Deconstructing knowledge and reconstructing understanding: Designing a knowledge architecture for transdisciplinary co‐creation of energy futures

Transdisciplinary approaches for planning and managing sustainability transitions present an opportunity for embedding knowledge making as an integral design element. Collaboratively formulated energy transitions as one such transdisciplinary undertaking, can benefit from the plural integration of k...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) West Yorkshire, England), 2022-04, Vol.30 (2), p.293-308
Hauptverfasser: Biswas, Saurabh, Miller, Clark A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 308
container_issue 2
container_start_page 293
container_title Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)
container_volume 30
creator Biswas, Saurabh
Miller, Clark A.
description Transdisciplinary approaches for planning and managing sustainability transitions present an opportunity for embedding knowledge making as an integral design element. Collaboratively formulated energy transitions as one such transdisciplinary undertaking, can benefit from the plural integration of knowledge forms to maximize uptake and diffusion of material outcomes, and the principles and values underlying collaborative action. Moreover, reflexive knowledge practices can identify safeguards that prevent disproportionate distribution of benefits, consequences, and lower participation barriers for diverse stakeholders. This article presents a knowledge making research agenda for co‐creation of sustainable energy transitions and proposes the deconstruction‐reconstruction knowledge making framework to enable systemic social learning among stakeholders. The theoretical framework is operationalized through a knowledge architecture, designed to facilitate a multi‐stakeholder sustainable energy transition project in Sierra Leone. Findings indicate that an embedded knowledge architecture can lower epistemological and methodological barriers to co‐creation, while enhancing the ability to adaptively manage emergent information and conflicts.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sd.2275
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2649907483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2649907483</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-d0f642887c7ab61670a61811500fc48dfe971cef92fcb7f7d3ea07d032292e983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWH_wFQIuXMjUm8x0krgT6x8ILtT1EJObGq1JTWYo3fkIgm_okzi1LnTh6nI537mXcwjZYzBkAPwo2yHnYrRGBgyUKphgap0MQNWyAAl8k2zl_AQAkrNqQD7GaGLIbepM68OEPoc4n6KdINXB0vRX7ILFlNte6bdjOsbsJ2Ep6N--ZB59i6btElIXE22TDtn6bPxs6oNOC2ri59u7SahbHwONjmLANFlQ1y1NeYdsOD3NuPszt8n9-dnd6WVxfXNxdXpyXRgu1aiw4OqKSymM0A81qwXomknGRgDOVNI6VIIZdIo78yCcsCVqEBZKzhVHJcttsr-6O0vxtcPcNk-xS6F_2fC6UgpEJcueOlhRJsWcE7pmlvxLH6Nh0Cwbb7Jtlo335OGKnPspLv7DmtvxN_0FywGGFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649907483</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deconstructing knowledge and reconstructing understanding: Designing a knowledge architecture for transdisciplinary co‐creation of energy futures</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Biswas, Saurabh ; Miller, Clark A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Biswas, Saurabh ; Miller, Clark A.</creatorcontrib><description>Transdisciplinary approaches for planning and managing sustainability transitions present an opportunity for embedding knowledge making as an integral design element. Collaboratively formulated energy transitions as one such transdisciplinary undertaking, can benefit from the plural integration of knowledge forms to maximize uptake and diffusion of material outcomes, and the principles and values underlying collaborative action. Moreover, reflexive knowledge practices can identify safeguards that prevent disproportionate distribution of benefits, consequences, and lower participation barriers for diverse stakeholders. This article presents a knowledge making research agenda for co‐creation of sustainable energy transitions and proposes the deconstruction‐reconstruction knowledge making framework to enable systemic social learning among stakeholders. The theoretical framework is operationalized through a knowledge architecture, designed to facilitate a multi‐stakeholder sustainable energy transition project in Sierra Leone. Findings indicate that an embedded knowledge architecture can lower epistemological and methodological barriers to co‐creation, while enhancing the ability to adaptively manage emergent information and conflicts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0802</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1719</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sd.2275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>co‐creation ; Deconstruction ; Embedding ; Energy ; Energy transition ; energy transitions planning ; Epistemology ; Information dissemination ; Information management ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Knowledge ; knowledge making ; reflexivity ; Renewable energy ; Safeguards ; Social discrimination learning ; Social learning ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Sustainability management ; Sustainability transitions ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable energy ; Uptake</subject><ispartof>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2022-04, Vol.30 (2), p.293-308</ispartof><rights>2021 ERP Environment and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 ERP Environment and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-d0f642887c7ab61670a61811500fc48dfe971cef92fcb7f7d3ea07d032292e983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-d0f642887c7ab61670a61811500fc48dfe971cef92fcb7f7d3ea07d032292e983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsd.2275$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsd.2275$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27849,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biswas, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Clark A.</creatorcontrib><title>Deconstructing knowledge and reconstructing understanding: Designing a knowledge architecture for transdisciplinary co‐creation of energy futures</title><title>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</title><description>Transdisciplinary approaches for planning and managing sustainability transitions present an opportunity for embedding knowledge making as an integral design element. Collaboratively formulated energy transitions as one such transdisciplinary undertaking, can benefit from the plural integration of knowledge forms to maximize uptake and diffusion of material outcomes, and the principles and values underlying collaborative action. Moreover, reflexive knowledge practices can identify safeguards that prevent disproportionate distribution of benefits, consequences, and lower participation barriers for diverse stakeholders. This article presents a knowledge making research agenda for co‐creation of sustainable energy transitions and proposes the deconstruction‐reconstruction knowledge making framework to enable systemic social learning among stakeholders. The theoretical framework is operationalized through a knowledge architecture, designed to facilitate a multi‐stakeholder sustainable energy transition project in Sierra Leone. Findings indicate that an embedded knowledge architecture can lower epistemological and methodological barriers to co‐creation, while enhancing the ability to adaptively manage emergent information and conflicts.</description><subject>co‐creation</subject><subject>Deconstruction</subject><subject>Embedding</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy transition</subject><subject>energy transitions planning</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>knowledge making</subject><subject>reflexivity</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Safeguards</subject><subject>Social discrimination learning</subject><subject>Social learning</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>Sustainability transitions</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable energy</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><issn>0968-0802</issn><issn>1099-1719</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWH_wFQIuXMjUm8x0krgT6x8ILtT1EJObGq1JTWYo3fkIgm_okzi1LnTh6nI537mXcwjZYzBkAPwo2yHnYrRGBgyUKphgap0MQNWyAAl8k2zl_AQAkrNqQD7GaGLIbepM68OEPoc4n6KdINXB0vRX7ILFlNte6bdjOsbsJ2Ep6N--ZB59i6btElIXE22TDtn6bPxs6oNOC2ri59u7SahbHwONjmLANFlQ1y1NeYdsOD3NuPszt8n9-dnd6WVxfXNxdXpyXRgu1aiw4OqKSymM0A81qwXomknGRgDOVNI6VIIZdIo78yCcsCVqEBZKzhVHJcttsr-6O0vxtcPcNk-xS6F_2fC6UgpEJcueOlhRJsWcE7pmlvxLH6Nh0Cwbb7Jtlo335OGKnPspLv7DmtvxN_0FywGGFw</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Biswas, Saurabh</creator><creator>Miller, Clark A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Deconstructing knowledge and reconstructing understanding: Designing a knowledge architecture for transdisciplinary co‐creation of energy futures</title><author>Biswas, Saurabh ; Miller, Clark A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-d0f642887c7ab61670a61811500fc48dfe971cef92fcb7f7d3ea07d032292e983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>co‐creation</topic><topic>Deconstruction</topic><topic>Embedding</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy transition</topic><topic>energy transitions planning</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>knowledge making</topic><topic>reflexivity</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Safeguards</topic><topic>Social discrimination learning</topic><topic>Social learning</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>Sustainability transitions</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable energy</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biswas, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Clark A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biswas, Saurabh</au><au>Miller, Clark A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deconstructing knowledge and reconstructing understanding: Designing a knowledge architecture for transdisciplinary co‐creation of energy futures</atitle><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>293-308</pages><issn>0968-0802</issn><eissn>1099-1719</eissn><abstract>Transdisciplinary approaches for planning and managing sustainability transitions present an opportunity for embedding knowledge making as an integral design element. Collaboratively formulated energy transitions as one such transdisciplinary undertaking, can benefit from the plural integration of knowledge forms to maximize uptake and diffusion of material outcomes, and the principles and values underlying collaborative action. Moreover, reflexive knowledge practices can identify safeguards that prevent disproportionate distribution of benefits, consequences, and lower participation barriers for diverse stakeholders. This article presents a knowledge making research agenda for co‐creation of sustainable energy transitions and proposes the deconstruction‐reconstruction knowledge making framework to enable systemic social learning among stakeholders. The theoretical framework is operationalized through a knowledge architecture, designed to facilitate a multi‐stakeholder sustainable energy transition project in Sierra Leone. Findings indicate that an embedded knowledge architecture can lower epistemological and methodological barriers to co‐creation, while enhancing the ability to adaptively manage emergent information and conflicts.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/sd.2275</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0968-0802
ispartof Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2022-04, Vol.30 (2), p.293-308
issn 0968-0802
1099-1719
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2649907483
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Business Source Complete
subjects co‐creation
Deconstruction
Embedding
Energy
Energy transition
energy transitions planning
Epistemology
Information dissemination
Information management
Interdisciplinary aspects
Knowledge
knowledge making
reflexivity
Renewable energy
Safeguards
Social discrimination learning
Social learning
Stakeholders
Sustainability
Sustainability management
Sustainability transitions
Sustainable development
Sustainable energy
Uptake
title Deconstructing knowledge and reconstructing understanding: Designing a knowledge architecture for transdisciplinary co‐creation of energy futures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A41%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deconstructing%20knowledge%20and%20reconstructing%20understanding:%20Designing%20a%20knowledge%20architecture%20for%20transdisciplinary%20co%E2%80%90creation%20of%20energy%20futures&rft.jtitle=Sustainable%20development%20(Bradford,%20West%20Yorkshire,%20England)&rft.au=Biswas,%20Saurabh&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=293-308&rft.issn=0968-0802&rft.eissn=1099-1719&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sd.2275&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2649907483%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649907483&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true