Deconstructing knowledge and reconstructing understanding: Designing a knowledge architecture for transdisciplinary co‐creation of energy futures
Transdisciplinary approaches for planning and managing sustainability transitions present an opportunity for embedding knowledge making as an integral design element. Collaboratively formulated energy transitions as one such transdisciplinary undertaking, can benefit from the plural integration of k...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) West Yorkshire, England), 2022-04, Vol.30 (2), p.293-308 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 308 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 293 |
container_title | Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Biswas, Saurabh Miller, Clark A. |
description | Transdisciplinary approaches for planning and managing sustainability transitions present an opportunity for embedding knowledge making as an integral design element. Collaboratively formulated energy transitions as one such transdisciplinary undertaking, can benefit from the plural integration of knowledge forms to maximize uptake and diffusion of material outcomes, and the principles and values underlying collaborative action. Moreover, reflexive knowledge practices can identify safeguards that prevent disproportionate distribution of benefits, consequences, and lower participation barriers for diverse stakeholders. This article presents a knowledge making research agenda for co‐creation of sustainable energy transitions and proposes the deconstruction‐reconstruction knowledge making framework to enable systemic social learning among stakeholders. The theoretical framework is operationalized through a knowledge architecture, designed to facilitate a multi‐stakeholder sustainable energy transition project in Sierra Leone. Findings indicate that an embedded knowledge architecture can lower epistemological and methodological barriers to co‐creation, while enhancing the ability to adaptively manage emergent information and conflicts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sd.2275 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2649907483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2649907483</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-d0f642887c7ab61670a61811500fc48dfe971cef92fcb7f7d3ea07d032292e983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWH_wFQIuXMjUm8x0krgT6x8ILtT1EJObGq1JTWYo3fkIgm_okzi1LnTh6nI537mXcwjZYzBkAPwo2yHnYrRGBgyUKphgap0MQNWyAAl8k2zl_AQAkrNqQD7GaGLIbepM68OEPoc4n6KdINXB0vRX7ILFlNte6bdjOsbsJ2Ep6N--ZB59i6btElIXE22TDtn6bPxs6oNOC2ri59u7SahbHwONjmLANFlQ1y1NeYdsOD3NuPszt8n9-dnd6WVxfXNxdXpyXRgu1aiw4OqKSymM0A81qwXomknGRgDOVNI6VIIZdIo78yCcsCVqEBZKzhVHJcttsr-6O0vxtcPcNk-xS6F_2fC6UgpEJcueOlhRJsWcE7pmlvxLH6Nh0Cwbb7Jtlo335OGKnPspLv7DmtvxN_0FywGGFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649907483</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deconstructing knowledge and reconstructing understanding: Designing a knowledge architecture for transdisciplinary co‐creation of energy futures</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Biswas, Saurabh ; Miller, Clark A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Biswas, Saurabh ; Miller, Clark A.</creatorcontrib><description>Transdisciplinary approaches for planning and managing sustainability transitions present an opportunity for embedding knowledge making as an integral design element. Collaboratively formulated energy transitions as one such transdisciplinary undertaking, can benefit from the plural integration of knowledge forms to maximize uptake and diffusion of material outcomes, and the principles and values underlying collaborative action. Moreover, reflexive knowledge practices can identify safeguards that prevent disproportionate distribution of benefits, consequences, and lower participation barriers for diverse stakeholders. This article presents a knowledge making research agenda for co‐creation of sustainable energy transitions and proposes the deconstruction‐reconstruction knowledge making framework to enable systemic social learning among stakeholders. The theoretical framework is operationalized through a knowledge architecture, designed to facilitate a multi‐stakeholder sustainable energy transition project in Sierra Leone. Findings indicate that an embedded knowledge architecture can lower epistemological and methodological barriers to co‐creation, while enhancing the ability to adaptively manage emergent information and conflicts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0802</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1719</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sd.2275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>co‐creation ; Deconstruction ; Embedding ; Energy ; Energy transition ; energy transitions planning ; Epistemology ; Information dissemination ; Information management ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Knowledge ; knowledge making ; reflexivity ; Renewable energy ; Safeguards ; Social discrimination learning ; Social learning ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Sustainability management ; Sustainability transitions ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable energy ; Uptake</subject><ispartof>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2022-04, Vol.30 (2), p.293-308</ispartof><rights>2021 ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 ERP Environment and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-d0f642887c7ab61670a61811500fc48dfe971cef92fcb7f7d3ea07d032292e983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-d0f642887c7ab61670a61811500fc48dfe971cef92fcb7f7d3ea07d032292e983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsd.2275$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsd.2275$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27849,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biswas, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Clark A.</creatorcontrib><title>Deconstructing knowledge and reconstructing understanding: Designing a knowledge architecture for transdisciplinary co‐creation of energy futures</title><title>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</title><description>Transdisciplinary approaches for planning and managing sustainability transitions present an opportunity for embedding knowledge making as an integral design element. Collaboratively formulated energy transitions as one such transdisciplinary undertaking, can benefit from the plural integration of knowledge forms to maximize uptake and diffusion of material outcomes, and the principles and values underlying collaborative action. Moreover, reflexive knowledge practices can identify safeguards that prevent disproportionate distribution of benefits, consequences, and lower participation barriers for diverse stakeholders. This article presents a knowledge making research agenda for co‐creation of sustainable energy transitions and proposes the deconstruction‐reconstruction knowledge making framework to enable systemic social learning among stakeholders. The theoretical framework is operationalized through a knowledge architecture, designed to facilitate a multi‐stakeholder sustainable energy transition project in Sierra Leone. Findings indicate that an embedded knowledge architecture can lower epistemological and methodological barriers to co‐creation, while enhancing the ability to adaptively manage emergent information and conflicts.</description><subject>co‐creation</subject><subject>Deconstruction</subject><subject>Embedding</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy transition</subject><subject>energy transitions planning</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>knowledge making</subject><subject>reflexivity</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Safeguards</subject><subject>Social discrimination learning</subject><subject>Social learning</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>Sustainability transitions</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable energy</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><issn>0968-0802</issn><issn>1099-1719</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWH_wFQIuXMjUm8x0krgT6x8ILtT1EJObGq1JTWYo3fkIgm_okzi1LnTh6nI537mXcwjZYzBkAPwo2yHnYrRGBgyUKphgap0MQNWyAAl8k2zl_AQAkrNqQD7GaGLIbepM68OEPoc4n6KdINXB0vRX7ILFlNte6bdjOsbsJ2Ep6N--ZB59i6btElIXE22TDtn6bPxs6oNOC2ri59u7SahbHwONjmLANFlQ1y1NeYdsOD3NuPszt8n9-dnd6WVxfXNxdXpyXRgu1aiw4OqKSymM0A81qwXomknGRgDOVNI6VIIZdIo78yCcsCVqEBZKzhVHJcttsr-6O0vxtcPcNk-xS6F_2fC6UgpEJcueOlhRJsWcE7pmlvxLH6Nh0Cwbb7Jtlo335OGKnPspLv7DmtvxN_0FywGGFw</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Biswas, Saurabh</creator><creator>Miller, Clark A.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Deconstructing knowledge and reconstructing understanding: Designing a knowledge architecture for transdisciplinary co‐creation of energy futures</title><author>Biswas, Saurabh ; Miller, Clark A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-d0f642887c7ab61670a61811500fc48dfe971cef92fcb7f7d3ea07d032292e983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>co‐creation</topic><topic>Deconstruction</topic><topic>Embedding</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy transition</topic><topic>energy transitions planning</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>knowledge making</topic><topic>reflexivity</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Safeguards</topic><topic>Social discrimination learning</topic><topic>Social learning</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>Sustainability transitions</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable energy</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biswas, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Clark A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biswas, Saurabh</au><au>Miller, Clark A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deconstructing knowledge and reconstructing understanding: Designing a knowledge architecture for transdisciplinary co‐creation of energy futures</atitle><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>293-308</pages><issn>0968-0802</issn><eissn>1099-1719</eissn><abstract>Transdisciplinary approaches for planning and managing sustainability transitions present an opportunity for embedding knowledge making as an integral design element. Collaboratively formulated energy transitions as one such transdisciplinary undertaking, can benefit from the plural integration of knowledge forms to maximize uptake and diffusion of material outcomes, and the principles and values underlying collaborative action. Moreover, reflexive knowledge practices can identify safeguards that prevent disproportionate distribution of benefits, consequences, and lower participation barriers for diverse stakeholders. This article presents a knowledge making research agenda for co‐creation of sustainable energy transitions and proposes the deconstruction‐reconstruction knowledge making framework to enable systemic social learning among stakeholders. The theoretical framework is operationalized through a knowledge architecture, designed to facilitate a multi‐stakeholder sustainable energy transition project in Sierra Leone. Findings indicate that an embedded knowledge architecture can lower epistemological and methodological barriers to co‐creation, while enhancing the ability to adaptively manage emergent information and conflicts.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/sd.2275</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0968-0802 |
ispartof | Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2022-04, Vol.30 (2), p.293-308 |
issn | 0968-0802 1099-1719 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2649907483 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Business Source Complete |
subjects | co‐creation Deconstruction Embedding Energy Energy transition energy transitions planning Epistemology Information dissemination Information management Interdisciplinary aspects Knowledge knowledge making reflexivity Renewable energy Safeguards Social discrimination learning Social learning Stakeholders Sustainability Sustainability management Sustainability transitions Sustainable development Sustainable energy Uptake |
title | Deconstructing knowledge and reconstructing understanding: Designing a knowledge architecture for transdisciplinary co‐creation of energy futures |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A41%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deconstructing%20knowledge%20and%20reconstructing%20understanding:%20Designing%20a%20knowledge%20architecture%20for%20transdisciplinary%20co%E2%80%90creation%20of%20energy%20futures&rft.jtitle=Sustainable%20development%20(Bradford,%20West%20Yorkshire,%20England)&rft.au=Biswas,%20Saurabh&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=293-308&rft.issn=0968-0802&rft.eissn=1099-1719&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sd.2275&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2649907483%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649907483&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |