Modelling a flexible two-phase inspection-maintenance policy for safety-critical systems considering revised and non-revised inspections

•Failures of safety-critical systems may have drastic consequences.•We propose a flexible two-phase inspection-maintenance policy.•The model performs well in terms of cost-rate and rate of operational failures.•An effective maintenance plan is essential for safety-critical system.•A new delay-time-b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reliability engineering & system safety 2022-05, Vol.221, p.108309, Article 108309
Hauptverfasser: Alberti, A.R., Neto, W.A. Ferreira, Cavalcante, C.A.V., Santos, A.C.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108309
container_title Reliability engineering & system safety
container_volume 221
creator Alberti, A.R.
Neto, W.A. Ferreira
Cavalcante, C.A.V.
Santos, A.C.J.
description •Failures of safety-critical systems may have drastic consequences.•We propose a flexible two-phase inspection-maintenance policy.•The model performs well in terms of cost-rate and rate of operational failures.•An effective maintenance plan is essential for safety-critical system.•A new delay-time-base model with a fixed and flexible inspection time is presented. This paper presents a flexible two-phase inspection and maintenance policy that has been designed for safety-critical systems to prevent failures that can have serious consequences. The proposed policy comprises two phases: the first guides inspections with a constant frequency and the second guides inspections with varying time intervals. Two delay-time-based mathematical models are presented. Model 1 concerns a case where an in-house inspection team has autonomy to perform the component replacement, and Model 2 concerns a case where a specialized team (often outsourced) is responsible for the replacements. A numerical application is presented, and the results showed that the proposed policy, when compared to its simpler variability: (i) always performs better in terms of cost-rate; (ii) has an even greater impact on reducing the rate of operational failures; (iii) is less sensitive to variations in the parameters of inspection, quality; (iv) tends to respond better to uncertainties in the estimation of the model parameters. Furthermore, a comparison between the results obtained applying the two models shows that the inspection-revised policy with maintenance outsourcing is advantageous when in-house team interventions can result in installation errors with a negative impact on the system's reliability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108309
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2649087946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0951832021007791</els_id><sourcerecordid>2649087946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-f846b5e836776f75bbaf7ed72b7bab87707e52600bf754f0a21d01c5fc3e5e323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU6xnYcTiQ2qeElFbGBtOc4YXKV28KSF_gGfjauC2LEazePemTmEnHM244xXl8tZBMSZYIKnQp2z5oBMeC2bLCXVIZmwpuRZnQt2TE4Ql4yxoinlhHw9hg763vlXqqnt4dO1PdDxI2TDm0agzuMAZnTBZyvt_AheewN0CL0zW2pDpKgtjNvMRDc6o3uKWxxhhdQEj66DuLOOsHEIHdW-oz5Z_eZ_7nhKjqzuEc5-4pS83N48z--zxdPdw_x6kRlR1mNm66JqS0hPSVlZWbatthI6KVrZ6raWkkkoRcVYm5qFZVrwjnFTWpNDCbnIp-Ri7zvE8L4GHNUyrKNPK5WoioYlZkWVpsR-ysSAGMGqIbqVjlvFmdoRV0u1I652xNWeeBJd7UWQ7t84iAqNg4SrczF9qbrg_pN_A-05jdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649087946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modelling a flexible two-phase inspection-maintenance policy for safety-critical systems considering revised and non-revised inspections</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Alberti, A.R. ; Neto, W.A. Ferreira ; Cavalcante, C.A.V. ; Santos, A.C.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alberti, A.R. ; Neto, W.A. Ferreira ; Cavalcante, C.A.V. ; Santos, A.C.J.</creatorcontrib><description>•Failures of safety-critical systems may have drastic consequences.•We propose a flexible two-phase inspection-maintenance policy.•The model performs well in terms of cost-rate and rate of operational failures.•An effective maintenance plan is essential for safety-critical system.