZbuh1cH8M5ObGmC3jxM-fk-Xb1tLzP1o93D8ubddYIxmOmtGmtRauFNEoKCcDrVplSqIZxjdIaqHWuBPCCm6K2sszLBtqacQtYaCHm5Oqgm757H5OFajuMvk8nK64kU5KzUiUUO6C-HXm01S45N_6zYlBNKVZ_UkycxYETzAZ_Vf8nfAH9FnMD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2651652186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental investigation on the cross-tensile properties of tubular rivet-reinforced joints</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Ren, Xiaoqiang ; Chen, Chao ; Peng, Hao ; Ran, Xiangkun ; Qin, Denglin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xiaoqiang ; Chen, Chao ; Peng, Hao ; Ran, Xiangkun ; Qin, Denglin</creatorcontrib><description>To decrease the exterior protrusion height and improve the tensile strength of the clinched joint, a rivet-reinforcing method was implemented on the clinched joint in this study. Solid rivets and tubular rivets with the wall thickness of 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm were employed to conduct the rivet-reinforcing experiments on the clinched joints. Mechanical interlock structure measurements and mechanical properties tests were performed on the above-mentioned reinforced joints. The results show that the rivet-reinforcing technology can significantly increase the tensile strength and improve the mechanical behavior of the clinched joint. Compared with the NRJ joint (the reinforced joint with no rivet), the static tensile strength of TRJ-1.0 (the rivet-reinforced joint with the tubular rivet of 1 mm wall thickness), TRJ-1.5 (the rivet-reinforced joint with the tubular rivet of 1.5 mm wall thickness), TRJ-2.0 (the rivet-reinforced joint with the tubular rivet of 2 mm wall thickness), and SRJ joint (the rivet-reinforced joint with the solid rivet) is separately increased by 30.05%, 24.59%, 16.28%, and 7.19%. The TRJ-1.0 joint has the highest tensile strength (1489.57 N) among the five types of reinforced joints in the cross-lap-tensile test. The energy absorption capacity of the rivet-reinforced joints decreases as the wall thickness of the tubular rivet increases. Therefore, the TRJ-1.0 joint has the highest energy absorption that is 5.890 J, while the energy absorption of the SRJ joint is the lowest, which is 2.868 J. The TRJ-1.0 joint has the most excellent strength performance in the lightweight evaluation, which with a lightweight evaluation value of
S
1.0
=
2.326
kN
/
g
. However, the TRJ-1.5 joint has the most outstanding energy absorption performance in the aspect of lightweight evaluation, with a lightweight evaluation value of
E
1.5
=
5.231
J
/
g
. The experiment has proven that the clinched joints reinforced with 1 mm wall thickness tubular rivets have the best mechanical properties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-4089</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-3009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/09544089211043629</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Clinching ; Energy absorption ; Lightweight ; Mechanical properties ; Performance evaluation ; Riveted joints ; Rivets ; Tensile properties ; Tensile strength ; Tensile tests ; Thickness</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part E, Journal of process mechanical engineering, 2022-04, Vol.236 (2), p.480-490</ispartof><rights>IMechE 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-69adffef935a6535002bd6a836c129e5fa0b94630272a7bf5848c0db12f0e7933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-69adffef935a6535002bd6a836c129e5fa0b94630272a7bf5848c0db12f0e7933</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9408-1547 ; 0000-0001-6332-3665</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/09544089211043629$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09544089211043629$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xiaoqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ran, Xiangkun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Denglin</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental investigation on the cross-tensile properties of tubular rivet-reinforced joints</title><title>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part E, Journal of process mechanical engineering</title><addtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering</addtitle><description>To decrease the exterior protrusion height and improve the tensile strength of the clinched joint, a rivet-reinforcing method was implemented on the clinched joint in this study. Solid rivets and tubular rivets with the wall thickness of 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm were employed to conduct the rivet-reinforcing experiments on the clinched joints. Mechanical interlock structure measurements and mechanical properties tests were performed on the above-mentioned reinforced joints. The results show that the rivet-reinforcing technology can significantly increase the tensile strength and improve the mechanical behavior of the clinched joint. Compared with the NRJ joint (the reinforced joint with no rivet), the static tensile strength of TRJ-1.0 (the rivet-reinforced joint with the tubular rivet of 1 mm wall thickness), TRJ-1.5 (the rivet-reinforced joint with the tubular rivet of 1.5 mm wall thickness), TRJ-2.0 (the rivet-reinforced joint with the tubular rivet of 2 mm wall thickness), and SRJ joint (the rivet-reinforced joint with the solid rivet) is separately increased by 30.05%, 24.59%, 16.28%, and 7.19%. The TRJ-1.0 joint has the highest tensile strength (1489.57 N) among the five types of reinforced joints in the cross-lap-tensile test. The energy absorption capacity of the rivet-reinforced joints decreases as the wall thickness of the tubular rivet increases. Therefore, the TRJ-1.0 joint has the highest energy absorption that is 5.890 J, while the energy absorption of the SRJ joint is the lowest, which is 2.868 J. The TRJ-1.0 joint has the most excellent strength performance in the lightweight evaluation, which with a lightweight evaluation value of
S
1.0
=
2.326
kN
/
g
. However, the TRJ-1.5 joint has the most outstanding energy absorption performance in the aspect of lightweight evaluation, with a lightweight evaluation value of
E
1.5
=
5.231
J
/
g
