Understanding the economic and farming practices driving species selection in aquaculture within the Mymensingh division of Bangladesh
Aquaculture is a major supplier of animal protein for Bangladesh’s population, and the Mymensingh division is a major contributor to finfish aquaculture, producing 43% of the total pond pangasius and 9% of the total amount of tilapia (figures from 2018). We conducted a finfish farmer survey covering...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aquaculture international 2022-04, Vol.30 (2), p.773-789 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 789 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 773 |
container_title | Aquaculture international |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Heal, Richard Haque, Mohammad Mahfujul Hasan, Neaz A. Nagoli, Joseph Arifuzzaman, Syed Tyler, Charles R. Bass, David |
description | Aquaculture is a major supplier of animal protein for Bangladesh’s population, and the Mymensingh division is a major contributor to finfish aquaculture, producing 43% of the total pond pangasius and 9% of the total amount of tilapia (figures from 2018). We conducted a finfish farmer survey covering Netrokona, Jamalpur and Mymensingh districts to understand current finfish farming practices and identify factors that drive farmers in their species choice between pangasius or tilapia cultivation. We found that most finfish farmers in Mymensingh are experienced practitioners and practise polyculture with a range of stocking densities for each species. Using an economic model of polyculture practice, we have shown that over a production cycle, pangasius gain body mass at a rate nearly 4 times greater than that for tilapia, resulting in substantially larger revenues and providing a strong incentive for their culture. High levels of tilapia aquaculture likely persist due to their short production cycle and an associated decreased economic risk due to crop loss from disease, both factors providing a strong incentive for their culture. Our findings also indicate production yield differences through different species selection in polyculture systems. For example, co-culturing pangasius, tilapia and carp together was less productive than co-culture of pangasius with tilapia. Furthermore, higher yields of tilapia were obtained when co-cultured with carp compared with pangasius, the reasons for which are not known and warrant further investigation. Our study uses information provided by finfish farmers to produce a useful guide on fish species choices to maximise production yields, and therefore food production, from their ponds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10499-021-00818-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2649844992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2649844992</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-523db7dff59d00b9a89c11c5781f609470a8a8c6696bc61d99f0d69f53f4f6b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscQ6sE8eJj1DxJxVxoRI3y_FPkyp1WjsB5QV4bhyKxI3TamdnZqUPoUsC1wSguAkEKOcJpCQBKEmZjEdoRvIiSwjN3o_RDDgrEkZSOEVnIWwAICsomaGvldPGh1463bg17muDjepct20Ujhq20m-nw85L1TfKBKx98zEpYWdUE_dgWhNPncONw3I_SDW0_eAN_mz6OkpT5cu4NS7EVI11TIfJ3Vl8J926ldqE-hydWNkGc_E752j1cP-2eEqWr4_Pi9tlolLK-yRPM10V2tqca4CKy5IrQlRelMQy4LQAWcpSMcZZpRjRnFvQjNs8s9SyimZzdHXo3fluP5jQi003eBdfipRRXtJIMY2u9OBSvgvBGyt2vtlKPwoCYuItDrxF5C1-eIsxhrJDKESzWxv_V_1P6hvKXYcR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649844992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding the economic and farming practices driving species selection in aquaculture within the Mymensingh division of Bangladesh</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Heal, Richard ; Haque, Mohammad Mahfujul ; Hasan, Neaz A. ; Nagoli, Joseph ; Arifuzzaman, Syed ; Tyler, Charles R. ; Bass, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Heal, Richard ; Haque, Mohammad Mahfujul ; Hasan, Neaz A. ; Nagoli, Joseph ; Arifuzzaman, Syed ; Tyler, Charles R. ; Bass, David</creatorcontrib><description>Aquaculture is a major supplier of animal protein for Bangladesh’s population, and the Mymensingh division is a major contributor to finfish aquaculture, producing 43% of the total pond pangasius and 9% of the total amount of tilapia (figures from 2018). We conducted a finfish farmer survey covering Netrokona, Jamalpur and Mymensingh districts to understand current finfish farming practices and identify factors that drive farmers in their species choice between pangasius or tilapia cultivation. We found that most finfish farmers in Mymensingh are experienced practitioners and practise polyculture with a range of stocking densities for each species. Using an economic model of polyculture practice, we have shown that over a production cycle, pangasius gain body mass at a rate nearly 4 times greater than that for tilapia, resulting in substantially larger revenues and providing a strong incentive for their culture. High levels of tilapia aquaculture likely persist due to their short production cycle and an associated decreased economic risk due to crop loss from disease, both factors providing a strong