Prediction of Blast-Induced Ground Vibration Using Gene Expression Programming (GEP), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Linear Multivariate Regression (LMR)
In this paper, an attempt was made to find out two empirical relationships incorporating linear multivariate regression (LMR) and gene expression programming (GEP) for predicting the blast-induced ground vibration (BIGV) at the Sarcheshmeh copper mine in south of Iran. For this purpose, five types o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of Mining Sciences 2020-01, Vol.65 (2), p.317 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 317 |
container_title | Archives of Mining Sciences |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Shakeri, Jamshid Shokri, Behshad Jodeiri Dehghani, Hesam |
description | In this paper, an attempt was made to find out two empirical relationships incorporating linear multivariate regression (LMR) and gene expression programming (GEP) for predicting the blast-induced ground vibration (BIGV) at the Sarcheshmeh copper mine in south of Iran. For this purpose, five types of effective parameters in the blasting operation including the distance from the blasting block, the burden, the spacing, the specific charge, and the charge per delay were considered as the input data while the output parameter was the BIGV. The correlation coefficient and root mean squared error for the LMR were 0.70 and 3.18 respectively, while the values for the GEP were 0.91 and 2.67 respectively. Also, for evaluating the validation of these two methods, a feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) with a 5-20-1 structure has been used for predicting the BIGV. Comparisons of these parameters revealed that both methods successfully suggested two empirical relationships for predicting the BIGV in the case study. However, the GEP was found to be more reliable and more reasonable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.24425/ams.2020.133195 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2650283685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2650283685</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-3c7bbe42a2b8be4f1f51604da424e0837c82dd0cbb88fc63954caa2fd4a842303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kc1PwjAYhxujiQS5e2ziBRKH_drWHZHgJBlIiHhduq4j1bHh282PP8f_1AF6-iVvnzw9PAhdUzJmQjD_Tu3cmBFGxpRzGvlnqEcDGXlEBNE56hEZEC8khF6igXM2IzTkktOA9tDPCkxudWPrCtcFvi-Va7x5lbfa5DiGuq1y_GIzUEdi42y1xbGpDJ597cF0su66gnoLarc7vA3j2Wp0iyfQ2MJqq0q8NC0cp_ms4c3h4WS5dB2iOnNiK6MAL9qysR8KrGoMXpvtv3iYLNajK3RRqNKZwd_20eZh9jx99JKneD6dJJ7mlDce12GWGcEUy2S3BS18GhCRK8GEIZKHWrI8JzrLpCx0wCNfaKVYkQslBeOE99HNybuH-r01rklf6xaq7suUBT5hkgfS7yhyojTUzoEp0j3YnYLvlJL02CLtWqSHFumpBf8F_RZ9nQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2650283685</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of Blast-Induced Ground Vibration Using Gene Expression Programming (GEP), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Linear Multivariate Regression (LMR)</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Shakeri, Jamshid ; Shokri, Behshad Jodeiri ; Dehghani, Hesam</creator><creatorcontrib>Shakeri, Jamshid ; Shokri, Behshad Jodeiri ; Dehghani, Hesam</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, an attempt was made to find out two empirical relationships incorporating linear multivariate regression (LMR) and gene expression programming (GEP) for predicting the blast-induced ground vibration (BIGV) at the Sarcheshmeh copper mine in south of Iran. For this purpose, five types of effective parameters in the blasting operation including the distance from the blasting block, the burden, the spacing, the specific charge, and the charge per delay were considered as the input data while the output parameter was the BIGV. The correlation coefficient and root mean squared error for the LMR were 0.70 and 3.18 respectively, while the values for the GEP were 0.91 and 2.67 respectively. Also, for evaluating the validation of these two methods, a feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) with a 5-20-1 structure has been used for predicting the BIGV. Comparisons of these parameters revealed that both methods successfully suggested two empirical relationships for predicting the BIGV in the case study. However, the GEP was found to be more reliable and more reasonable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0860-7001</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1689-0469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24425/ams.2020.133195</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Blasting ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Gene expression ; Ground motion ; Methods ; Multivariate analysis ; Neural networks ; Parameters ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Archives of Mining Sciences, 2020-01, Vol.65 (2), p.317</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-3c7bbe42a2b8be4f1f51604da424e0837c82dd0cbb88fc63954caa2fd4a842303</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shakeri, Jamshid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shokri, Behshad Jodeiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehghani, Hesam</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of Blast-Induced Ground Vibration Using Gene Expression Programming (GEP), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Linear Multivariate Regression (LMR)</title><title>Archives of Mining Sciences</title><description>In this paper, an attempt was made to find out two empirical relationships incorporating linear multivariate regression (LMR) and gene expression programming (GEP) for predicting the blast-induced ground vibration (BIGV) at the Sarcheshmeh copper mine in south of Iran. For this purpose, five types of effective parameters in the blasting operation including the distance from the blasting block, the burden, the spacing, the specific charge, and the charge per delay were considered as the input data while the output parameter was the BIGV. The correlation coefficient and root mean squared error for the LMR were 0.70 and 3.18 respectively, while the values for the GEP were 0.91 and 2.67 respectively. Also, for evaluating the validation of these two methods, a feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) with a 5-20-1 structure has been used for predicting the BIGV. Comparisons of these parameters revealed that both methods successfully suggested two empirical relationships for predicting the BIGV in the case study. However, the GEP was found to be more reliable and more reasonable.</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Blasting</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>0860-7001</issn><issn>1689-0469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kc1PwjAYhxujiQS5e2ziBRKH_drWHZHgJBlIiHhduq4j1bHh282PP8f_1AF6-iVvnzw9PAhdUzJmQjD_Tu3cmBFGxpRzGvlnqEcDGXlEBNE56hEZEC8khF6igXM2IzTkktOA9tDPCkxudWPrCtcFvi-Va7x5lbfa5DiGuq1y_GIzUEdi42y1xbGpDJ597cF0su66gnoLarc7vA3j2Wp0iyfQ2MJqq0q8NC0cp_ms4c3h4WS5dB2iOnNiK6MAL9qysR8KrGoMXpvtv3iYLNajK3RRqNKZwd_20eZh9jx99JKneD6dJJ7mlDce12GWGcEUy2S3BS18GhCRK8GEIZKHWrI8JzrLpCx0wCNfaKVYkQslBeOE99HNybuH-r01rklf6xaq7suUBT5hkgfS7yhyojTUzoEp0j3YnYLvlJL02CLtWqSHFumpBf8F_RZ9nQ</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Shakeri, Jamshid</creator><creator>Shokri, Behshad Jodeiri</creator><creator>Dehghani, Hesam</creator><general>Polish Academy of Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Prediction of Blast-Induced Ground Vibration Using Gene Expression Programming (GEP), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Linear Multivariate Regression (LMR)</title><author>Shakeri, Jamshid ; Shokri, Behshad Jodeiri ; Dehghani, Hesam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-3c7bbe42a2b8be4f1f51604da424e0837c82dd0cbb88fc63954caa2fd4a842303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Blasting</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shakeri, Jamshid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shokri, Behshad Jodeiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehghani, Hesam</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Archives of Mining Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shakeri, Jamshid</au><au>Shokri, Behshad Jodeiri</au><au>Dehghani, Hesam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of Blast-Induced Ground Vibration Using Gene Expression Programming (GEP), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Linear Multivariate Regression (LMR)</atitle><jtitle>Archives of Mining Sciences</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>317</spage><pages>317-</pages><issn>0860-7001</issn><eissn>1689-0469</eissn><abstract>In this paper, an attempt was made to find out two empirical relationships incorporating linear multivariate regression (LMR) and gene expression programming (GEP) for predicting the blast-induced ground vibration (BIGV) at the Sarcheshmeh copper mine in south of Iran. For this purpose, five types of effective parameters in the blasting operation including the distance from the blasting block, the burden, the spacing, the specific charge, and the charge per delay were considered as the input data while the output parameter was the BIGV. The correlation coefficient and root mean squared error for the LMR were 0.70 and 3.18 respectively, while the values for the GEP were 0.91 and 2.67 respectively. Also, for evaluating the validation of these two methods, a feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) with a 5-20-1 structure has been used for predicting the BIGV. Comparisons of these parameters revealed that both methods successfully suggested two empirical relationships for predicting the BIGV in the case study. However, the GEP was found to be more reliable and more reasonable.</abstract><cop>Warsaw</cop><pub>Polish Academy of Sciences</pub><doi>10.24425/ams.2020.133195</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0860-7001 |
ispartof | Archives of Mining Sciences, 2020-01, Vol.65 (2), p.317 |
issn | 0860-7001 1689-0469 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2650283685 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Artificial neural networks Blasting Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Gene expression Ground motion Methods Multivariate analysis Neural networks Parameters Vibration |
title | Prediction of Blast-Induced Ground Vibration Using Gene Expression Programming (GEP), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Linear Multivariate Regression (LMR) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A40%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20Blast-Induced%20Ground%20Vibration%20Using%20Gene%20Expression%20Programming%20(GEP),%20Artificial%20Neural%20Networks%20(ANNs),%20and%20Linear%20Multivariate%20Regression%20(LMR)&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20Mining%20Sciences&rft.au=Shakeri,%20Jamshid&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=317&rft.pages=317-&rft.issn=0860-7001&rft.eissn=1689-0469&rft_id=info:doi/10.24425/ams.2020.133195&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2650283685%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2650283685&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |