Paying off the Competition: Market Power and Innovation Incentives

How does a firm's market power in existing products affect its incentives to innovate? We explore this fundamental question using granular project-level and firm-level data from the pharmaceutical industry, focusing on a particular mechanism through which incumbent firms maintain their market p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NBER Working Paper Series 2021
1. Verfasser: Li, Xuelin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title NBER Working Paper Series
container_volume
creator Li, Xuelin
description How does a firm's market power in existing products affect its incentives to innovate? We explore this fundamental question using granular project-level and firm-level data from the pharmaceutical industry, focusing on a particular mechanism through which incumbent firms maintain their market power: "reverse payment" or "pay-for-delay" agreements to delay the market entry of competitors. We first show that when firms are unfettered in their use of "pay-for-delay" agreements, they reduce their innovation activities in response to the potential entry of direct competitors. We then examine a legal ruling that subjected these agreements to antitrust litigation, thereby reducing the incentive to enter them. After the ruling, incumbent firms increased their net innovation activities in response to competitive entry. These effects center on firms with products that are more directly affected by competition. However, at the product therapeutic area level, we find a reduction in innovation by new entrants after the ruling in response to increased competition. Overall, these results are consistent with firms having reduced incentives to innovate when they are able to maintain their market power, highlighting a specific channel through which this occurs
doi_str_mv 10.3386/w28964
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2649378414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2649378414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e534-427365768be784c9941e71fc7ef8806181eddc262be8cf8356fe67d71d45c0423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjstOwzAQRb0AqaWUD2AViXXAY0_G4yWKeEmVYNF9lDpjSEXjkKRC_XsildXdHN1zlLoBfW8t08OvYU94oZaaPefGW7dQV-O419owa1iq24_61HafWYoxm74kK9Ohl6md2tRdq8tYf4-y_t-V2j4_bcvXfPP-8lY-bnIpLOZonKXCEe_EMQbvEcRBDE7ibCBgkKYJhsxOOES2BUUh1zhosAgajV2pu_NtP6Sfo4xTtU_HoZuNlSGcixkBZyo7UxJS145VP7SHejhV4Ag8ESDZP21yQpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649378414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paying off the Competition: Market Power and Innovation Incentives</title><source>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Li, Xuelin</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Xuelin</creatorcontrib><description>How does a firm's market power in existing products affect its incentives to innovate? We explore this fundamental question using granular project-level and firm-level data from the pharmaceutical industry, focusing on a particular mechanism through which incumbent firms maintain their market power: "reverse payment" or "pay-for-delay" agreements to delay the market entry of competitors. We first show that when firms are unfettered in their use of "pay-for-delay" agreements, they reduce their innovation activities in response to the potential entry of direct competitors. We then examine a legal ruling that subjected these agreements to antitrust litigation, thereby reducing the incentive to enter them. After the ruling, incumbent firms increased their net innovation activities in response to competitive entry. These effects center on firms with products that are more directly affected by competition. However, at the product therapeutic area level, we find a reduction in innovation by new entrants after the ruling in response to increased competition. Overall, these results are consistent with firms having reduced incentives to innovate when they are able to maintain their market power, highlighting a specific channel through which this occurs</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w28964</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research</publisher><subject>Anreiz ; Competition ; Economic theory ; Incentives ; Innovation ; Market entry ; Marktmacht</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2021</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Jun 2021</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>778,782,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Xuelin</creatorcontrib><title>Paying off the Competition: Market Power and Innovation Incentives</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>How does a firm's market power in existing products affect its incentives to innovate? We explore this fundamental question using granular project-level and firm-level data from the pharmaceutical industry, focusing on a particular mechanism through which incumbent firms maintain their market power: "reverse payment" or "pay-for-delay" agreements to delay the market entry of competitors. We first show that when firms are unfettered in their use of "pay-for-delay" agreements, they reduce their innovation activities in response to the potential entry of direct competitors. We then examine a legal ruling that subjected these agreements to antitrust litigation, thereby reducing the incentive to enter them. After the ruling, incumbent firms increased their net innovation activities in response to competitive entry. These effects center on firms with products that are more directly affected by competition. However, at the product therapeutic area level, we find a reduction in innovation by new entrants after the ruling in response to increased competition. Overall, these results are consistent with firms having reduced incentives to innovate when they are able to maintain their market power, highlighting a specific channel through which this occurs</description><subject>Anreiz</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Market entry</subject><subject>Marktmacht</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNotjstOwzAQRb0AqaWUD2AViXXAY0_G4yWKeEmVYNF9lDpjSEXjkKRC_XsildXdHN1zlLoBfW8t08OvYU94oZaaPefGW7dQV-O419owa1iq24_61HafWYoxm74kK9Ohl6md2tRdq8tYf4-y_t-V2j4_bcvXfPP-8lY-bnIpLOZonKXCEe_EMQbvEcRBDE7ibCBgkKYJhsxOOES2BUUh1zhosAgajV2pu_NtP6Sfo4xTtU_HoZuNlSGcixkBZyo7UxJS145VP7SHejhV4Ag8ESDZP21yQpg</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Li, Xuelin</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research</general><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Paying off the Competition</title><author>Li, Xuelin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e534-427365768be784c9941e71fc7ef8806181eddc262be8cf8356fe67d71d45c0423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anreiz</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Market entry</topic><topic>Marktmacht</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Xuelin</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Xuelin</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Paying off the Competition: Market Power and Innovation Incentives</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>How does a firm's market power in existing products affect its incentives to innovate? We explore this fundamental question using granular project-level and firm-level data from the pharmaceutical industry, focusing on a particular mechanism through which incumbent firms maintain their market power: "reverse payment" or "pay-for-delay" agreements to delay the market entry of competitors. We first show that when firms are unfettered in their use of "pay-for-delay" agreements, they reduce their innovation activities in response to the potential entry of direct competitors. We then examine a legal ruling that subjected these agreements to antitrust litigation, thereby reducing the incentive to enter them. After the ruling, incumbent firms increased their net innovation activities in response to competitive entry. These effects center on firms with products that are more directly affected by competition. However, at the product therapeutic area level, we find a reduction in innovation by new entrants after the ruling in response to increased competition. Overall, these results are consistent with firms having reduced incentives to innovate when they are able to maintain their market power, highlighting a specific channel through which this occurs</abstract><cop>Cambridge, Mass</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research</pub><doi>10.3386/w28964</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2937
ispartof NBER Working Paper Series, 2021
issn 0898-2937
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2649378414
source National Bureau of Economic Research Publications; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anreiz
Competition
Economic theory
Incentives
Innovation
Market entry
Marktmacht
title Paying off the Competition: Market Power and Innovation Incentives
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A41%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Paying%20off%20the%20Competition:%20Market%20Power%20and%20Innovation%20Incentives&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Li,%20Xuelin&rft.date=2021&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w28964&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E2649378414%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649378414&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true