incentive for their culture. Our findings also indicate production yield differences through different species selection in polyculture systems. For example, co-culturing pangasius, tilapia and carp together was less productive than co-culture of pangasius with tilapia. Furthermore, higher yields of tilapia were obtained when co-cultured with carp compared with pangasius, the reasons for which are not known and warrant further investigation. Our study uses information provided by finfish farmers to produce a useful guide on fish species choices to maximise production yields, and therefore food production, from their ponds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-6120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-143X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10499-021-00818-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Aquaculture ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Econometric models ; Economic models ; Economics ; Farmers ; Fish ; Food production ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Freshwater fishes ; Life Sciences ; Polyculture ; Polyculture (aquaculture) ; Ponds ; Stocking density ; Surveying ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture international, 2022-04, Vol.30 (2), p.773-789</ispartof><rights>Crown 2021</rights><rights>Crown 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-523db7dff59d00b9a89c11c5781f609470a8a8c6696bc61d99f0d69f53f4f6b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-523db7dff59d00b9a89c11c5781f609470a8a8c6696bc61d99f0d69f53f4f6b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10499-021-00818-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10499-021-00818-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heal, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haque, Mohammad Mahfujul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasan, Neaz A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagoli, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arifuzzaman, Syed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bass, David</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding the economic and farming practices driving species selection in aquaculture within the Mymensingh division of Bangladesh</title><title>Aquaculture international</title><addtitle>Aquacult Int</addtitle><description>Aquaculture is a major supplier of animal protein for Bangladesh’s population, and the Mymensingh division is a major contributor to finfish aquaculture, producing 43% of the total pond pangasius and 9% of the total amount of tilapia (figures from 2018). We conducted a finfish farmer survey covering Netrokona, Jamalpur and Mymensingh districts to understand current finfish farming practices and identify factors that drive farmers in their species choice between pangasius or tilapia cultivation. We found that most finfish farmers in Mymensingh are experienced practitioners and practise polyculture with a range of stocking densities for each species. Using an economic model of polyculture practice, we have shown that over a production cycle, pangasius gain body mass at a rate nearly 4 times greater than that for tilapia, resulting in substantially larger revenues and providing a strong incentive for their culture. High levels of tilapia aquaculture likely persist due to their short production cycle and an associated decreased economic risk due to crop loss from disease, both factors providing a strong incentive for their culture. Our findings also indicate production yield differences through different species selection in polyculture systems. For example, co-culturing pangasius, tilapia and carp together was less productive than co-culture of pangasius with tilapia. Furthermore, higher yields of tilapia were obtained when co-cultured with carp compared with pangasius, the reasons for which are not known and warrant further investigation. Our study uses information provided by finfish farmers to produce a useful guide on fish species choices to maximise production yields, and therefore food production, from their ponds.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Econometric models</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food production</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Polyculture</subject><subject>Polyculture (aquaculture)</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Stocking density</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0967-6120</issn><issn>1573-143X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscQ6sE8eJj1DxJxVxoRI3y_FPkyp1WjsB5QV4bhyKxI3TamdnZqUPoUsC1wSguAkEKOcJpCQBKEmZjEdoRvIiSwjN3o_RDDgrEkZSOEVnIWwAICsomaGvldPGh1463bg17muDjepct20Ujhq20m-nw85L1TfKBKx98zEpYWdUE_dgWhNPncONw3I_SDW0_eAN_mz6OkpT5cu4NS7EVI11TIfJ3Vl8J926ldqE-hydWNkGc_E752j1cP-2eEqWr4_Pi9tlolLK-yRPM10V2tqca4CKy5IrQlRelMQy4LQAWcpSMcZZpRjRnFvQjNs8s9SyimZzdHXo3fluP5jQi003eBdfipRRXtJIMY2u9OBSvgvBGyt2vtlKPwoCYuItDrxF5C1-eIsxhrJDKESzWxv_V_1P6hvKXYcR</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Heal, Richard</creator><creator>Haque, Mohammad Mahfujul</creator><creator>Hasan, Neaz A.</creator><creator>Nagoli, Joseph</creator><creator>Arifuzzaman, Syed</creator><creator>Tyler, Charles R.</creator><creator>Bass, David</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Understanding the economic and farming practices driving species selection in aquaculture within the Mymensingh division of Bangladesh</title><author>Heal, Richard ; Haque, Mohammad Mahfujul ; Hasan, Neaz A. ; Nagoli, Joseph ; Arifuzzaman, Syed ; Tyler, Charles R. ; Bass, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-523db7dff59d00b9a89c11c5781f609470a8a8c6696bc61d99f0d69f53f4f6b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Econometric models</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food production</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Polyculture</topic><topic>Polyculture (aquaculture)</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Stocking density</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heal, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haque, Mohammad Mahfujul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasan, Neaz A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagoli, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arifuzzaman, Syed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bass, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heal, Richard</au><au>Haque, Mohammad Mahfujul</au><au>Hasan, Neaz A.</au><au>Nagoli, Joseph</au><au>Arifuzzaman, Syed</au><au>Tyler, Charles R.</au><au>Bass, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding the economic and farming practices driving species selection in aquaculture within the Mymensingh division of Bangladesh</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture international</jtitle><stitle>Aquacult Int</stitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>773</spage><epage>789</epage><pages>773-789</pages><issn>0967-6120</issn><eissn>1573-143X</eissn><abstract>Aquaculture is a major supplier of animal protein for Bangladesh’s population, and the Mymensingh division is a major contributor to finfish aquaculture, producing 43% of the total pond pangasius and 9% of the total amount of tilapia (figures from 2018). We conducted a finfish farmer survey covering Netrokona, Jamalpur and Mymensingh districts to understand current finfish farming practices and identify factors that drive farmers in their species choice between pangasius or tilapia cultivation. We found that most finfish farmers in Mymensingh are experienced practitioners and practise polyculture with a range of stocking densities for each species. Using an economic model of polyculture practice, we have shown that over a production cycle, pangasius gain body mass at a rate nearly 4 times greater than that for tilapia, resulting in substantially larger revenues and providing a strong incentive for their culture. High levels of tilapia aquaculture likely persist due to their short production cycle and an associated decreased economic risk due to crop loss from disease, both factors providing a strong incentive for their culture. Our findings also indicate production yield differences through different species selection in polyculture systems. For example, co-culturing pangasius, tilapia and carp together was less productive than co-culture of pangasius with tilapia. Furthermore, higher yields of tilapia were obtained when co-cultured with carp compared with pangasius, the reasons for which are not known and warrant further investigation. Our study uses information provided by finfish farmers to produce a useful guide on fish species choices to maximise production yields, and therefore food production, from their ponds.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10499-021-00818-y</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0967-6120 |
ispartof | Aquaculture international, 2022-04, Vol.30 (2), p.773-789 |
issn | 0967-6120 1573-143X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2649844992 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Agricultural practices Aquaculture Biomedical and Life Sciences Econometric models Economic models Economics Farmers Fish Food production Freshwater & Marine Ecology Freshwater fishes Life Sciences Polyculture Polyculture (aquaculture) Ponds Stocking density Surveying Zoology |
title | Understanding the economic and farming practices driving species selection in aquaculture within the Mymensingh division of Bangladesh |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T03%3A55%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20the%20economic%20and%20farming%20practices%20driving%20species%20selection%20in%20aquaculture%20within%20the%20Mymensingh%20division%20of%20Bangladesh&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20international&rft.au=Heal,%20Richard&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=773&rft.epage=789&rft.pages=773-789&rft.issn=0967-6120&rft.eissn=1573-143X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10499-021-00818-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2649844992%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649844992&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |