Inequality and the Safety Net Throughout the Income Distribution, 1929-1940

We explored two measures of inequality that described the full income distribution in cities. One measure is an income gini based on family incomes in 1929 for 33 cities and in 1933 for up to 48 cities in 1933 were spread throughout the country. We also estimated gini coefficients that made use of c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NBER Working Paper Series 2020-05
Hauptverfasser: Feigenbaum, James J, Fishback, Price V, Grayson, Keoka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title NBER Working Paper Series
container_volume
creator Feigenbaum, James J
Fishback, Price V
Grayson, Keoka
description We explored two measures of inequality that described the full income distribution in cities. One measure is an income gini based on family incomes in 1929 for 33 cities and in 1933 for up to 48 cities in 1933 were spread throughout the country. We also estimated gini coefficients that made use of contract rents for renters and implicit rents for home owners for up to 955 cities throughout the country. We were able to expand to all counties when looking at a top-end inequality measure, the number of taxpayers per family. All three measures varied substantially across the country. We show the correlations between the various measures and also estimate the relationship between the measures and various relief programs developed by governments at all levels during the period.
doi_str_mv 10.3386/w27069
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2649461387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><nber_id>w27069</nber_id><sourcerecordid>2649461387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e727-6b69545b5aa30d50f8ad0078651af0cc6c4c83145ff1dfd10a96866fe354bde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90D1PwzAQBmAPIFEK_AAmS6wEzvH3iAqFiAqGdo-cxCapWrt1HKH-eyKCmE6ne_Se9CJ0Q-CBUiUev3MJQp-hGSitslxTeYEu-34LkCsFZIbeC2-Pg9l16YSNb3BqLV4bZ8f1wya8aWMYvtowpN9L4euwt_i561PsqiF1wd9jonOdEc3gCp07s-vt9d-co_XyZbN4y1afr8XiaZVZmctMVEJzxituDIWGg1OmAZBKcGIc1LWoWa0oYdw50riGgNFCCeEs5axqLJ2juyn1EMNxsH0qt2GIfnxY5oJpJghVclR4UrYOvuvLQ-z2Jp5KIqliwMdyRnI7EV_Z-A-mxugPzpJcRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649461387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inequality and the Safety Net Throughout the Income Distribution, 1929-1940</title><source>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Feigenbaum, James J ; Fishback, Price V ; Grayson, Keoka</creator><creatorcontrib>Feigenbaum, James J ; Fishback, Price V ; Grayson, Keoka</creatorcontrib><description>We explored two measures of inequality that described the full income distribution in cities. One measure is an income gini based on family incomes in 1929 for 33 cities and in 1933 for up to 48 cities in 1933 were spread throughout the country. We also estimated gini coefficients that made use of contract rents for renters and implicit rents for home owners for up to 955 cities throughout the country. We were able to expand to all counties when looking at a top-end inequality measure, the number of taxpayers per family. All three measures varied substantially across the country. We show the correlations between the various measures and also estimate the relationship between the measures and various relief programs developed by governments at all levels during the period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w27069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research</publisher><subject>Development of the American Economy ; Economic theory ; Income distribution ; Inequality</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2020-05</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. May 2020</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feigenbaum, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fishback, Price V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grayson, Keoka</creatorcontrib><title>Inequality and the Safety Net Throughout the Income Distribution, 1929-1940</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>We explored two measures of inequality that described the full income distribution in cities. One measure is an income gini based on family incomes in 1929 for 33 cities and in 1933 for up to 48 cities in 1933 were spread throughout the country. We also estimated gini coefficients that made use of contract rents for renters and implicit rents for home owners for up to 955 cities throughout the country. We were able to expand to all counties when looking at a top-end inequality measure, the number of taxpayers per family. All three measures varied substantially across the country. We show the correlations between the various measures and also estimate the relationship between the measures and various relief programs developed by governments at all levels during the period.</description><subject>Development of the American Economy</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>NBR</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo90D1PwzAQBmAPIFEK_AAmS6wEzvH3iAqFiAqGdo-cxCapWrt1HKH-eyKCmE6ne_Se9CJ0Q-CBUiUev3MJQp-hGSitslxTeYEu-34LkCsFZIbeC2-Pg9l16YSNb3BqLV4bZ8f1wya8aWMYvtowpN9L4euwt_i561PsqiF1wd9jonOdEc3gCp07s-vt9d-co_XyZbN4y1afr8XiaZVZmctMVEJzxituDIWGg1OmAZBKcGIc1LWoWa0oYdw50riGgNFCCeEs5axqLJ2juyn1EMNxsH0qt2GIfnxY5oJpJghVclR4UrYOvuvLQ-z2Jp5KIqliwMdyRnI7EV_Z-A-mxugPzpJcRw</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Feigenbaum, James J</creator><creator>Fishback, Price V</creator><creator>Grayson, Keoka</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research</general><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>CZO</scope><scope>MPB</scope><scope>NBR</scope><scope>XD6</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Inequality and the Safety Net Throughout the Income Distribution, 1929-1940</title><author>Feigenbaum, James J ; Fishback, Price V ; Grayson, Keoka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e727-6b69545b5aa30d50f8ad0078651af0cc6c4c83145ff1dfd10a96866fe354bde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Development of the American Economy</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feigenbaum, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fishback, Price V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grayson, Keoka</creatorcontrib><collection>NBER Working Papers</collection><collection>NBER</collection><collection>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</collection><collection>NBER Technical Working Papers Archive</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feigenbaum, James J</au><au>Fishback, Price V</au><au>Grayson, Keoka</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Inequality and the Safety Net Throughout the Income Distribution, 1929-1940</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>We explored two measures of inequality that described the full income distribution in cities. One measure is an income gini based on family incomes in 1929 for 33 cities and in 1933 for up to 48 cities in 1933 were spread throughout the country. We also estimated gini coefficients that made use of contract rents for renters and implicit rents for home owners for up to 955 cities throughout the country. We were able to expand to all counties when looking at a top-end inequality measure, the number of taxpayers per family. All three measures varied substantially across the country. We show the correlations between the various measures and also estimate the relationship between the measures and various relief programs developed by governments at all levels during the period.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, Mass</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research</pub><doi>10.3386/w27069</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2937
ispartof NBER Working Paper Series, 2020-05
issn 0898-2937
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2649461387
source National Bureau of Economic Research Publications; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Development of the American Economy
Economic theory
Income distribution
Inequality
title Inequality and the Safety Net Throughout the Income Distribution, 1929-1940
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T17%3A41%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Inequality%20and%20the%20Safety%20Net%20Throughout%20the%20Income%20Distribution,%201929-1940&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Feigenbaum,%20James%20J&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w27069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E2649461387%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649461387&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_nber_id=w27069&rfr_iscdi=true