. The experiment has proven that the clinched joints reinforced with 1 mm wall thickness tubular rivets have the best mechanical properties.</description><subject>Clinching</subject><subject>Energy absorption</subject><subject>Lightweight</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Riveted joints</subject><subject>Rivets</subject><subject>Tensile properties</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Tensile tests</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><issn>0954-4089</issn><issn>2041-3009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1LxDAQDaLguvoDvAU8d50kTdocZVk_YMGLHqWk7WTNUts1SRf996au4EEcBuYw772Z9wi5ZLBgrCiuQcs8h1JzxiAXiusjMuOQs0wA6GMym_bZBDglZyFsIVUOxYy8rD526N0b9tF01PV7DNFtTHRDT1PHV6SNH0LIIvbBdUh3fkiE6DDQwdI41mNnPPVujzHz6Ho7-AZbuh1cH8M5ObGmC3jxM-fk-Xb1tLzP1o93D8ubddYIxmOmtGmtRauFNEoKCcDrVplSqIZxjdIaqHWuBPCCm6K2sszLBtqacQtYaCHm5Oqgm757H5OFajuMvk8nK64kU5KzUiUUO6C-HXm01S45N_6zYlBNKVZ_UkycxYETzAZ_Vf8nfAH9FnMD</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Ren, Xiaoqiang</creator><creator>Chen, Chao</creator><creator>Peng, Hao</creator><creator>Ran, Xiangkun</creator><creator>Qin, Denglin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9408-1547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6332-3665</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Experimental investigation on the cross-tensile properties of tubular rivet-reinforced joints</title><author>Ren, Xiaoqiang ; Chen, Chao ; Peng, Hao ; Ran, Xiangkun ; Qin, Denglin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-69adffef935a6535002bd6a836c129e5fa0b94630272a7bf5848c0db12f0e7933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clinching</topic><topic>Energy absorption</topic><topic>Lightweight</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Riveted joints</topic><topic>Rivets</topic><topic>Tensile properties</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Tensile tests</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xiaoqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ran, Xiangkun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Denglin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part E, Journal of process mechanical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ren, Xiaoqiang</au><au>Chen, Chao</au><au>Peng, Hao</au><au>Ran, Xiangkun</au><au>Qin, Denglin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental investigation on the cross-tensile properties of tubular rivet-reinforced joints</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part E, Journal of process mechanical engineering</jtitle><addtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>236</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>480</spage><epage>490</epage><pages>480-490</pages><issn>0954-4089</issn><eissn>2041-3009</eissn><abstract>To decrease the exterior protrusion height and improve the tensile strength of the clinched joint, a rivet-reinforcing method was implemented on the clinched joint in this study. Solid rivets and tubular rivets with the wall thickness of 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm were employed to conduct the rivet-reinforcing experiments on the clinched joints. Mechanical interlock structure measurements and mechanical properties tests were performed on the above-mentioned reinforced joints. The results show that the rivet-reinforcing technology can significantly increase the tensile strength and improve the mechanical behavior of the clinched joint. Compared with the NRJ joint (the reinforced joint with no rivet), the static tensile strength of TRJ-1.0 (the rivet-reinforced joint with the tubular rivet of 1 mm wall thickness), TRJ-1.5 (the rivet-reinforced joint with the tubular rivet of 1.5 mm wall thickness), TRJ-2.0 (the rivet-reinforced joint with the tubular rivet of 2 mm wall thickness), and SRJ joint (the rivet-reinforced joint with the solid rivet) is separately increased by 30.05%, 24.59%, 16.28%, and 7.19%. The TRJ-1.0 joint has the highest tensile strength (1489.57 N) among the five types of reinforced joints in the cross-lap-tensile test. The energy absorption capacity of the rivet-reinforced joints decreases as the wall thickness of the tubular rivet increases. Therefore, the TRJ-1.0 joint has the highest energy absorption that is 5.890 J, while the energy absorption of the SRJ joint is the lowest, which is 2.868 J. The TRJ-1.0 joint has the most excellent strength performance in the lightweight evaluation, which with a lightweight evaluation value of
S
1.0
=
2.326
kN
/
g
. However, the TRJ-1.5 joint has the most outstanding energy absorption performance in the aspect of lightweight evaluation, with a lightweight evaluation value of
E
1.5
=
5.231
J
/
g
. The experiment has proven that the clinched joints reinforced with 1 mm wall thickness tubular rivets have the best mechanical properties.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/09544089211043629</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9408-1547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6332-3665</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0954-4089 |
| ispartof | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part E, Journal of process mechanical engineering, 2022-04, Vol.236 (2), p.480-490 |
| issn | 0954-4089 2041-3009 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2651652186 |
| source | SAGE Complete |
| subjects | Clinching Energy absorption Lightweight Mechanical properties Performance evaluation Riveted joints Rivets Tensile properties Tensile strength Tensile tests Thickness |
| title | Experimental investigation on the cross-tensile properties of tubular rivet-reinforced joints |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T03%3A42%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20investigation%20on%20the%20cross-tensile%20properties%20of%20tubular%20rivet-reinforced%20joints&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Institution%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers.%20Part%20E,%20Journal%20of%20process%20mechanical%20engineering&rft.au=Ren,%20Xiaoqiang&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=236&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=480&rft.epage=490&rft.pages=480-490&rft.issn=0954-4089&rft.eissn=2041-3009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/09544089211043629&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2651652186%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2651652186&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_09544089211043629&rfr_iscdi=true |