Correcting Estimates of Electric Vehicle Emissions Abatement: Implications for Climate Policy
Transportation electrification is viewed by many as a cornerstone for climate change mitigation, with the ultimate vision to phase out conventional vehicles entirely. In a world with only electric vehicles (EVs), transportation pollution would be primarily determined by the electricity grid composit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | NBER Working Paper Series 2020-05 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | NBER Working Paper Series |
container_volume | |
creator | Muehlegger, Erich Rapson, David S |
description | Transportation electrification is viewed by many as a cornerstone for climate change mitigation, with the ultimate vision to phase out conventional vehicles entirely. In a world with only electric vehicles (EVs), transportation pollution would be primarily determined by the electricity grid composition. For the foreseeable future, however, environmental benefits of EVs must be measured relative to the (likely gasoline) car that would have been bought instead. This so-called “counterfactual” vehicle cannot be observed, but its fuel economy can be estimated. A quasi-experiment in California allows us to show that subsidized buyers of EVs would have, on average, purchased relatively fuel-efficient cars had they not gone electric. The actual incremental pollution abatement arising from EVs today is thus substantially smaller than one would predict using the fleet average as the counterfactual vehicle. We discuss implications for climate policy and how to accurately reflect EV choice in integrated assessment models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3386/w27197 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nber_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2649462056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><nber_id>w27197</nber_id><sourcerecordid>2649462056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-n476-be8b68b0913a09ba0452c34c4e65b2757deacb0e16edfe968f07652000a4bac63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkFFLwzAUhfOg4Jz6A3wK-Fy9TdI08W2UqoOBPgzfpCTZrWa0zUw6ZP_euvl04ePjnMMl5CaHe86VfPhhZa7LMzIDpVXGNC8vyGVKWwCmFOQz8lGFGNGNfvikdRp9b0ZMNLS07iYavaPv-OVdh7TufUo-DIku7CT1OIyPdNnvOu_MeORtiLTqjhH0LUz8cEXOW9MlvP6_c7J-qtfVS7Z6fV5Wi1U2iFJmFpWVyoLOuQFtDYiCOS6cQFlYVhblBo2zgLnETYtaqhZKWTAAMMIaJ_mc3J1idzF87zGNzTbs4zA1NkwKLSSD4s-6PVmDxdjs4jQ0HprTh_gv619a_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649462056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correcting Estimates of Electric Vehicle Emissions Abatement: Implications for Climate Policy</title><source>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Muehlegger, Erich ; Rapson, David S</creator><creatorcontrib>Muehlegger, Erich ; Rapson, David S</creatorcontrib><description>Transportation electrification is viewed by many as a cornerstone for climate change mitigation, with the ultimate vision to phase out conventional vehicles entirely. In a world with only electric vehicles (EVs), transportation pollution would be primarily determined by the electricity grid composition. For the foreseeable future, however, environmental benefits of EVs must be measured relative to the (likely gasoline) car that would have been bought instead. This so-called “counterfactual” vehicle cannot be observed, but its fuel economy can be estimated. A quasi-experiment in California allows us to show that subsidized buyers of EVs would have, on average, purchased relatively fuel-efficient cars had they not gone electric. The actual incremental pollution abatement arising from EVs today is thus substantially smaller than one would predict using the fleet average as the counterfactual vehicle. We discuss implications for climate policy and how to accurately reflect EV choice in integrated assessment models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w27197</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Climate policy ; Economic theory ; Electric vehicles ; Electricity distribution ; Energy efficiency ; Environment and Energy Economics ; Environmental policy ; Fuel economy ; Gasoline ; Pollution control ; Vehicle emissions</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2020-05</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. May 2020</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muehlegger, Erich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapson, David S</creatorcontrib><title>Correcting Estimates of Electric Vehicle Emissions Abatement: Implications for Climate Policy</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>Transportation electrification is viewed by many as a cornerstone for climate change mitigation, with the ultimate vision to phase out conventional vehicles entirely. In a world with only electric vehicles (EVs), transportation pollution would be primarily determined by the electricity grid composition. For the foreseeable future, however, environmental benefits of EVs must be measured relative to the (likely gasoline) car that would have been bought instead. This so-called “counterfactual” vehicle cannot be observed, but its fuel economy can be estimated. A quasi-experiment in California allows us to show that subsidized buyers of EVs would have, on average, purchased relatively fuel-efficient cars had they not gone electric. The actual incremental pollution abatement arising from EVs today is thus substantially smaller than one would predict using the fleet average as the counterfactual vehicle. We discuss implications for climate policy and how to accurately reflect EV choice in integrated assessment models.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Electricity distribution</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Environment and Energy Economics</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Fuel economy</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Vehicle emissions</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>NBR</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNotkFFLwzAUhfOg4Jz6A3wK-Fy9TdI08W2UqoOBPgzfpCTZrWa0zUw6ZP_euvl04ePjnMMl5CaHe86VfPhhZa7LMzIDpVXGNC8vyGVKWwCmFOQz8lGFGNGNfvikdRp9b0ZMNLS07iYavaPv-OVdh7TufUo-DIku7CT1OIyPdNnvOu_MeORtiLTqjhH0LUz8cEXOW9MlvP6_c7J-qtfVS7Z6fV5Wi1U2iFJmFpWVyoLOuQFtDYiCOS6cQFlYVhblBo2zgLnETYtaqhZKWTAAMMIaJ_mc3J1idzF87zGNzTbs4zA1NkwKLSSD4s-6PVmDxdjs4jQ0HprTh_gv619a_A</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Muehlegger, Erich</creator><creator>Rapson, David S</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research</general><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>CZO</scope><scope>MPB</scope><scope>NBR</scope><scope>XD6</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Correcting Estimates of Electric Vehicle Emissions Abatement: Implications for Climate Policy</title><author>Muehlegger, Erich ; Rapson, David S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-n476-be8b68b0913a09ba0452c34c4e65b2757deacb0e16edfe968f07652000a4bac63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Electricity distribution</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Environment and Energy Economics</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Fuel economy</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Vehicle emissions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muehlegger, Erich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapson, David S</creatorcontrib><collection>NBER Working Papers</collection><collection>NBER</collection><collection>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</collection><collection>NBER Technical Working Papers Archive</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muehlegger, Erich</au><au>Rapson, David S</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Correcting Estimates of Electric Vehicle Emissions Abatement: Implications for Climate Policy</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>Transportation electrification is viewed by many as a cornerstone for climate change mitigation, with the ultimate vision to phase out conventional vehicles entirely. In a world with only electric vehicles (EVs), transportation pollution would be primarily determined by the electricity grid composition. For the foreseeable future, however, environmental benefits of EVs must be measured relative to the (likely gasoline) car that would have been bought instead. This so-called “counterfactual” vehicle cannot be observed, but its fuel economy can be estimated. A quasi-experiment in California allows us to show that subsidized buyers of EVs would have, on average, purchased relatively fuel-efficient cars had they not gone electric. The actual incremental pollution abatement arising from EVs today is thus substantially smaller than one would predict using the fleet average as the counterfactual vehicle. We discuss implications for climate policy and how to accurately reflect EV choice in integrated assessment models.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research</pub><doi>10.3386/w27197</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-2937 |
ispartof | NBER Working Paper Series, 2020-05 |
issn | 0898-2937 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2649462056 |
source | National Bureau of Economic Research Publications; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate policy Economic theory Electric vehicles Electricity distribution Energy efficiency Environment and Energy Economics Environmental policy Fuel economy Gasoline Pollution control Vehicle emissions |
title | Correcting Estimates of Electric Vehicle Emissions Abatement: Implications for Climate Policy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T14%3A11%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nber_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Correcting%20Estimates%20of%20Electric%20Vehicle%20Emissions%20Abatement:%20Implications%20for%20Climate%20Policy&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Muehlegger,%20Erich&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w27197&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nber_%3E2649462056%3C/proquest_nber_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649462056&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_nber_id=w27197&rfr_iscdi=true |