•A new delay-time-base model with a fixed and flexible inspection time is presented. This paper presents a flexible two-phase inspection and maintenance policy that has been designed for safety-critical systems to prevent failures that can have serious consequences. The proposed policy comprises two phases: the first guides inspections with a constant frequency and the second guides inspections with varying time intervals. Two delay-time-based mathematical models are presented. Model 1 concerns a case where an in-house inspection team has autonomy to perform the component replacement, and Model 2 concerns a case where a specialized team (often outsourced) is responsible for the replacements. A numerical application is presented, and the results showed that the proposed policy, when compared to its simpler variability: (i) always performs better in terms of cost-rate; (ii) has an even greater impact on reducing the rate of operational failures; (iii) is less sensitive to variations in the parameters of inspection, quality; (iv) tends to respond better to uncertainties in the estimation of the model parameters. Furthermore, a comparison between the results obtained applying the two models shows that the inspection-revised policy with maintenance outsourcing is advantageous when in-house team interventions can result in installation errors with a negative impact on the system's reliability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-8320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Autonomy ; Delay-time modelling ; Flexible maintenance policy ; Inspection ; Inspections ; Maintenance ; Maintenance outsourcing ; Mathematical models ; Outsourcing ; Parameter sensitivity ; Quality ; Reliability engineering ; Safety critical ; Safety-critical system</subject><ispartof>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety, 2022-05, Vol.221, p.108309, Article 108309</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV May 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-f846b5e836776f75bbaf7ed72b7bab87707e52600bf754f0a21d01c5fc3e5e323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-f846b5e836776f75bbaf7ed72b7bab87707e52600bf754f0a21d01c5fc3e5e323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108309$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alberti, A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, W.A. Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalcante, C.A.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, A.C.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Modelling a flexible two-phase inspection-maintenance policy for safety-critical systems considering revised and non-revised inspections</title><title>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety</title><description>•Failures of safety-critical systems may have drastic consequences.•We propose a flexible two-phase inspection-maintenance policy.•The model performs well in terms of cost-rate and rate of operational failures.•An effective maintenance plan is essential for safety-critical system.•A new delay-time-base model with a fixed and flexible inspection time is presented. This paper presents a flexible two-phase inspection and maintenance policy that has been designed for safety-critical systems to prevent failures that can have serious consequences. The proposed policy comprises two phases: the first guides inspections with a constant frequency and the second guides inspections with varying time intervals. Two delay-time-based mathematical models are presented. Model 1 concerns a case where an in-house inspection team has autonomy to perform the component replacement, and Model 2 concerns a case where a specialized team (often outsourced) is responsible for the replacements. A numerical application is presented, and the results showed that the proposed policy, when compared to its simpler variability: (i) always performs better in terms of cost-rate; (ii) has an even greater impact on reducing the rate of operational failures; (iii) is less sensitive to variations in the parameters of inspection, quality; (iv) tends to respond better to uncertainties in the estimation of the model parameters. Furthermore, a comparison between the results obtained applying the two models shows that the inspection-revised policy with maintenance outsourcing is advantageous when in-house team interventions can result in installation errors with a negative impact on the system's reliability.</description><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Delay-time modelling</subject><subject>Flexible maintenance policy</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Inspections</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Maintenance outsourcing</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Outsourcing</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Reliability engineering</subject><subject>Safety critical</subject><subject>Safety-critical system</subject><issn>0951-8320</issn><issn>1879-0836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU6xnYcTiQ2qeElFbGBtOc4YXKV28KSF_gGfjauC2LEazePemTmEnHM244xXl8tZBMSZYIKnQp2z5oBMeC2bLCXVIZmwpuRZnQt2TE4Ql4yxoinlhHw9hg763vlXqqnt4dO1PdDxI2TDm0agzuMAZnTBZyvt_AheewN0CL0zW2pDpKgtjNvMRDc6o3uKWxxhhdQEj66DuLOOsHEIHdW-oz5Z_eZ_7nhKjqzuEc5-4pS83N48z--zxdPdw_x6kRlR1mNm66JqS0hPSVlZWbatthI6KVrZ6raWkkkoRcVYm5qFZVrwjnFTWpNDCbnIp-Ri7zvE8L4GHNUyrKNPK5WoioYlZkWVpsR-ysSAGMGqIbqVjlvFmdoRV0u1I652xNWeeBJd7UWQ7t84iAqNg4SrczF9qbrg_pN_A-05jdA</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Alberti, A.R.</creator><creator>Neto, W.A. Ferreira</creator><creator>Cavalcante, C.A.V.