Assessing the Age Specificity of Infection Fatality Rates for COVID-19: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, & Public Policy Implications

To assess age-specific infection fatality rates (IFRs) for COVID-19, we have conducted a systematic review of seroprevalence studies as well as countries with comprehensive tracing programs. Age-specific IFRs were computed using the prevalence data in conjunction with reported fatalities four weeks...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NBER Working Paper Series 2020-07
Hauptverfasser: Cochran, Kensington B, Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon, Hanage, William P, Walsh, Seamus P, Levin, Andrew T, Owusu, Nana O T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title NBER Working Paper Series
container_volume
creator Cochran, Kensington B
Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon
Hanage, William P
Walsh, Seamus P
Levin, Andrew T
Owusu, Nana O T
description To assess age-specific infection fatality rates (IFRs) for COVID-19, we have conducted a systematic review of seroprevalence studies as well as countries with comprehensive tracing programs. Age-specific IFRs were computed using the prevalence data in conjunction with reported fatalities four weeks after the midpoint date of each study, reflecting typical lags in fatalities and reporting. Using metaregression procedures, we find a highly significant log-linear relationship between age and IFR for COVID-19. The estimated age-specific IFRs are very low for children and younger adults but increase progressively to 0.4% at age 55, 1.3% at age 65, 4.2% at age 75, and 14% at age 85. About 90% of the geographical variation in population IFR is explained by differences in age composition of the population and age-specific prevalence. These results indicate that COVID-19 is hazardous not only for the elderly but also for middle-aged adults. Moreover, the population IFR for COVID-19 should not be viewed as a fixed parameter but as intrinsically linked to the age-specific pattern of infections. Consequently, public health measures to protect vulnerable age groups could substantially decrease total deaths.
doi_str_mv 10.3386/w27597
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nber_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2649449379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><nber_id>w27597</nber_id><sourcerecordid>2649449379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c849-f779f91c34ca9eddeb72f98d4ef529b6f76757686bdd79ff4b6a355a1df1aa833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEFLw0AUhPegYK36AzwtCJ4aTbJJdtdbaa0GKi1t8Rpekrd1S5rE7NaSP-Dvdku9zMC8j-ExhNwF_hNjInk-hjyW_IIMfCGFF0rGr8i1MTvfD4XwgwH5HRuDxuh6S-0X0vEW6brFQitdaNvTRtG0VlhY3dR0BhaqU7oCi4aqpqOTxWc69QL5Qte9sbgHqwu6wh-NxxH9QAse1FD1RpsRfaTLQ165-7Jx2tN03zqHU7W5IZcKKoO3_z4km9nrZvLuzRdv6WQ89woRSU9xLpUMChYVILEsMeehkqKMUMWhzBPFEx7zRCR5WTpSRXkCLI4hKFUAIBgbkodzbds13wc0Nts1h859aLIwiWQUuYGko-7PVJ1jl7Wd3kPXZ-cp2R-HFWjW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649449379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the Age Specificity of Infection Fatality Rates for COVID-19: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, &amp; Public Policy Implications</title><source>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cochran, Kensington B ; Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon ; Hanage, William P ; Walsh, Seamus P ; Levin, Andrew T ; Owusu, Nana O T</creator><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Kensington B ; Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon ; Hanage, William P ; Walsh, Seamus P ; Levin, Andrew T ; Owusu, Nana O T</creatorcontrib><description>To assess age-specific infection fatality rates (IFRs) for COVID-19, we have conducted a systematic review of seroprevalence studies as well as countries with comprehensive tracing programs. Age-specific IFRs were computed using the prevalence data in conjunction with reported fatalities four weeks after the midpoint date of each study, reflecting typical lags in fatalities and reporting. Using metaregression procedures, we find a highly significant log-linear relationship between age and IFR for COVID-19. The estimated age-specific IFRs are very low for children and younger adults but increase progressively to 0.4% at age 55, 1.3% at age 65, 4.2% at age 75, and 14% at age 85. About 90% of the geographical variation in population IFR is explained by differences in age composition of the population and age-specific prevalence. These results indicate that COVID-19 is hazardous not only for the elderly but also for middle-aged adults. Moreover, the population IFR for COVID-19 should not be viewed as a fixed parameter but as intrinsically linked to the age-specific pattern of infections. Consequently, public health measures to protect vulnerable age groups could substantially decrease total deaths.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w27597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research</publisher><subject>Age ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Economic theory ; Economics of Health ; Fatalities ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2020-07</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Jul 2020</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c849-f779f91c34ca9eddeb72f98d4ef529b6f76757686bdd79ff4b6a355a1df1aa833</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>781,785,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Kensington B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanage, William P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Seamus P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Andrew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owusu, Nana O T</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the Age Specificity of Infection Fatality Rates for COVID-19: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, &amp; Public Policy Implications</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>To assess age-specific infection fatality rates (IFRs) for COVID-19, we have conducted a systematic review of seroprevalence studies as well as countries with comprehensive tracing programs. Age-specific IFRs were computed using the prevalence data in conjunction with reported fatalities four weeks after the midpoint date of each study, reflecting typical lags in fatalities and reporting. Using metaregression procedures, we find a highly significant log-linear relationship between age and IFR for COVID-19. The estimated age-specific IFRs are very low for children and younger adults but increase progressively to 0.4% at age 55, 1.3% at age 65, 4.2% at age 75, and 14% at age 85. About 90% of the geographical variation in population IFR is explained by differences in age composition of the population and age-specific prevalence. These results indicate that COVID-19 is hazardous not only for the elderly but also for middle-aged adults. Moreover, the population IFR for COVID-19 should not be viewed as a fixed parameter but as intrinsically linked to the age-specific pattern of infections. Consequently, public health measures to protect vulnerable age groups could substantially decrease total deaths.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics of Health</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>NBR</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEFLw0AUhPegYK36AzwtCJ4aTbJJdtdbaa0GKi1t8Rpekrd1S5rE7NaSP-Dvdku9zMC8j-ExhNwF_hNjInk-hjyW_IIMfCGFF0rGr8i1MTvfD4XwgwH5HRuDxuh6S-0X0vEW6brFQitdaNvTRtG0VlhY3dR0BhaqU7oCi4aqpqOTxWc69QL5Qte9sbgHqwu6wh-NxxH9QAse1FD1RpsRfaTLQ165-7Jx2tN03zqHU7W5IZcKKoO3_z4km9nrZvLuzRdv6WQ89woRSU9xLpUMChYVILEsMeehkqKMUMWhzBPFEx7zRCR5WTpSRXkCLI4hKFUAIBgbkodzbds13wc0Nts1h859aLIwiWQUuYGko-7PVJ1jl7Wd3kPXZ-cp2R-HFWjW</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Cochran, Kensington B</creator><creator>Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon</creator><creator>Hanage, William P</creator><creator>Walsh, Seamus P</creator><creator>Levin, Andrew T</creator><creator>Owusu, Nana O T</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research</general><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>CZO</scope><scope>MPB</scope><scope>NBR</scope><scope>XD6</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Assessing the Age Specificity of Infection Fatality Rates for COVID-19: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, &amp; Public Policy Implications</title><author>Cochran, Kensington B ; Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon ; Hanage, William P ; Walsh, Seamus P ; Levin, Andrew T ; Owusu, Nana O T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c849-f779f91c34ca9eddeb72f98d4ef529b6f76757686bdd79ff4b6a355a1df1aa833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics of Health</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Kensington B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanage, William P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Seamus P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Andrew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owusu, Nana O T</creatorcontrib><collection>NBER Working Papers</collection><collection>NBER</collection><collection>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</collection><collection>NBER Technical Working Papers Archive</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cochran, Kensington B</au><au>Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon</au><au>Hanage, William P</au><au>Walsh, Seamus P</au><au>Levin, Andrew T</au><au>Owusu, Nana O T</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Assessing the Age Specificity of Infection Fatality Rates for COVID-19: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, &amp; Public Policy Implications</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>To assess age-specific infection fatality rates (IFRs) for COVID-19, we have conducted a systematic review of seroprevalence studies as well as countries with comprehensive tracing programs. Age-specific IFRs were computed using the prevalence data in conjunction with reported fatalities four weeks after the midpoint date of each study, reflecting typical lags in fatalities and reporting. Using metaregression procedures, we find a highly significant log-linear relationship between age and IFR for COVID-19. The estimated age-specific IFRs are very low for children and younger adults but increase progressively to 0.4% at age 55, 1.3% at age 65, 4.2% at age 75, and 14% at age 85. About 90% of the geographical variation in population IFR is explained by differences in age composition of the population and age-specific prevalence. These results indicate that COVID-19 is hazardous not only for the elderly but also for middle-aged adults. Moreover, the population IFR for COVID-19 should not be viewed as a fixed parameter but as intrinsically linked to the age-specific pattern of infections. Consequently, public health measures to protect vulnerable age groups could substantially decrease total deaths.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research</pub><doi>10.3386/w27597</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2937
ispartof NBER Working Paper Series, 2020-07
issn 0898-2937
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2649449379
source National Bureau of Economic Research Publications; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Age
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Economic theory
Economics of Health
Fatalities
Systematic review
title Assessing the Age Specificity of Infection Fatality Rates for COVID-19: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, & Public Policy Implications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T08%3A24%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nber_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20Age%20Specificity%20of%20Infection%20Fatality%20Rates%20for%20COVID-19:%20Systematic%20Review,%20Meta-analysis,%20&%20Public%20Policy%20Implications&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Cochran,%20Kensington%20B&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w27597&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nber_%3E2649449379%3C/proquest_nber_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649449379&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_nber_id=w27597&rfr_iscdi=true