</creator><creator>Santos, A.C.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Modelling a flexible two-phase inspection-maintenance policy for safety-critical systems considering revised and non-revised inspections</title><author>Alberti, A.R. ; Neto, W.A. Ferreira ; Cavalcante, C.A.V. ; Santos, A.C.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-f846b5e836776f75bbaf7ed72b7bab87707e52600bf754f0a21d01c5fc3e5e323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Delay-time modelling</topic><topic>Flexible maintenance policy</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Inspections</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Maintenance outsourcing</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Outsourcing</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Reliability engineering</topic><topic>Safety critical</topic><topic>Safety-critical system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alberti, A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, W.A. Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalcante, C.A.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, A.C.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alberti, A.R.</au><au>Neto, W.A. Ferreira</au><au>Cavalcante, C.A.V.</au><au>Santos, A.C.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modelling a flexible two-phase inspection-maintenance policy for safety-critical systems considering revised and non-revised inspections</atitle><jtitle>Reliability engineering &amp; system safety</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>221</volume><spage>108309</spage><pages>108309-</pages><artnum>108309</artnum><issn>0951-8320</issn><eissn>1879-0836</eissn><abstract>•Failures of safety-critical systems may have drastic consequences.•We propose a flexible two-phase inspection-maintenance policy.•The model performs well in terms of cost-rate and rate of operational failures.•An effective maintenance plan is essential for safety-critical system.•A new delay-time-base model with a fixed and flexible inspection time is presented. This paper presents a flexible two-phase inspection and maintenance policy that has been designed for safety-critical systems to prevent failures that can have serious consequences. The proposed policy comprises two phases: the first guides inspections with a constant frequency and the second guides inspections with varying time intervals. Two delay-time-based mathematical models are presented. Model 1 concerns a case where an in-house inspection team has autonomy to perform the component replacement, and Model 2 concerns a case where a specialized team (often outsourced) is responsible for the replacements. A numerical application is presented, and the results showed that the proposed policy, when compared to its simpler variability: (i) always performs better in terms of cost-rate; (ii) has an even greater impact on reducing the rate of operational failures; (iii) is less sensitive to variations in the parameters of inspection, quality; (iv) tends to respond better to uncertainties in the estimation of the model parameters. Furthermore, a comparison between the results obtained applying the two models shows that the inspection-revised policy with maintenance outsourcing is advantageous when in-house team interventions can result in installation errors with a negative impact on the system's reliability.</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ress.2021.108309</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-8320
ispartof Reliability engineering & system safety, 2022-05, Vol.221, p.108309, Article 108309
issn 0951-8320
1879-0836
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2649087946
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Autonomy
Delay-time modelling
Flexible maintenance policy
Inspection
Inspections
Maintenance
Maintenance outsourcing
Mathematical models
Outsourcing
Parameter sensitivity
Quality
Reliability engineering
Safety critical
Safety-critical system
title Modelling a flexible two-phase inspection-maintenance policy for safety-critical systems considering revised and non-revised inspections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T06%3A01%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modelling%20a%20flexible%20two-phase%20inspection-maintenance%20policy%20for%20safety-critical%20systems%20considering%20revised%20and%20non-revised%20inspections&rft.jtitle=Reliability%20engineering%20&%20system%20safety&rft.au=Alberti,%20A.R.&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=221&rft.spage=108309&rft.pages=108309-&rft.artnum=108309&rft.issn=0951-8320&rft.eissn=1879-0836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108309&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2649087946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649087946&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0951832021007791&rfr_iscdi=true